-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(genesis export): genesis exporting for assets, delegation and operator modules. #108
feat(genesis export): genesis exporting for assets, delegation and operator modules. #108
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant modifications across multiple files, focusing on the initialization and management of operator and delegation data. Key updates include the removal of certain parameters in function calls, the introduction of new data structures, and the transition from map fields to slice fields in various proto files. These alterations enhance the clarity and maintainability of the codebase, streamlining the overall functionality of the Exocore application. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
682dfad
to
9502f43
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 50
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationEnsure Comprehensive Tests for Asset Initialization and Retrieval
The current tests check for successful retrieval of assets and client chains but do not cover scenarios where no assets or client chains are found. Please add test cases to handle these edge cases.
- Add tests for
GetAllClientChainInfo
when no client chains exist.- Add tests for
GetAllStakingAssetsInfo
when no staking assets exist.These additions will ensure robustness in handling all possible scenarios.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
29-51
: Validate Asset Initialization and Retrieval LogicThe tests for asset initialization and retrieval seem comprehensive. However, ensure that the
GetAllClientChainInfo
andGetAllStakingAssetsInfo
methods are thoroughly tested to handle cases where the assets or client chains are not found in the system.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the comprehensive testing of asset initialization and retrieval. # Test: Search for the function usage and test coverage. rg --type go $'GetAllClientChainInfo|GetAllStakingAssetsInfo'Length of output: 2039
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test cases for handling empty results or errors in asset initialization and retrieval. # Search for test cases handling empty results or errors for GetAllClientChainInfo rg --type go 'GetAllClientChainInfo' -A 10 | grep -E 'NoError|Error|Empty|Len|Contains|Equal' # Search for test cases handling empty results or errors for GetAllStakingAssetsInfo rg --type go 'GetAllStakingAssetsInfo' -A 10 | grep -E 'NoError|Error|Empty|Len|Contains|Equal'Length of output: 1266
x/delegation/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Line range hint
15-40
: Proper integration ofisGeneralInit
flag, but consider alternative approaches for passing flags.The addition of the
isGeneralInit
flag is well-documented. However, passing such flags through the context or command line as noted might be limiting. Consider using a configuration file or environment variables for greater flexibility and separation of concerns.x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationEnsure that the
historicalCtx
field is utilized in the keeper's methods.The
historicalCtx
field is declared and initialized but not used in any keeper's methods. This could lead to potential runtime issues if it's intended to be used.
- File:
x/operator/keeper/keeper.go
- Lines: 37-43
Analysis chain
Line range hint
40-51
: Ensure that all necessary fields are initialized in theNewKeeper
function.The
NewKeeper
function initializes a newKeeper
instance. It's important to ensure that all fields, especially the newisGeneralInit
andhistoricalCtx
, are correctly utilized in the keeper's methods to prevent runtime issues.
To ensure that the
isGeneralInit
andhistoricalCtx
fields are correctly utilized in the keeper's methods, we need to delve deeper into the usage ofhistoricalCtx
as therg
output does not show its usage clearly. This will help us confirm if it's being used appropriately in the methods.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of `isGeneralInit` and `historicalCtx` fields throughout the keeper's methods. rg 'isGeneralInit|historicalCtx' --type goLength of output: 1875
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of `historicalCtx` field throughout the keeper's methods. rg 'historicalCtx' --type goLength of output: 228
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (52)
- app/app.go (3 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (2 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (5 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (4 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/cross_chain_tx_process.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (8 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (4 hunks)
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto
- x/assets/types/errors.go
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go
- x/delegation/types/keys.go
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: break-check
proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto
[failure] 24-24:
Previously present message "QueryAllClientChainInfoResponse.AllClientChainInfosEntry" was deleted from file.
[failure] 26-26:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllClientChainInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllClientChainInfoResponse.AllClientChainInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.ClientChainInfo".
[failure] 40-40:
Previously present message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" was deleted from file.
[failure] 42-42:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.StakingAssetInfo".
[failure] 52-52:
Previously present message "QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" was deleted from file.
[failure] 54-54:
Field "1" on message "QueryAssetInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.DepositByAsset".
[failure] 72-72:
Previously present message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" was deleted from file.
[failure] 74-74:
Field "1" on message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.AssetByID".proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto
[failure] 15-15:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.operator.v1.OperatorInfo" to "exocore.operator.v1.OperatorDetail".
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
x/assets/types/genesis.go
[warning] 107-107:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 180-180:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 202-202:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
Additional comments not posted (49)
x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1)
46-46
: Ensure Correct Arithmetic in Test AssertionThe line adds the
StakingTotalAmount
fromassets[0]
with a newsdkmath.NewInt(10)
, which is a part of the test setup. Ensure that this addition accurately reflects the expected state change in the system after the reward operation.x/assets/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
58-58
: Ensure Initial Staking Amount is CorrectThe initialization of
StakingTotalAmount
to zero when registering a new asset is critical. Confirm that this aligns with the expected behavior, especially in scenarios where an asset might be expected to have an initial non-zero staking amount due to business rules or previous state.Verification successful
Ensure Initial Staking Amount is Correct
The
RegisterAsset
function inx/assets/keeper/msg_server.go
correctly initializesStakingTotalAmount
to zero when a new asset is registered. This aligns with the expected behavior of starting with zero staking amount. There are no indications of business rules or previous states affecting this initialization.
x/assets/keeper/msg_server.go
, lines 54-64:RegisterAsset
function initializesStakingTotalAmount
to zero.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initial staking amount during asset registration. # Test: Check for any business rules or previous states that might affect this initialization. rg --type go $'RegisterAsset'Length of output: 6899
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the RegisterAsset function from msg_server.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (k Keeper) RegisterAsset(ctx context.Context, req *assetstype.RegisterAssetReq) (*assetstype.RegisterAssetResponse, error) { $$$ }' --jsonLength of output: 1231
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (4)
8-8
: Approved new import statement.The import of
query.proto
is correctly placed and necessary for the new message types introduced in this file.
18-29
: Enhancements toGenesisState
are well-defined.The addition of
delegation_states
,stakers_by_operator
, andundelegations
with non-nullable constraints enhances the robustness of the data structure. Consider adding more detailed comments to explain the purpose and usage of each new field for better code maintainability.
31-37
: New message typeDelegationStates
is well-formed.The structure is clear, and the use of non-nullable fields ensures data integrity. Enhance the comments to provide examples of what constitutes a
key
for better clarity.
39-44
: New message typeStakersByOperator
is correctly implemented.The message type is properly defined with all fields marked as non-nullable. It would be beneficial to include examples or a more detailed description of the
key
format used here.precompiles/assets/tx.go (1)
95-97
: Well-implemented client chain retrieval, suggest adding explanatory comments.The conversion of
LayerZeroChainID
touint32
is crucial and correctly implemented. Consider adding a comment to explain why this conversion is necessary, especially if there are specific constraints or compatibility issues.x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (2)
25-26
: Consider removing debug print statements from test cases.The
fmt.Println
statement on line 26 should be removed from the test case to keep the test output clean and focused only on test results.
37-49
: Ensure consistency in test assertions.The test case
TestAllOperators
sets up anOperatorDetail
, but it's unclear if theContains
assertion in line 49 is sufficient to verify the correctness ofAllOperators
function. Consider using more specific assertions that check individual fields of the returned operators.x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (1)
18-25
: Document the rationale behind not using context for passing flags.The comment on lines 22-24 explains why the
isGeneralInit
flag is not passed through the context. It would be beneficial to expand this comment to include potential alternatives considered or why they were dismissed, to provide more context to future maintainers.proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (1)
39-45
: EnsureAssetsByOperator
struct is utilized correctly.The
AssetsByOperator
message has been introduced to store operator and their assets state. It's important to verify that this structure is being used appropriately across the module to maintain state integrity.Verification successful
The
AssetsByOperator
struct is utilized correctly.The search results show that the
AssetsByOperator
struct is used in various parts of the module, including the keeper and genesis state files. This indicates that the structure is integrated and utilized as intended across the codebase, maintaining state integrity.
- Files verified:
x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go
x/assets/types/genesis.go
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of `AssetsByOperator` to ensure it's being utilized correctly. rg 'AssetsByOperator' --type goLength of output: 3165
x/assets/types/keys.go (2)
94-96
: Approved: FunctionIsJoinedStoreKey
correctly checks for joined keys.
94-102
: Approved: FunctionParseJoinedStoreKey
correctly parses and validates the key structure.x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
14-44
: Approved: FunctionAllDeposits
is well-implemented with proper resource management and error handling.
Line range hint
47-64
: Approved: FunctionGetStakerAssetInfos
correctly retrieves asset information for a specific staker.x/delegation/keeper/cross_chain_tx_process.go (1)
Line range hint
119-131
: Approved: FunctionUndelegateFrom
correctly handles undelegation logic with proper validation and state updates.x/assets/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)
10-156
: Approved: FunctionTestInitGenesisFromBootStrap
is well-implemented with comprehensive test cases and proper handling of test state modifications.x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (1)
11-173
: Approved: FunctionInitGenesis
in the operator module is robust, correctly handling multiple aspects of genesis initialization with detailed error handling.x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (2)
62-67
: Ensure no duplicate or invalid data in genesis state.These test cases effectively check for duplicates and invalid data in the genesis state. It's crucial to ensure that the genesis state is correctly initialized to prevent issues at runtime.
Also applies to: 76-90, 102-104, 118-120, 134-139, 168-170, 190-195
51-53
: Check the address validation logic for operator address.The test case checks for the validity of the operator address using a hardcoded "invalid" string. Ensure the test is robust by checking various forms of invalid addresses.
Verification successful
Check the address validation logic for operator address.
The validation logic is implemented in the
ValidateHexAddress
function found inx/assets/types/params.go
. Additionally, the test cases inx/operator/types/genesis_test.go
cover various forms of invalid addresses, ensuring robustness.
