fix/refactor_composer_unit_tests

[aarmoa]

• Refactored composer unit tests to always compare the constructed message in JSON representation

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Improved test clarity and readability by refactoring test methods to compare message objects with their expected dictionary representations.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes streamline tests in tests/test_composer.py by converting messages to dictionaries using json_format.MessageToDict and comparing them against expected dictionary values. This approach replaces direct comparison of message attributes, enhancing test clarity and readability.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
tests/test_composer.py	Refactored test methods by removing direct assertions on message attributes and adding comparisons between dictionary representations of messages and expected values for several test cases.

Poem

In the world of code, we made a shift,
Comparing dictionaries, a valuable gift.
Tests now clearer, easier to see,
For every rabbit coder, efficiency.
Attributes transformed, like magic they view,
A brighter horizon, our tests anew. 🌟🐇✨

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.60%. Comparing base (c513f80) to head (987f25b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #336   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.60%   77.60%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines        4502     4502           
  Branches      333      333           
=======================================
  Hits         3494     3494           
  Misses        915      915           
  Partials       93       93           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.