-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VisualProspecting Identifying Ore Veins Incorrectly #18058
Comments
Did you delete/forget to copy the veintypesLUT file in the visualprospecting folder? |
I recopied over the veintypesLUT file from my previous instance and that seems to have fixed the issue. |
if i deleted what should i do? |
I have a similar issue. With the 2.7.0 update i thought of starting up my old server. It is hosted locally on my own server. I dont have the client files anymore. When i connect with a freshly installed client to my local server, then I get the message that 77 new ore veins have been discovered. These are however the wrong ore veins... I dont mind rediscovering the veins as long as they are correct. Is there a way to clear all discovered veins or fix the issue when i dont have the old files? |
Nothing in the pack will automatically discover veins for you on login, sounds like whatever you have installed that is doing that is using some outdated info. If you are starting with a completely fresh visualprospecting folder on the client you don't need your old veintypesLUT file it's only needed if you intend to use your old cache. |
Your GTNH Discord Username
Lazorati\9174
Your Pack Version
2.7.0 Beta 4
Your Server
SP
Java Version
Java 19
Type of Server
Single Player
Your Expectation
For Visual Prospecting to correctly record my ore vein data and display properly to Journeymap.
The Reality
When upgraded my world to Beta 4, I ensure to move across Journeymap and VisualProspecting data.
However, I've noticed that veins are all being identified incorrectly.
Existing 'found' veins have had their labels changed, and newly prospected ones are being identified incorrectly.
Below screenshot shows a vein being newly scanned in beta 4 with an LV Prospector's Scanner - the chat readout identified it as a Terra & Aer vein, despite being in the overworld. However it also detects ores typical of an Apatite vein.
Example of existing prospecting data that has been changed, after being ported over from Beta 3. The highlighted Naquadah vein was in fact a Mica vein.
Your Proposal
For ore veins to be correctly identified and recorded.
Final Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: