High-level declarative HTTP library for Effect-TS built on top of @effect/platform.
- ⭐ Client derivation. Write the api specification once, get the type-safe client with runtime validation for free.
- 🌈 OpenAPI derivation.
/docs
endpoint with OpenAPI UI out of box. - 🔋 Batteries included server implementation. Automatic runtime request and response validation.
- 🔮 Example server derivation. Automatic derivation of example server implementation.
- 🐛 Mock client derivation. Test safely against a specified API.
Under development. Please note that currently any release might introduce breaking changes and the internals and the public API are still evolving and changing.
Note
This is an unofficial community package. You might benefit from checking the @effect/platform
and @effect/rpc
packages as they are the official Effect packages. The effect-http
package strongly
relies on @effect/platform
, and knowledge of it can be beneficial for understanding what
the effect-http
does under the hood.
- Quickstart
- Request validation
- Headers
- Security
- Responses
- Testing the server
- Error handling
- Grouping endpoints
- Descriptions in OpenApi
- Representations
- API on the client side
- Router handlers
- Compatibility
- Scaling up
Install
effect-http
- platform-agnostic, this one is enough if you intend to use it in browser onlyeffect-http-node
- if you're planning to run a HTTP server on a node
pnpm add effect-http effect-http-node
Note that effect
, @effect/platform
and @effect/platform-node
are requested as peer dependencies.
You very probably have them already. If not, install them using
pnpm add effect @effect/platform @effect/platform-node
The @effect/platform-node
is needed only for the node version.
Bootstrap a simple API specification.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema";
import { Api } from "effect-http";
const UserResponse = Schema.Struct({
name: Schema.String,
id: pipe(Schema.Number, Schema.int(), Schema.positive())
})
const GetUserQuery = Schema.Struct({ id: Schema.NumberFromString })
const api = pipe(
Api.make({ title: "Users API" }),
Api.addEndpoint(
pipe(
Api.get("getUser", "/user"),
Api.setResponseBody(UserResponse),
Api.setRequestQuery(GetUserQuery)
)
)
)
Create the app implementation.
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect";
import { RouterBuilder } from "effect-http";
const app = pipe(
RouterBuilder.make(api),
RouterBuilder.handle("getUser", ({ query }) => Effect.succeed({ name: "milan", id: query.id })),
RouterBuilder.build
)
Now, we can generate an object providing the HTTP client interface using Client.make
.
import { Client } from "effect-http";
const client = Client.make(api, { baseUrl: "http://localhost:3000" });
Spawn the server on port 3000,
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node";
app.pipe(NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }), NodeRuntime.runMain);
and call it using the client
.
const response = pipe(
client.getUser({ query: { id: 12 } }),
Effect.flatMap((user) => Effect.log(`Got ${user.name}, nice!`)),
Effect.scoped,
);
Also, check the auto-generated OpenAPI UI running on localhost:3000/docs. How awesome is that!
Each endpoint can declare expectations on the request format. Specifically,
body
- request bodyquery
- query parameterspath
- path parametersheaders
- request headers
They are specified in the input schemas object (3rd argument of Api.get
, Api.post
, ...).
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema";
import { Api } from "effect-http";
const Stuff = Schema.Struct({ value: Schema.Number })
const StuffRequest = Schema.Struct({ field: Schema.Array(Schema.String) })
const StuffQuery = Schema.Struct({ value: Schema.String })
const StuffPath = Schema.Struct({ param: Schema.String })
export const api = Api.make({ title: "My api" }).pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.post("stuff", "/stuff/:param").pipe(
Api.setRequestBody(StuffRequest),
Api.setRequestQuery(StuffQuery),
Api.setRequestPath(StuffPath),
Api.setResponseBody(Stuff)
)
)
)
Optional parameter is denoted using a question mark in the path
match pattern. In the request param schema, use Schema.optional(<schema>)
.
In the following example the last :another
path parameter can be
ommited on the client side.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { pipe } from "effect"
import { Api } from "effect-http"
const Stuff = Schema.Struct({ value: Schema.Number })
const StuffParams = Schema.Struct({
param: Schema.String,
another: Schema.optional(Schema.String)
})
export const api = pipe(
Api.make({ title: "My api" }),
Api.addEndpoint(
pipe(
Api.get("stuff", "/stuff/:param/:another?"),
Api.setResponseBody(Stuff),
Api.setRequestPath(StuffParams)
)
)
)
Request headers are part of input schemas along with the request body or query parameters.
Their schema is specified similarly to query parameters and path parameters, i.e. using
a mapping from header names onto their schemas. The example below shows an API with
a single endpoint /hello
which expects a header X-Client-Id
to be present.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, ExampleServer, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
const api = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("hello", "/hello").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.String),
Api.setRequestHeaders(Schema.Struct({ "x-client-id": Schema.String }))
)
)
)
pipe(
ExampleServer.make(api),
RouterBuilder.build,
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
Server implementation deals with the validation the usual way. For example, if we try to call the endpoint without the header we will get the following error response.
{
"error": "Request validation error",
"location": "headers",
"message": "x-client-id is missing"
}
And as usual, the information about headers will be reflected in the generated OpenAPI UI.
Important! Use a lowercase form of header names.
To deal with authentication / authorization, the effect-http
exposes the Security
module. Security.Security<A, E, R>
is a structure capturing information how to document the security mechanism within the OpenAPI and how to parse the
incomming server request to produce a value A
available for the endpoint handler.
To to secure an endpoint, use the Api.setSecurity
combinator. Let's see an example of a secured endpoint
using the basic auth.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect } from "effect"
import { Api, RouterBuilder, Security } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
const api = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.post("mySecuredEndpoint", "/my-secured-endpoint").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.String),
Api.setSecurity(Security.basic())
)
)
)
const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle(
"mySecuredEndpoint",
(_, security) => Effect.succeed(`Accessed as ${security.user}`)
),
RouterBuilder.build
)
app.pipe(NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }), NodeRuntime.runMain)
In the example, we use the Security.basic()
constructor which produces a new security of type
Security<BasicCredentials, never, never>
. In the second argument of our handler
function, we receive the value of BasicCredentials
if the request contains a valid
authorization header with the basic auth credentials.
In case the request doesn't include valid authorization, the client will get a 401 Unauthorized
response
with a JSON body containing the error message.
Implementation-wise, the Security<A, E, R>
contains an Effect<A, E | HttpError, R | ServerRequest>
.
Therefore, we can combine multiple security mechanisms similarly as if we were combining effects.
For instance, we could make the authentication optional using the Security.or
combinator.
const mySecurity = Security.or(
Security.asSome(Security.basic()),
Security.as(Security.unit, Option.none())
)
The Security.asSome
, Security.as
and Security.unit
behave the same way as their Effect
counterparts.
The following example show-cases how to construct a security mechanism that validates
the basic auth credentials and then fetches the user information from the UserStorage
service.
import { Effect, Layer, pipe } from "effect"
import { Security } from "effect-http"
interface UserInfo {
email: string
}
class UserStorage extends Effect.Tag("UserStorage")<
UserStorage,
{ getInfo: (user: string) => Effect.Effect<UserInfo> }
>() {
static dummy = Layer.succeed(
UserStorage,
UserStorage.of({
getInfo: (_: string) => Effect.succeed({ email: "[email protected]" })
})
)
}
const mySecurity = pipe(
Security.basic({ description: "My basic auth" }),
Security.map((creds) => creds.user),
Security.mapEffect((user) => UserStorage.getInfo(user))
)
In the handler implementation, we obtain the security
argument typed as UserInfo
.
const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle(
"endpoint",
(_, security) => Effect.succeed(`Logged as ${security.email}`)
),
RouterBuilder.build,
Middlewares.errorLog
)
And finally, because we made use of the effect context, we are forced to provide the UserStorage
when running the server.
app.pipe(
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
Effect.provide(UserStorage.dummy),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
Each endpoint method accepts an optional second argument of type (request: ClientRequest) => ClientRequest
used to map internally produced HttpClient.request.ClientRequest
. We can provide the header mapping
to set the appropriate header. Additionally, the Client
module exposes Client.setBasic
and Client.setBearer
combinators that produce setter functions configuring the Authorization
header.
import { Client } from 'effect-http';
const client = Client.make(api)
client.endpoint({}, Client.setBasic("user", "pass"))
A primitive security is constructed using Security.make
function.
It accepts a handler effect which is expected to access the ServerRequest
and possibly fail with a HttpError
.
If we want to document the authorization mechanism in the OpenAPI, we must also provide the second argument
of the Security.make
which is a mapping of the auth identifier and actual security scheme spec.
Here is an example of a security validating a X-API-KEY
header.
import { HttpServer } from "@effect/platform"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Security, HttpError } from "effect-http"
const customSecurity = Security.make(
pipe(
HttpServer.request.schemaHeaders(Schema.Struct({ "x-api-key": Schema.String })),
Effect.mapError(() => HttpError.unauthorizedError("Expected valid X-API-KEY header")),
Effect.map((headers) => headers["x-api-key"])
),
{ "myApiKey": { name: "x-api-key", type: "apiKey", in: "header", description: "My API key" } }
)
If the client doesn't provide the X-API-KEY
header, the server will respond with 401 Unauthorized
status
and the given message.
Note
In this particular case, you can use Security.apiKey({ key: "X-API-KEY", in: "header" })
instead
of a custom security.
Every new endpoint has default response with status code 200 with ignored response and headers.
If you want to customize the default response, use the Api.setResponseStatus
,
Api.setResponseBody
or Api.setResponseHeaders
combinators. The following
example shows how to enforce (both for types and runtime) that returned status,
body and headers conform the specified response.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { pipe } from "effect"
import { Api } from "effect-http"
const api = pipe(
Api.make(),
Api.addEndpoint(
pipe(
Api.get("hello", "/hello"),
Api.setResponseStatus(201),
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.Number),
Api.setResponseHeaders(Schema.Struct({ "x-hello-world": Schema.String }))
)
)
)
It is also possible to specify multiple response schemas. Use the Api.addResponse
combinator to another possible response of an endpoint. The Api.addResponse
accepts
either an ApiResponse
object created using ApiResponse.make
or a plain object of
form { status; headers; body}
.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, ApiResponse, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
const helloEndpoint = Api.post("hello", "/hello").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.Number),
Api.setResponseHeaders(Schema.Struct({
"my-header": pipe(
Schema.NumberFromString,
Schema.annotations({ description: "My header" })
)
})),
Api.addResponse(ApiResponse.make(201, Schema.Number)),
Api.addResponse({ status: 204, headers: Schema.Struct({ "x-another": Schema.NumberFromString }) })
)
const api = pipe(
Api.make(),
Api.addEndpoint(helloEndpoint)
)
The server implemention is type-checked against the api responses and one of the specified response objects must be returned.
Note: the status
needs to be as const
because without it Typescript
will infere the number
type.
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
const app = pipe(
RouterBuilder.make(api),
RouterBuilder.handle("hello", () => Effect.succeed({ body: 12, headers: { "my-header": 69 }, status: 201 as const })),
RouterBuilder.build
)
You need to install effect-http-node
.
While most of your tests should focus on the functionality independent
of HTTP exposure, it can be beneficial to perform integration or
contract tests for your endpoints. The NodeTesting
module offers a
NodeTesting.make
combinator that generates a testing client from
the Server. This derived testing client has a similar interface
to the one derived by Client.make
.
Now, let's write an example test for the following server.
const api = Api.api().pipe(
Api.get("hello", "/hello", {
response: Schema.String,
}),
);
const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle("hello", ({ query }) =>
Effect.succeed(`${query.input + 1}`),
),
RouterBUilder.build,
);
The test might look as follows.
import { NodeTesting } from 'effect-http-node';
test("test /hello endpoint", async () => {
const response = await NodeTesting.make(app, api).pipe(
Effect.flatMap((client) => client.hello({ query: { input: 12 } })),
Effect.scoped,
Effect.runPromise,
);
expect(response).toEqual("13");
});
In comparison to the Client
we need to run our endpoint handlers
in place. Therefore, in case your server uses DI services, you need to
provide them in the test code. This contract is type safe and you'll be
notified by the type-checker if the Effect
isn't invoked with all
the required services.
Validation of query parameters, path parameters, body and even responses is handled for you out of box. By default, failed validation will be reported to clients in the response body. On the server side, you get warn logs with the same information.
On top of the automatic input and output validation, handlers can fail for variety of different reasons.
Suppose we're creating user management API. When persisting a new user, we want
to guarantee we don't attempt to persist a user with an already taken name.
If the user name check fails, the API should return 409 CONFLICT
error because the client
is attempting to trigger an operatin conflicting with the current state of the server.
For these cases, effect-http
provides error types and corresponding creational
functions we can use in the error rail of the handler effect.
