[HOLD for payment 2024-12-07] [Search v1] Add bulk actions on Search

[luacmartins]

With this PR, we're introducing new inline actions on the Search page. The next step is to add bulk actions so users can batch process reports.

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @lschurr / @VictoriaExpensify

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @lschurr (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details. Please add this Feature request to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ It looks like this issue is labelled as a New Feature but not tied to any GitHub Project. Keep in mind that all new features should be tied to GitHub Projects in order to properly track external CAP software time ⚠️

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Design team member for new feature review - @dubielzyk-expensify (NewFeature)

[luacmartins]

Draft PR is ready, but we need to hold on the inline PRs.

[dubielzyk-expensify]

Any PR you want me to have a look at?

[luacmartins]

@dubielzyk-expensify eventually this PR, but that's still on hold for other PRs

[dubielzyk-expensify]

Alright. Let me know and I'll give it a review when it's ready 👍

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[twisterdotcom]

Relabelling as Lauren is OOO now.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @VictoriaExpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details. Please add this Feature request to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ It looks like this issue is labelled as a New Feature but not tied to any GitHub Project. Keep in mind that all new features should be tied to GitHub Projects in order to properly track external CAP software time ⚠️

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @dubielzyk-expensify is eligible for the NewFeature assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[trjExpensify]

I know we're super close to being done here, but I'm popping it in #migrate anyway to track to completion, as making the action buttons available on the search page is central to support our plans to better support batch processing on the Search page.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.68-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Add bulk actions #51913

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-12-07. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @Pujan92 requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@Pujan92] Please propose regression test steps to ensure the new feature will work correctly on production in further releases.
• [@lschurr / @VictoriaExpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

[lschurr]

Removing you Vics :)

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Reviewer: @Pujan92 owed $250 via NewDot

BugZero Checklist (@lschurr)

• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[lschurr]

Payment summary is correct - please request in ND @Pujan92 :)

[garrettmknight]

$250 approved for @Pujan92