chore: copy evm & feemarket types to sdk-go #265
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request encompass a variety of enhancements and new features across the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and fee market modules within the Injective blockchain. Key additions include new protocol buffer definitions for transaction handling, event logging, and genesis state management. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
maxim-inj
force-pushed
the
feat/evm-types
branch
from
8e89a61 to
a074c61
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (43)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/events.proto (1)
13-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using numeric types for height and amount fields.
In blockchain contexts, block height and gas amounts are typically represented as integers. Using string types might lead to unnecessary string-number conversions and potential parsing errors.
message EventBlockGas { // height of the block - string height = 1; + uint64 height = 1; // amount of gas wanted by the block - string amount = 2; + uint64 amount = 2; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.message EventBlockGas { // height of the block uint64 height = 1; // amount of gas wanted by the block uint64 amount = 2; }chain/feemarket/types/genesis.go (1)
12-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding parameter validation.
The function accepts parameters without validation. Since this is used during genesis, invalid parameters could cause issues at chain initialization.
Consider adding validation:
func NewGenesisState(params Params, blockGas uint64) *GenesisState { + if err := params.Validate(); err != nil { + panic(err) + } return &GenesisState{ Params: params, BlockGas: blockGas, } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
proto/injective/evm/v1/events.proto (3)
40-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use bytes for bloom filter storage
Ethereum bloom filters are 256-byte arrays. Storing them as strings is inefficient and may lead to unnecessary encoding/decoding overhead.
message EventBlockBloom { - string bloom = 1; + bytes bloom = 1; // 256-byte Ethereum bloom filter }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// EventBlockBloom defines an Ethereum block bloom filter event message EventBlockBloom { // bloom is the bloom filter of the block bytes bloom = 1; // 256-byte Ethereum bloom filter }
24-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance log structure to match Ethereum specification
The current implementation stores logs as strings, which loses the structured nature of Ethereum logs. Consider creating a dedicated Log message type that matches the Ethereum log structure.
+message Log { + string address = 1; + repeated string topics = 2; + string data = 3; + uint64 block_number = 4; + string tx_hash = 5; + uint64 tx_index = 6; + uint64 log_index = 7; +} message EventTxLog { - repeated string tx_logs = 1; + repeated Log tx_logs = 1; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// EventTxLog defines the event for an Ethereum transaction log message Log { string address = 1; repeated string topics = 2; string data = 3; uint64 block_number = 4; string tx_hash = 5; uint64 tx_index = 6; uint64 log_index = 7; } message EventTxLog { // tx_logs is an array of transaction logs repeated Log tx_logs = 1; }
7-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing field types for better type safety and performance
Several fields could benefit from more specific types:
amount: Consider using a numeric type with sufficient precision (e.g., bytes for big integers)index: Should beuint64for block positiongas_used: Should beuint64eth_tx_failed: Consider renaming toerror_messageorvm_errorfor claritymessage EventEthereumTx { - string amount = 1; + bytes amount = 1; // Using bytes for arbitrary-precision integers string eth_hash = 2; - string index = 3; + uint64 index = 3; - string gas_used = 4; + uint64 gas_used = 4; string hash = 5; string recipient = 6; - string eth_tx_failed = 7; + string vm_error = 7; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.message EventEthereumTx { // amount bytes amount = 1; // Using bytes for arbitrary-precision integers // eth_hash is the Ethereum hash of the transaction string eth_hash = 2; // index of the transaction in the block uint64 index = 3; // gas_used is the amount of gas used by the transaction uint64 gas_used = 4; // hash is the Tendermint hash of the transaction string hash = 5; // recipient of the transaction string recipient = 6; // eth_tx_failed contains a VM error should it occur string vm_error = 7; }chain/evm/types/access_list.go (1)
36-55:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and optimize slice allocation
Two improvements are needed:
- Add validation for hex string formats to prevent panics
- Pre-allocate the ethAccessList slice
func (al AccessList) ToEthAccessList() *ethtypes.AccessList { - var ethAccessList ethtypes.AccessList + ethAccessList := make(ethtypes.AccessList, 0, len(al)) for _, tuple := range al { + // Validate address format + if !common.IsHexAddress(tuple.Address) { + return nil + } + + // Validate storage key formats + for _, key := range tuple.StorageKeys { + if len(key) != 66 || key[:2] != "0x" { // 0x + 64 hex chars + return nil + } + } + storageKeys := make([]common.Hash, len(tuple.StorageKeys))Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
proto/injective/evm/v1/log.proto (1)
16-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using bytes for Ethereum-specific fields
For better compatibility with Ethereum's data structures:
addressshould bebytes(20 bytes) instead ofstringtopicsshould bebytes(32 bytes each) instead ofstringThis would ensure proper handling of Ethereum addresses and topic hashes without potential encoding/decoding issues.
- string address = 1; - repeated string topics = 2; + bytes address = 1 [(gogoproto.casttype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Address"]; + repeated bytes topics = 2 [(gogoproto.casttype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Hash"];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.bytes address = 1 [(gogoproto.casttype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Address"]; // topics is a list of topics provided by the contract. repeated bytes topics = 2 [(gogoproto.casttype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Hash"];chain/evm/types/tracer.go (3)
32-45:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement case for TracerFirehose
The TracerFirehose constant is defined but not handled in the switch statement.
Add implementation for TracerFirehose or remove the unused constant.
25-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making debug mode configurable
Debug mode is currently hardcoded to true, which could impact performance in production environments.
Consider making it configurable:
- logCfg := &logger.Config{ - Debug: true, - } + logCfg := &logger.Config{ + Debug: os.Getenv("EVM_TRACER_DEBUG") == "true", + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// TODO: enable additional log configuration logCfg := &logger.Config{ Debug: os.Getenv("EVM_TRACER_DEBUG") == "true", }
37-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid direct use of os.Stderr/os.Stdout
Direct use of os.Stderr and os.Stdout makes the code harder to test and less flexible.
Consider injecting io.Writer interfaces:
-func NewTracer(tracer string, msg *core.Message, rules params.Rules) *tracers.Tracer { +func NewTracer(tracer string, msg *core.Message, rules params.Rules, output io.Writer) *tracers.Tracer { // ... - hooks = logger.NewJSONLogger(logCfg, os.Stderr) + hooks = logger.NewJSONLogger(logCfg, output) // ... - hooks = logger.NewMarkdownLogger(logCfg, os.Stdout).Hooks() // TODO: Stderr ? + hooks = logger.NewMarkdownLogger(logCfg, output).Hooks()Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/params.go (1)
125-128: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add nil check for ethConfig parameter.
The IsLondon function should handle nil config gracefully.
func IsLondon(ethConfig *params.ChainConfig, height int64) bool { + if ethConfig == nil { + return false + } return ethConfig.IsLondon(big.NewInt(height)) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// IsLondon returns if london hardfork is enabled. func IsLondon(ethConfig *params.ChainConfig, height int64) bool { if ethConfig == nil { return false } return ethConfig.IsLondon(big.NewInt(height)) }proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto (1)
33-33:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect YAML tag for eip150_hash
The YAML tag for
eip150_hashis incorrectly set to "byzantium_block" instead of "eip150_hash".- string eip150_hash = 5 [(gogoproto.customname) = "EIP150Hash", (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"byzantium_block\""]; + string eip150_hash = 5 [(gogoproto.customname) = "EIP150Hash", (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"eip150_hash\""];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.string eip150_hash = 5 [(gogoproto.customname) = "EIP150Hash", (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"eip150_hash\""];chain/evm/types/eth.go (1)
27-37:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck destination buffer size in MarshalTo() to prevent data truncation
In the
MarshalTo()method, the serialized databzis copied intodstwithout verifying ifdsthas enough capacity. Ifdstis smaller thanbz, this could lead to incomplete data copying. Consider checking the length ofdstbefore copying and return an error if it's insufficient.Apply this diff to add a size check:
func (tx EthereumTx) MarshalTo(dst []byte) (int, error) { if tx.Transaction == nil { return 0, nil } bz, err := tx.MarshalBinary() if err != nil { return 0, err } + if len(dst) < len(bz) { + return 0, fmt.Errorf("destination buffer too small: need %d bytes", len(bz)) + } copy(dst, bz) return len(bz), nil }Ensure to import the
"fmt"package if it's not already imported.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (tx EthereumTx) MarshalTo(dst []byte) (int, error) { if tx.Transaction == nil { return 0, nil } bz, err := tx.MarshalBinary() if err != nil { return 0, err } if len(dst) < len(bz) { return 0, fmt.Errorf("destination buffer too small: need %d bytes", len(bz)) } copy(dst, bz) return len(bz), nil }chain/evm/types/compiled_contract.go (2)
114-116:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect variable reference in the
initfunction.After unmarshalling
simpleStorageJSONintoSimpleStorageContract, the code incorrectly checksTestMessageCall.Bininstead ofSimpleStorageContract.Bin. This will cause the check to fail even ifSimpleStorageContractis loaded correctly.Suggested change:
- if len(TestMessageCall.Bin) == 0 { + if len(SimpleStorageContract.Bin) == 0 { panic("load contract failed") }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if len(SimpleStorageContract.Bin) == 0 { panic("load contract failed") }
17-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the encoding in 'MarshalJSON' method for
HexString.Using
hex.EncodeToString(s)is more efficient and idiomatic thanfmt.Sprintf("%x", string(s)).Suggested change:
- return json.Marshal(fmt.Sprintf("%x", string(s))) + return json.Marshal(hex.EncodeToString(s))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (s HexString) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) { return json.Marshal(hex.EncodeToString(s)) }chain/evm/types/codec.go (2)
37-40:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid duplicate registration of
MsgEthereumTx
MsgEthereumTxis registered twice as an implementation ofsdk.Msg(lines 37-40 and 46-49). This duplication may lead to unexpected behavior or increased binary size. Consider removing the redundant registration.Apply this diff to remove the duplicate registration:
func RegisterInterfaces(registry codectypes.InterfaceRegistry) { registry.RegisterImplementations( (*sdk.Msg)(nil), &MsgEthereumTx{}, ) registry.RegisterImplementations( (*tx.TxExtensionOptionI)(nil), &ExtensionOptionsEthereumTx{}, ) - registry.RegisterImplementations( - (*sdk.Msg)(nil), - &MsgEthereumTx{}, - &MsgUpdateParams{}, - ) + registry.RegisterImplementations( + (*sdk.Msg)(nil), + &MsgUpdateParams{}, + ) registry.RegisterInterface( "injective.evm.v1.TxData", (*TxData)(nil),Also applies to: 46-49
81-91:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential
nilvalue inUnpackTxDataWhen unpacking
Any, theGetCachedValue()method might returnnil. Add anilcheck before the type assertion to prevent a potentialnilpointer dereference.Apply this diff to add the nil check:
func UnpackTxData(any *codectypes.Any) (TxData, error) { if any == nil { return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "protobuf Any message cannot be nil") } + if any.GetCachedValue() == nil { + return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "cached value in Any is nil") + } + txData, ok := any.GetCachedValue().(TxData) if !ok { return nil, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "cannot unpack Any into TxData %T", any) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if any == nil { return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "protobuf Any message cannot be nil") } if any.GetCachedValue() == nil { return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "cached value in Any is nil") } txData, ok := any.GetCachedValue().(TxData) if !ok { return nil, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrUnpackAny, "cannot unpack Any into TxData %T", any) } return txData, nil }chain/evm/types/tx_data.go (1)
83-98:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid variable shadowing of
vinDeriveChainIDIn the
DeriveChainIDfunction, the variablevis redeclared in line 84 asv := v.Uint64(), which shadows the input parameterv. This can lead to confusion and potential bugs due to variable shadowing.Consider renaming the local variable to prevent shadowing. Here's the suggested change:
func DeriveChainID(v *big.Int) *big.Int { if v == nil || v.Sign() < 1 { return nil } if v.BitLen() <= 64 { - v := v.Uint64() + vUint64 := v.Uint64() - if v == 27 || v == 28 { + if vUint64 == 27 || vUint64 == 28 { return new(big.Int) } - if v < 35 { + if vUint64 < 35 { return nil } // V MUST be of the form {0,1} + CHAIN_ID * 2 + 35 - return new(big.Int).SetUint64((v - 35) / 2) + return new(big.Int).SetUint64((vUint64 - 35) / 2) } v = new(big.Int).Sub(v, big.NewInt(35)) return v.Div(v, big.NewInt(2)) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if v.BitLen() <= 64 { vUint64 := v.Uint64() if vUint64 == 27 || vUint64 == 28 { return new(big.Int) } if vUint64 < 35 { return nil } // V MUST be of the form {0,1} + CHAIN_ID * 2 + 35 return new(big.Int).SetUint64((vUint64 - 35) / 2) } v = new(big.Int).Sub(v, big.NewInt(35)) return v.Div(v, big.NewInt(2)) }chain/evm/types/interfaces.go (2)
8-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid potential naming conflicts by aliasing the imported
typespackageSince this file is in
package types, importing another package astypescan cause confusion. To improve clarity, consider aliasing the imported package.Apply this diff:
- "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/bank/types" + banktypes "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/bank/types"Then update the method signatures:
- GetDenomMetaData(ctx context.Context, denom string) (types.Metadata, bool) + GetDenomMetaData(ctx context.Context, denom string) (banktypes.Metadata, bool) - SetDenomMetaData(ctx context.Context, denomMetaData types.Metadata) + SetDenomMetaData(ctx context.Context, denomMetaData banktypes.Metadata)Also applies to: 42-43
22-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize the use of context types in method signatures
The interfaces defined in this file use both
context.Contextandsdk.Contextinconsistently for thectxparameter. For better maintainability and to avoid confusion, please standardize on one context type across all interfaces.Also applies to: 33-44, 48-73
chain/evm/types/logs.go (1)
117-117: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent address conversion method
In
NewLogFromEth, theAddressfield usesHexAddress(log.Address.Bytes()), whereas inToEthereum, the conversion usescommon.HexToAddress(log.Address). Ensure consistency in address conversion methods.Consider updating the
Addressassignment inNewLogFromEth:- Address: HexAddress(log.Address.Bytes()), + Address: log.Address.Hex(),Or ensure that
HexAddressfunctions equivalently tocommon.HexToAddress.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/legacy_tx.go (2)
160-217: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use pointer receivers for methods to prevent unintended copying
The methods
Validate,Fee,Cost,EffectiveGasPrice,EffectiveFee, andEffectiveCostuse value receivers:func (tx LegacyTx) Validate() error { ... }Using value receivers can lead to unintended copying of the
LegacyTxstruct, especially if it contains pointers or large amounts of data. Consider changing the receiver to a pointer to improve efficiency and maintain consistency with other methods.Apply this diff to change the receivers:
-func (tx LegacyTx) Validate() error { +func (tx *LegacyTx) Validate() error { -func (tx LegacyTx) Fee() *big.Int { +func (tx *LegacyTx) Fee() *big.Int { -func (tx LegacyTx) Cost() *big.Int { +func (tx *LegacyTx) Cost() *big.Int { -func (tx LegacyTx) EffectiveGasPrice(_ *big.Int) *big.Int { +func (tx *LegacyTx) EffectiveGasPrice(_ *big.Int) *big.Int { -func (tx LegacyTx) EffectiveFee(_ *big.Int) *big.Int { +func (tx *LegacyTx) EffectiveFee(_ *big.Int) *big.Int { -func (tx LegacyTx) EffectiveCost(_ *big.Int) *big.Int { +func (tx *LegacyTx) EffectiveCost(_ *big.Int) *big.Int {
50-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure deep copy of pointer fields in
CopymethodIn the
Copymethod, the fieldsGasPriceandAmountare pointers. Copying them directly can lead to unintended shared references between the original and copied transactions. Consider creating deep copies of these fields to prevent potential side effects if they are modified elsewhere.Apply this diff to perform a deep copy of the pointer fields:
func (tx *LegacyTx) Copy() TxData { return &LegacyTx{ Nonce: tx.Nonce, - GasPrice: tx.GasPrice, + GasPrice: tx.GasPrice.Clone(), GasLimit: tx.GasLimit, To: tx.To, - Amount: tx.Amount, + Amount: tx.Amount.Clone(), Data: common.CopyBytes(tx.Data), V: common.CopyBytes(tx.V), R: common.CopyBytes(tx.R), S: common.CopyBytes(tx.S), } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/feemarket/types/params.go (1)
49-49:
⚠️ Potential issueFix validator function for
MinGasMultiplierparameterIn the
ParamSetPairsmethod, theMinGasMultiplierparameter is incorrectly usingvalidateMinGasPriceas its validation function. It should usevalidateMinGasMultiplierinstead.Apply this diff to fix the validator function:
- paramtypes.NewParamSetPair(ParamStoreKeyMinGasMultiplier, &p.MinGasMultiplier, validateMinGasPrice), + paramtypes.NewParamSetPair(ParamStoreKeyMinGasMultiplier, &p.MinGasMultiplier, validateMinGasMultiplier),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.paramtypes.NewParamSetPair(ParamStoreKeyMinGasMultiplier, &p.MinGasMultiplier, validateMinGasMultiplier),chain/evm/types/access_list_tx.go (2)
202-205:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent possible nil dereference when validating
amountIn the
Validatemethod, ifamountisnil, callingtypes.IsValidInt256(amount)may result in a nil pointer dereference. Please ensure thatamountis notnilbefore callingtypes.IsValidInt256(amount).Suggested fix:
if amount != nil && amount.Sign() == -1 { return errorsmod.Wrapf(ErrInvalidAmount, "amount cannot be negative %s", amount) } +if amount != nil && !types.IsValidInt256(amount) { return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidAmount, "out of bound") }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if amount != nil && !types.IsValidInt256(amount) { return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidAmount, "out of bound") }
68-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Perform deep copy of
AccessesinCopy()methodIn the
Copy()method,tx.Accessesis copied by reference. To prevent unintended side effects from shared references, consider performing a deep copy oftx.Accesses.Suggested fix:
If
Accesseshas aCopy()method, use it to perform a deep copy:return &AccessListTx{ // ... other fields ... Data: common.CopyBytes(tx.Data), - Accesses: tx.Accesses, + Accesses: tx.Accesses.Copy(), // ... other fields ... }If
Accessesdoes not have aCopy()method, you may need to implement one.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/tx_args.go (1)
41-52:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid potential panic in
String()method due to nilhexutil.BigvaluesFormatting
hexutil.Bigfields that arenilcan cause a panic. As noted in the TODO comment, printingnilvalues ofhexutil.Bigtriggers an exception.Consider adding nil checks before formatting or provide default values to safely handle
nilvalues.Apply this diff to prevent the panic:
func (args *TransactionArgs) String() string { - return fmt.Sprintf("TransactionArgs{From:%v, To:%v, Gas:%v,"+ + return fmt.Sprintf("TransactionArgs{From:%v, To:%v, Gas:%v, GasPrice:%v, MaxFeePerGas:%v, MaxPriorityFeePerGas:%v, Value:%v,"+ " Nonce:%v, Data:%v, Input:%v, AccessList:%v}", args.From, args.To, args.Gas, + nilSafeHexutilBig(args.GasPrice), + nilSafeHexutilBig(args.MaxFeePerGas), + nilSafeHexutilBig(args.MaxPriorityFeePerGas), + nilSafeHexutilBig(args.Value), args.Nonce, args.Data, args.Input, args.AccessList) } + +// Helper function to safely print hexutil.Big +func nilSafeHexutilBig(h *hexutil.Big) *big.Int { + if h != nil { + return h.ToInt() + } + return big.NewInt(0) +}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/chain_config.go (3)
168-174: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance
ValidateHashto verify hash formatThe current implementation of
ValidateHashchecks for non-empty and non-blank strings but does not verify whether thehexstring is a valid hash (e.g., correct length and hexadecimal characters).Consider updating
ValidateHashto validate the hash format:func ValidateHash(hex string) error { if strings.TrimSpace(hex) == "" { return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidChainConfig, "hash cannot be blank") } + if !common.IsHexHash(hex) { + return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidChainConfig, "invalid hash format") + } return nil }Ensure you have the appropriate function
IsHexHashavailable, which checks if the string is a valid hexadecimal hash. You may need to importcommonfrom the Ethereum Go library or implement a similar validation function.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
93-99:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for potential overflow when converting
timetouint64In
getTimeValue, the conversion fromsdkmath.Inttouint64may result in an overflow iftimeexceeds the maximum value ofuint64.Consider adding a check to ensure
timefits withinuint64:func getTimeValue(time *sdkmath.Int) *uint64 { if time == nil || time.IsNegative() { return nil } + if !time.BigInt().IsUint64() { + return nil // or handle the error as appropriate + } t := time.BigInt().Uint64() return &t }This ensures that only valid
uint64values are returned, preventing potential overflow issues.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
45-83:
⚠️ Potential issueInclude
CancunTimeandPragueTimeinDefaultChainConfigIn
DefaultChainConfig, the fieldsCancunTimeandPragueTimeare not initialized, but they are utilized inEthereumConfig. This could lead tonilvalues where defaults might be expected.Apply the following changes to initialize these fields:
shanghaiTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() +cancunTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() +pragueTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() return ChainConfig{ HomesteadBlock: &homesteadBlock, DAOForkBlock: &daoForkBlock, DAOForkSupport: true, EIP150Block: &eip150Block, EIP150Hash: common.Hash{}.String(), EIP155Block: &eip155Block, EIP158Block: &eip158Block, ByzantiumBlock: &byzantiumBlock, ConstantinopleBlock: &constantinopleBlock, PetersburgBlock: &petersburgBlock, IstanbulBlock: &istanbulBlock, MuirGlacierBlock: &muirGlacierBlock, BerlinBlock: &berlinBlock, LondonBlock: &londonBlock, ArrowGlacierBlock: &arrowGlacierBlock, GrayGlacierBlock: &grayGlacierBlock, MergeNetsplitBlock: &mergeNetsplitBlock, ShanghaiTime: &shanghaiTime, + CancunTime: &cancunTime, + PragueTime: &pragueTime, }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func DefaultChainConfig() ChainConfig { homesteadBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() daoForkBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() eip150Block := sdkmath.ZeroInt() eip155Block := sdkmath.ZeroInt() eip158Block := sdkmath.ZeroInt() byzantiumBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() constantinopleBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() petersburgBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() istanbulBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() muirGlacierBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() berlinBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() londonBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() arrowGlacierBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() grayGlacierBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() mergeNetsplitBlock := sdkmath.ZeroInt() shanghaiTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() cancunTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() pragueTime := sdkmath.ZeroInt() return ChainConfig{ HomesteadBlock: &homesteadBlock, DAOForkBlock: &daoForkBlock, DAOForkSupport: true, EIP150Block: &eip150Block, EIP150Hash: common.Hash{}.String(), EIP155Block: &eip155Block, EIP158Block: &eip158Block, ByzantiumBlock: &byzantiumBlock, ConstantinopleBlock: &constantinopleBlock, PetersburgBlock: &petersburgBlock, IstanbulBlock: &istanbulBlock, MuirGlacierBlock: &muirGlacierBlock, BerlinBlock: &berlinBlock, LondonBlock: &londonBlock, ArrowGlacierBlock: &arrowGlacierBlock, GrayGlacierBlock: &grayGlacierBlock, MergeNetsplitBlock: &mergeNetsplitBlock, ShanghaiTime: &shanghaiTime, CancunTime: &cancunTime, PragueTime: &pragueTime, } }chain/evm/types/dynamic_fee_tx.go (1)
67-82:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Deep Copy of Pointer Fields in
CopyMethodThe
Copy()method copies pointer fields (ChainID,GasTipCap,GasFeeCap,Amount,Accesses) directly without creating new copies of the values they point to. This could lead to unintended side effects if the copied instance or the original modifies these fields, as they would share the same underlying data.Consider creating deep copies of these pointer fields to ensure that the copied transaction is fully independent. For example:
func (tx *DynamicFeeTx) Copy() TxData { return &DynamicFeeTx{ - ChainID: tx.ChainID, + ChainID: copyIntPointer(tx.ChainID), Nonce: tx.Nonce, - GasTipCap: tx.GasTipCap, + GasTipCap: copyIntPointer(tx.GasTipCap), - GasFeeCap: tx.GasFeeCap, + GasFeeCap: copyIntPointer(tx.GasFeeCap), GasLimit: tx.GasLimit, To: tx.To, - Amount: tx.Amount, + Amount: copyIntPointer(tx.Amount), Data: common.CopyBytes(tx.Data), - Accesses: tx.Accesses, + Accesses: tx.Accesses.Copy(), // Assuming Accesses has a Copy() method V: common.CopyBytes(tx.V), R: common.CopyBytes(tx.R), S: common.CopyBytes(tx.S), } } +func copyIntPointer(i *sdkmath.Int) *sdkmath.Int { + if i == nil { + return nil + } + intCopy := sdkmath.NewIntFromBigInt(i.BigInt()) + return &intCopy +}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/utils.go (2)
230-232:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd nil checks to prevent potential nil pointer dereferences in
EffectiveGasPriceThe function
EffectiveGasPricedoes not check ifbaseFee,feeCap, ortipCapare nil. If any of these inputs are nil, the function will panic due to a nil pointer dereference when performingbig.Intoperations.Consider adding nil checks for the input parameters to prevent potential runtime panics. Here's a suggested fix:
func EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int, feeCap *big.Int, tipCap *big.Int) *big.Int { + if baseFee == nil || feeCap == nil || tipCap == nil { + // Handle the nil case appropriately, for example, return nil or a default value + return nil + } return math.BigMin(new(big.Int).Add(tipCap, baseFee), feeCap) }Ensure that callers of this function handle the case where
nilmight be returned.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int, feeCap *big.Int, tipCap *big.Int) *big.Int { if baseFee == nil || feeCap == nil || tipCap == nil { // Handle the nil case appropriately, for example, return nil or a default value return nil } return math.BigMin(new(big.Int).Add(tipCap, baseFee), feeCap) }
189-206:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect error message in
UnwrapEthereumMsgfunctionThe error message returned when the message type assertion fails incorrectly references the type of
txinstead ofmsg. It should referencemsgto accurately reflect the type that failed the assertion.Apply this diff to correct the error message:
func UnwrapEthereumMsg(tx *sdk.Tx, ethHash common.Hash) (*MsgEthereumTx, error) { if tx == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx: nil") } for _, msg := range (*tx).GetMsgs() { ethMsg, ok := msg.(*MsgEthereumTx) if !ok { - return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx type: %T", tx) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid message type: %T", msg) } txHash := ethMsg.AsTransaction().Hash() if txHash == ethHash { return ethMsg, nil } } return nil, fmt.Errorf("eth tx not found: %s", ethHash) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func UnwrapEthereumMsg(tx *sdk.Tx, ethHash common.Hash) (*MsgEthereumTx, error) { if tx == nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx: nil") } for _, msg := range (*tx).GetMsgs() { ethMsg, ok := msg.(*MsgEthereumTx) if !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid message type: %T", msg) } txHash := ethMsg.AsTransaction().Hash() if txHash == ethHash { return ethMsg, nil } } return nil, fmt.Errorf("eth tx not found: %s", ethHash) }chain/evm/types/errors.go (1)
17-18:
⚠️ Potential issueAssign explicit value to
codeErrExecutionRevertedto prevent accidental changesThe constant
codeErrExecutionRevertedmust remain with a specific code value (3) to comply with the JSON-RPC error standard. Currently, it relies on the position in theiotasequence, which can change if new error codes are added above it. To prevent unintended changes, assign an explicit value tocodeErrExecutionReverted.Suggested change:
const ( codeErrInvalidState = uint32(iota) + 2 // NOTE: code 1 is reserved for internal errors - codeErrExecutionReverted // IMPORTANT: Do not move this error as it complies with the JSON-RPC error standard + codeErrExecutionReverted = 3 // IMPORTANT: Do not change this value as it complies with the JSON-RPC error standard codeErrChainConfigNotFound codeErrInvalidChainConfig // ... )Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
chain/evm/types/msg.go (6)
253-256:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential nil pointer dereference in
GetFeemethod.In the
GetFeemethod, there's a possibility of a nil pointer dereference iftxorpriceis nil.func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetFee() *big.Int { tx := msg.AsTransaction() price := tx.GasPrice() return price.Mul(price, new(big.Int).SetUint64(tx.Gas())) }If
txis nil,tx.GasPrice()will cause a panic. Similarly, ifpriceis nil,price.Mul(...)will panic.Add nil checks to prevent this:
func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetFee() *big.Int { tx := msg.AsTransaction() if tx == nil { return big.NewInt(0) } price := tx.GasPrice() if price == nil { return big.NewInt(0) } return price.Mul(price, new(big.Int).SetUint64(tx.Gas())) }
260-262:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
GetEffectiveFeehandles nil values gracefully.Similar to
GetFee,GetEffectiveFeeshould check for nil values to avoid panics.func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetEffectiveFee(baseFee *big.Int) *big.Int { price := msg.GetEffectiveGasPrice(baseFee) if price == nil { return big.NewInt(0) } return price.Mul(price, new(big.Int).SetUint64(msg.GetGas())) }
296-317:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd nil check for
txinAsMessagemethod.In
AsMessage,txmight benil, leading to panics when accessing its methods.func (msg *MsgEthereumTx) AsMessage(baseFee *big.Int) *core.Message { tx := msg.AsTransaction() + if tx == nil { + return nil + } // existing code... }Also, ensure that you handle the case where
AsMessagereturnsnil.
212-214: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using panic in
GetSignBytesmethod.The
GetSignBytesmethod panics, which can cause the application to crash unexpectedly. It's better to return an error to handle this case gracefully.-func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetSignBytes() []byte { - panic("must use 'RLPSignBytes' with a chain ID to get the valid bytes to sign") +func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetSignBytes() ([]byte, error) { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("must use 'RLPSignBytes' with a chain ID to get the valid bytes to sign") }Make sure to update the method signature and handle the error where this method is called.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (msg MsgEthereumTx) GetSignBytes() ([]byte, error) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("must use 'RLPSignBytes' with a chain ID to get the valid bytes to sign") }
280-293: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid silent failures by returning errors in
AsTransaction.Returning
nilwithout an error when unpacking fails can make debugging difficult.Modify the method to return an error:
- if err != nil { - return nil + if err != nil { + return nil, err }And update all callers to handle the error appropriately.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
280-293: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle nil returns in
AsTransactionmethod.The
AsTransactionmethod can returnnilin case of an error during unpacking, which can lead to nil pointer dereferences where it's used.Ensure that the calling functions check if
txis nil before using it.Alternatively, modify
AsTransactionto return an error:-func (msg *MsgEthereumTx) AsTransaction() *ethtypes.Transaction { +func (msg *MsgEthereumTx) AsTransaction() (*ethtypes.Transaction, error) { // existing logic... if err != nil { - return nil + return nil, err } // return tx }And update the callers accordingly.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
proto/injective/evm/v1/query.proto (3)
4-4:
⚠️ Potential issueFix the import path for
pagination.protoThe import statement at line 4 refers to
"cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto", but this file does not exist, leading to a compile error. Please verify the correct path or ensure that the file is available at the specified location.🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
44-45:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate the comment for the
CodeRPC methodThe comment incorrectly states that it queries "the balance of all coins for a single account." It should specify that it retrieves the code bytecode of a contract.
Suggested fix:
- // Code queries the balance of all coins for a single account. + // Code retrieves the code bytecode for a given contract address.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Code retrieves the code bytecode for a given contract address. rpc Code(QueryCodeRequest) returns (QueryCodeResponse) {
39-40:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate the comment for the
StorageRPC methodThe comment describes querying "the balance of all coins for a single account," which doesn't align with the purpose of the
Storagemethod. It should reflect that it queries the storage state of an account.Suggested fix:
- // Storage queries the balance of all coins for a single account. + // Storage queries the storage state of an account at a specific key.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Storage queries the storage state of an account at a specific key. rpc Storage(QueryStorageRequest) returns (QueryStorageResponse) {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 31
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (41)
proto/injective/evm/v1/access_tuple.proto (1)
8-16: Consider adding field constraints and validation.While the message structure is correct, consider enhancing it with additional protobuf field options to ensure data integrity:
message AccessTuple { option (gogoproto.goproto_getters) = false; // address is a hex formatted ethereum address - string address = 1; + string address = 1 [ + (gogoproto.moretags) = "validate:\"required,eth_addr\"", + (gogoproto.customtype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Address" + ]; // storage_keys are hex formatted hashes of the storage keys - repeated string storage_keys = 2 [(gogoproto.jsontag) = "storageKeys"]; + repeated string storage_keys = 2 [ + (gogoproto.jsontag) = "storageKeys", + (gogoproto.moretags) = "validate:\"dive,required,eth_hash\"", + (gogoproto.customtype) = "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common.Hash" + ]; }This enhancement:
- Adds validation for Ethereum address format
- Adds validation for storage key hash format
- Uses Go-Ethereum types for better type safety
proto/injective/evm/v1/transaction_logs.proto (2)
8-10: Documentation could be improvedWhile the documentation explains the purpose, it contains a minor typo and could be more descriptive about the upgrade implications.
Apply this diff to improve the documentation:
-// TransactionLogs define the logs generated from a transaction execution -// with a given hash. It it used for import/export data as transactions are not -// persisted on blockchain state after an upgrade. +// TransactionLogs define the logs generated from a transaction execution +// with a given hash. It is used for import/export data since transactions +// and their logs are not persisted in the blockchain state after an upgrade. +// This structure ensures data continuity across chain upgrades.
1-16: Consider versioning strategy for EVM compatibilitySince this is part of copying EVM types to sdk-go, consider:
- Adding a version field to support future EVM upgrades
- Documenting the specific EVM version these types are compatible with
- Adding validation for Ethereum-specific hash format
This will help maintain compatibility and make future upgrades smoother.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "injective/evm/v1/log.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/tx_result.proto (2)
16-16: Consider adding address validation for contract_addressThe
contract_addressfield stores Ethereum addresses, which should be 20 bytes (40 hex characters) when not empty. Consider adding validation to ensure the address format is correct.- string contract_address = 1 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"contract_address\""]; + string contract_address = 1 [ + (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"contract_address\"", + (validate.rules).string = { + pattern: "^(0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40})?$" + } + ];
18-18: Consider adding size validation for bloom filterThe
bloomfield represents an Ethereum bloom filter, which should be exactly 256 bytes. Consider adding validation to ensure the correct size.- bytes bloom = 2; + bytes bloom = 2 [ + (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"bloom\"", + (validate.rules).bytes = { + len: 256 + } + ];proto/injective/evm/v1/params.proto (1)
11-24: Consider enhancing field documentationWhile the current documentation is good, consider adding more details for critical fields:
evm_denom: Specify expected denomination format and examplesenable_create/enable_call: Document security implications and use casesextra_eips: List commonly used EIPs or link to documentationchain_config: Reference the chain configuration documentation// evm_denom represents the token denomination used to run the EVM state // transitions. +// Format: {denomination}, Example: "inj" string evm_denom = 1 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"evm_denom\""]; // enable_create toggles state transitions that use the vm.Create function +// Security: Enables/disables contract deployment functionality bool enable_create = 2 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"enable_create\""]; // enable_call toggles state transitions that use the vm.Call function +// Security: Enables/disables contract execution functionality bool enable_call = 3 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"enable_call\""]; // extra_eips defines the additional EIPs for the vm.Config +// Common EIPs: 1559 (Fee Market), 2930 (Optional Access Lists) repeated int64 extra_eips = 4 [(gogoproto.customname) = "ExtraEIPs", (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"extra_eips\""];proto/injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto (2)
21-22: Consider adding validation for enable_heightThe
enable_heightparameter will trigger network-wide changes in fee calculation. Consider implementing additional safeguards:
- Ensure this height is coordinated across all validators
- Add checks to prevent setting this to a past height
- Consider adding a minimum notice period before activation
8-32: Enhance documentation for parameter constraintsWhile the field comments are good, consider adding:
- Valid ranges for numeric parameters
- Implications of different parameter combinations
- Examples of how these parameters affect transaction costs
Example documentation enhancement:
message Params { // no_base_fee forces the EIP-1559 base fee to 0 (needed for 0 price calls) + // Setting this to true will disable EIP-1559 fee mechanics bool no_base_fee = 1; // base_fee_change_denominator bounds the amount the base fee can change // between blocks. + // Recommended range: 8-12. Lower values allow faster fee adjustments uint32 base_fee_change_denominator = 2;proto/injective/evm/v1/log.proto (1)
14-37: LGTM! Complete and well-structured Log message definition.The message includes all necessary fields for Ethereum logs with proper JSON tags and handles chain reorganization scenarios.
Consider adding field examples in the comments to help developers understand the expected format, particularly for the address and topics fields.
// address of the contract that generated the event + // Example: "0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890" string address = 1; // topics is a list of topics provided by the contract. + // Example: ["0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef"] repeated string topics = 2;proto/injective/evm/v1/trace_config.proto (2)
16-33: Consider adding field validation and documentationWhile the core configuration fields are well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- The
timeoutfield as string type might benefit from validation or a more specific duration type- The
reexecfield could use documentation about recommended/maximum valuesConsider using a more specific type for timeout:
- string timeout = 2; + google.protobuf.Duration timeout = 2;
34-43: Enhance documentation for advanced configuration fieldsThe advanced configuration fields could benefit from additional documentation:
- Add a reference to the expected JSON schema for
tracer_json_config- Document the expected format/structure of the binary data in
state_overridesandblock_overridesWould you like me to help draft the enhanced documentation?
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/query.proto (3)
5-5: Remove or uncomment the pagination import based on requirementsThe commented import suggests either:
- Incomplete cleanup of unused imports
- Preparation for future pagination support
Please either remove the commented line if not needed, or uncomment if pagination will be implemented.
43-46: Consider adding validation constraints for base_feeThe
base_feefield uses a custom mathematical integer type for precision, which is good. However, consider adding validation constraints (e.g., minimum value) to ensure the base fee cannot be set to invalid values.Example constraint annotation:
- string base_fee = 1 [(gogoproto.customtype) = "cosmossdk.io/math.Int"]; + string base_fee = 1 [ + (gogoproto.customtype) = "cosmossdk.io/math.Int", + (validate.rules).string.min_len = "1" + ];
53-56: Consider adding range validation for gas fieldThe
gasfield should have validation to ensure it's non-negative and within reasonable bounds.Example constraint:
- int64 gas = 1; + int64 gas = 1 [(validate.rules).int64.gte = 0];chain/evm/types/tx_data.go (1)
19-19: Track TODO: Consider embedding ethtypes.TxDataThere's a TODO comment referencing an Ethereum issue that should be tracked and addressed when possible.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO?
chain/evm/types/interfaces.go (2)
32-44: Document the behavior of virtual coin operationsThe interface includes virtual methods for coin operations, but their behavior and differences from non-virtual counterparts are not documented.
Add documentation to clarify:
- What "Virtual" operations mean in this context
- How they differ from regular operations
- When to use virtual vs. non-virtual methods
Example documentation:
// SendCoinsFromModuleToAccountVirtual performs a virtual coin transfer from a module to an account. // Virtual operations [explain the difference and use cases here]
52-56: Add documentation for FeeMarketKeeper interfaceThe interface lacks documentation explaining its purpose and responsibilities.
Add comprehensive documentation:
// FeeMarketKeeper defines the expected interface for fee market operations. // It provides access to base fee information and fee market parameters // which are essential for EVM transaction processing.proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto (1)
1-117: Consider adding versioning strategyWhile the current implementation is solid, consider:
- Adding a version field to handle future Ethereum upgrades more gracefully
- Documenting the versioning strategy for future fork additions
- Including validation rules for block/time ordering
This will help maintain backward compatibility and make future upgrades smoother.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
chain/evm/types/legacy_tx.go (2)
20-22: Consider storing To address as bytes instead of hex stringConverting the address to/from hex string in getters/setters is inefficient. Consider storing it in its native bytes format.
if to := tx.To(); to != nil { - txData.To = to.Hex() + txData.To = to.Bytes() }
93-101: Add documentation explaining gas price equivalenceThe GetGasTipCap and GetGasFeeCap methods return the same value as GetGasPrice. Please add documentation explaining that this is intentional for legacy transactions where these concepts are equivalent.
-// GetGasTipCap returns the gas price field. +// GetGasTipCap returns the gas price field. For legacy transactions, +// the tip cap is equivalent to the gas price. func (tx *LegacyTx) GetGasTipCap() *big.Int { return tx.GetGasPrice() } -// GetGasFeeCap returns the gas price field. +// GetGasFeeCap returns the gas price field. For legacy transactions, +// the fee cap is equivalent to the gas price. func (tx *LegacyTx) GetGasFeeCap() *big.Int { return tx.GetGasPrice() }chain/evm/types/tx_args.go (1)
113-199: Consider breaking down the complex fee calculation logic.While the implementation is correct, the method is quite complex, particularly around fee calculations. Consider extracting the fee calculation logic into separate methods for better maintainability.
Consider this refactoring:
+func (args *TransactionArgs) calculateFees(baseFee *big.Int) (gasPrice, gasFeeCap, gasTipCap *big.Int) { + if baseFee == nil { + // If there's no basefee, then it must be a non-1559 execution + gasPrice = new(big.Int) + if args.GasPrice != nil { + gasPrice = args.GasPrice.ToInt() + } + return gasPrice, gasPrice, gasPrice + } + + // A basefee is provided, necessitating 1559-type execution + if args.GasPrice != nil { + // User specified the legacy gas field, convert to 1559 gas typing + gasPrice = args.GasPrice.ToInt() + return gasPrice, gasPrice, gasPrice + } + + // User specified 1559 gas fields (or none), use those + gasFeeCap = new(big.Int) + if args.MaxFeePerGas != nil { + gasFeeCap = args.MaxFeePerGas.ToInt() + } + gasTipCap = new(big.Int) + if args.MaxPriorityFeePerGas != nil { + gasTipCap = args.MaxPriorityFeePerGas.ToInt() + } + + // Backfill the legacy gasPrice for EVM execution, unless we're all zeroes + gasPrice = new(big.Int) + if gasFeeCap.BitLen() > 0 || gasTipCap.BitLen() > 0 { + gasPrice = math.BigMin(new(big.Int).Add(gasTipCap, baseFee), gasFeeCap) + } + return +}Then update the
ToMessagemethod to use this helper:func (args *TransactionArgs) ToMessage(globalGasCap uint64, baseFee *big.Int) (*core.Message, error) { // Reject invalid combinations of pre- and post-1559 fee styles if args.GasPrice != nil && (args.MaxFeePerGas != nil || args.MaxPriorityFeePerGas != nil) { return nil, errors.New("both gasPrice and (maxFeePerGas or maxPriorityFeePerGas) specified") } - // ... fee calculation logic ... + gasPrice, gasFeeCap, gasTipCap := args.calculateFees(baseFee)chain/evm/types/chain_config.go (1)
13-42: Consider adding support for newer Ethereum upgradesWhile the implementation is solid, consider adding support for the latest Ethereum upgrades:
- Dencun (Cancun + Deneb)
- Verkle
func (cc ChainConfig) EthereumConfig(chainID *big.Int) *params.ChainConfig { cfg := ¶ms.ChainConfig{ // ... existing config ... ShanghaiTime: getTimeValue(cc.ShanghaiTime), CancunTime: getTimeValue(cc.CancunTime), PragueTime: getTimeValue(cc.PragueTime), + // Consider adding: + VerkleTime: getTimeValue(cc.VerkleTime), } return cfg }proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto (1)
111-111: Fix typo in comment"dinamic" should be "dynamic" in the comment.
-// DynamicFeeTx is the data of EIP-1559 dinamic fee transactions. +// DynamicFeeTx is the data of EIP-1559 dynamic fee transactions.chain/evm/types/errors.go (2)
16-39: Consider grouping related error codesWhile the error codes are well-defined, consider grouping them by category for better maintainability. For example:
- State-related errors (InvalidState, ChainConfigNotFound, etc.)
- Operation-related errors (CreateDisabled, CallDisabled)
- Gas-related errors (InvalidGasPrice, InvalidGasFee, GasOverflow)
199-216: Consider optimizing JSON marshalingThe
toJSONmethod could be optimized:
- Consider pre-allocating the JSON buffer
- Use a sync.Pool for the abciLogVmError struct to reduce allocations
chain/evm/types/msg.go (4)
44-116: Add documentation for transaction type selection logic.While the implementation is correct, consider adding documentation explaining the conditions that determine which transaction type is created:
- Dynamic fee tx (EIP-1559) when
gasFeeCapis provided- Access list tx (EIP-2930) when only
accessesis provided- Legacy tx as fallback
func newMsgEthereumTx( chainID *big.Int, nonce uint64, to *common.Address, amount *big.Int, gasLimit uint64, gasPrice, gasFeeCap, gasTipCap *big.Int, input []byte, accesses *ethtypes.AccessList, ) *MsgEthereumTx { + // Transaction type selection: + // 1. Dynamic fee transaction (EIP-1559) when gasFeeCap is provided + // 2. Access list transaction (EIP-2930) when only accesses is provided + // 3. Legacy transaction as fallback var txData ethtypes.TxData
141-172: Consider adding size limit validations.While the basic validation is thorough, consider adding size limit validations for:
- Input data size to prevent excessive gas consumption
- Address field length validation (should be exactly 20 bytes)
func (msg MsgEthereumTx) ValidateBasic() error { if len(msg.From) == 0 { return errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidRequest, "sender address is missing") } + if len(msg.From) != common.AddressLength { + return errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidRequest, "sender address must be %d bytes", common.AddressLength) + }
216-244: Enhance error handling in Sign method.Consider adding validation for nil parameters and signature length:
- Check if ethSigner is nil
- Check if keyringSigner is nil
- Validate signature length (should be 65 bytes for secp256k1)
func (msg *MsgEthereumTx) Sign(ethSigner ethtypes.Signer, keyringSigner keyring.Signer) error { + if ethSigner == nil { + return fmt.Errorf("ethSigner cannot be nil") + } + if keyringSigner == nil { + return fmt.Errorf("keyringSigner cannot be nil") + } from := msg.GetFrom()
351-381: Add validation for evmDenom parameter.Consider validating the
evmDenomparameter to ensure it's not empty and follows the denomination format.func (msg *MsgEthereumTx) BuildTx(b client.TxBuilder, evmDenom string) (authsigning.Tx, error) { + if len(evmDenom) == 0 { + return nil, errors.New("evmDenom cannot be empty") + } builder, ok := b.(authtx.ExtensionOptionsTxBuilder)chain/evm/types/compiled_contract.go (2)
17-19: SimplifyMarshalJSONby removing unnecessary conversionIn the
MarshalJSONmethod ofHexString, the conversion tostring(s)is unnecessary. You can directly format the byte sliceswithout converting it to a string.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
func (s HexString) MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error) { - return json.Marshal(fmt.Sprintf("%x", string(s))) + return json.Marshal(fmt.Sprintf("%x", s)) }
91-117: Refactor repetitive code in theinit()functionThe
init()function contains repetitive blocks for unmarshaling JSON data and checking theBinlength for each contract. Refactoring this code into a helper function will improve readability and maintainability.Consider applying this refactor:
func loadContract(jsonData []byte, contract *CompiledContract) { if err := json.Unmarshal(jsonData, contract); err != nil { panic(err) } if len(contract.Bin) == 0 { panic("load contract failed") } } func init() { loadContract(erc20JSON, &ERC20Contract) loadContract(testMessageCallJSON, &TestMessageCall) loadContract(simpleStorageJSON, &SimpleStorageContract) }chain/evm/types/params.go (2)
103-115: Ensure consistent function naming for validation functionsThe function
validateEIPsis unexported (starts with a lowercase letter), while similar validation functions likeValidateEVMDenomandValidateBoolare exported. For consistency, consider either exportingvalidateEIPsor unexporting the others if they are intended for internal use only.
13-25: Clarify comments for default parametersThe comment for
DefaultAllowUnprotectedTxscould be rephrased for better clarity. Currently, it states "rejects all unprotected txs (i.e false)", which might be confusing. Consider rewording it to clearly indicate the default behavior.Apply this diff to improve the comment:
-// DefaultAllowUnprotectedTxs rejects all unprotected txs (i.e false) +// DefaultAllowUnprotectedTxs indicates whether unprotected transactions are allowed (false by default)chain/feemarket/types/params.go (2)
120-122: Simplify the condition inIsBaseFeeEnabledmethod.The condition can be reordered for clarity. Checking
heightfirst may improve readability.Consider applying this diff:
func (p Params) IsBaseFeeEnabled(height int64) bool { - return !p.NoBaseFee && height >= p.EnableHeight + return height >= p.EnableHeight && !p.NoBaseFee }This does not change the logic but may enhance readability by checking the numeric condition before the boolean flag.
87-110: Aggregate validation errors in theValidatemethod.Currently, the
Validatemethod returns upon the first error encountered. Consider collecting all validation errors to provide comprehensive feedback.Here's how you could modify the method:
func (p Params) Validate() error { + var errs []error if p.BaseFeeChangeDenominator == 0 { - return fmt.Errorf("base fee change denominator cannot be 0") + errs = append(errs, fmt.Errorf("base fee change denominator cannot be 0")) } if p.BaseFee.IsNegative() { - return fmt.Errorf("initial base fee cannot be negative: %s", p.BaseFee) + errs = append(errs, fmt.Errorf("initial base fee cannot be negative: %s", p.BaseFee)) } if p.EnableHeight < 0 { - return fmt.Errorf("enable height cannot be negative: %d", p.EnableHeight) + errs = append(errs, fmt.Errorf("enable height cannot be negative: %d", p.EnableHeight)) } if err := validateMinGasMultiplier(p.MinGasMultiplier); err != nil { - return err + errs = append(errs, err) } if p.ElasticityMultiplier == 0 { - return fmt.Errorf("elasticity multiplier cannot be 0") + errs = append(errs, fmt.Errorf("elasticity multiplier cannot be 0")) } if err := validateMinGasPrice(p.MinGasPrice); err != nil { - return err + errs = append(errs, err) } + if len(errs) > 0 { + return fmt.Errorf("validation errors: %v", errs) + } return nil }This approach collects all validation errors before returning, providing a complete list of issues to be addressed.
chain/evm/types/access_list_tx.go (1)
184-224: Include validation for theAccesses(access list) fieldCurrently, the
Validate()method does not validate theAccessesfield. Invalid entries in the access list could lead to issues during transaction execution. Consider adding validation to ensure that each address and storage key in the access list is well-formed.You might add validation like:
if tx.Accesses != nil { for _, access := range tx.Accesses.AccessList { if err := types.ValidateAddress(access.Address); err != nil { return errorsmod.Wrap(err, "invalid address in access list") } for _, key := range access.StorageKeys { if len(key) != 32 { return errorsmod.Wrapf(ErrInvalidStorageKey, "invalid storage key length: %d", len(key)) } } } }This ensures that all entries in the access list are valid and conform to expected formats.
chain/evm/types/dynamic_fee_tx.go (1)
215-215: Improve error messages: use 'out of bounds'The error messages use "out of bound"; it's more conventional to say "out of bounds".
Apply this diff to update the error messages:
- return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "out of bound") + return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "out of bounds")Similarly, update lines 230 and 239:
- return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasFee, "out of bound") + return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasFee, "out of bounds")- return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidAmount, "out of bound") + return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidAmount, "out of bounds")Also applies to: 230-230, 239-239
chain/evm/types/utils.go (3)
26-26: Consider unexportingDefaultPriorityReductionif not used outside the package.If
DefaultPriorityReductionis intended for internal use only, consider making it unexported by renaming it todefaultPriorityReductionto limit its visibility.Apply this diff if appropriate:
-var DefaultPriorityReduction = sdk.DefaultPowerReduction +var defaultPriorityReduction = sdk.DefaultPowerReduction
209-226: Enhance error messages for better clarity inBinSearchfunction.In the
BinSearchfunction, consider providing more descriptive error messages when returning errors. This will improve debuggability and maintainability.For example, you might modify the error handling as follows:
- return 0, err + return 0, fmt.Errorf("binary search executable function failed at gas limit %d: %w", mid, err)
235-240: OptimizeHexAddressfunction using existing utilities.Consider using
common.BytesToAddress(a).Hex()instead of manually encoding the Ethereum address. This leverages well-tested library code and improves readability.Apply this diff to simplify the function:
-func HexAddress(a []byte) string { - var buf [common.AddressLength*2 + 2]byte - copy(buf[:2], "0x") - hex.Encode(buf[2:], a) - return string(buf[:]) +func HexAddress(a []byte) string { + return common.BytesToAddress(a).Hex() }proto/injective/evm/v1/query.proto (1)
88-89: Simplify repetitivegogoprotooptions in message definitions.The
option (gogoproto.equal) = false;andoption (gogoproto.goproto_getters) = false;statements are repeated in multiple message definitions. While this is syntactically correct, it may lead to clutter and reduced readability.Consider defining these options at the file level if they apply to all messages, or remove them from individual messages where they are not necessary. This can make the code cleaner and more maintainable.
For example, at the top of the file, specify:
option (gogoproto.equal_all) = false; option (gogoproto.goproto_getters_all) = false;Then, remove the individual options from each message definition.
Also applies to: 108-109, 129-130, 149-150
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (17)
chain/evm/types/access_tuple.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/chain_config.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/events.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/log.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/state.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/trace_config.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/transaction_logs.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/evm/types/tx_result.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/feemarket/types/events.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/feemarket/types/feemarket.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/feemarket/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/feemarket/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gochain/feemarket/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (51)
.gitignore(1 hunks)Makefile(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/access_list.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/access_list_tx.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/chain_config.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/codec.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/compiled_contract.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/dynamic_fee_tx.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/errors.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/eth.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/events.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/genesis.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/interfaces.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/key.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/legacy_tx.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/logs.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/msg.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/params.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/protocol.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/query.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/response.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/storage.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/tracer.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/tx.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/tx_args.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/tx_data.go(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/utils.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/codec.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/events.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/genesis.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/interfaces.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/keys.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/msg.go(1 hunks)chain/feemarket/types/params.go(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/access_tuple.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/events.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/genesis.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/log.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/params.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/query.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/state.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/trace_config.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/transaction_logs.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/evm/v1/tx_result.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/feemarket/v1/events.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/feemarket/v1/genesis.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/feemarket/v1/query.proto(1 hunks)proto/injective/feemarket/v1/tx.proto(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- chain/feemarket/types/keys.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (23)
- .gitignore
- Makefile
- chain/evm/types/access_list.go
- chain/evm/types/codec.go
- chain/evm/types/eth.go
- chain/evm/types/events.go
- chain/evm/types/genesis.go
- chain/evm/types/key.go
- chain/evm/types/logs.go
- chain/evm/types/protocol.go
- chain/evm/types/query.go
- chain/evm/types/response.go
- chain/evm/types/storage.go
- chain/evm/types/tracer.go
- chain/evm/types/tx.go
- chain/feemarket/types/codec.go
- chain/feemarket/types/events.go
- chain/feemarket/types/genesis.go
- chain/feemarket/types/interfaces.go
- chain/feemarket/types/msg.go
- proto/injective/evm/v1/events.proto
- proto/injective/evm/v1/state.proto
- proto/injective/feemarket/v1/events.proto
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
proto/injective/evm/v1/access_tuple.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "injective/evm/v1/params.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/log.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/params.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/query.proto
4-4: import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/trace_config.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/transaction_logs.proto
4-4: import "injective/evm/v1/log.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto
4-4: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/tx_result.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/query.proto
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/tx.proto
4-4: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
🔇 Additional comments (50)
proto/injective/evm/v1/access_tuple.proto (2)
1-7: LGTM! File header and imports are well-structured.
The protobuf configuration follows best practices with proper syntax, package naming, and import declarations.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
1-16: Verify integration with related EVM files.
Let's ensure this AccessTuple definition aligns with other EVM-related files and Ethereum specifications.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation details to ensure complete verification.
AccessTuple implementation is properly integrated and aligned with EIP-2930
The verification shows that:
- The AccessTuple proto definition is correctly imported and used in
tx.protofor both AccessListTx (EIP-2930) and DynamicFeeTx (EIP-1559) messages - The implementation in Go (
access_list.go) properly converts between Ethereum core types and the proto-defined AccessTuple - The structure maintains compatibility with Ethereum specifications, containing the required address and storage keys fields
- The type is used consistently across the EVM module for access list transactions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for related proto files and AccessTuple usage
echo "Checking for related proto files..."
fd -e proto | xargs rg "AccessTuple"
echo "Checking for imports of this proto..."
rg 'import.*access_tuple\.proto'
# Verify alignment with EIP-2930 access list structure
echo "Checking for EIP-2930 related files..."
rg -l "EIP-2930|AccessList|access list"
Length of output: 1130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details in Go files
echo "Checking AccessTuple implementation in Go..."
rg -A 5 "type AccessTuple" chain/evm/types/
# Check tx.proto for AccessTuple usage context
echo "Checking tx.proto content..."
cat proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto
# Check access list implementation
echo "Checking access list implementation..."
rg -A 5 "AccessList" chain/evm/types/access_list.go
Length of output: 9530
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/transaction_logs.proto (2)
11-16: LGTM! Message structure follows proto3 best practices
The TransactionLogs message is well-structured with:
- Clear field numbering
- Appropriate use of field types (string for hash, repeated for logs)
- Descriptive field comments
4-4: Verify the existence of the imported proto file
The static analysis indicates that the imported file injective/evm/v1/log.proto does not exist. This import is critical as it provides the Log message type used in TransactionLogs.
Let's verify if the file exists or needs to be copied as part of this PR:
✅ Verification successful
Import path is valid and file exists
The verification shows that injective/evm/v1/log.proto exists at the correct location in the repository, and it's part of a consistent set of EVM-related proto files. The import statement is correctly referencing this file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence of the log.proto file and related EVM proto files
# Search for log.proto file
echo "Searching for log.proto file..."
fd --type f "log.proto$"
# Check if there are any other EVM-related proto files
echo "Checking for other EVM-related proto files..."
fd --type f ".proto$" | grep -i "evm"
Length of output: 726
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "injective/evm/v1/log.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/genesis.proto (2)
10-20: LGTM! Well-structured genesis state definition
The GenesisState message is well-documented and properly structured:
- Non-nullable params with proper gogoproto annotation
- Clean deprecation handling for base_fee
- Clear documentation for all fields
17-19: Verify block_gas validation in application code
While the comment indicates block_gas should be "Zero by default" (which is already guaranteed by proto3 for uint64), ensure there's proper validation logic in the application code if there are any specific constraints on this value during genesis initialization.
proto/injective/evm/v1/tx_result.proto (2)
9-28: LGTM! Well-structured message definition
The TxResult message is well-designed with appropriate field types and clear documentation. The use of non-nullable for tx_logs and the inclusion of essential transaction result fields like gas_used and reverted is good practice.
4-4: Verify gogoproto dependency setup
The import looks correct, but please ensure that the gogoproto dependency is properly set up in the project's build system and protocol buffer generation workflow.
✅ Verification successful
gogoproto dependency is properly configured
The gogoproto import is valid and correctly used throughout the codebase:
- The dependency is properly declared in go.mod (github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.3.2)
- The import pattern is consistently used across 65+ proto files in the project
- The usage in tx_result.proto follows the same pattern as other proto files in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if gogoproto is properly set up in the project
# Check for buf.yaml configuration
if [ -f "buf.yaml" ]; then
echo "Checking buf.yaml for gogoproto dependency..."
cat buf.yaml
fi
# Check for other common proto dependency configurations
fd -t f "go.mod|go.sum" -x grep -l "gogo/protobuf"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of go.mod and buf.yaml for gogoproto dependency
# Check go.mod content
echo "=== go.mod content ==="
cat go.mod | grep -A 2 "gogo/protobuf"
# Check if buf.yaml exists and its content
if [ -f "buf.yaml" ]; then
echo -e "\n=== buf.yaml content ==="
cat buf.yaml
fi
# Check for other .proto files using gogoproto to verify consistent usage
echo -e "\n=== Other .proto files using gogoproto ==="
rg "import.*gogoproto/gogo.proto" "proto/"
Length of output: 5576
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/genesis.proto (2)
10-16: LGTM! Well-structured genesis state definition
The GenesisState message is well-defined with clear field descriptions and appropriate use of gogoproto options for non-nullable fields.
4-6: Verify the availability of imported proto files
The static analysis indicates that params.proto is missing. This dependency is critical as it's required for the Params type used in GenesisState.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "injective/evm/v1/params.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/params.proto (2)
1-8: LGTM! File setup follows protobuf best practices
The package declaration, imports, and go_package option are properly configured.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
22-24: Verify security implications of allow_unprotected_txs
The allow_unprotected_txs flag could expose the system to replay attacks if enabled. Please ensure this is thoroughly documented and that appropriate warnings are in place.
Let's check for any existing documentation or usage patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the security implications by checking for any EVM transaction handling code and configuration:
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Security implications of allow_unprotected_txs are properly documented and controlled
The codebase shows proper handling of unprotected transactions through:
- Clear documentation in proto definition stating these are "non EIP155 signed" transactions
- Integration with chain configuration that defines EIP155 block activation
- Proper validation in transaction handling code that enforces chain ID checks
- Default protection through EIP-155 replay protection unless explicitly allowed
The flag serves a legitimate purpose for backward compatibility while having appropriate security controls in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or usage of allow_unprotected_txs
rg -A 5 "allow_unprotected_txs"
# Look for any security-related comments or docs
rg -A 5 "replay attack|transaction replay|unprotected transaction"
Length of output: 2205
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for EVM transaction handling code and security checks
rg -A 10 "func.*ProcessTransaction|func.*ApplyTransaction|func.*ValidateTransaction"
# Look for EIP-155 related code and configuration
rg -A 5 "EIP155|ChainID"
# Check for any security documentation in README or docs
fd -e md | xargs rg -l "security|transaction|evm"
Length of output: 34747
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/tx.proto (3)
19-31: LGTM! Well-structured message definitions
The message definitions follow protobuf best practices with:
- Appropriate use of protobuf options
- Clear documentation
- Proper request/response structure
- Standard governance parameter update pattern
4-4: Verify the import path for cosmos msg proto
The static analysis indicates that cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto file is missing. This could cause compilation issues.
✅ Verification successful
Import path cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto is valid and widely used
The import is correct and consistently used across multiple proto files in the codebase. The search results show that this import is used in many other tx.proto files:
- proto/injective/wasmx/v1/tx.proto
- proto/injective/tokenfactory/v1beta1/tx.proto
- proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto
- proto/injective/oracle/v1beta1/tx.proto
- proto/injective/exchange/v1beta1/tx.proto
And several others following the same pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the cosmos msg proto file exists in the repository or its dependencies
# Search for the file in the repository
fd --type f "msg.proto"
# Check if there are any other cosmos proto imports in the codebase
rg --type proto "import.*cosmos/msg"
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any .proto files in the repository
fd -e proto
# Search for cosmos/msg import pattern in all files (without file type restriction)
rg "import.*cosmos/msg"
# Search for other cosmos-related proto imports to understand the import pattern
rg "import.*cosmos/" -A 1
Length of output: 13077
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
1-31: Verify completeness of the implementation
According to the AI summary, this file should include several additional message types that are currently missing:
MsgEthereumTxLegacyTxAccessListTxDynamicFeeTxMsgEthereumTxResponse
Please verify if these types should be included in this file or if they will be added in a separate PR.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto (2)
4-4: Verify gogoproto dependency is properly configured
The import statement requires the gogoproto package. Please ensure it's properly configured in your build system.
✅ Verification successful
Import of gogoproto/gogo.proto is properly configured and widely used
The import of gogoproto/gogo.proto is consistent with the codebase pattern, as evidenced by its usage across 63 other proto files in the repository, including related feemarket proto files. This is a standard dependency in the project's protobuf ecosystem.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if buf.yaml or similar proto config files exist and contain gogoproto
fd -e yaml -e yml . | xargs grep -l "gogoproto"
# Check if other proto files also use gogoproto
fd -e proto . | xargs grep -l "gogoproto/gogo.proto"
Length of output: 3114
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
24-31: Verify numeric type precision requirements
The use of cosmossdk.io/math.Int and cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec for financial calculations is appropriate. However, please verify:
- That
math.Intprovides sufficient precision forbase_fee - The implications of using
LegacyDecvs newer alternatives
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can provide a final response since we have sufficient information about the usage of these numeric types in the codebase:
Numeric type choices are appropriate for the fee market context
The usage of math.Int for base_fee and math.LegacyDec for gas price parameters is consistent with their requirements:
math.Intis used extensively throughout the codebase for block numbers, fees, and amounts where whole number precision is neededmath.LegacyDecis used consistently for gas prices, rates, and multipliers where decimal precision is required- The
LegacyDectype, while marked as legacy, is still the standard decimal type used throughout the exchange, oracle and other core modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other usages of these types in the codebase
rg "cosmossdk.io/math.Int" -A 2
rg "cosmossdk.io/math.LegacyDec" -A 2
# Look for any migration notes or discussions about LegacyDec
fd . -e md | xargs rg "LegacyDec"
Length of output: 102679
proto/injective/evm/v1/log.proto (2)
8-13: LGTM! Well-documented message purpose and field types.
The documentation clearly distinguishes between consensus and derived fields, which is crucial for developers working with the Log message.
4-4: Verify gogoproto dependency availability
Ensure that the gogoproto dependency is properly set up in the sdk-go repository.
✅ Verification successful
Gogoproto dependency is properly configured
The verification shows that gogoproto is correctly set up in the repository:
- The dependency is properly declared in go.mod:
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto v1.5.0 - The import is consistently used across multiple proto files in the codebase
- The file
proto/injective/evm/v1/log.protofollows the same import pattern as other proto files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if gogoproto is properly set up
fd -t f "gogo.proto"
Length of output: 20
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for go.mod dependencies related to gogoproto
grep -i "gogo" go.mod
# Check for proto files importing gogoproto
rg "import.*gogoproto/gogo.proto"
# Look for any references to gogoproto in build or dependency files
fd -t f "go.mod|go.sum|*.toml|*.yaml|*.yml" --exec grep -l "gogo"
Length of output: 5812
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/evm/v1/trace_config.proto (2)
9-15: LGTM! Well-structured deprecation handling
The deprecation of disable_memory and disable_return_data fields is properly handled using the reserved keyword, and the documentation clearly indicates the migration path to the new enable_* fields.
1-8: Verify gogoproto dependency availability
The import paths and package declaration look correct. However, let's ensure the gogoproto dependency is properly set up.
✅ Verification successful
Gogoproto dependency is properly configured
The import of gogoproto/gogo.proto is valid as the project correctly depends on buf.build/cosmos/gogo-proto in both buf.yaml and buf.lock files. This is a standard setup in Cosmos SDK-based projects, and the dependency is properly versioned and locked.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if gogoproto is properly configured in the project
# Expected: Find buf.yaml or similar config files that include gogoproto
# Check for buf configuration
fd -t f "buf\.(yaml|json|lock)"
# Check for other common proto config files
fd -t f "(buf\.gen|protoc)\.yaml"
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of buf.yaml and buf.lock to verify gogoproto dependency
echo "=== buf.yaml content ==="
cat proto/buf.yaml
echo -e "\n=== buf.lock content ==="
cat proto/buf.lock
# Check if gogoproto files exist in the proto directory
echo -e "\n=== Searching for gogoproto files ==="
fd "gogo\.proto" proto/
Length of output: 1394
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/injective/feemarket/v1/query.proto (1)
12-27: LGTM! Well-structured Query service definition
The Query service is well-designed with:
- Clear method documentation
- Proper HTTP GET mappings
- Logical endpoint paths
chain/evm/types/tx_data.go (4)
1-8: LGTM!
The imports are clean and appropriate for the functionality being implemented.
10-14: LGTM! Good use of compile-time interface compliance checking.
The type assertions ensure that all transaction types properly implement the TxData interface, catching any implementation issues at compile time.
18-48: LGTM! Well-designed interface covering all Ethereum transaction aspects.
The interface provides a comprehensive set of methods for handling Ethereum transactions, including:
- Basic transaction data access
- Signature management
- Fee calculation
- Validation
70-98: LGTM! Well-implemented EIP-155 chain ID derivation.
The function correctly implements the chain ID derivation according to EIP-155 with proper input validation and clear documentation.
chain/evm/types/interfaces.go (2)
67-74: LGTM! Well-documented parameter migration types
The types are well-defined and their purpose for x/params migration is clearly documented.
61-65: Verify PostTxProcessing error handling in implementations
The comment indicates that returning an error will revert the whole transaction. This is a critical behavior that needs careful implementation.
proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto (3)
76-78: LGTM! Proper handling of deprecated fields
The deprecated fields are correctly handled by:
- Using the
reservedkeyword for both field numbers and names - Including clear documentation about the deprecation
- Following proto3 best practices
Also applies to: 89-91
4-4: Verify the gogoproto import path
The static analysis reports that "gogoproto/gogo.proto" file is missing. Please ensure that:
- The gogoproto dependency is properly installed
- The import path is correct in your development environment
✅ Verification successful
The gogoproto import is correctly used across the codebase
The import of "gogoproto/gogo.proto" is consistently used across multiple proto files in the codebase, including other files in the same evm/v1 package. This indicates that the import path is correct and the dependency is properly set up in the development environment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if gogoproto is properly set up
fd -e proto | xargs grep -l "gogoproto/gogo.proto"
Length of output: 3064
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
8-10: Verify the impact of using sdkmath.Int
The switch from *big.Int to *sdkmath.Int is a significant change. Please ensure that:
- All dependent code is updated to handle sdkmath.Int
- There are no precision or compatibility issues with existing Ethereum implementations
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage and conversion between these types.
Let me check one final thing to verify the conversion between types.
Let me check the conversion helper function to complete the verification.
The switch to sdkmath.Int is properly handled
The codebase shows a well-implemented conversion between types:
- The proto definition correctly uses
cosmossdk.io/math.Intfor all block numbers - The
EthereumConfigmethod properly converts fromsdkmath.Inttobig.IntusingBigIntMut() - The
getBlockValuehelper function handles nil and negative cases appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for big.Int usage that might need updating
rg --type go "big\.Int.*ChainConfig"
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of ChainConfig in Go
ast-grep --pattern 'type ChainConfig struct {
$$$
}'
# Check for sdkmath.Int usage with ChainConfig
rg --type go "sdkmath\.Int.*ChainConfig" -A 3
# Look at the actual proto definition
cat proto/injective/evm/v1/chain_config.proto
Length of output: 12507
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the EthereumConfig method implementation to see how the conversion is handled
rg -A 10 "func.*EthereumConfig.*big\.Int.*ChainConfig"
Length of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the getBlockValue implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func getBlockValue($_) $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 439
chain/evm/types/legacy_tx.go (2)
204-217: Implementation of effective price/fee methods looks good
The effective gas price, fee, and cost methods are correctly implemented for legacy transactions, maintaining compatibility with the interface while properly documenting that they return the same values as their non-effective counterparts.
146-157: Verify the ignored chainId parameter in SetSignatureValues
The first parameter (chainId) is ignored in the implementation. If this is intentional, please document why. If not, consider if it should be used to validate the signature values.
✅ Verification successful
Intentionally ignored chainId in LegacyTx is correct
The implementation is correct as is. Looking at the codebase:
- The
TxDatainterface intx_data.godefinesSetSignatureValues(chainID, v, r, s *big.Int) - Both
DynamicFeeTxandAccessListTximplementations use thechainIDparameter - Only
LegacyTxexplicitly ignores it with_
This is intentional because:
- Legacy transactions handle chainId differently - it's encoded within the
vvalue itself as per EIP-155 - Other transaction types (Dynamic Fee and Access List) are post-EIP-155 and handle chainId separately
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other implementations of SetSignatureValues to understand the expected usage of chainId
ast-grep --pattern 'SetSignatureValues($CHAIN_ID, $_, $_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to SetSignatureValues and chainId to understand the context better
rg -A 5 "SetSignatureValues"
# Also search for any interfaces or types that might define this method
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
SetSignatureValues($$$)
$$$
}'
# Look for any tests that might show the intended usage
rg -A 5 "SetSignatureValues.*test"
Length of output: 2751
chain/evm/types/tx_args.go (3)
15-38: LGTM! Well-documented struct definition.
The TransactionArgs struct is well-designed, covering all necessary fields for both legacy and EIP-1559 transactions. The source of duplication and backward compatibility considerations are properly documented.
201-207: LGTM! Safe handling of nil From address.
The method correctly handles the nil case by returning a zero address.
209-218: LGTM! Correct implementation of backward compatibility.
The method properly implements the backward compatibility by prioritizing the Input field over Data, as documented in the struct definition.
chain/evm/types/chain_config.go (2)
1-11: LGTM!
The package structure and imports are well-organized, using appropriate dependencies.
162-164: Verify fork order implementation
Let's verify that the fork order check is working as expected.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the information gathered, I can now provide a final response:
Fork order check is properly implemented through go-ethereum dependency
The code correctly implements fork order validation by:
- Converting the chain configuration to Ethereum's native format via
EthereumConfig() - Utilizing go-ethereum's built-in
CheckConfigForkOrder()from theparamspackage - Properly mapping all fork blocks (HomesteadBlock, DAOForkBlock, EIP150Block, etc.) in the conversion
The implementation is safe as it relies on the well-tested upstream go-ethereum validation logic rather than reimplementing it.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for CheckConfigForkOrder implementation and tests
# to ensure proper fork order validation
# Look for CheckConfigForkOrder implementation
echo "Searching for CheckConfigForkOrder implementation..."
rg -A 10 "CheckConfigForkOrder"
# Look for related tests
echo "Searching for related tests..."
fd -e go -e _test.go | xargs rg "TestChainConfig|TestValidate"
Length of output: 942
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the EthereumConfig method implementation and related fork order checks
# Search for EthereumConfig implementation
echo "Searching for EthereumConfig implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func (cc $_) EthereumConfig($_) $_'
# Search for fork-related configurations and validations
echo "Searching for fork-related configurations..."
rg -A 5 "Fork.*Block" chain/evm/types/
# Search for test files specifically in chain/evm/types directory
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -e _test.go . chain/evm/types/
Length of output: 7396
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the params package for CheckConfigForkOrder implementation
# since EthereumConfig returns *params.ChainConfig
# Search for CheckConfigForkOrder in go.mod to find the ethereum package
echo "Searching for ethereum package in go.mod..."
rg "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum" go.mod
# Search for CheckConfigForkOrder in vendor directory
echo "Searching for CheckConfigForkOrder implementation in vendor..."
rg -A 10 "func.*CheckConfigForkOrder" vendor/
# Search for chain config tests
echo "Searching for chain config tests..."
rg -A 10 "func Test.*ChainConfig" chain/evm/types/
Length of output: 546
proto/injective/evm/v1/tx.proto (3)
15-25: LGTM! Well-structured service definition
The service definition follows best practices with:
- Clear documentation for each RPC method
- Proper HTTP endpoint configuration for EthereumTx
- Governance-controlled parameter updates
28-189: LGTM! Well-structured message definitions
The message definitions follow Protocol Buffer best practices:
- Proper use of custom types for blockchain values
- Clear interface implementations
- Consistent field types across messages
- Well-documented fields and deprecations
- Proper governance controls for parameter updates
4-4: Verify the import path for cosmos message types
The import path "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto" appears to be invalid. This could indicate a missing dependency or incorrect import path.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if this import is actually valid and being used correctly in other files.
Let me check the buf.yaml configuration to understand the proto dependencies setup.
Import path "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto" is valid and correctly configured
The import is valid because:
- The project correctly depends on cosmos-sdk proto files through buf dependency
buf.build/cosmos/cosmos-sdk:v0.50.5 - Multiple files in the codebase successfully use this import
- The import is consistently used across various transaction proto files for the cosmos message service option
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the cosmos proto files are available in the repository
# and verify the correct import path
# Search for cosmos proto files
fd -e proto -x dirname {} \; | sort -u | grep -i cosmos
# Check if there are any references to the correct import path
rg -l "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto" -g "*.proto"
Length of output: 587
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of some of the files that use this import to see if it's working correctly
# and how it's being used
# Look at a few of the files that use this import
echo "=== Content of feemarket tx.proto ==="
cat proto/injective/feemarket/v1/tx.proto | head -n 20
echo -e "\n=== Content of tokenfactory tx.proto ==="
cat proto/injective/tokenfactory/v1beta1/tx.proto | head -n 20
# Also check if there are any buf.yaml or similar proto config files
echo -e "\n=== Proto build configuration files ==="
fd buf.yaml
fd -e yaml | grep -i proto
Length of output: 2009
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the buf.yaml configuration and other related files
echo "=== Content of buf.yaml ==="
cat proto/buf.yaml
echo -e "\n=== Checking for cosmos proto dependencies ==="
# Look for any cosmos-sdk or cosmos proto references in the workspace
rg -l "cosmos-sdk|cosmos/msg" proto/
Length of output: 1716
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
chain/evm/types/errors.go (3)
1-14: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The package structure and imports are clean and well-organized, with clear separation between standard library and external dependencies.
110-120: LGTM! Well-defined interface
The VmError interface is well-documented and provides a comprehensive set of methods for error handling.
222-252: Add input validation for NewVmErrorWithRet
Consider adding validation for the input parameters:
- Check if hash is a valid hex string
- Validate that gasUsed is not zero when vmErr indicates execution
Additionally, verify that all callers handle the returned error appropriately.
chain/evm/types/msg.go (3)
29-42: LGTM: Interface implementations and type constants are well-defined.
The compile-time interface checks ensure type safety and the constant follows naming conventions.
251-272: LGTM: Fee calculation implements EIP-1559 correctly.
The implementation properly handles both legacy and dynamic fee calculations, with correct usage of big integer operations and bounds checking.
383-395: LGTM: Parameter update validation is well-implemented.
The validation properly checks the authority address and parameters, with appropriate error wrapping.
chain/feemarket/types/params.go (1)
77-84: Verify default values from the params package in DefaultParams.
The DefaultParams function uses default values params.DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator and params.DefaultElasticityMultiplier from the imported params package. Ensure these defaults align with the intended values for the fee market parameters.
Run the following script to check the default values:
Expected Result: Confirm that the values match the desired defaults for BaseFeeChangeDenominator and ElasticityMultiplier.
✅ Verification successful
From the code, I can see that these parameters are imported from the Ethereum go-ethereum params package ("github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/params"). Since these are well-established parameters from the Ethereum codebase, I can now generate the final response:
Default values from go-ethereum params package are appropriate
The DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator and DefaultElasticityMultiplier values are imported from the official go-ethereum params package, which provides the canonical EIP-1559 fee market parameters. This is the correct and intended source for these values, ensuring compatibility with Ethereum's fee market mechanism.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the default values of BaseFeeChangeDenominator and ElasticityMultiplier from the params package.
# Retrieve the default values from the params package.
ast-grep --pattern $'
package params {
$$$
const (
DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator = $_
DefaultElasticityMultiplier = $_
$$$
)
}'
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find these parameters
# First, let's find all files that might contain these parameters
fd -t f "params.go" | xargs rg -l "DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator|DefaultElasticityMultiplier"
# Then let's look at the content of these files
fd -t f "params.go" | xargs rg "DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator|DefaultElasticityMultiplier" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 740
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find where these parameters are defined in the imported params package
rg -l "package params" | xargs rg "DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator.*=|DefaultElasticityMultiplier.*=" -B1 -A1
# Also check for any imports in the feemarket params.go to find the correct params package
rg -A5 "^import.*\(" chain/feemarket/types/params.go
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the file to see where these params are imported from
rg -B2 -A2 'import.*"params"' chain/feemarket/types/params.go
# Let's also check if these constants are defined in the same file
rg "const.*\(" -A10 chain/feemarket/types/params.go
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at all imports and the entire content of the params.go file
cat chain/feemarket/types/params.go
# Also check for any other files that might contain these default values
rg "DefaultBaseFeeChangeDenominator.*=|DefaultElasticityMultiplier.*=" --type go
Length of output: 5991
chain/evm/types/utils.go (1)
243-252: Verify the use of IsLondon function and its impact on base fee calculation.
Ensure that the IsLondon function correctly determines the activation of the London hard fork, as it affects the base fee retrieval in GetBaseFee.
Run the following script to check where IsLondon is defined and confirm its implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Base fee calculation and London hardfork checks are correctly implemented
The implementation is verified to be correct:
- The
IsLondonfunction correctly checks the London hardfork activation using the chain configuration - Base fee calculation in
GetBaseFeefollows the proper flow:- Checks London hardfork activation first
- Gets base fee from feemarket params
- Returns appropriate values based on the hardfork state and params
The code properly handles the EIP-1559 fee market mechanism introduced in the London hardfork.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the definition and usage of the IsLondon function.
# Search for the IsLondon function definition.
rg -A 5 -B 2 'func IsLondon\('
# Find all usages of IsLondon.
rg 'IsLondon\('
Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of IsLondon in the Ethereum params package
# and its usage context in the codebase
# Find the ChainConfig.IsLondon implementation
rg -A 5 "func.*IsLondon" chain/evm/params/
# Check the context of GetBaseFee usage
rg -A 5 -B 5 "GetBaseFee"
# Look for any tests related to London hardfork and base fee
rg -l "london.*test|test.*london" -i
Length of output: 3347
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the go.mod to find the ethereum dependency and then look for the IsLondon implementation
# Check go.mod for ethereum dependency
cat go.mod
# Look for the params package and chain config
fd params.go
# Check for any test files related to base fee and London hardfork
fd -e go -x grep -l "London\|BaseFee" {}
Length of output: 12770
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the chain config and London hardfork implementation
# Check the chain config implementation
rg -A 10 "type ChainConfig struct" chain/evm/types/
# Look for London hardfork related code in chain config
rg -A 5 "London" chain/evm/types/chain_config.go
# Check the base fee implementation in feemarket
cat chain/feemarket/types/params.go
Length of output: 8358
proto/injective/evm/v1/query.proto (1)
337-337: Verify the custom type for base_fee.
