You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was testing LiftOff and LiftOn to see which one is "best" for genome annotation. I was looking at some RefSeq genomes, lifting the brown-headed cowbird and red-winged blackbird onto the bronzed cowbird. Interestingly, in both cases LiftOff created better BUSCO scores and LiftOn also generated some weird features where the end coordinate of the feature was earlier than the start coordinate. Although LiftOff generated better BUSCO scores, GFFCompare suggested that the LiftOn genome had more matching transcripts, but the precision was a tad lower. As a result, I feel I trust LiftOff more as an annotation tool and wanted to bring these results to your attention.
Here is my BUSCO score for LiftOff, brown-headed cowbird on bronzed cowbird:
----------------------------------------------------
|Results from dataset passeriformes_odb10 |
----------------------------------------------------
|C:93.6%[S:60.2%,D:33.4%],F:1.2%,M:5.2%,n:10844 |
|10148 Complete BUSCOs (C) |
|6526 Complete and single-copy BUSCOs (S) |
|3622 Complete and duplicated BUSCOs (D) |
|127 Fragmented BUSCOs (F) |
|569 Missing BUSCOs (M) |
|10844 Total BUSCO groups searched |
----------------------------------------------------
And here is GFFCompare, when comparing this brown-headed cowbird LiftOff annotation to the RefSeq annotation:
Thanks @14zac2 for sharing the results with us! I’ll definitely be looking into them closely. If possible, could you please share the genome and annotation files with me? That would be incredibly helpful.
There’s still some work to be done to address a few edge cases to improve LiftOn. I’m confident that after resolving these issues, LiftOn will perform as well as, if not better than, current methods on those more divergent genes.
I’m currently on an internship until the end of August, so I’ll revisit this in September. It was great meeting you at the conference, and thanks again for testing LiftOn!
Sure thing! All of these were RefSeq genomes and annotations, so I'll link to the FTPs of the species below. In each case, I used the *.fna FASTA files and the GFF annotations.
Hi there,
I was testing LiftOff and LiftOn to see which one is "best" for genome annotation. I was looking at some RefSeq genomes, lifting the brown-headed cowbird and red-winged blackbird onto the bronzed cowbird. Interestingly, in both cases LiftOff created better BUSCO scores and LiftOn also generated some weird features where the end coordinate of the feature was earlier than the start coordinate. Although LiftOff generated better BUSCO scores, GFFCompare suggested that the LiftOn genome had more matching transcripts, but the precision was a tad lower. As a result, I feel I trust LiftOff more as an annotation tool and wanted to bring these results to your attention.
Here is my BUSCO score for LiftOff, brown-headed cowbird on bronzed cowbird:
And here is GFFCompare, when comparing this brown-headed cowbird LiftOff annotation to the RefSeq annotation:
Here is BUSCO for LiftOn, brown-headed cowbird on bronzed cowbird:
GFFCompare for LiftOn brown-headed cowbird compared to RefSeq:
BUSCO for LiftOff of red-winged blackbird on bronzed cowbird:
GFFCompare of LiftOff red-winged blackbird compared to RefSeq annotation:
BUSCO of LiftOn red-winged blackbird onto bronzed cowbird:
GFFCompare of LiftOn red-winged blackbird compared to RefSeq annotation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: