Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix failure for DefineAsset and IssueAsset operation sent in same txn #1022

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 18, 2023

Conversation

harshadptl
Copy link
Contributor

@harshadptl harshadptl commented Oct 13, 2023

The DefineAsset Operation has the raw asset code whereas IssueAsset Operation has the derived asset code.

Currently if both the operations are sent in the same txn for a new asset it fails because the Asset code don't match. This is fixed by comparing the derived asset code from newly defined assets in the txn.

  • make sure that you have executed all the following process and no errors occur

    • make fmt
    • make lint
    • make test
  • The major changes of this PR

  • The major impacts of this PR

    • Impact WASM?
    • Impact Web3 API?
    • Impact mainnet data compatibility?
  • Extra documentations

harshadptl and others added 11 commits October 12, 2023 22:14
The DefineAsset Operation has the raw asset code whereas IssueAsset Operation
has the derived asset code.

Currently if both the operations are sent in the same txn for a new asset it fails
because the Asset code don't match. This is fixed by comparing the derived asset
code from newly defined assets in the txn.
@weikengchen
Copy link
Member

Approve but pending for the CI.

@weikengchen weikengchen merged commit feb40e8 into develop Oct 18, 2023
1 check passed
@weikengchen weikengchen deleted the fix_issue_asset_with_define branch October 18, 2023 04:34
shaorongqiang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2023
…#1022)

* Fix failure for DefineAsset and IssueAsset operation sent in same txn

The DefineAsset Operation has the raw asset code whereas IssueAsset Operation
has the derived asset code.

Currently if both the operations are sent in the same txn for a new asset it fails
because the Asset code don't match. This is fixed by comparing the derived asset
code from newly defined assets in the txn.

* lint

* fix docker image build

* fix lint

* lint

* lint

* Remove fix for testing

* trigger build

* trigger github actions

* Revert "Remove fix for testing"

This reverts commit df1f070.

* fix typo in yaml of CLI

* Update mod.rs

---------

Co-authored-by: Weikeng Chen <[email protected]>
shaorongqiang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2023
…#1022)

* Fix failure for DefineAsset and IssueAsset operation sent in same txn

The DefineAsset Operation has the raw asset code whereas IssueAsset Operation
has the derived asset code.

Currently if both the operations are sent in the same txn for a new asset it fails
because the Asset code don't match. This is fixed by comparing the derived asset
code from newly defined assets in the txn.

* lint

* fix docker image build

* fix lint

* lint

* lint

* Remove fix for testing

* trigger build

* trigger github actions

* Revert "Remove fix for testing"

This reverts commit df1f070.

* fix typo in yaml of CLI

* Update mod.rs

---------

Co-authored-by: Weikeng Chen <[email protected]>
shaorongqiang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
…#1022)

* Fix failure for DefineAsset and IssueAsset operation sent in same txn

The DefineAsset Operation has the raw asset code whereas IssueAsset Operation
has the derived asset code.

Currently if both the operations are sent in the same txn for a new asset it fails
because the Asset code don't match. This is fixed by comparing the derived asset
code from newly defined assets in the txn.

* lint

* fix docker image build

* fix lint

* lint

* lint

* Remove fix for testing

* trigger build

* trigger github actions

* Revert "Remove fix for testing"

This reverts commit df1f070.

* fix typo in yaml of CLI

* Update mod.rs

---------

Co-authored-by: Weikeng Chen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants