-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(lint): Fix super linter (again) #14
chore(lint): Fix super linter (again) #14
Conversation
If a variable name contains the word KEY, gitleaks does not like it and flags it as a potential secret. I have changed the name of the variable in these files from KEYALGO to ALGO since it is not a secret but rather the algorithm of the key generation. That silences gitleaks.
added a blank line at the end of `.golangci.yml`
The previous commit worked on the markdownlint from the super-linter.
The OS keyring may not always be available.
It can potentially reduce the number of layers in the image, making it smaller and more efficient to build and pull.
Note that this file is used from the root of the project via `make localnet-build`, which is why the paths work.
e2493e2
to
a36167d
Compare
a36167d
to
72b459a
Compare
On the
Of these, the failures are On this pull request, the items that run are as follows.
All of these passed, including the ones that previously failed on Note that the JSON check is not run within this PR, but it was run on The PR adds back the IaC (Infrastructure as Code) check and ensures it passes and skips generated files.
|
CVE-2024-24786 / GO-2024-2611 is fixed with this upgrade. Even though this package is fundamental to our system, the changes between 1.31.0 and 1.33.0 are minor.
This reverts commit c09f986.
A vulnerability has been fixed in v1.33.0 of google.golang.org/protobuf and we must update the associated github.com/golang/protobuf as well.
Files which have noteworthy changes to review:
|
The test workflow will not fully run right now because it runs on `pull_request_target` which must be merged into the base branch first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, excellent work!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The super linter workflow is running differently between a branch push and a pull request. As a consequence, we see a failure on the branch here when a run on the corresponding pull request passed. This change attempts to fix the issue.