- Implementation:
x/assets/types/params.go
- Test Cases:
x/operator/types/genesis_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the address validation logic is robust. # Test: Search for the address validation function. Expect: A robust validation logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ValidateAddress($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the address validation logic is robust. # Search for address validation function by looking for common validation patterns and functions in Go. # Look for functions that might validate addresses by searching for keywords 'validate' and 'address'. rg 'validate.*address' --glob '*.go' # Also, look for the usage of the term 'invalid' in test files to see if other invalid address cases are being tested. rg 'invalid' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 11889
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness of the address validation logic. # Check the implementation of ValidateHexAddress function. rg 'func ValidateHexAddress' --glob '*.go' # Check the test cases in x/operator/types/genesis_test.go to ensure various forms of invalid addresses are covered. rg 'invalid' x/operator/types/genesis_test.goLength of output: 792
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1)
88-90
: Ensure correct handling of WaitUnbondingAmount.The tests now include checks for
WaitUnbondingAmount
. This is important for accurately tracking the unbonding amounts which are critical for financial calculations in staking logic.Also applies to: 93-95
x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (1)
123-123
: Check asset information retrieval in voting power test.The retrieval of asset information using the
AssetBasicInfo
field is crucial for ensuring the correct calculation of voting power based on asset values. Ensure that this retrieval is robust and handles possible edge cases.x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1)
13-44
: Review the implementation of asset retrieval by operators.The function
AllOperatorAssets
efficiently retrieves all assets associated with operators. The use of a prefix store and iterator ensures optimal performance. However, ensure error handling and data consistency are robust, especially in edge cases where data might be corrupted or missing.x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (1)
78-82
: Clarification on default earning address behavior.The comment and logic suggest that if no earning address is provided, it defaults to the sender's address. This behavior is implicit and could benefit from explicit documentation in the command's help text to ensure it's clear to users.
app/ethtest_helper.go (1)
Line range hint
192-214
: Clarification needed on staking total amount comment.The comment about the staking total amount being required to be zero during initialization is unclear. It would be helpful to expand on why this is necessary, as it impacts understanding the initial state setup for assets.
x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4)
49-49
: Validate futureSlashEventHeight
properly.The validation logic to ensure that the
SlashEventHeight
does not exceed the current block height is crucial for the integrity of the slashing process. This prevents retrospective or future-dated slashing which could lead to inconsistencies or abuses.
85-86
: Initialization of slice fields inSlashExecutionInfo
.Initializing the
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
slices with zero length is a good practice as it ensures that these slices are ready to use and avoids potential nil slice issues.
94-94
: Appending toSlashUndelegations
within a loop.Appending to the
SlashUndelegations
slice within a loop based on conditional logic is efficient and ensures that only relevant undelegations are considered. This is a good use of memory and processing resources.
[APROVED]
135-135
: Efficient management of slashed assets.Appending to the
SlashAssetsPool
slice within the asset iteration function is efficient. This ensures that only the assets that are actually slashed are recorded, which is crucial for accurate and efficient state management.proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2)
72-72
: Clarify the use of(gogoproto.nullable) = false
The use of
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
onasset_basic_info
withinStakingAssetInfo
ensures that theAssetInfo
cannot be null. This is a good practice for required fields to prevent runtime errors due to null dereferencing.
119-120
: Clarify the exclusion ofwait_unbonding_amount
The comment on
total_amount
now specifies that it excludes thewait_unbonding_amount
. This is a useful clarification for maintaining clear understanding of the asset's total amount during calculations and reporting.x/delegation/types/genesis.go (1)
144-184
: Ensure proper error handling and data validation inValidateDelegationStates
The function
ValidateDelegationStates
properly checks for nil and negative values in delegation states, which is crucial for data integrity. However, consider adding checks for other potential data anomalies, such as extremely large values which might indicate data corruption or overflow issues.app/test_helpers.go (2)
221-221
: Clarification onStakingTotalAmount
initializationThe initialization of
StakingTotalAmount
to zero is noted as being required due to deposits being handled post-token initialization. This is a critical implementation detail that ensures correct application state before operations that could affect token amounts.
229-236
: Review initialization ofOperatorInfo
The initialization of
OperatorInfo
withinOperatorDetail
includes setting theCommission
to zero. Ensure this is the intended behavior, as zero commission might not be typical or expected in operational environments.x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (1)
261-276
: Ensure proper error handling inGetAllUSDValues
.In the function
GetAllUSDValues
, it retrieves all USD values. It's crucial to ensure that any potential errors during the unmarshalling process are handled appropriately. Currently, the code assumes the unmarshalling will always succeed which might not be the case.cmd/exocored/root.go (2)
Line range hint
270-290
: Ensure chain ID is correctly set innewApp
.The function
newApp
initializes theExocoreApp
with various configurations. It is crucial to ensure that thechainID
is correctly retrieved and set, as it influences many operational aspects of the application.Verification successful
Ensure correct retrieval and setting of chainID in
newApp
.The
chainID
is correctly retrieved using thegetChainID
function and set usingbaseapp.SetChainID(chainID)
in thenewApp
function.
- Retrieval:
chainID := getChainID(appOpts, homePath)
is present in thecmd/exocored/root.go
file.- Setting:
baseapp.SetChainID(chainID)
is also present in the same file.No issues found with the retrieval and setting of
chainID
.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the chain ID is correctly set and used in the newApp function. # Test: Search for chainID usage in the newApp function. Expect: Correct retrieval and usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (a appCreator) newApp($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { $_ := getChainID($_, $_) $$$ baseapp.SetChainID($_) }'Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the retrieval and setting of chainID in the newApp function. # Search for the definition and retrieval of chainID in the newApp function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (a appCreator) newApp($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { chainID := $_ $$$ }' # Search for the setting of chainID in the newApp function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (a appCreator) newApp($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ baseapp.SetChainID(chainID) }'Length of output: 425
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the retrieval and setting of chainID in the newApp function. # Search for the definition and retrieval of chainID in the newApp function. rg 'chainID := .*' -A 10 -B 10 --glob '*.go' | tee chainID_retrieval.txt # Search for the setting of chainID in the newApp function. rg 'baseapp.SetChainID\(chainID\)' -A 10 -B 10 --glob '*.go' | tee chainID_setting.txtLength of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the retrieval and setting of chainID in the newApp function. # Search for the definition and retrieval of chainID in the newApp function. rg 'chainID := .*' -A 10 -B 10 --glob '*.go' # Search for the setting of chainID in the newApp function. rg 'baseapp.SetChainID\(chainID\)' -A 10 -B 10 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 29371
Line range hint
305-331
: Check for potential improvements inappExport
.The
appExport
function handles the export of app state and validators. It's important to ensure that the function handles different scenarios robustly, especially the condition whereheight
is not-1
, which implies loading a specific blockchain height.Verification successful
Potential Improvements in
appExport
Function Handling Different ScenariosThe
appExport
function incmd/exocored/root.go
handles the export of app state and validators, particularly focusing on scenarios whereheight
is not-1
. The function appears to robustly handle the condition by creating an instance ofExocoreApp
and loading the specified height if needed. However, it's always good to ensure edge cases and potential improvements are considered.
Function Implementation:
- The function checks whether
height
is-1
and handles the creation ofExocoreApp
accordingly.- If
height
is not-1
, it attempts to load the specified height.- If any error occurs during this process, it returns the error.
Potential Improvements:
- Error Handling: Ensure all possible errors are caught and handled gracefully.
- Logging: Add detailed logging for better traceability and debugging.
- Configuration Checks: Validate all configurations and parameters before proceeding with the export.
Code Locations:
cmd/exocored/root.go
:appExport
function implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify robust handling of different scenarios in appExport function. # Test: Search for conditional logic handling different heights. Expect: Robust handling of edge cases. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (a appCreator) appExport($_, $_, $_, height int64, $_, $_, $_, $_) ($_ error) { if height != -1 { $$$ } else { $$$ } }'Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the appExport function in the codebase. # Search for the appExport function definition in the codebase. rg "func (a appCreator) appExport"Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to find any function related to exporting app state or validators. # Search for any function definitions that might be related to exporting app state or validators. rg "func.*Export"Length of output: 1697
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the appExport function in cmd/exocored/root.go. # Extract the full implementation of the appExport function. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (a appCreator) appExport($_, $_, $_, height int64, $_, $_, $_, $_) ($_ error) { $$$ }' cmd/exocored/root.goLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the content of cmd/exocored/root.go to manually verify the appExport function definition. # Display the content of cmd/exocored/root.go. cat cmd/exocored/root.goLength of output: 11413
testutil/utils.go (3)
142-142
: Clarification on theStakingTotalAmount
field.The comment indicates that the
StakingTotalAmount
is required to be zero because deposits are handled after token initialization. This is a good practice as it ensures clarity on the state of the tokens at the time of initialization.
151-166
: Consider adding more detailed comments forOperatorDetail
.The struct
OperatorDetail
is used to initialize operator information. It would be beneficial to include more detailed comments explaining the purpose of each field, especiallyOperatorMetaInfo
andCommission
, to aid future maintainability and understanding.+ // OperatorMetaInfo provides metadata about the operator + // Commission defines the fee structure for the operator
Line range hint
179-188
: Check consistency ofOperatorAddress
usage.The
OperatorAddress
field is used as a key in the consensus key records. Ensure that this address is consistently used across all modules and that its format (e.g., bech32, hex) is standardized across your application to avoid potential bugs or mismatches.x/operator/types/genesis.go (3)
24-24
: Ensure proper unit testing forDefaultGenesis
function.The
DefaultGenesis
function initializes aGenesisState
with empty slices. Ensure that unit tests cover this initialization to verify correct behavior and prevent future regressions.Verification successful
Unit tests for
DefaultGenesis
function are already present.The
DefaultGenesis
function is tested within theTestValidateGenesis
method inx/operator/types/genesis_test.go
. This test suite includes various test cases to ensure the correct behavior of theDefaultGenesis
function, covering valid and invalid scenarios.
x/operator/types/genesis_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify unit tests for `DefaultGenesis` function. # Test: Search for unit tests related to `DefaultGenesis`. rg --type go $'func TestDefaultGenesis'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the `DefaultGenesis` function definition in the codebase. # Search for the `DefaultGenesis` function definition in Go files. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func DefaultGenesis($_) $_'Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search criteria to locate any potential variations of the `DefaultGenesis` function definition. # Search for any occurrence of `DefaultGenesis` in Go files. rg --type go 'DefaultGenesis'Length of output: 6374
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the content of `x/operator/types/genesis_test.go` for tests related to `DefaultGenesis`. # Display the content of `x/operator/types/genesis_test.go`. cat x/operator/types/genesis_test.goLength of output: 5496
Line range hint
30-98
: Check the comprehensive validation logic inValidateOperators
.The
ValidateOperators
method contains extensive validation logic, including duplicate address checks, Bech32 format validation, and earnings address validation. It's crucial to ensure that all these checks are covered thoroughly in unit tests, particularly the new checks added forClientChainEarningsAddr
and commission validations.
Line range hint
100-157
: Review error handling and validation logic inValidateOperatorConsKeyRecords
.This function performs multiple checks on consensus keys and addresses, including Bech32 format validation and duplicate address checking. Ensure these validations are correctly implemented and covered by unit tests, especially since this function handles critical data for chain operations.
x/assets/types/genesis.go (3)
11-14
: Approved: New struct definition for TotalSupplyAndStaking.The struct
TotalSupplyAndStaking
has been defined to hold total supply and staking amounts asmath.Int
types, which is appropriate for handling large numbers without floating point inaccuracies.
268-342
: Approved: Comprehensive validation in ValidateOperatorAssets.The function
ValidateOperatorAssets
provides thorough validation for operator assets, ensuring no inconsistencies in the asset registration and staking amounts. This is critical for maintaining the integrity of the blockchain state.
343-364
: Approved: Overall genesis state validation.The
Validate
method aggregates all individual validation functions to provide a comprehensive check of the genesis state. This method is crucial for ensuring the blockchain starts in a consistent and expected state.cmd/exocored/testnet.go (1)
Line range hint
402-471
: Ensure consistency in data structures and initialization withingetTestExocoreGenesis
.The function
getTestExocoreGenesis
appears to handle the initialization of various genesis states correctly based on the new structures and fields mentioned in the PR summary. However, ensure that the new fields and data structures used here are consistently initialized and used across other parts of the codebase that interact with these modules.Verification successful
Initialization and Usage of New Fields Verified
The new fields
OperatorDetail
andGenesisState
are consistently initialized and used across the codebase. The functiongetTestExocoreGenesis
correctly handles the initialization of these fields.
- The fields
OperatorDetail
andGenesisState
are defined and used in various places, ensuring consistency.- The initialization within
getTestExocoreGenesis
aligns with their definitions and usages elsewhere.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new fields across the codebase. # Search for new field `OperatorDetail` and `GenesisState` modifications in other relevant files. fd . --type f --exec rg --type py 'OperatorDetail|GenesisState'Length of output: 33941
app/app.go (2)
548-549
: Modification ofNewExocoreApp
function to handleisGeneralInit
parameter.The
isGeneralInit
boolean parameter has been added to theNewExocoreApp
function to conditionally initialize various keepers based on the genesis state. This change is crucial for ensuring that initialization logic can be customized based on how the genesis state is set up, which is important for the application's flexibility in startup configurations. The implementation appears correct and aligns with the newly introduced constant.Also applies to: 566-566
301-310
: New constantGenesisIsGeneralInit
introduced.The constant
GenesisIsGeneralInit
has been introduced to manage initialization states based on the genesis file. This addition appears to be well-documented with comments explaining its purpose and future considerations. However, it mentions a dependency on code from another repository which should be tracked to ensure compatibility and timely updates.
9502f43
to
ede2cba
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 21
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (14)
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (2)
43-43
: Check for comprehensive client chain assertions.The test now only checks for the presence of the first client chain. Consider verifying all expected client chains to ensure comprehensive validation.
- suite.Contains(clientChains, defaultGensisState.ClientChains[0]) + for _, expectedChain := range defaultGensisState.ClientChains { + suite.Contains(clientChains, expectedChain) + }
52-52
: Ensure thorough asset assertions.Similar to client chains, consider verifying all expected assets to ensure comprehensive validation.
- suite.Contains(assets, defaultGensisState.Tokens[0]) + for _, expectedAsset := range defaultGensisState.Tokens { + suite.Contains(assets, expectedAsset) + }x/assets/types/errors.go (1)
95-98
: Ensure consistency of error messages.The error message "the joined key can't be parsed" should be consistent with the style and clarity of other error messages in the file. Consider revising for uniformity if needed.
- "the joined key can't be parsed" + "unable to parse the joined key"x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3)
4-5
: Remove unnecessary import.The
fmt
package is imported but only used for a debug print statement. Consider removing the import and the print statement for cleaner code.- "fmt"
25-26
: Remove debug print statement.The print statement is likely used for debugging purposes. It should be removed to keep the test output clean.
- fmt.Println("the acc address length is:", len(suite.AccAddress))
37-49
: Add comprehensive test coverage forOperatorDetail
fields.The current tests do not consistently cover all fields of
OperatorInfo
, particularlyApproveAddr
andClientChainEarningsAddr
. Ensure that all fields are included in the tests to maintain comprehensive coverage.
- Ensure
ApproveAddr
andClientChainEarningsAddr
are tested inoperator_info_test.go
and other relevant test files.Analysis chain
Ensure comprehensive test coverage for
OperatorDetail
.The
TestAllOperators
method has been updated to useOperatorDetail
. Ensure that all fields ofOperatorDetail
are being tested, especially if more fields are added in the future.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all fields of `OperatorDetail` are covered in tests. # Test: Search for `OperatorDetail` usage in tests. Expect: Comprehensive test coverage for all fields. rg 'OperatorDetail' --type go -A 10Length of output: 22484
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the definition of `OperatorInfo` to understand its fields. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type OperatorInfo struct { $$$ }' # Check for test coverage of `OperatorInfo` fields. rg 'OperatorInfo' --type go -A 10Length of output: 82437
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1)
88-90
: Add Test Cases for Non-ZeroWaitUnbondingAmount
The current test coverage for
WaitUnbondingAmount
only includes scenarios where it is set to zero. Consider adding test cases with non-zero values to ensure comprehensive validation of its behavior.
- Review and update tests in
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go
and other relevant files to include non-zero scenarios forWaitUnbondingAmount
.Analysis chain
Ensure comprehensive test coverage for
WaitUnbondingAmount
.The addition of the
WaitUnbondingAmount
field is a valuable enhancement. Ensure that the test cases cover scenarios where this field is non-zero to validate its behavior.Also applies to: 93-95
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `WaitUnbondingAmount` is adequately tested with non-zero values. # Test: Search for tests involving `WaitUnbondingAmount` with non-zero values. rg --type go --word-regexp 'WaitUnbondingAmount:\s*math\.NewInt\([1-9]\d*\)'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refine the search for tests involving `WaitUnbondingAmount` with non-zero values. # Test: Search for all instances where `WaitUnbondingAmount` is set, and check for non-zero values. rg --type go 'WaitUnbondingAmount:\s*math\.NewInt\(\d+\)' -A 3Length of output: 2297
x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (2)
22-22
: Document the purpose ofFlagEarningAddr
.Ensure that the constant
FlagEarningAddr
is well-documented and its usage is clear throughout the code.// FlagEarningAddr is used to specify a distinct address for receiving earnings.
78-82
: Ensure clarity in the flag description.The description for
FlagEarningAddr
should clearly state its purpose and default behavior.- "The address which is used to receive the earning reward in the Exocore chain. "+ + "The address used to receive earnings in the Exocore chain. Defaults to the sender's address if not provided."x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1)
42-42
: Reminder: Clarify the TODO comment.The comment suggests checking if the state can only be set once. Consider clarifying or addressing this TODO.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (1)
120-121
: Improved documentation fortotal_amount
.The updated comment clarifies that
total_amount
excludeswait_unbonding_amount
, which enhances understanding for developers.x/operator/keeper/slash.go (1)
Line range hint
172-172
: Address TODO comment regarding return value.The TODO comment suggests a future change in the return value to reflect the amount of burned Exo.
Would you like me to help implement this change or open a GitHub issue to track it?
testutil/utils.go (1)
203-227
: Incomplete Transition toOperatorDetail
The transition from
OperatorInfo
toOperatorDetail
is incomplete. There are still many instances ofOperatorInfo
in the codebase. Please update all occurrences toOperatorDetail
to maintain consistency and avoid potential issues.
- Files with
OperatorInfo
:
x/slash/keeper/slash_state.go
x/slash/types/keys.go
x/operator/types/keys.go
x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go
x/operator/keeper/operator.go
x/dogfood/keeper/opt_out_test.go
x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding_test.go
x/operator/keeper/msg_server.go
x/operator/keeper/grpc_query.go
x/operator/types/genesis_test.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
x/operator/types/query.pb.go
x/operator/client/cli/query.go
x/operator/types/genesis.go
x/operator/keeper/genesis.go
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_op_test.go
x/avs/keeper/avs_test.go
testutil/utils.go
cmd/exocored/testnet.go
app/ethtest_helper.go
app/test_helpers.go
Analysis chain
Ensure consistent usage of
OperatorDetail
.Verify that all instances of
OperatorInfo
have been updated toOperatorDetail
throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `OperatorDetail`. # Test: Search for any remaining instances of `OperatorInfo`. rg --type go 'OperatorInfo'Length of output: 17193
x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (1)
537-549
: Add error handling for encoding inGetAllOperatorKeyRemovals
.Consider adding error handling for
hexutil.Encode
to ensure robustness in case of unexpected encoding issues.encodedKey, err := hexutil.Encode(iterator.Key()) if err != nil { return nil, err }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (10)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/avs/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/avs/types/tx.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (49)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (4 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- local_node.sh (1 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (9 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- cmd/exocored/root.go
- go.mod
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1)
Learnt from: MaxMustermann2 PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#95 File: x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go:91-116 Timestamp: 2024-06-12T04:29:35.064Z Learning: The `GetAllUndelegationsToMature` function in `x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go` uses an iterator that processes one record per iteration, and the record keys are stored efficiently as a key-value pair with the key being a prefix + big-endian epoch. This storage pattern provides direct and efficient access to the data.
