-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/security headers #4842
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feat/security headers #4842
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2)
86-93
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: useEffect for updating querySlug.The useEffect hook is well-implemented, correctly waiting for the router to be ready and ensuring the slug is a string before updating
querySlug
.Consider handling the edge case where
slug
might be an array:useEffect(() => { if (router.isReady) { const slugValue = Array.isArray(slug) ? slug[0] : slug; if (typeof slugValue === 'string') { setQuerySlug(slugValue); } } }, [router.isReady, slug]);This change ensures that even if
slug
is unexpectedly an array, the first value is used.
112-112
: Approved with suggestion: Updated Link href attribute.The use of
querySlug
in the Link's href attribute is a good change, ensuring that the correct and validated slug is used for navigation.To make the code more robust, consider handling the case where
querySlug
might be undefined:<Link href={querySlug ? slugToVerification(querySlug) : '#'}>This change ensures that even if
querySlug
is undefined (which shouldn't happen given the useEffect, but it's good to be safe), the Link will still render without throwing a runtime error.next.config.js (1)
Clarified CORS and Framing Policies Configuration
Based on the verification, multiple iframe usages exist which may requireapp.safe.global
to frame certain components. If framing byapp.safe.global
is intended, please update theContent-Security-Policy
to allowapp.safe.global
as a validframe-ancestor
. Otherwise, ensure that iframe usages are necessary and secure.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
155-173
: Clarify the intention behind CORS and framing policiesThere seems to be a potential conflict between the CORS policy and the new framing restrictions:
- The
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
header allows access fromhttps://app.safe.global
.- The new
X-Frame-Options
andContent-Security-Policy
headers restrict framing to the same origin.Could you clarify the intended behavior? If the manifest needs to be accessible but not frameable by
app.safe.global
, the current configuration is correct. However, if framing byapp.safe.global
is intended, you might need to adjust theContent-Security-Policy
header.Also, consider if framing protection is necessary for a manifest.json file, as it's typically used for PWA configurations and not usually framed.
To help verify the intended behavior, you can run the following script:
This will help us understand how manifest.json is used in the project and if there are any Safe-related configurations that explain the CORS setting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of manifest.json that might be affected by these changes # Test: Search for references to manifest.json in the codebase echo "Searching for references to manifest.json:" rg "manifest\.json" # Test: Check if there are any iframe usages that might be affected echo "Checking for iframe usages:" rg "<iframe" # Test: Look for any Safe-related configurations that might explain the CORS setting echo "Checking for Safe-related configurations:" rg "safe\.global"Length of output: 1894
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- next.config.js (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2)
81-81
: LGTM: New state variable for query slug.The addition of the
querySlug
state variable is a good approach to manage the routing logic more effectively after email verification. The typing and initialization are correct.
Line range hint
81-112
: Overall assessment: Improved email verification handling.The changes to the
Verified
component enhance the handling of the slug for navigation after email verification. The introduction ofquerySlug
and the useEffect hook to manage it improves the reliability of the routing logic.A few minor suggestions were made to further improve robustness:
- Handling the case where
slug
might be an array in the useEffect hook.- Safeguarding against potential undefined
querySlug
in the Link component.These changes contribute to a more stable and predictable user experience during the email verification process.
next.config.js (1)
166-173
: Excellent addition of security headers!The new
X-Frame-Options
andContent-Security-Policy
headers provide robust protection against clickjacking attacks. This is a great security enhancement for the/manifest.json
endpoint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- next.config.js (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- next-env.d.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
next.config.js (2)
166-173
: Security headers correctly implementedThe addition of the
X-Frame-Options
andContent-Security-Policy
headers enhances security by mitigating clickjacking attacks and controlling embedding sources. The headers are correctly configured for/manifest.json
.
Line range hint
158-164
: Verify theAccess-Control-Allow-Origin
header valueThe
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
header is set tohttps://app.safe.global
. Please verify that this is the intended origin and that no other origins require access to/manifest.json
. If multiple origins need access, you might need to adjust the CORS configuration accordingly.Run the following script to check for cross-origin requests to
/manifest.json
in the codebase:
Summary by CodeRabbit
X-Frame-Options
andContent-Security-Policy
.