- 400
HttpError.badRequest
- client make an invalid request - 401
HttpError.unauthorizedError
- invalid authentication credentials - 403
HttpError.forbiddenError
- authorization failure - 404
HttpError.notFoundError
- cannot find the requested resource - 409
HttpError.conflictError
- request conflicts with the current state of the server - 415
HttpError.unsupportedMediaTypeError
- unsupported payload format - 429
HttpError.tooManyRequestsError
- the user has sent too many requests in a given amount of time
- 500
HttpError.internalHttpError
- internal server error - 501
HttpError.notImplementedError
- functionality to fulfill the request is not supported - 502
HttpError.badGatewayError
- invalid response from the upstream server - 503
HttpError.serviceunavailableError
- server is not ready to handle the request - 504
HttpError.gatewayTimeoutError
- request timeout from the upstream server
Let's see it in action and implement the mentioned user management API. The API will look as follows.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema";
import { Context, Effect, pipe } from "effect";
import { Api, RouterBuilder, HttpError } from "effect-http";
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node";
const api = pipe(
Api.make({ title: "Users API" }),
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.post("storeUser", "/users").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.String),
Api.setRequestBody(Schema.Struct({ name: Schema.String }))
)
)
)
Now, let's implement a UserRepository
interface abstracting the interaction with
our user storage. I'm also providing a mock implementation which will always return
the user already exists. We will plug the mock user repository into our server
so we can see the failure behavior.
interface UserRepository {
userExistsByName: (name: string) => Effect.Effect<boolean>;
storeUser: (user: string) => Effect.Effect<void>;
}
const UserRepository = Context.GenericTag<UserRepository>("UserRepository");
const mockUserRepository = UserRepository.of({
userExistsByName: () => Effect.succeed(true),
storeUser: () => Effect.unit,
});
const { userExistsByName, storeUser } = Effect.serviceFunctions(UserRepository);
And finally, we have the actual HttpApp.HttpApp
implementation.
const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle("storeUser", ({ body }) =>
pipe(
userExistsByName(body.name),
Effect.filterOrFail(
(alreadyExists) => !alreadyExists,
() => HttpError.conflictError(`User "${body.name}" already exists.`),
),
Effect.andThen(storeUser(body.name)),
Effect.map(() => `User "${body.name}" stored.`),
)),
RouterBuilder.build,
);
To run the server, we will start the server using NodeServer.listen
and provide
the mockUserRepository
service.
app.pipe(
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
Effect.provideService(UserRepository, mockUserRepository),
NodeRuntime.runMain
);
Try to run the server and call the POST /user
.
Server
$ pnpm tsx examples/conflict-error-example.ts
22:06:00 (Fiber #0) DEBUG Static swagger UI files loaded (1.7MB)
22:06:00 (Fiber #0) INFO Listening on :::3000
22:06:01 (Fiber #8) WARN POST /users client error 409
Client (using httpie cli)
$ http localhost:3000/users name="patrik"
HTTP/1.1 409 Conflict
Content-Length: 68
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
User "patrik" already exists.
To create a new group of endpoints, use ApiGroup.apiGroup("group name")
. This combinator
initializes new ApiGroup
object. You can pipe it with combinators like ApiGroup.addEndpoint
,
followed by ApiGroup.get
, Api.post
, etc, as if were defining the Api
. Api groups can be combined into an
Api
using a Api.addGroup
combinator which merges endpoints from the group
into the api in the type-safe manner while preserving group names for each endpoint.
This enables separability of concers for big APIs and provides information for generation of tags for the OpenAPI specification.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, ApiGroup, ExampleServer, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
const Response = Schema.Struct({ name: Schema.String })
const testApi = pipe(
ApiGroup.make("test", {
description: "Test description",
externalDocs: {
description: "Test external doc",
url: "https://www.google.com/search?q=effect-http"
}
}),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.get("test", "/test").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
)
)
const userApi = pipe(
ApiGroup.make("Users", {
description: "All about users",
externalDocs: {
url: "https://www.google.com/search?q=effect-http"
}
}),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.get("getUser", "/user").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.post("storeUser", "/user").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.put("updateUser", "/user").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.delete("deleteUser", "/user").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
)
)
const categoriesApi = ApiGroup.make("Categories").pipe(
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.get("getCategory", "/category").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.post("storeCategory", "/category").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.put("updateCategory", "/category").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(
ApiGroup.delete("deleteCategory", "/category").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
)
)
const api = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addGroup(testApi),
Api.addGroup(userApi),
Api.addGroup(categoriesApi)
)
ExampleServer.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.build,
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
The OpenAPI UI will group endpoints according to the api
and show
corresponding titles for each group.