GitHub Check: break-check
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 22-22:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto
[failure] 48-48:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.StakingAssetInfo".
[failure] 60-60:
Field "1" on message "QueryAssetInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.DepositByAsset".
[failure] 80-80:
Field "1" on message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.AssetByID".
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
x/assets/types/genesis.go
[warning] 109-109:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 183-183:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
[warning] 205-205:
unused-parameter: parameter 'i' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)
Additional comments not posted (107)
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1)
29-30
: Verify the initialization ofStakingTotalAmount
.The
StakingTotalAmount
is initialized usingmath.NewIntWithDecimal(201, 6)
. Ensure this value is correct and aligns with the intended test scenario.x/delegation/types/errors.go (1)
107-110
: Clarify Error Message for Better Understandability.The error message "the block height to complete the undelegation is invalid" could be more descriptive. Consider specifying what makes the block height invalid.
- "the block height to complete the unelegation is invalid", + "the block height to complete the undelegation is invalid: must be greater than the current height",proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (1)
18-28
: Verify Impact of Breaking Changes inGenesisState
.The changes to the
GenesisState
message, including renaming and changing field types, introduce breaking changes. Ensure that all dependent systems and clients are updated to handle these changes.Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 18-18:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 22-22:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1)
50-56
: Verify Impact of Return Type Changes inIAssets
Interface.The return types of several methods in the
IAssets
interface have been changed from maps to slices. Ensure that all implementations and usages of these methods are updated to handle the new return types.x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (2)
Line range hint
29-54
:
Optimize map initialization and error handling inInitGenesis
.In the function
InitGenesis
, the maptokenState
is initialized with a size of 0, which is not optimal for performance. Initializing it with the expected size, based ondata.Tokens
, would reduce potential reallocations. Additionally, the error handling during the setting ofStakingAssetInfo
could be more descriptive to aid debugging.- tokenState := make(map[string]types.TotalSupplyAndStaking, 0) + tokenState := make(map[string]types.TotalSupplyAndStaking, len(data.Tokens))- panic(errorsmod.Wrapf( + return errorsmod.Wrapf(
Line range hint
62-103
:
Review and potentially refactor theExportGenesis
function for clarity and error handling.The function
ExportGenesis
is crucial for exporting the genesis state of assets. It currently panics on any error encountered, which could be replaced with error returns for better error handling and consistency with other modules. Additionally, consider breaking this function into smaller sub-functions for better readability and maintainability.- panic(err) + return nil, errx/operator/keeper/keeper.go (1)
16-17
: Simplification ofKeeper
initialization.The removal of the
historicalCtx
field and parameter simplifies theKeeper
initialization process. This change reduces complexity related to context management within the keeper's functionality. Ensure that the removal does not affect any dependent logic or functionality.proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3)
30-34
: Ensure handling ofoperator_assets
in genesis functions.The
operator_assets
field has been added toGenesisState
. Ensure that theInitGenesis
andExportGenesis
functions are updated to handle this new field.
47-54
: Clarify the purpose ofAssetByID
.The
AssetByID
message is introduced to encapsulate asset information. Ensure that its usage is well-documented and integrated into the system's logic.Verification successful
AssetByID
is documented inline.The
AssetByID
message is documented with inline comments within the codebase, explaining its purpose and usage. These comments provide sufficient documentation for understanding its role in the system.
- Inline comments in
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
describeAssetByID
as a helper struct used in the genesis state to store asset IDs and their info for an operator.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and documentation of `AssetByID`. # Test: Search for `AssetByID` usage in the codebase. Expect: Proper integration and documentation. rg 'AssetByID' --type goLength of output: 3925
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation related to `AssetByID` in markdown files or comments within the codebase. rg 'AssetByID' --type mdLength of output: 24
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for comments related to `AssetByID` in Go files to check for inline documentation. rg 'AssetByID' --type go -A 3 | rg '//'Length of output: 675
36-45
: Clarify the purpose ofAssetsByOperator
.The
AssetsByOperator
message is introduced to store operator asset states. Ensure that its usage is well-documented and integrated into the system's logic.x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2)
46-48
: Validation for negative staking amounts is appropriate.The added validation in
SetStakingAssetInfo
to prevent negative staking amounts is a good practice to ensure data integrity.
94-103
: Consider edge case handling inGetAllStakingAssetsInfo
.The method now returns a slice instead of a map. Ensure that edge cases, such as empty data, are handled appropriately.
x/delegation/types/keys.go (1)
Line range hint
75-81
:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The renaming of the function to
ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
improves readability and aligns with its functionality.However, ensure that all function calls to
ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
match the new name.Verification successful
All function calls to
ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
are correctly updated. The function is consistently used with its new name across the codebase, ensuring that there are no mismatches or outdated references.
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator` match the new name. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new name. rg --type go -A 5 $'ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator'Length of output: 1733
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
14-45
: LGTM! New methodAllDeposits
is well-implemented.The
AllDeposits
method effectively retrieves and aggregates deposit information for all stakers. It handles potential errors and returns a comprehensive view of deposits.
Line range hint
47-64
:
LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.The return type of
GetStakerAssetInfos
has been changed from a map to a slice, which streamlines the output format.However, ensure that all method calls to
GetStakerAssetInfos
handle the new return type.Verification successful
Method usage of
GetStakerAssetInfos
is correctly updated. The method is used inx/assets/keeper/grpc_query.go
and tested inx/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go
, both of which handle the new slice return type appropriately. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all method calls to `GetStakerAssetInfos` handle the new return type. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences handling the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetStakerAssetInfos'Length of output: 2783
x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1)
75-79
: LGTM! Dereferencing removal enhances readability.The removal of dereferencing in
TestSlashWithInfractionReason
enhances readability and reduces potential nil pointer dereference issues.precompiles/assets/tx.go (1)
146-146
: Verify the impact of passingasset
by value instead of by reference.The change from passing a pointer to passing the
asset
variable directly might affect howSetStakingAssetInfo
handlesAssetBasicInfo
. Ensure that this modification does not introduce unintended side effects, such as performance issues or incorrect data handling.x/assets/types/keys.go (2)
94-96
: LGTM! TheIsJoinedStoreKey
function enhances utility.The addition of
IsJoinedStoreKey
provides a straightforward way to determine the structure of keys, improving the module's robustness.
Line range hint
102-108
:
Improved error handling inParseJoinedStoreKey
.Changing the error type to
ErrParseJoinedKey
provides a more accurate description of the error context, aiding in debugging and maintenance.x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
27-27
: Verify the impact of changingGetAllStakingAssetsInfo
return type.The return type change from a map to a slice may affect iteration and access patterns in code that implements or utilizes this interface. Ensure that all consumers of this method are updated accordingly.
Verification successful
Return type change of
GetAllStakingAssetsInfo
is compatible with current usage.The change from a map to a slice has been accounted for in the codebase. The method is used in various files, and the operations performed on its return value are consistent with slice operations, such as iteration and length checks. The test files further confirm that the change has been addressed appropriately. No further action is required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `GetAllStakingAssetsInfo` to ensure compatibility with the new return type. # Test: Search for all usages of `GetAllStakingAssetsInfo`. Expect: Proper handling of the new return type. rg --type go 'GetAllStakingAssetsInfo' -A 5Length of output: 4475
x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
27-220
:
Comprehensive test coverage for genesis validation.The restructuring and addition of new test cases significantly enhance the robustness of the genesis validation logic. The tests cover a wide range of invalid states, ensuring thorough validation.
x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (2)
14-43
: Efficient retrieval and organization of operator assets.The
AllOperatorAssets
function efficiently retrieves and organizes operator assets into a structured format. The use of slices for grouping is a clear and effective approach.
46-55
: Improved structure for operator asset information.The change to return a slice of
AssetByID
improves the consistency and usability of the function. This aligns with the overall enhancements in asset information representation.x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (11)
70-72
: Test case "base, should pass" looks good.The test case correctly uses the new
delegationStates
structure.
75-82
: Test case "invalid staker id" effectively tests validation logic.The test case correctly manipulates the
Key
to test invalid staker ID handling.
86-93
: Test case "duplicate state key" correctly tests for duplicates.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for duplicate state keys.
98-105
: Test case "invalid asset id" correctly tests validation logic.The test case manipulates the
Key
to test invalid asset ID handling.
110-120
: Test case "asset id mismatch" effectively tests mismatched IDs.The test case correctly manipulates the
Key
to create a mismatch.
124-131
: Test case "nil wrapped undelegatable share" correctly tests nil handling.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for nil
UndelegatableShare
.
135-142
: Test case "nil wrapped unbonding amount" correctly tests nil handling.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for nil
WaitUndelegationAmount
.
146-153
: Test case "negative wrapped undelegatable share" correctly tests negative handling.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for negative
UndelegatableShare
.
158-165
: Test case "invalid operator address" effectively tests validation logic.The test case manipulates the
Key
to test invalid operator address handling.
Line range hint
170-181
:
Test case "duplicate stakerID in associations" correctly tests for duplicates.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for duplicate
StakerID
inAssociations
.
Line range hint
185-196
:
Test case "one stakerID in associations" correctly tests singleStakerID
handling.The test case effectively checks the validation logic for a single
StakerID
inAssociations
.proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (3)
48-48
: Change torepeated
field inQueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse
looks good.The change from a map to a repeated field is consistent with the new structure. Ensure compatibility with existing clients.
Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 48-48:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.StakingAssetInfo".
60-60
: Change torepeated
field inQueryAssetInfoResponse
looks good.The change from a map to a repeated field is consistent with the new structure. Ensure compatibility with existing clients.
Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 60-60:
Field "1" on message "QueryAssetInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.DepositByAsset".
80-80
: Change torepeated
field inQueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse
looks good.The change from a map to a repeated field is consistent with the new structure. Ensure compatibility with existing clients.
Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 80-80:
Field "1" on message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.AssetByID".x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2)
77-79
: Change to useAssetBasicInfo
as a value inTestAVSUSDValue
looks good.The change simplifies the code by using a value instead of a pointer, aligning with the new handling of
AssetBasicInfo
.
135-137
: Change to useAssetBasicInfo
as a value inTestVotingPowerForDogFood
looks good.The change simplifies the code by using a value instead of dereferencing a pointer, aligning with the new handling of
AssetBasicInfo
.x/operator/types/keys.go (1)
31-33
: Clarify the purpose ofAccAddressLength
.The constant
AccAddressLength
is used for parsing keys. Ensure that its usage is consistent throughout the codebase and that any assumptions about address length are well-documented.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
AccAddressLength
VerifiedThe constant
AccAddressLength
is used consistently across the codebase for slicing keys and validating their lengths. Its usage aligns with its intended purpose as described in the comments. Additionally, it is referenced in a test file, suggesting it is being tested for correctness. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `AccAddressLength` across the codebase to ensure consistent application. # Test: Search for occurrences of `AccAddressLength`. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'AccAddressLength'Length of output: 1263
x/operator/keeper/operator.go (4)
195-203
: Ensure atomicity inSetAllOptedInfo
.The function sets multiple opted states in a loop, which could lead to partial updates if an error occurs midway. Consider implementing a transaction mechanism to ensure atomicity.
205-220
: LGTM! But verify method usage.The method retrieves all opted states and returns them as a slice of
operatortypes.OptedState
. Ensure that the method is used appropriately and efficiently.Verification successful
Method usage is appropriate.
The
GetAllOptedInfo
method is used correctly ingenesis.go
, with its results assigned tores.OptStates
and errors properly handled. No issues found with its usage.
x/operator/keeper/genesis.go
: Proper error handling and assignment tores.OptStates
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `GetAllOptedInfo` method are appropriate and efficient. # Test: Search for method usage. Expect: All usages handle `operatortypes.OptedState`. rg --type go 'GetAllOptedInfo\('Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how the `GetAllOptedInfo` method is used in `genesis.go` and examine the context around its usage. rg --type go -A 10 'GetAllOptedInfo\(' x/operator/keeper/genesis.goLength of output: 294
25-25
: Verify the removal of earnings address validation.The removal of the validation check for the earnings address might lead to unintended consequences. Ensure that this change is intentional and verify that it does not introduce any issues.
76-89
: LGTM! But verify method usage.The change to return a slice of
operatortypes.OperatorDetail
enhances the method's functionality. Ensure that all usages of this method are updated to handle the new return type.Verification successful
All usages of
AllOperators
correctly handleOperatorDetail
.The changes to the
AllOperators
method have been appropriately reflected in the codebase. The usages ingenesis.go
andoperator_info_test.go
correctly handle theOperatorDetail
type. The gRPC-related methods are not affected by the change.
x/operator/keeper/genesis.go
: Correctly assignsAllOperators
result tores.Operators
.x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go
: Tests confirm handling ofOperatorDetail
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `AllOperators` method are updated to handle the new return type. # Test: Search for method usage. Expect: All usages handle `operatortypes.OperatorDetail`. rg --type go 'AllOperators\('Length of output: 1776
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how the `AllOperators` method is used in `genesis.go`. rg --context 5 'AllOperators\(' x/operator/keeper/genesis.go # Check how the `AllOperators` method is used in `operator_info_test.go`. rg --context 5 'AllOperators\(' x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go # Check the `QueryAllOperators` function in `grpc_query.go` to see if it handles `OperatorDetail`. rg --context 5 'QueryAllOperators' x/operator/keeper/grpc_query.go # Check the `QueryAllOperators` client call in `cli/query.go`. rg --context 5 'QueryAllOperators' x/operator/client/cli/query.goLength of output: 2468
proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (9)
15-15
: Field type change inGenesisState
requires careful consideration.The change from
OperatorInfo
toOperatorDetail
indicates a more detailed structuring of operator data. Ensure all dependent code is updated and consider implications for data migration.
46-54
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorDetail
usage.The
OperatorDetail
message provides detailed operator information and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
OperatorDetail
Usage Verified ingenesis.proto
The
OperatorDetail
message is appropriately used within thegenesis.proto
file as a repeated field to store multiple operator details. This aligns with its intended purpose for genesis state configuration.
- File:
proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto
repeated OperatorDetail operators = 1 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false];
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorDetail` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'OperatorDetail'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorDetail` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage in .proto files. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg 'OperatorDetail' --glob '*.proto' -A 5Length of output: 1361
75-86
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorUSDValue
usage.The
OperatorUSDValue
message stores USD values for operators and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.
66-73
: LGTM! But verifyAVSUSDValue
usage.The
AVSUSDValue
message stores USD values for AVS and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.
56-64
: LGTM! But verifyOptedState
usage.The
OptedState
message stores opted state information and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
OptedState usage is appropriate.
The
OptedState
message is used in a repeated field, which aligns with its purpose of storing multiple opted states. This usage is consistent with the intended data model.
repeated OptedState opt_states = 3 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false];
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OptedState` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'OptedState'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .proto files and search for the usage of `OptedState` within them. fd --extension proto --exec rg 'OptedState' {}Length of output: 222
88-96
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorSlashState
usage.The
OperatorSlashState
message stores slashing information and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
OperatorSlashState
is appropriate and well-integrated.The
OperatorSlashState
message is used in various parts of the codebase, includinggenesis.go
,genesis.pb.go
, andoperator_slash_state.go
, indicating it is correctly integrated into the application logic for managing slashing information.
x/operator/types/genesis.go
: UtilizesOperatorSlashState
in slashing state management functions.x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go
: Contains functions likeSetAllSlashInfo
andGetAllSlashInfo
, which manage slashing data usingOperatorSlashState
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorSlashState` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'OperatorSlashState'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of `OperatorSlashState` across the codebase. # Search for references to `OperatorSlashState` in all files. rg 'OperatorSlashState'Length of output: 3833
111-117
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorKeyRemoval
usage.The
OperatorKeyRemoval
message tracks operators unbonding their keys and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
OperatorKeyRemoval
Usage is AppropriateThe
OperatorKeyRemoval
message is used correctly as a repeated field in the proto file, aligning with its intended purpose to track operators unbonding their keys. The usage is consistent with the data model requirements.
- Usage found in a repeated field:
operator_key_removals = 8 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false];
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorKeyRemoval` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'OperatorKeyRemoval'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all .proto files and search for the usage of `OperatorKeyRemoval`. # Find all .proto files and search for `OperatorKeyRemoval` within them. fd --extension proto --exec rg 'OperatorKeyRemoval' {}Length of output: 341
98-109
: LGTM! But verifyPrevConsKey
usage.The
PrevConsKey
message stores previous consensus keys and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
To verify the usage of
PrevConsKey
, I'll adjust the search to correctly identify and search within.proto
files.
Usage of
PrevConsKey
is appropriate.The
PrevConsKey
message is used as a repeated fieldpre_cons_keys
withgogoproto.nullable
set to false, which aligns with the intended data model for storing multiple previous consensus keys.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `PrevConsKey` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'PrevConsKey'Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .proto files and search for the usage of `PrevConsKey` fd --extension proto --exec rg 'PrevConsKey' {}Length of output: 300
119-127
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorConsKeyRecord
usage.The
OperatorConsKeyRecord
message contains operator address and chain details and aligns with the overall data model. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
OperatorConsKeyRecord
is appropriate and well-integrated.The
OperatorConsKeyRecord
message is used consistently across functions, tests, and protobuf files, indicating proper integration into the system's logic.
- Functions: Utilized in
GetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords
and other related functions.- Tests: Extensively used in
genesis_test.go
, ensuring its functionality is validated.- Protobuf: Defined and used in
genesis.proto
andgenesis.pb.go
.These usages align with the data model and its intended purpose.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorConsKeyRecord` message are appropriate. # Test: Search for message usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type proto 'OperatorConsKeyRecord'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .proto files and search for the usage of `OperatorConsKeyRecord`. fd --extension proto --exec rg 'OperatorConsKeyRecord' {}Length of output: 227
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of `OperatorConsKeyRecord` in the entire repository. rg 'OperatorConsKeyRecord'Length of output: 4297
app/ethtest_helper.go (6)
206-213
: LGTM! But verifyOperatorDetail
usage.The change to
OperatorDetail
enhances the clarity of the operator's identity. Ensure that all usages of this structure are updated to handle the new fields.Verification successful
Verification Complete:
OperatorDetail
Usage is ConsistentThe
OperatorDetail
structure is used consistently across the codebase, including in test files and protobuf-generated files. All usages appear to handle the fields appropriately. No issues were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `OperatorDetail` structure are updated to handle new fields. # Test: Search for structure usage. Expect: All usages handle new fields. rg --type go 'OperatorDetail'Length of output: 4016
252-252
: LGTM! But verify consistency with intended logic.The inclusion of the operator's account address in
dogfoodGenesis
should be consistent with the intended logic. Ensure that these changes align with the overall design.
235-242
: LGTM! But verifyStakersByOperator
usage.The
StakersByOperator
structure enhances the relationship tracking between operators and stakers. Ensure that it is used appropriately throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
StakersByOperator
is appropriate and consistent.The
StakersByOperator
structure is well-integrated into the codebase, with consistent usage across various modules and functions. It is used for managing staker information by operator, aligning with its intended purpose.
- Files Involved:
x/delegation/types/genesis.go
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
The integration seems robust, with both production and test code utilizing this structure effectively.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `StakersByOperator` structure are appropriate. # Test: Search for structure usage. Expect: All usages align with the data model. rg --type go 'StakersByOperator'Length of output: 6790
243-243
: LGTM! But verify consistency with intended logic.The revision to the delegation genesis state reflects a more organized approach to delegations and associations. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended logic.
Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
delegationGenesis
Across FilesThe
delegationGenesis
variable is consistently used across multiple files (testutil/utils.go
,app/test_helpers.go
, andapp/ethtest_helper.go
). In each case, it is created using the same method and parameters, and is marshaled into JSON for inclusion in thegenesisState
. This confirms that the changes are consistent with the intended logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of `delegationGenesis` changes with intended logic. # Test: Search for references to `delegationGenesis`. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type go 'delegationGenesis'Length of output: 740
192-193
: LGTM! But verify consistency with intended logic.The changes simplify the data structure and initialize
StakingTotalAmount
with actual deposit values. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended logic.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Changes to
AssetBasicInfo
andStakingTotalAmount
are consistent with the codebase logic.The modifications in
app/ethtest_helper.go
align with the validation and usage patterns observed throughout the codebase, ensuring thatStakingTotalAmount
andAssetBasicInfo
are set and used correctly. The presence of comprehensive test cases further supports the correctness of these changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of `AssetBasicInfo` and `StakingTotalAmount` changes with intended logic. # Test: Search for references to `AssetBasicInfo` and `StakingTotalAmount`. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type go 'AssetBasicInfo|StakingTotalAmount'Length of output: 9158
219-225
: LGTM! But verifyDelegationStates
usage.The change to
DelegationStates
introduces a more nuanced approach to managing delegation states. Ensure that all usages of this structure are updated to handle the new fields.Verification successful
All usages of
DelegationStates
are updated.The
DelegationStates
structure is consistently used across the codebase with the new fields properly handled, as verified in test cases and function implementations.
- Files Checked:
x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.go
x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
testutil/utils.go
cmd/exocored/testnet.go
app/test_helpers.go
app/ethtest_helper.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `DelegationStates` structure are updated to handle new fields. # Test: Search for structure usage. Expect: All usages handle new fields. rg --type go 'DelegationStates'Length of output: 6969
x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Line range hint
131-143
:
Review the impact of changingUndelegationRecord
from pointer to value.Switching from a pointer to a value may affect memory usage and performance. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior, especially if mutability of the record is required.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (1)
73-73
: Enforcing non-nullability improves data integrity.The addition of
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
ensures thatasset_basic_info
cannot be null, enhancing the robustness of theStakingAssetInfo
message.x/operator/keeper/slash.go (2)
45-47
: Enhance error message forSlashProportion
validation.The error message could be more informative by explicitly stating the expected condition.
- return errorsmod.Wrapf(types.ErrValueIsNilOrZero, "SlashProportion: %+v", parameter.SlashProportion) + return errorsmod.Wrapf(types.ErrValueIsNilOrZero, "Invalid SlashProportion; expected non-nil and non-negative, got: %+v", parameter.SlashProportion)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
86-87
: LGTM! Verify impact of moving from pointers to value types.The change simplifies memory management and improves performance. Ensure related code handles these changes correctly.
Also applies to: 135-135
Verification successful
Change from pointers to value types is safe and effective.
The transition from pointers to value types for
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
aligns with best practices and does not introduce issues in the codebase. The usages in the code are consistent with this change, ensuring correct handling.
x/operator/keeper/slash.go
: Initialization and usage ofSlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
.x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go
: Tests confirm correct behavior with value types.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changing from pointers to value types in `SlashAssets`. # Test: Search for usages of `SlashExecutionInfo` to ensure correct handling of value types. rg --type go 'SlashExecutionInfo'Length of output: 2975
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of `SlashUndelegations` and `SlashAssetsPool` to verify correct handling of value types. # Test: Search for `SlashUndelegations` usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'SlashUndelegations' # Test: Search for `SlashAssetsPool` usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'SlashAssetsPool'Length of output: 3512
app/test_helpers.go (4)
228-243
: LGTM! Verify impact ofAssetsByOperator
structure changes.The new structure enhances granularity and clarity in asset management. Ensure consistency with related code.
Verification successful
Verification Successful:
AssetsByOperator
Structure Changes are ConsistentThe
AssetsByOperator
structure changes are consistently applied across the codebase, including protobuf definitions, genesis state handling, and asset management functions. No inconsistencies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changes to `AssetsByOperator` structure. # Test: Search for usages of `AssetsByOperator` to ensure consistency. rg --type go 'AssetsByOperator'Length of output: 3482
247-257
: LGTM! Verify impact ofOperatorDetail
structure changes.The updated structure provides a more detailed representation of operator data. Ensure consistency with related code.
276-283
: LGTM! Verify impact ofstakersByOperator
structure changes.The new structure provides a clearer mapping of asset delegations. Ensure consistency with related code.
Verification successful
Verification of
stakersByOperator
Structure ChangesThe
stakersByOperator
structure is used consistently across multiple files, including for creating genesis states and validation functions. Ensure that all related logic is tested and validated for consistency.
- Files to Review:
x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.go
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
app/test_helpers.go
app/ethtest_helper.go
Please verify that all related tests pass successfully and consider edge cases that might not be covered.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changes to `stakersByOperator` structure. # Test: Search for usages of `stakersByOperator` to ensure consistency. rg --type go 'stakersByOperator'Length of output: 3489
260-266
: LGTM! Verify impact ofDelegationStates
structure changes.The new structure streamlines delegation management. Ensure consistency with related code.
proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1)
172-174
: LGTM! Verify impact of non-nullable repeated fields.The change ensures non-null lists, enhancing data integrity. Verify the impact on serialization and deserialization processes.
Verification successful
Non-nullable fields in
SlashExecutionInfo
are properly handled in serialization.The
SlashExecutionInfo
struct and its methods intx.pb.go
confirm that the non-nullable fields are integrated into the serialization and deserialization processes. This ensures data integrity without adverse effects.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of non-nullable repeated fields in `SlashExecutionInfo`. # Test: Search for usages of `SlashExecutionInfo` to ensure correct handling of non-nullable fields. rg --type proto 'SlashExecutionInfo'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate `.proto` files and search for usages of `SlashExecutionInfo`. # Find all `.proto` files and search for `SlashExecutionInfo` within them. fd --extension proto --exec rg 'SlashExecutionInfo' {}Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `SlashExecutionInfo` in non-proto files to gather more context about its usage and handling. # Find all files except `.proto` and search for `SlashExecutionInfo` within them. rg 'SlashExecutionInfo' --type-not protoLength of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `SlashExecutionInfo` in all files except `.proto` to gather more context about its usage and handling. # Find all files, excluding `.proto`, and search for `SlashExecutionInfo` within them. rg 'SlashExecutionInfo' --glob '!*.proto'Length of output: 2983
x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (2)
254-269
: LGTM!The function
GetAllOperatorUSDValues
is implemented correctly and efficiently retrieves all operator USD values.
281-296
: LGTM!The function
GetAllAVSUSDValues
is implemented correctly and efficiently retrieves all AVS USD values.x/delegation/types/genesis.go (5)
16-25
: LGTM!The function
NewGenesis
correctly initializes theGenesisState
with the provided parameters, enhancing the genesis state initialization.
30-31
: LGTM!The function
DefaultGenesis
correctly returns a default genesis state usingNewGenesis
.
34-61
: Refactor error handling for consistency and clarity.The error messages in
ValidateIDAndOperator
could be improved for consistency and clarity. Consider using a uniform error prefix and providing more context in the messages.
180-212
: LGTM!The function
ValidateAssociations
is implemented correctly and performs necessary validation checks for associations.
214-254
: LGTM!The function
ValidateDelegationStates
is implemented correctly and performs necessary validation checks for delegation states.x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (1)
29-30
: LGTM!The changes to the
TestValidateGenesis
function streamline the test setup by usingnil
for empty slices and adjusting staking amounts. Ensure that the removal of certain test cases does not overlook any critical validation scenarios.testutil/utils.go (4)
136-165
: Verify initialization values forTotalShare
andOperatorShare
.Ensure that the values for
TotalShare
andOperatorShare
are correctly calculated and initialized. This is crucial for accurate asset management and distribution.Verification successful
Initialization values for
TotalShare
andOperatorShare
are correct.The values for
TotalShare
andOperatorShare
intestutil/utils.go
are initialized usingsdk.NewDecFromBigInt(depositAmount.BigInt())
, which aligns with the expected behavior observed in other parts of the codebase. No issues found with the initialization.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization values for `TotalShare` and `OperatorShare`. # Test: Check if the values are correctly calculated and initialized. rg --type go 'TotalShare|OperatorShare' -A 5Length of output: 19809
Line range hint
231-271
: Verify transition todelegationStates
.Ensure that all references to
delegationsByStaker
have been updated todelegationStates
for consistency in delegation management.Verification successful
Transition to
delegationStates
Verified SuccessfullyThe transition from
delegationsByStaker
todelegationStates
is complete and consistent across the codebase. All references have been updated appropriately. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transition to `delegationStates`. # Test: Search for any remaining instances of `delegationsByStaker`. rg --type go 'delegationsByStaker'Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `delegationStates`. # Test: Search for instances of `delegationStates` to ensure it's being used consistently. rg --type go 'delegationStates'Length of output: 3220
227-227
: VerifyoperatorGenesis
initialization.Ensure that the
operatorGenesis
initialization is correct and aligns with the new operator structure.Verification successful
Let's verify the definition of
NewGenesisState
inoperatortypes
to ensure that theoperatorGenesis
initialization is correct.
Initialization of
operatorGenesis
is correct.The initialization of
operatorGenesis
withoperatorInfos
andnil
values for other parameters aligns with the expected signature ofNewGenesisState
inoperatortypes
. This confirms the correctness of the initialization across the codebase.
x/operator/types/genesis.go
:NewGenesisState
function definition confirms the parameter structure.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `operatorGenesis` initialization. # Test: Check the initialization of `operatorGenesis`. rg --type go 'operatorGenesis'Length of output: 696
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the definition of `NewGenesisState` in `operatortypes`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewGenesisState($_, $$$) $_'Length of output: 1215
271-271
: VerifydelegationGenesis
initialization.Ensure that the
delegationGenesis
initialization is correct and aligns with the new delegation structure.Verification successful
Initialization of
delegationGenesis
is correct.The
delegationGenesis
initialization aligns with theNewGenesis
function definition inx/delegation/types/genesis.go
. The use ofnil
forundelegations
is appropriate given the function's parameters. No issues found with the current setup.
x/delegation/types/genesis.go
:NewGenesis
function definition confirms expected parameters.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `delegationGenesis` initialization. # Test: Check the initialization of `delegationGenesis`. rg --type go 'delegationGenesis'Length of output: 740
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate `delegationtypes.NewGenesis` function to verify parameters. # Locate the definition of the `NewGenesis` function in `delegationtypes`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewGenesis($_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `NewGenesis` function in the codebase. # Use ripgrep to locate the `NewGenesis` function definition. rg 'func NewGenesis' --type go -A 5Length of output: 2559
x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (2)
17-32
: Handle potential errors fromMustUnmarshal
.To avoid panics, consider handling errors from the
MustUnmarshal
method. This will enhance robustness and prevent crashes in production.- k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stateInfo) + if err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stateInfo); err != nil { + return nil, err + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
54-54
: Approve the change to key parsing method.The change to
ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
improves key handling. Ensure consistent usage across the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of Key Parsing Method Verified
The old parsing method
ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperatorAddrFromKey
is not present in the codebase, confirming that the transition toParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
has been completed successfully. The new method is consistently used for key handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator`. # Test: Search for any remaining instances of the old parsing method. rg --type go 'ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperatorAddrFromKey'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run the search for the old parsing method to confirm its absence. rg --type go 'ParseStakerAssetIDAndOperatorAddrFromKey'Length of output: 55
local_node.sh (4)
99-99
: Approve change tostaking_total_amount
.The change to
"5000"
reflects a new initial staking balance. Verify consistency with other configurations.Verification successful
Change to
staking_total_amount
is consistent.The
staking_total_amount
is only referenced inlocal_node.sh
, where it is set to"5000"
. No inconsistencies found with other configurations in the shell scripts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of `staking_total_amount` with other configurations. # Test: Search for occurrences of `staking_total_amount` to ensure consistency. rg --type sh 'staking_total_amount'Length of output: 179
116-121
: Approve restructuring ofoperator_info
.The encapsulation of attributes enhances clarity. Verify consistent usage of
operator_info
.Verification successful
Consistent usage of
operator_info
verified.The
operator_info
structure is used consistently in thelocal_node.sh
file, ensuring clarity and organization of operator-related attributes. No discrepancies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `operator_info`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `operator_info` to ensure consistency. rg --type sh 'operator_info'Length of output: 958
124-126
: Approve changes todelegation_states
.The new format provides a clearer view of delegation status. Verify consistent usage of
delegation_states
.Verification successful
Consistent usage of
delegation_states
confirmed.The
delegation_states
changes are isolated tolocal_node.sh
, and there are no inconsistencies found in its usage across other shell scripts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `delegation_states`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `delegation_states` to ensure consistency. rg --type sh 'delegation_states'Length of output: 646
105-110
: Approve changes tooperator_assets
.The new entries enhance clarity and organization. Verify that the new entries are correctly initialized.
x/operator/types/genesis.go (11)
13-28
: LGTM: Expanded function signature.The
NewGenesisState
function has been expanded to include additional fields, which enhances its functionality. The initialization logic is correct.
34-34
: LGTM: Updated default genesis initialization.The
DefaultGenesis
function correctly initializes the new fields withnil
, ensuring compatibility with the expandedGenesisState
.
Line range hint
40-108
: LGTM: Comprehensive operator validation.The
ValidateOperators
function effectively checks for duplicate addresses, correct formats, and valid commission structures. The error handling is well-implemented.
114-170
: LGTM: Effective consensus key record validation.The
ValidateOperatorConsKeyRecords
function correctly validates consensus key records, ensuring no duplicates and correct formats. The logic is clear and well-structured.
172-213
: LGTM: Thorough opted states validation.The
ValidateOptedStates
function ensures operators are registered and validates the sequence of opted-in and opted-out heights. The logic is robust and clear.
215-249
: LGTM: Comprehensive AVS USD values validation.The
ValidateAVSUSDValues
function effectively checks for valid AVS addresses and ensures that monetary values are non-negative. The logic is clear and well-implemented.
251-324
: LGTM: Robust operator USD values validation.The
ValidateOperatorUSDValues
function ensures consistency between operator and AVS USD values and checks for nil and negative fields. The logic is well-structured.
326-429
: LGTM: Comprehensive slash states validation.The
ValidateSlashStates
function effectively validates slashing information, ensuring correct operator registration and valid slashing proportions. The logic is robust and clear.
431-476
: LGTM: Effective previous consensus keys validation.The
ValidatePrevConsKeys
function ensures correct key decoding and operator registration, maintaining the integrity of consensus keys. The logic is sound.
478-514
: LGTM: Robust operator key removals validation.The
ValidateOperatorKeyRemovals
function ensures correct key decoding and operator registration, maintaining the integrity of key removals. The logic is clear and well-implemented.
518-550
: LGTM: Comprehensive genesis state validation.The
Validate
function orchestrates the validation of the genesis state, ensuring each component is thoroughly checked. The error handling is well-implemented.x/assets/types/genesis.go (6)
11-14
: LGTM: New typeTotalSupplyAndStaking
.The introduction of
TotalSupplyAndStaking
enhances clarity and encapsulation for handling staking and supply values.
15-27
: LGTM: Expanded function signature forNewGenesis
.The inclusion of
operatorAssets
in theNewGenesis
function allows for a more comprehensive initialization of the genesis state.
41-67
: LGTM: Generic validation withCommonValidation
.The
CommonValidation
function enhances code reusability and maintainability by providing a generic mechanism for validating slices and checking for duplicates.
69-105
: LGTM: Effective client chains validation.The
ValidateClientChains
function ensures correct formats and no duplicates, with comprehensive checks for valid names, IDs, and address lengths.
288-346
: LGTM: Comprehensive operator assets validation.The
ValidateOperatorAssets
function ensures operator assets are correctly registered and values are non-negative. The logic is clear and well-implemented.
350-368
: LGTM: Comprehensive genesis state validation.The
Validate
function orchestrates the validation of the genesis state, ensuring each component is thoroughly checked. The error handling is well-implemented.cmd/exocored/testnet.go (2)
Line range hint
398-469
: LGTM: Enhanced data handling ingetTestExocoreGenesis
.The restructuring of
getTestExocoreGenesis
enhances clarity and functionality in managing operator and delegation information. The changes align with the new data model.
398-398
: Ensure proper resource cleanup ininitTestnetFiles
.The function involves file and directory operations. Ensure resources are properly cleaned up in error scenarios to prevent leaks. Consider using defer statements for cleanup.
- if err := os.RemoveAll(args.outputDir); err != nil { + defer func() { + if err := os.RemoveAll(args.outputDir); err != nil { + cmd.PrintErr("Failed to clean up resources:", err) + } + }()Likely invalid or redundant comment.
x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (1)
551-580
: Verify robustness of error handling inGetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords
.Ensure that error handling for
ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey
is robust, as any failure in parsing could disrupt the function's logic.Verification successful
Error handling in
GetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords
is robust.The function
ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey
checks for missing addresses and invalid key lengths, returning meaningful errors. These are correctly handled inGetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords
. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness of error handling in `GetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords`. # Test: Search for usage and error handling of `ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey`. rg --type go 'ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey'Length of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of `ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey` to verify error handling. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey($_) ($_, $_, error) { $$$ }'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to extract the implementation of `ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey` again with a refined pattern. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey(key []byte) (sdk.AccAddress, string, error) { $$$ }'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the function definition of `ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey`. rg 'func ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey' --type go -A 10Length of output: 858
app/app.go (1)
Line range hint
259-259
: Verify impact of removingbApp.CreateQueryContext
fromOperatorKeeper
.Ensure that the removal of
bApp.CreateQueryContext
does not negatively impact the application's functionality, particularly in how query contexts are managed.Verification successful
No impact from removing
bApp.CreateQueryContext
fromOperatorKeeper
.The removal of
bApp.CreateQueryContext
does not affect the application's functionality, as there are no active references or usages related toOperatorKeeper
. The only mention is in a commented-out section of a test file.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `bApp.CreateQueryContext` from `OperatorKeeper`. # Test: Search for references to `CreateQueryContext` in the codebase to ensure its removal does not affect functionality. rg --type go 'CreateQueryContext'Length of output: 250
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to `CreateQueryContext` in relation to `OperatorKeeper`. # Test: Search for `CreateQueryContext` usage in the context of `OperatorKeeper`. rg --type go 'OperatorKeeper' -A 10 | rg 'CreateQueryContext'Length of output: 174
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
x/assets/types/genesis.go (2)
41-68
: Enhance readability with inline comments.Consider adding more inline comments to explain the parameters
seenFieldValue
andvalidation
for better code readability.+ // seenFieldValue extracts a unique field and its associated data from the element. + // validation performs custom validation logic on the element.
