add implementations to support gov-tx-proposal #240
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leonz789 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/dogfood/keeper/impl_sdk.go (2)
143-143: Enhance the documentation clarity.While the note explains that this is not a universal delegation function, it would be helpful to explicitly mention which modules/cases this is designed for (e.g., governance module for voting power calculation).
Line range hint
236-247: Critical: Implement required governance module interfaces.The current implementation with
panicwill break governance operations. These methods are essential for voting power calculation:
TotalBondedTokens: Required to calculate the total voting powerIterateDelegations: Required to calculate individual delegation voting powerThe TODO comments provide good implementation guidance, but these methods need to be implemented before the governance module can function correctly. This contradicts the PR objective of supporting governance voting power calculation.
Would you like help implementing these methods according to the TODO comments? I can provide a detailed implementation that:
- Calculates total bonded power compatible with multi-asset staking
- Computes delegation shares based on USD power
local_node.sh (2)
Line range hint
266-267: Consider documenting the governance timing parameters.The governance parameters have been adjusted for local testing:
- max_deposit_period: 172800s → 30s
- voting_period: 172800s → 30s
While these changes are appropriate for testing, consider adding a comment explaining these are test-specific values and what the production values should be.
+ # Note: These are test-specific values. Production values should be: + # max_deposit_period: 172800s (48 hours) + # voting_period: 172800s (48 hours) sed -i.bak 's/"max_deposit_period": "172800s"/"max_deposit_period": "30s"/g' "$HOMEDIR"/config/genesis.json sed -i.bak 's/"voting_period": "172800s"/"voting_period": "30s"/g' "$HOMEDIR"/config/genesis.json
Line range hint
1-324: Ensure error handling for jq commands.The script uses numerous
jqcommands for JSON manipulation but doesn't check their success. Consider adding error checking for critical operations.+ # Function to handle jq command failures + handle_jq_error() { + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "Error: Failed to modify genesis file with jq command" + exit 1 + fi + } # Example usage: jq '.app_state["feemarket"]["params"]["base_fee"]="10"' "$GENESIS" >"$TMP_GENESIS" && mv "$TMP_GENESIS" "$GENESIS" + handle_jq_error
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/feedistribution/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
local_node.sh(1 hunks)x/dogfood/keeper/impl_sdk.go(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/dogfood/keeper/impl_sdk.go (1)
Line range hint 220-225: Clarify the token calculation documentation.
The comment about 'Tokens' could be more explicit about the calculation formula. Consider:
-// the 'Tokens' is actually usd value including different types of assets * sdk.DefaultPowerReduction
+// the 'Tokens' represents the total USD value of all asset types, multiplied by sdk.DefaultPowerReduction for power calculationAlso, verify that this power calculation aligns with the governance module's expectations.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search failed because we assumed the governance module was in x/gov/. Let's first locate the correct paths and then search for power calculations.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about how the token values and power calculations are used in the codebase.
Documentation accurately reflects the token calculation mechanism
The current comment is correct and aligns with the codebase implementation. Here's why:
- The
TotalBondedTokensimplementation inx/dogfood/keeper/impl_sdk.goconfirms this is a multi-asset staking system where tokens represent USD values - The code shows consistent usage of
sdk.DefaultPowerReductionfor power calculations across the codebase - The TODO comment in
IterateDelegationsexplicitly confirms that "usd-power" is used for governance voting power calculations
The current comment succinctly captures this relationship, and the suggested change would not add meaningful clarity to the implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify how the governance module uses these token values
# Look for references to validator tokens or power in the governance module
rg -A 5 "BondedTokens|GetShares|DelegatorShares" x/gov/
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the governance module location and any references to validator power
fd -t f -e go . | xargs rg -l "gov"
# Then look for power calculation references
rg -A 5 "TokensFromConsensusPower|DefaultPowerReduction|BondedTokens|GetShares|DelegatorShares"
Length of output: 15517
local_node.sh (2)
133-134: LGTM: Base fee configuration added for fee market.
The addition of base fee configuration with a value of "10" is appropriate for a local testnet environment.
Line range hint 183-188: Verify dogfood module configuration aligns with governance requirements.
The dogfood module configuration includes:
- 1-minute epoch identifier (for testing)
- 5 epochs until unbonded
- Minimum self-delegation of 100
- Initial validator power of 5000
While these values are suitable for testing, we should verify they meet the governance module's requirements for voting power calculations.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Dogfood module configuration is compatible with governance requirements
The verification shows that voting power in the system:
- Is calculated dynamically based on USD value of staked assets
- Has no hardcoded dependencies on epoch duration or minimum self-delegation
- Is updated via
UpdateVotingPowerat epoch boundaries for all AVS modules
The test configuration values in local_node.sh are safe to use as they only affect testing environments and don't conflict with production governance calculations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify governance module's compatibility with dogfood configuration
# Test: Check if governance module references these parameters
rg -A 5 "epochs_until_unbonded|min_self_delegation|epoch_identifier" --type go
# Test: Check if there are any hardcoded values in governance that might conflict
rg -A 5 "VotingPower|StakingPower" --type go
Length of output: 11253
leonz789
changed the title
leonz789
changed the title
leonz789
requested review from
magj2006,
bwhour,
adu-web3,
cloud8little,
MaxMustermann2,
mikebraver and
TimmyExogenous
Description
gov module need those two interface from dogfood(/staking-module) to calculate power of votes to complete proposal.
Changes
Closes #XXX
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes