chore: bumped package to include both permissions and peggy messages #229
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ChainA
participant ChainB
participant PeggyModule
User->>PeggyModule: Initiate asset transfer
PeggyModule->>ChainA: Validate and process request
ChainA->>PeggyModule: Confirm transaction
PeggyModule->>ChainB: Forward transfer request
ChainB->>PeggyModule: Confirm receipt
PeggyModule->>User: Notify success
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (9)
- packages/injective-std/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/cosmos/base/query/v1beta1.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/cosmos/base/v1beta1.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/exchange/v1beta1.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/peggy/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/peggy/v1.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/permissions/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/permissions/v1beta1.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/injective-std/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (48)
packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/peggy/mod.rs (1)
1-1: Module Declaration: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe new module
v1is declared correctly. Ensure that the correspondingv1module file exists and is correctly implemented.packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/permissions/mod.rs (1)
1-1: Module Declaration: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe new module
v1beta1is declared correctly. Ensure that the correspondingv1beta1module file exists and is correctly implemented.packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/mod.rs (1)
5-6: Module Declarations: Ensure Consistency and CompletenessThe new modules
peggyandpermissionsare declared correctly. Ensure that the corresponding module files exist and are correctly implemented.packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/permissions/v1beta1.rs (16)
3-6: Verify the necessity of the emptyParamsstruct.The
Paramsstruct is currently empty. Ensure that this is intentional and aligns with the module's requirements.
8-28: LGTM!The
Namespacestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
32-42: LGTM!The
Rolestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
45-49: LGTM!The
Rolesstruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
53-58: LGTM!The
RoleIDsstruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
61-65: LGTM!The
Voucherstruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
69-99: LGTM!The
Actionenum is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
103-110: LGTM!The
GenesisStatestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
114-120: LGTM!The
QueryParamsRequeststruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
123-128: LGTM!The
QueryParamsResponsestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
133-139: LGTM!The
QueryAllNamespacesRequeststruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
143-147: LGTM!The
QueryAllNamespacesResponsestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
152-160: LGTM!The
QueryNamespaceByDenomRequeststruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
167-171: LGTM!The
QueryNamespaceByDenomResponsestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
176-186: LGTM!The
QueryAddressesByRoleRequeststruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.
191-195: LGTM!The
QueryAddressesByRoleResponsestruct is well-defined and appears to be correctly implemented.packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/peggy/v1.rs (27)
1-33: LGTM! StructAttestationis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
34-48: LGTM! StructErc20Tokenis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
49-86: LGTM! EnumClaimTypeis well-defined.The enum is well-documented and includes appropriate methods for string conversion.
87-114: LGTM! StructOutgoingTxBatchis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
115-135: LGTM! StructOutgoingTransferTxis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
136-166: LGTM! EnumSignTypeis well-defined.The enum is well-documented and includes appropriate methods for string conversion.
167-179: LGTM! StructBridgeValidatoris well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
181-207: LGTM! StructValsetis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
208-228: LGTM! StructLastObservedEthereumBlockHeightis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
230-247: LGTM! StructLastClaimEventis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
248-258: LGTM! StructErc20ToDenomis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
259-287: LGTM! StructEventAttestationObservedis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
288-301: LGTM! StructEventBridgeWithdrawCanceledis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
303-325: LGTM! StructEventOutgoingBatchis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
326-351: LGTM! StructEventOutgoingBatchCanceledis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
352-375: LGTM! StructEventValsetUpdateRequestis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
377-386: LGTM! StructEventSetOrchestratorAddressesis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
388-399: LGTM! StructEventValsetConfirmis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
400-419: LGTM! StructEventSendToEthis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
420-432: LGTM! StructEventConfirmBatchis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
433-448: LGTM! StructEventAttestationVoteis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
449-479: LGTM! StructEventDepositClaimis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
481-510: LGTM! StructEventWithdrawClaimis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
511-545: LGTM! StructEventErc20DeployedClaimis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
547-577: LGTM! StructEventValsetUpdateClaimis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
583-592: LGTM! StructEventCancelSendToEthis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
593-601: LGTM! StructEventSubmitBadSignatureEvidenceis well-defined.The struct is well-documented and includes appropriate attributes for serialization and deserialization.
[packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/exchange/v1beta1.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-5:
Verify the correctness and consistency of themin_quantity_tick_sizefield.Ensure that the
min_quantity_tick_sizefield is correctly added or modified in theMsgInstantSpotMarketLaunchstruct. Verify that the tag value6is unique and consistent with the rest of the struct.Verification successful
The
min_quantity_tick_sizefield in theMsgInstantSpotMarketLaunchstruct is correctly added and consistent with the rest of the struct. The tag value6is unique and properly used.
- Location:
packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/exchange/v1beta1.rs,MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunchstruct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and consistency of the `min_quantity_tick_size` field in `MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch` struct. # Test: Search for the `MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch` struct definition. Expect: The tag value `6` is unique and consistent. rg --type rust -A 10 $'struct MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch'Length of output: 4390
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the completeness and consistency of the `MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch` struct definition. # Test: Search for the complete definition of the `MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch` struct. rg --type rust -A 20 $'struct MsgInstantSpotMarketLaunch'Length of output: 8005
Line range hint
6-10:
Verify the correctness and consistency of themin_quantity_tick_sizefield.Ensure that the
min_quantity_tick_sizefield is correctly added or modified in theMsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunchstruct. Verify that the tag value13is unique and consistent with the rest of the struct.Verification successful
The
min_quantity_tick_sizefield is correctly added and consistent with the rest of theMsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunchstruct.
- The field
min_quantity_tick_sizeis present with the tag value13.- All tag values in the struct are unique and consistent.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and consistency of the `min_quantity_tick_size` field in `MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch` struct. # Test: Search for the `MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch` struct definition. Expect: The tag value `13` is unique and consistent. rg --type rust -A 10 $'struct MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch'Length of output: 4427
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and consistency of the `min_quantity_tick_size` field in `MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch` struct. # Test: Search for the complete definition of the `MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch` struct to check the presence and correctness of the `min_quantity_tick_size` field and its tag value `13`. rg --type rust -A 50 $'struct MsgInstantPerpetualMarketLaunch'Length of output: 18799
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/exchange/v1beta1.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/injective-std/src/types/injective/exchange/v1beta1.rs
As per:
this issueBUT.
I think it's healthier for us to transition to supporting
injective-stdmore actively and secondlywasmbindingshave no peggy message integrations so 🤷Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
peggymodule to facilitate cross-chain transactions between Cosmos and Ethereum networks.permissionsmodule to manage permissions within the blockchain application, enhancing security and access control.Bug Fixes
injective-stdpackage, indicating minor revisions and potential bug fixes.Refactor
min_notionalfield from market launch messages.Enhancements
type_urlattributes for various Protobuf message structures, improving organization and compatibility.