fix: fix slice init length

[wangjingcun]

The intention here should be to initialize a slice with a capacity of 2 rather than initializing the length of this slice.

The online demo: https://go.dev/play/p/q1BcVCmvidW

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Improved the TestLoadTokensFromUrl function for better dynamic handling of token metadata.
  • Ensured existing tests validate the expected behavior of token loading without altering core logic.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the TestLoadTokensFromUrl function in the client/core/tokens_file_loader_test.go file. The initialization of the tokensMetadata slice has been altered to allow for dynamic growth by changing its creation from a fixed length of 2 to a length of 0 with a capacity of 2. This adjustment does not affect the logic or assertions of the existing tests, which continue to validate the functionality of the LoadTokens function.

Changes

File	Change Summary
client/core/tokens_file_loader_test.go	Modified TestLoadTokensFromUrl to initialize tokensMetadata with length 0 and capacity 2 for dynamic growth. No changes to logic or assertions in tests.

Poem

In the code where tokens play,
A slice was changed in a clever way.
With room to grow, it leaps and bounds,
In tests, the right behavior founds.
Hooray for tweaks that make it bright,
Our tokens dance in code's delight! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ae8d48 and 88a027c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• client/core/tokens_file_loader_test.go (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

client/core/tokens_file_loader_test.go (1)

14-14: LGTM! Good optimization of slice initialization.

The change from make([]TokenMetadata, 2) to make([]TokenMetadata, 0, 2) is a correct optimization. The original code pre-allocated two zero-value TokenMetadata structs that were immediately overwritten by the append operations. The new code allocates the capacity but starts with zero length, which is more efficient since we're using append to add the actual values.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.66%. Comparing base (7cdfb24) to head (88a027c).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #254      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   15.82%   16.66%   +0.84%     
==========================================
  Files          25       26       +1     
  Lines        4784     4884     +100     
==========================================
+ Hits          757      814      +57     
- Misses       3992     4035      +43     
  Partials       35       35              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.