The OpenAPI logic takes into account description annotations and propagates them into the specification.
Some descriptions are provided from the built-in @effect/schema/Schema
combinators.
For example, the usage of Schema.Int.pipe(Schema.positive())
will result in "a positive number"
description in the OpenApi schema. One can also add custom description using
Schema.annotations({ description: ... })
.
On top of types descriptions which are included in the schema
field, effect-http
also checks top-level schema descriptions and uses them for the parent object which
uses the schema. In the following example, the "User" description for the response
schema is used both as the schema description but also for the response itself. The
same holds for the id
query paremeter.
For an operation-level description, call the API endpoint method (Api.get
,
Api.post
etc) with a 4th argument and set the description
field to the
desired description.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
const Response = pipe(
Schema.Struct({
name: Schema.String,
id: pipe(Schema.Number, Schema.int(), Schema.positive())
}),
Schema.annotations({ description: "User" })
)
const Query = Schema.Struct({
id: pipe(Schema.NumberFromString, Schema.annotations({ description: "User id" }))
})
const api = pipe(
Api.make({ title: "Users API" }),
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("getUser", "/user", { description: "Returns a User by id" }).pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Response),
Api.setRequestQuery(Query)
)
)
)
const app = pipe(
RouterBuilder.make(api),
RouterBuilder.handle("getUser", ({ query }) => Effect.succeed({ name: "mike", id: query.id })),
RouterBuilder.build
)
pipe(
app,
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
By default, the effect-http
client and server will attempt the serialize/deserialize
messages as JSONs. This means that whenever you return something from a handler, the
internal logic will serialize it as a JSON onto a string and send the response along
with content-type: application/json
header.
This behaviour is a result of a default Representation.json.
The default representation of the content can be changed using Api.setResponseRepresentations
combinator.
For example, the following API specification states that the response of /test
endpoint
will be always a string represent as a plain text. Therefore, the HTTP message
will contain content-type: text/plain
header.
export const api2 = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("myHandler", "/test").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.String),
Api.setResponseRepresentations([Representation.plainText])
)
)
)
The representations
is a list and if it contains multiple possible representations
of the data it internal server logic will respect incomming Accept
header to decide
which representation to use.
The following example uses plainText
and json
representations. The order of
representations is respected by the logic that decides which representation should
be used, and if there is no representation matching the incomming Accept
media type,
it will choose the first representation in the list.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect } from "effect"
import { Api, Representation, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
export const api = Api.make({ title: "Example API" }).pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("root", "/").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.Unknown),
Api.setResponseRepresentations([Representation.plainText, Representation.json])
)
)
)
export const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle("root", () => Effect.succeed({ content: { hello: "world" }, status: 200 as const })),
RouterBuilder.build
)
app.pipe(
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
Try running the server above and call the root path with different
Accept
headers. You should see the response content-type reflecting
the incomming Accept
header.
# JSON
curl localhost:3000/ -H 'accept: application/json' -v
# Plain text
curl localhost:3000/ -H 'accept: text/plain' -v
While effect-http
is intended to be primarly used on the server-side, i.e.
by developers providing the HTTP service, it is possible to use it also to
model, use and test against someone else's API. Out of box, you can make
us of the following combinators.
Client
- client for the real integration with the API.MockClient
- client for testing against the API interface.ExampleServer
- server implementation derivation with example responses.
effect-http
has the ability to generate an example server
implementation based on the Api
specification. This can be
helpful in the following and probably many more cases.
- You're in a process of designing an API and you want to have something to share with other people and have a discussion over before the actual implementation starts.
- You develop a fullstack application with frontend first approach you want to test the integration with a backend you haven't implemeted yet.
- You integrate a 3rd party HTTP API and you want to have an ability to perform integration tests without the need to connect to a real running HTTP service.
Use ExampleServer.make
combinator to generate a RouterBuilder
from an Api
.
import { NodeRuntime } from "@effect/platform-node"
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema"
import { Effect, pipe } from "effect"
import { Api, ExampleServer, RouterBuilder } from "effect-http"
import { NodeServer } from "effect-http-node"
const Response = Schema.Struct({
name: Schema.String,
value: Schema.Number
})
const api = pipe(
Api.make({ servers: ["http://localhost:3000", { description: "hello", url: "/api/" }] }),
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("test", "/test").pipe(Api.setResponseBody(Response))
)
)
pipe(
ExampleServer.make(api),
RouterBuilder.build,
NodeServer.listen({ port: 3000 }),
NodeRuntime.runMain
)
Go to localhost:3000/docs and try calling
endpoints. The exposed HTTP service conforms the api
and will return
only valid example responses.
To performed quick tests against the API interface, effect-http
has
the ability to generate a mock client which will return example or
specified responses. Suppose we are integrating a hypothetical API
with /get-value
endpoint returning a number. We can model such
API as follows.
import { Schema } from "@effect/schema";
import { Api } from "effect-http";
const api = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addEndpoint(
Api.get("getValue", "/value").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Schema.Number)
)
)
)
In a real environment, we will probably use the derived client
using Client.make
. But for tests, we probably want a dummy
client which will return values conforming the API. For such
a use-case, we can derive a mock client.
const client = MockClient.make(api);
Calling getValue
on the client will perform the same client-side
validation as would be done by the real client. But it will return
an example response instead of calling the API. It is also possible
to enforce the value to be returned in a type-safe manner
using the option argument. The following client will always
return number 12
when calling the getValue
operation.
const client = MockClient.make(api, { responses: { getValue: 12 } });
For bigger applications, you might want to separate the logic of endpoints
or groups of endpoints into separate modules. This section shows how to do
that. Firstly, it is possible to declare endpoints independently of the Api
or ApiGroup
the're part of. Suppose we are creating a CMS system with
articles, users, categories, etc. The API group responsible for management
of articles would schematically look as follows.
import { Api, ApiGroup } from 'effect-http';
export const getArticleEndpoint = Api.get("getArticle", "/article").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Response)
)
export const storeArticleEndpoint = Api.post("storeArticle", "/article").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Response)
)
export const updateArticleEndpoint = Api.put("updateArticle", "/article").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Response)
)
export const deleteArticleEndpoint = Api.delete("deleteArticle", "/article").pipe(
Api.setResponseBody(Response)
)
export const articleApi = ApiGroup.make("Articles").pipe(
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(getArticleEndpoint),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(storeArticleEndpoint),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(updateArticleEndpoint),
ApiGroup.addEndpoint(deleteArticleEndpoint)
)
Similarly, we'd define the API group for user management, categories and others. Let's combine these groups into our API definition.
export const api = Api.make().pipe(
Api.addGroup(articleApi),
Api.addGroup(userApi),
Api.addGroup(categoryApi),
// ...
)
Each one of deleteUserEndpoint
, storeUserEndpoint
, ..., is an object
of type ApiEndpoint<Id, Request, Response, Security>
. They are a full type
and runtime declarations of your endpoints. You can use these objects to
implement the handlers for these endpoints. Produced handlers are objects
of type Handler<A, E, R>
(where A
is a description of an endpoint
ApiEndpoint<Id, Request, Response, Security>
). Handlers are combined
into a router using a RouterBuilder
. You'd implement the handlers
of the article API group as follows.
import { Handler, RouterBuilder } from 'effect-http';
import { api, getArticleEndpoint, storeArticleEndpoint, updateArticleEndpoint, deleteArticleEndpoint } from 'path-to-your-api';
const getArticleHandler = Handler.make(getArticleEndpoint, () => Effect.succeed(...))
const storeArticleHandler = Handler.make(storeArticleEndpoint, () => Effect.succeed(...))
const updateArticleHandler = Handler.make(updateArticleEndpoint, () => Effect.succeed(...))
const deleteArticleHandler = Handler.make(deleteArticleEndpoint, () => Effect.succeed(...))
export const articleRouterBuilder = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.handle(getArticleHandler),
RouterBuilder.handle(storeArticleHandler),
RouterBuilder.handle(updateArticleHandler),
RouterBuilder.handle(deleteArticleHandler),
)
Note
The Handler.make
function has both data-first and data-last overloads.
If you prefer the pipe style, you can also do the following.
const getArticleHandler = getArticleEndpoint.pipe(
Handler.make(() => Effect.succeed(...)
)
Finally, you merge all the router builders and build the app.
import { RouterBuilder } from 'effect-http';
import { userRouterBuilder } from 'path-to-your-router-builder';
const app = RouterBuilder.make(api).pipe(
RouterBuilder.merge(userRouterBuilder),
RouterBuilder.merge(articleRouterBuilder),
RouterBuilder.merge(categoryRouterBuilder),
// ...
RouterBuilder.build
)
This library is tested against nodejs 21.5.0.