The base_fee field is defined as a string with a custom type of cosmossdk.io/math.Int. This may cause serialization issues or type mismatches.
Please ensure that the base_fee field is correctly typed. If cosmossdk.io/math.Int is intended to represent an integer value, consider changing the field type from string to cosmos.base.v1beta1.Int or the appropriate numeric type.
Alternatively, if using a custom type is necessary, confirm that the serialization and code generation tools handle gogoproto.customtype correctly.
| syntax = "proto3"; | ||
| package injective.feemarket.v1; | ||
|
|
||
| import "injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix missing import dependency
The static analysis indicates that "injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto" file is missing. This will prevent proper compilation of the proto files.
Please ensure that:
- The file exists in the correct location
- The import path is correct relative to the proto root
- The file is properly copied during the build process
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "injective/feemarket/v1/feemarket.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
| // GenesisAccount defines an account to be initialized in the genesis state. | ||
| // Its main difference between with Geth's GenesisAccount is that it uses a | ||
| // custom storage type and that it doesn't contain the private key field. | ||
| message GenesisAccount { | ||
| // address defines an ethereum hex formated address of an account | ||
| string address = 1; | ||
| // code defines the hex bytes of the account code. | ||
| string code = 2; | ||
| // storage defines the set of state key values for the account. | ||
| repeated State storage = 3 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false, (gogoproto.castrepeated) = "Storage"]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Address and storage validation already implemented, code validation could be enhanced
Based on the codebase analysis:
-
Address validation is properly implemented:
GenesisAccount.Validate()useschaintypes.ValidateAddress- The validation ensures proper Ethereum hex address format using
common.IsHexAddress - Duplicate addresses are checked in genesis state validation
-
Storage validation is implemented:
GenesisAccount.Validate()callsStorage.Validate()- Genesis state includes checks for duplicate accounts
However, there's no explicit validation for the code field's hex format and size. Consider adding validation to ensure the contract bytecode is properly formatted.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding field validation and enhancing documentation
The GenesisAccount message is well-structured, but consider the following suggestions:
- Add field validation:
- Ensure the
addressfield follows the correct Ethereum hex format (0x prefix, 20 bytes) - Validate the
codefield for proper hex formatting and reasonable size limits
- Ensure the
- Enhance documentation:
- Add examples of valid address and code formats
- Document any size limitations for the storage field
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any validation implementations in the codebase
rg -A 5 "func.*Validate.*Genesis"
Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any validation related to genesis accounts or EVM genesis
rg -A 5 "ValidateGenesis|ValidateEVMGenesis|ValidateGenesisAccount"
# Also search for any validation in Go files near the proto definition
fd "genesis\.go" --exec rg -A 5 "Validate"
# Check if there are any existing validators for hex addresses
rg -A 5 "validate.*[Hh]ex.*[Aa]ddress"
# Look for any existing size/format constraints on code or storage
rg -A 5 "validate.*code|validate.*storage"
Length of output: 2970
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of chaintypes.ValidateAddress which is used in GenesisAccount validation
rg -A 10 "func.*ValidateAddress"
# Also check for Storage validation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func (Storage) Validate() error {
$$$
}'
# Look for any existing hex validation utilities
rg -A 5 "IsHexAddress|ValidateHexString"
Length of output: 1755
| // Msg defines the erc20 Msg service. | ||
| service Msg { | ||
| option (cosmos.msg.v1.service) = true; | ||
| // UpdateParams defined a governance operation for updating the x/feemarket module parameters. | ||
| // The authority is hard-coded to the Cosmos SDK x/gov module account | ||
| rpc UpdateParams(MsgUpdateParams) returns (MsgUpdateParamsResponse); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update service documentation and verify completeness
- The service comment incorrectly states "erc20 Msg service" but this is in the feemarket module.
- According to the AI summary, this service should also include an
EthereumTxRPC method, but it's not present in the code.
Please update the documentation and verify if the EthereumTx RPC method should be added:
-// Msg defines the erc20 Msg service.
+// Msg defines the feemarket Msg service.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Msg defines the erc20 Msg service. | |
| service Msg { | |
| option (cosmos.msg.v1.service) = true; | |
| // UpdateParams defined a governance operation for updating the x/feemarket module parameters. | |
| // The authority is hard-coded to the Cosmos SDK x/gov module account | |
| rpc UpdateParams(MsgUpdateParams) returns (MsgUpdateParamsResponse); | |
| } | |
| // Msg defines the feemarket Msg service. | |
| service Msg { | |
| option (cosmos.msg.v1.service) = true; | |
| // UpdateParams defined a governance operation for updating the x/feemarket module parameters. | |
| // The authority is hard-coded to the Cosmos SDK x/gov module account | |
| rpc UpdateParams(MsgUpdateParams) returns (MsgUpdateParamsResponse); | |
| } |
|
|
||
| import "gogoproto/gogo.proto"; | ||
|
|
||
| option go_package = "github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-core/injective-chain/modules/evm/types"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update go_package path to match sdk-go repository
The go_package option currently points to the injective-core repository, but this file is being copied to sdk-go. The path should be updated to reflect the new location.
-option go_package = "github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-core/injective-chain/modules/evm/types";
+option go_package = "github.com/InjectiveLabs/sdk-go/chain/evm/types";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| option go_package = "github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-core/injective-chain/modules/evm/types"; | |
| option go_package = "github.com/InjectiveLabs/sdk-go/chain/evm/types"; |
| func fee(gasPrice *big.Int, gas uint64) *big.Int { | ||
| gasLimit := new(big.Int).SetUint64(gas) | ||
| return new(big.Int).Mul(gasPrice, gasLimit) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func cost(fee, value *big.Int) *big.Int { | ||
| if value != nil { | ||
| return new(big.Int).Add(fee, value) | ||
| } | ||
| return fee | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for fee and cost calculations
While the implementations are correct, they should validate input parameters to prevent panics.
Add input validation:
func fee(gasPrice *big.Int, gas uint64) *big.Int {
+ if gasPrice == nil {
+ return new(big.Int)
+ }
gasLimit := new(big.Int).SetUint64(gas)
return new(big.Int).Mul(gasPrice, gasLimit)
}
func cost(fee, value *big.Int) *big.Int {
+ if fee == nil {
+ fee = new(big.Int)
+ }
if value != nil {
return new(big.Int).Add(fee, value)
}
return fee
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func fee(gasPrice *big.Int, gas uint64) *big.Int { | |
| gasLimit := new(big.Int).SetUint64(gas) | |
| return new(big.Int).Mul(gasPrice, gasLimit) | |
| } | |
| func cost(fee, value *big.Int) *big.Int { | |
| if value != nil { | |
| return new(big.Int).Add(fee, value) | |
| } | |
| return fee | |
| } | |
| func fee(gasPrice *big.Int, gas uint64) *big.Int { | |
| if gasPrice == nil { | |
| return new(big.Int) | |
| } | |
| gasLimit := new(big.Int).SetUint64(gas) | |
| return new(big.Int).Mul(gasPrice, gasLimit) | |
| } | |
| func cost(fee, value *big.Int) *big.Int { | |
| if fee == nil { | |
| fee = new(big.Int) | |
| } | |
| if value != nil { | |
| return new(big.Int).Add(fee, value) | |
| } | |
| return fee | |
| } |
| // Validate performs a stateless validation of the tx fields. | ||
| func (tx DynamicFeeTx) Validate() error { | ||
| if tx.GasTipCap == nil { | ||
| return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "gas tip cap cannot nil") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typographical error in error message
The error message should read "gas tip cap cannot be nil" instead of "gas tip cap cannot nil".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "gas tip cap cannot nil")
+ return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "gas tip cap cannot be nil")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "gas tip cap cannot nil") | |
| return errorsmod.Wrap(ErrInvalidGasCap, "gas tip cap cannot be nil") |
| func (tx *DynamicFeeTx) EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int) *big.Int { | ||
| return EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee, tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt(), tx.GasTipCap.BigInt()) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential nil pointer dereference in EffectiveGasPrice
Accessing tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt() and tx.GasTipCap.BigInt() without checking if they are nil could lead to a nil pointer dereference.
Consider adding nil checks before calling .BigInt():
func (tx *DynamicFeeTx) EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int) *big.Int {
- return EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee, tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt(), tx.GasTipCap.BigInt())
+ var gasFeeCapBigInt, gasTipCapBigInt *big.Int
+ if tx.GasFeeCap != nil {
+ gasFeeCapBigInt = tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt()
+ }
+ if tx.GasTipCap != nil {
+ gasTipCapBigInt = tx.GasTipCap.BigInt()
+ }
+ return EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee, gasFeeCapBigInt, gasTipCapBigInt)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func (tx *DynamicFeeTx) EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int) *big.Int { | |
| return EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee, tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt(), tx.GasTipCap.BigInt()) | |
| } | |
| func (tx *DynamicFeeTx) EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee *big.Int) *big.Int { | |
| var gasFeeCapBigInt, gasTipCapBigInt *big.Int | |
| if tx.GasFeeCap != nil { | |
| gasFeeCapBigInt = tx.GasFeeCap.BigInt() | |
| } | |
| if tx.GasTipCap != nil { | |
| gasTipCapBigInt = tx.GasTipCap.BigInt() | |
| } | |
| return EffectiveGasPrice(baseFee, gasFeeCapBigInt, gasTipCapBigInt) | |
| } |
| for _, msg := range (*tx).GetMsgs() { | ||
| ethMsg, ok := msg.(*MsgEthereumTx) | ||
| if !ok { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx type: %T", tx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the error message to reference 'msg' instead of 'tx'.
In the UnwrapEthereumMsg function, the error message incorrectly references tx when it should reference msg. This could lead to confusion during debugging.
Apply this diff to fix the error message:
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx type: %T", tx)
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid msg type: %T", msg)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid tx type: %T", tx) | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid msg type: %T", msg) |
| syntax = "proto3"; | ||
| package injective.evm.v1; | ||
|
|
||
| import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the missing import statement for pagination.
The import at line 4 references a file that does not exist: "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto". This will cause a compilation error.
Please ensure that the pagination.proto file exists at the specified path or update the import path to the correct location. If pagination features are not used in this file, consider removing this import and any related pagination code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 buf (1.47.2)
4-4: import "cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
| // Storage queries the balance of all coins for a single account. | ||
| rpc Storage(QueryStorageRequest) returns (QueryStorageResponse) { | ||
| option (google.api.http).get = "/injective/evm/v1/storage/{address}/{key}"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the inaccurate comments for the Storage and Code RPC methods.
The comments for the Storage and Code RPC methods incorrectly state that they "query the balance of all coins for a single account." This is misleading and does not reflect the actual functionality of these methods.
Please update the comments to accurately describe each method:
-
For the
Storagemethod (lines 39-41), update the comment to:// Storage queries the storage value of a key for a specific Ethereum account. -
For the
Codemethod (lines 44-46), update the comment to:// Code retrieves the code bytecode for a specific Ethereum account.
Also applies to: 44-46
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
chain/types/validation.go (3)
11-14: Add input validation to prevent panicsWhile the implementation is correct, it could panic if the input string is not a valid hex string. Consider adding validation before conversion.
func IsEmptyHash(hash string) bool { + if !common.IsHexAddress(hash) { + return false + } return bytes.Equal(common.HexToHash(hash).Bytes(), common.Hash{}.Bytes()) }
16-19: Add input validation to prevent panicsSimilar to IsEmptyHash, this function should validate the input before conversion to prevent potential panics.
func IsZeroAddress(address string) bool { + if !common.IsHexAddress(address) { + return false + } return bytes.Equal(common.HexToAddress(address).Bytes(), common.Address{}.Bytes()) }
21-30: Complete the function documentationThe function comment is incomplete and should describe the full validation behavior.
-// ValidateAddress returns an error if the provided string is either not a hex formatted string address +// ValidateAddress returns an error if the provided string is not a valid hex formatted Ethereum address
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
chain/evm/types/ERC20Contract.json(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/SimpleStorageContract.json(1 hunks)chain/evm/types/TestMessageCall.json(1 hunks)chain/types/int.go(2 hunks)chain/types/validation.go(1 hunks)go.mod(8 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- chain/evm/types/SimpleStorageContract.json
- chain/evm/types/TestMessageCall.json
🔇 Additional comments (13)
chain/types/validation.go (3)
1-9: LGTM! Clean package structure and imports
The package structure is well-organized with clear import aliases and necessary dependencies.
32-42: LGTM! Well-structured validation function
The function is well-implemented with:
- Proper composition using existing validation functions
- Clear error messages
- Efficient validation order (checks zero address before format)
1-42: Verify consistent usage of address validation
These validation functions are critical for security. Let's verify they're used consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Address validation functions are used consistently across critical paths
Based on the search results, the validation functions are properly utilized in key areas:
- All EVM transaction types (Legacy, AccessList, DynamicFee) validate destination addresses using
ValidateAddress - Log entries validate addresses and check for empty hashes
- Genesis account addresses are validated
- Direct
HexToAddressusage appears in safe contexts (after validation or in internal type conversions)
Key validation points:
chain/evm/types/: Consistent validation across all transaction typeschain/peggy/types/: Uses equivalent validation viagethcommon.IsHexAddresschain/oracle/types/: Properly validates publisher addresses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct Ethereum address handling that might bypass these validation functions
rg -g '!{vendor,node_modules}/**' 'common\.HexToAddress|common\.IsHexAddress' --type go
# Search for potential usage points of these validation functions
rg -g '!{vendor,node_modules}/**' 'ValidateAddress|ValidateNonZeroAddress|IsEmptyHash|IsZeroAddress' --type go
Length of output: 4046
go.mod (4)
38-41: Verify security package updates
Critical security-related packages have been updated:
- golang.org/x/crypto v0.25.0
- google.golang.org/protobuf v1.34.2
- google.golang.org/grpc v1.64.1
These updates include important security fixes and should be maintained.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the security advisories for the other packages as well to provide a complete verification.
Security package updates verified - Important fixes included
The updated versions are safe and include critical security fixes:
golang.org/x/crypto v0.25.0(from v0.24.0): Above all known vulnerability rangesgoogle.golang.org/protobuf v1.34.2(from v1.33.0): Addresses the infinite loop vulnerability in protojson.Unmarshalgoogle.golang.org/grpc v1.64.1(from v1.63.2): Fixes the private token logging issue in v1.64.0
These updates are necessary as they patch several security vulnerabilities:
- HIGH severity: Protobuf DoS vulnerability
- MODERATE severity: Protojson unmarshaling infinite loop
- LOW severity: gRPC private token logging issue
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any security advisories for the updated packages
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "golang.org/x/crypto") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}
'
Length of output: 1124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check security advisories for protobuf and grpc
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "google.golang.org/protobuf") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}
'
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "google.golang.org/grpc") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}
'
# Let's also check the previous versions in go.mod
git show HEAD^:go.mod | grep -E "crypto|protobuf|grpc"
Length of output: 2092
27-27: Verify Ethereum dependency compatibility
The ethereum/go-ethereum dependency has been updated to v1.14.12 and is being replaced with a custom fork. This is a significant version jump that might introduce breaking changes.
Consider:
- Documenting the reason for using a custom fork
- Adding integration tests for Ethereum-specific functionality
- Monitoring for any performance impacts from this update
Also applies to: 258-258
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Ethereum dependency usage and changes.
Let me check one more aspect to understand if there are any breaking changes in the Ethereum types being used.
Custom fork is properly configured with minimal impact
The update to ethereum/go-ethereum v1.14.12 is properly managed through a custom fork (InjectiveLabs/go-ethereum) as shown in the replace directive. The codebase primarily uses stable Ethereum types and utilities (common, crypto, core) with no direct dependency on eth.Block, eth.Transaction, or eth.Header that could introduce breaking changes. The usage is concentrated in type definitions and utility functions rather than core blockchain operations.
Key observations:
- Custom fork is pinned to specific version:
github.com/InjectiveLabs/go-ethereum v1.9.22-0.20240923100242-5e28e23d353e - Usage is limited to stable packages like common, crypto, and core types
- No direct geth API dependencies found that could be affected by breaking changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Ethereum-specific type usage that might be affected
rg -l "eth\." | xargs rg "eth\.(Block|Transaction|Header)"
# Check for any direct geth API usage
ast-grep --pattern 'eth.$_'
Length of output: 1408
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the go.mod history for ethereum dependency
git log -p -- go.mod | grep -A 5 -B 5 "ethereum/go-ethereum"
# Find all imports of ethereum packages
rg -l "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
# Check for replace directives in go.mod
grep -A 5 "replace" go.mod
# Look for any ethereum types or methods usage
rg "eth\." -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5995
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific ethereum package imports to understand usage
rg "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/(\w+)" --only-matching | sort | uniq
# Look for any ethereum-specific configuration or parameters
rg -l "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum" | xargs rg "eth\.Config|eth\.Params|eth\.ChainConfig"
# Check for any replace directives specifically for ethereum
cat go.mod | grep -A 1 "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
Length of output: 8047
3-5:
Verify toolchain compatibility
The toolchain version (go1.23.3) is higher than the Go version (1.22.2) specified. This might cause compatibility issues or unexpected behavior.
Consider aligning the toolchain version with the Go version or documenting the reason for this specific combination.
243-256: Verify replace directive consistency
The replace directives are pointing to custom forks with specific versions. This is a critical part of the dependency management that needs careful verification.
Consider:
- Documenting the rationale for each custom fork
- Setting up automated dependency update checks
- Maintaining a compatibility matrix
✅ Verification successful
Replace directives are properly used and consistent with imports
The verification shows that:
- All replaced modules are actively used in imports across the codebase
- The replace directives point to custom forks with specific versions that align with the project's requirements
- Each replaced module serves a clear purpose:
- Core SDK components (cosmos-sdk, store, evidence, feegrant, etc.)
- Smart contract support (wasmd)
- Consensus and networking (cometbft)
- IBC functionality (ibc-go, ibc-hooks)
- External integrations (bandchain-packet)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all replaced modules are actually used
for module in $(awk '/^replace/ {print $2}' go.mod); do
if [[ $module != "=>" ]]; then
rg -l "$module"
fi
done
# Verify that replaced versions are consistent with main dependencies
for module in $(awk '/^replace/ {print $2}' go.mod); do
if [[ $module != "=>" ]]; then
echo "Checking $module..."
rg "require.*$module" go.mod
fi
done
Length of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all replaced modules are actually used
while IFS= read -r line; do
if [[ $line =~ ^[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)[[:space:]]=\> ]]; then
module="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
echo "Checking usage of $module"
rg -l "$module" || true
fi
done < go.mod
# Check require statements for these modules
echo -e "\nChecking require statements:"
while IFS= read -r line; do
if [[ $line =~ ^[[:space:]]*([^[:space:]]+)[[:space:]]=\> ]]; then
module="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
echo -e "\nRequire entries for $module:"
rg "require.*$module" go.mod || true
fi
done < go.mod
# Get the main module name
echo -e "\nMain module name:"
rg "^module" go.mod
Length of output: 66009
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if replaced modules are actually used in imports
echo "Checking imports for replaced modules:"
for module in \
"cosmossdk.io/store" \
"cosmossdk.io/x/evidence" \
"cosmossdk.io/x/feegrant" \
"cosmossdk.io/x/tx" \
"cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade" \
"github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd" \
"github.com/bandprotocol/bandchain-packet" \
"github.com/cometbft/cometbft" \
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk" \
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-apps/modules/ibc-hooks/v8" \
"github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v8"; do
echo -e "\nChecking imports of $module"
rg "\"$module" --type go || true
done
# Check version consistency between require and replace
echo -e "\nChecking version consistency:"
grep -A1 "^require" go.mod
echo -e "\nReplace directives:"
grep "=>" go.mod
Length of output: 72246
chain/evm/types/ERC20Contract.json (1)
1-4: Verify contract source and compilation
The contract appears to be compiled with Solidity 0.5.17. For security and maintainability:
Recommendations:
- Include the original Solidity source code in the repository for transparency
- Consider upgrading to a more recent Solidity version (0.8.x) for better security features
- If this is from OpenZeppelin, specify the exact version in documentation
✅ Verification successful
Contract is used for testing purposes - no security concerns
Based on the code analysis, this ERC20 contract is embedded as a test contract in the codebase. The compiled_contract.go file clearly shows it's used alongside other test contracts (SimpleStorage, TestMessageCall) and is loaded during initialization for testing purposes. The contract's source code absence is not a security concern in this context since it's not meant for production deployment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the contract source is available and matches the bytecode
# Look for potential Solidity source files
echo "Searching for potential source files..."
fd -e sol -e solidity . -x echo "Found potential source: {}"
# Check if this contract is imported from a known package
echo "Checking package.json for relevant dependencies..."
fd package.json -x jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[]' {} | grep -i "openzeppelin\|erc20"
Length of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the context of this contract
# Search for any references to this contract file
echo "Searching for references to ERC20Contract.json..."
rg -l "ERC20Contract.json"
# Look for related test files
echo "Searching for related test files..."
fd -t f -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.ts . -x echo "Found test: {}"
# Search for any build or contract artifacts directory
echo "Searching for contract build directories..."
fd -t d "build|artifacts|contracts" -x echo "Found contracts directory: {}"
# Look for hardhat or truffle config
echo "Searching for contract framework configs..."
fd "hardhat.config|truffle-config" -x echo "Found config: {}"
Length of output: 1112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Go file that references this contract to understand its usage
echo "Checking compiled_contract.go content..."
cat chain/evm/types/compiled_contract.go
# Also search for any ERC20-related code or tests
echo -e "\nSearching for ERC20 related files..."
rg -l "ERC20" --type go --type rust
# Look for any contract deployment or testing code
echo -e "\nSearching for contract deployment patterns..."
rg -l "DeployContract|ContractDeployment" --type go
Length of output: 3269
chain/types/int.go (5)
45-51: LGTM!
The SafeInt64 function correctly handles potential overflows when converting uint64 to int64.
62-67: LGTM!
The SafeNewIntFromBigInt function properly constructs sdkmath.Int from *big.Int with appropriate overflow checks.
70-75: LGTM!
The SaturatedNewInt function correctly handles overflows by saturating values exceeding 256 bits to MaxInt256.
78-80: LGTM!
The IsValidInt256 function effectively checks whether a *big.Int is within the 256-bit limit.
84-93: LGTM!
The bigIntOverflows function efficiently determines if a *big.Int exceeds the 256-bit limit by optimizing the check using word length before bit length.
| { | ||
| "abi": "[{\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"initialAccount\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"initialBalance\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"constructor\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"owner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Approval\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"sender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"i\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"TestLog\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Transfer\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_owner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"allowance\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"approve\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_owner\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"balanceOf\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"n\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"benchmarkLogs\",\"outputs\":[],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_subtractedValue\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"decreaseApproval\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_addedValue\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"increaseApproval\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"account\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"amount\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"mint\",\"outputs\":[],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"totalSupply\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transfer\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transferFrom\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"}]", | ||
| "bin": "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" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement additional security measures
The contract implementation could benefit from modern security practices.
Consider implementing these security enhancements:
- Add pausable functionality for emergency situations
- Implement permit functionality (EIP-2612) for gasless approvals
- Add explicit overflow checks (although implicit in Solidity >=0.8.0)
- Add events for mint operations
Example permit extension:
{
"inputs": [
{"internalType": "address", "name": "owner", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "address", "name": "spender", "type": "address"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "value", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint256", "name": "deadline", "type": "uint256"},
{"internalType": "uint8", "name": "v", "type": "uint8"},
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "r", "type": "bytes32"},
{"internalType": "bytes32", "name": "s", "type": "bytes32"}
],
"name": "permit",
"outputs": [],
"stateMutability": "nonpayable",
"type": "function"
}| { | ||
| "abi": "[{\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"initialAccount\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"initialBalance\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"constructor\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"owner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Approval\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"sender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"i\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"TestLog\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Transfer\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_owner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"allowance\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"approve\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_owner\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"balanceOf\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"n\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"benchmarkLogs\",\"outputs\":[],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_subtractedValue\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"decreaseApproval\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_addedValue\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"increaseApproval\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"account\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"amount\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"mint\",\"outputs\":[],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"totalSupply\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transfer\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"address\",\"name\":\"_to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"internalType\":\"uint256\",\"name\":\"_value\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transferFrom\",\"outputs\":[{\"internalType\":\"bool\",\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"}]", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review non-standard ERC20 methods for security implications
The contract includes non-standard methods that require careful consideration:
benchmarkLogs: This method emits test events which could pollute the event log.mint: Allows creation of new tokens without access control.
Consider implementing the following security measures:
- Add access control (e.g., Ownable) to the
mintfunction - Remove or restrict
benchmarkLogsto testing environments only - Add a cap to total supply to prevent infinite minting
- "mint": Allows creation of new tokens without access control.
+ "mint": {
+ "inputs": [
+ {"internalType": "address","name": "account","type": "address"},
+ {"internalType": "uint256","name": "amount","type": "uint256"}
+ ],
+ "name": "mint",
+ "outputs": [],
+ "payable": false,
+ "stateMutability": "nonpayable",
+ "type": "function",
+ "modifiers": [{"name": "onlyOwner"}]
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| func SafeInt(value uint) (int, error) { | ||
| if value > uint(math.MaxInt64) { | ||
| return 0, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidHeight, "uint value %v cannot exceed %v", value, int(math.MaxInt64)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return int(value), nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential overflow in SafeInt function on 32-bit systems
The SafeInt function casts a uint to an int, assuming int is at least 64 bits. On 32-bit systems, int is 32 bits, which can lead to overflow when value exceeds math.MaxInt32. The current check against math.MaxInt64 is insufficient for 32-bit systems.
Apply the following fix to ensure compatibility across different architectures:
-func SafeInt(value uint) (int, error) {
- if value > uint(math.MaxInt64) {
- return 0, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidHeight, "uint value %v cannot exceed %v", value, int(math.MaxInt64))
+func SafeInt(value uint) (int, error) {
+ var maxInt uint
+ if ^uint(0) == uint(^uint32(0)) { // Detect 32-bit systems
+ maxInt = uint(math.MaxInt32)
+ } else {
+ maxInt = uint(math.MaxInt64)
+ }
+ if value > maxInt {
+ return 0, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidHeight, "uint value %v cannot exceed %v", value, int(maxInt))
}
return int(value), nil
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func SafeInt(value uint) (int, error) { | |
| if value > uint(math.MaxInt64) { | |
| return 0, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidHeight, "uint value %v cannot exceed %v", value, int(math.MaxInt64)) | |
| } | |
| return int(value), nil | |
| } | |
| func SafeInt(value uint) (int, error) { | |
| var maxInt uint | |
| if ^uint(0) == uint(^uint32(0)) { // Detect 32-bit systems | |
| maxInt = uint(math.MaxInt32) | |
| } else { | |
| maxInt = uint(math.MaxInt64) | |
| } | |
| if value > maxInt { | |
| return 0, errorsmod.Wrapf(errortypes.ErrInvalidHeight, "uint value %v cannot exceed %v", value, int(maxInt)) | |
| } | |
| return int(value), nil | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A change like this (adding support for new proto definitions that are not yet deployed to mainnet or testnet) should never be done pointing to master branch.
Also @maxim-inj please let the SDK maintainers work on adding support to new modules, to ensure we follow the SDK standards (and we update the documentation and examples accordingly)
Copied types of EVM and FeeMarket modules required for https://github.com/InjectiveLabs/injective-core/pull/2014 in injective-core.
Interchaintest from injective-core uses
sdk-goas entrypoint for all type / codec dependencies.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude certain files from version control.go.mod.