289-347
: Enhance readability with inline comments.Consider adding more inline comments to explain the validation logic within the
ValidateOperatorAssets
function for better code readability.+ // Validate the operator's address format. + // Ensure the sum of operator's amounts does not exceed the total staking amount. + // Check that the operator's share does not exceed the total share.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: break-check
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 19-19:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".
Additional comments not posted (24)
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (4)
28-34
: New Message Structure Approved.The
DelegationStates
message is well-defined and enhances the functionality of theGenesisState
. Ensure that it is correctly utilized in the codebase.
36-43
: New Message Structure Approved.The
StakersByOperator
message is well-defined and enhances the functionality of theGenesisState
. Ensure that it is correctly utilized in the codebase.
17-23
: Ensure Compatibility with Previous Versions.The
GenesisState
message has undergone significant changes, including renaming and reordering fields. It's crucial to ensure that these changes are compatible with previous versions of the protocol and that any necessary migrations are handled appropriately.Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 19-19:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".
17-17
: Verify Field Name and Type Changes.The field
associations
inGenesisState
has changed its name and type fromdelegations
toassociations
. Ensure that these changes are correctly reflected throughout the codebase and that any dependent code is updated accordingly.Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".x/delegation/types/genesis.go (7)
13-25
: Enhanced Initialization Approved.The
NewGenesis
function now accepts additional parameters, enhancing the initialization of theGenesisState
. Ensure these parameters are correctly integrated into the rest of the codebase.
31-31
: Default Genesis State Updated.The
DefaultGenesis
function has been updated to accommodate new parameters, ensuring compatibility with the updatedGenesisState
.
180-212
: Association Validation Approved.The
ValidateAssociations
function effectively checks for duplicate staker IDs and valid operator addresses, ensuring data integrity.
214-254
: Delegation State Validation Approved.The
ValidateDelegationStates
function ensures the integrity of delegation states by checking for nil and negative values.
256-311
: Staker List Validation Approved.The
ValidateStakerList
function effectively validates operator addresses and asset IDs, ensuring data consistency.
313-361
: Undelegation Validation Approved.The
ValidateUndelegations
function includes comprehensive checks for transaction hashes and logical consistency, enhancing data integrity.
Line range hint
363-550
:
Comprehensive Validation Approved.The
Validate
function orchestrates multiple specific validation functions, ensuring a comprehensive and error-resistant initialization of theGenesisState
.x/operator/types/genesis.go (10)
13-28
: Enhanced Genesis State Initialization Approved.The
NewGenesisState
function now includes additional parameters, enhancing the functionality of theGenesisState
to encompass a broader range of operational data.
34-34
: Default Genesis State Updated.The
DefaultGenesis
function has been updated to accommodate new parameters, ensuring compatibility with the updatedGenesisState
.
Line range hint
37-108
:
Operator Validation Approved.The
ValidateOperators
function includes comprehensive validation checks, ensuring that operator addresses are valid and free of duplicates.
110-170
: Consensus Key Record Validation Approved.The
ValidateOperatorConsKeyRecords
function effectively validates operator consensus key records, ensuring data integrity.
172-213
: Opted State Validation Approved.The
ValidateOptedStates
function ensures that operators are registered and checks the consistency of opted-in and opted-out heights.
215-249
: AVS USD Value Validation Approved.The
ValidateAVSUSDValues
function checks for valid AVS addresses and ensures that values are not nil or negative, enhancing data integrity.
251-324
: Operator USD Value Validation Approved.The
ValidateOperatorUSDValues
function ensures that values are not nil or negative and checks for consistency with AVS USD values.
326-429
: Slashing State Validation Approved.The
ValidateSlashStates
function includes comprehensive checks for logical consistency and valid slashing proportions, enhancing data integrity.
431-476
: Previous Consensus Key Validation Approved.The
ValidatePrevConsKeys
function effectively validates previous consensus keys, ensuring data integrity.
478-514
: Operator Key Removal Validation Approved.The
ValidateOperatorKeyRemovals
function ensures that keys are correctly decoded and operators are registered, enhancing data integrity.x/assets/types/genesis.go (3)
11-14
: LGTM: New typeTotalSupplyAndStaking
.The introduction of the
TotalSupplyAndStaking
type is clear and enhances data encapsulation for staking and supply values.
15-27
: LGTM: UpdatedNewGenesis
function.The addition of
operatorAssets
to theNewGenesis
function is appropriate and aligns with the PR's objectives to support genesis exporting.
348-369
: LGTM: RefactoredValidate
function.The refactor of the
Validate
function enhances the robustness and clarity of the genesis state validation process.
cc6ba25
to
45160c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
x/delegation/types/errors.go (1)
83-86
: Clarify Error Message for Better UnderstandabilityThe error message "the block height to complete the unelegation is invalid" could be more descriptive. Consider specifying what makes the block height invalid.
- "the block height to complete the unelegation is invalid", + "the block height to complete the unelegation is invalid: must be greater than the current height",x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (1)
25-26
: LGTM, but consider removing the print statement.The code changes are approved. The print statement at line 26 is used for debugging purposes. Consider removing it before merging the PR.
Apply this diff to remove the print statement:
- fmt.Println("the acc address length is:", len(suite.AccAddress))
x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1)
16-27
: Consider adding error handling for unmarshalling.While the
MustUnmarshal
function is used for simplicity, it might be beneficial to handle potential errors explicitly to improve robustness.for ; iterator.Valid(); iterator.Next() { var undelegation types.UndelegationRecord err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(iterator.Value(), &undelegation) if err != nil { return nil, err } ret = append(ret, undelegation) }app/test_helpers.go (1)
276-283
: Clarify the purpose and usage of thestakersByOperator
data structure.Please provide more context on how this new data structure is intended to be used within the delegation management functionality. Explain how it improves the efficiency or simplifies the logic of associating stakers with operators.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (51)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (4 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- local_node.sh (1 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (11 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (5 hunks)
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- cmd/exocored/root.go
- x/delegation/types/keys.go
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1)
Learnt from: MaxMustermann2 PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#95 File: x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go:91-116 Timestamp: 2024-06-12T04:29:35.064Z Learning: The `GetAllUndelegationsToMature` function in `x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go` uses an iterator that processes one record per iteration, and the record keys are stored efficiently as a key-value pair with the key being a prefix + big-endian epoch. This storage pattern provides direct and efficient access to the data.
buf
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
5-5: import "exocore/delegation/v1/query.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
GitHub Check: break-check
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 19-19:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto
[failure] 48-48:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.StakingAssetInfo".
[failure] 60-60:
Field "1" on message "QueryAssetInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.DepositByAsset".
[failure] 80-80:
Field "1" on message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.AssetByID".
Additional comments not posted (143)
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (5)
29-30
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
37-37
: Verify the impact of adding thenil
parameter.Ensure that adding the
nil
parameter to theNewGenesis
function call doesn't introduce any issues or unintended side effects.
43-43
: Verify the test coverage.Ensure that replacing the loop with a single assertion doesn't reduce the test coverage. Consider adding more assertions to cover all the client chains if necessary.
47-47
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
52-52
: Verify the test coverage.Ensure that replacing the loop with a single assertion doesn't reduce the test coverage. Consider adding more assertions to cover all the assets if necessary.
x/assets/types/errors.go (1)
95-98
: LGTM!The new error declaration
ErrParseJoinedKey
is well-defined and follows the existing pattern in the file. The error message is clear and descriptive, and the error identifier is unique and incremental. This addition enhances the error handling capabilities of the module by providing a specific error for cases where parsing a joined key fails.x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (3)
34-47
: Enhance error handling inInitGenesis
.The current implementation panics on error. Consider logging the error before panicking to provide more context for debugging.
- panic(err) + // Log the error before panicking + ctx.Logger().Error("Error initializing genesis", "err", err) + panic(err)
52-52
: LGTM!The code change is approved.
53-77
: Review error handling inExportGenesis
.Similar to
InitGenesis
, consider logging errors before panicking to aid in debugging and provide more context.- panic(err) + // Log the error before panicking + ctx.Logger().Error("Error exporting genesis", "err", err) + panic(err)x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (3)
50-50
: LGTM!The change from map to slice for the return type of
GetAllStakingAssetsInfo
is approved. It simplifies the return type and aligns with the other changes in the interface.
52-52
: LGTM!The change from map to slice for the return type of
GetStakerAssetInfos
is approved. It simplifies the return type and aligns with the other changes in the interface.
56-56
: The existing comment is still valid and applicable to this change:Proper integration of
isGeneralInit
flag, but consider alternative approaches for passing flags.The addition of the
isGeneralInit
flag is well-documented. However, passing such flags through the context or command line as noted might be limiting. Consider using a configuration file or environment variables for greater flexibility and separation of concerns.x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1)
69-69
: Useassets[assetID]
instead ofassets[0]
to maintain the test's validity.The change in the index used to access the
assets
slice is concerning because:
- It makes the test dependent on the specific asset at index 0 rather than the asset corresponding to
assetID
.- It may no longer accurately reflect the intended behavior of the function being tested if
assets[0]
does not represent the same asset asassets[assetID]
.To maintain the test's validity, use the original index
assets[assetID]
instead ofassets[0]
:- suite.Equal(assets[0].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount) + suite.Equal(assets[assetID].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount)proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (4)
19-19
: LGTM!The addition of the
delegation_states
field to theGenesisState
message looks good. It seems to be part of the effort to improve the representation of delegation states in the genesis state.Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 19-19:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".
28-34
: LGTM!The new
DelegationStates
message looks good. It seems to be a helper struct used to construct the genesis state and improve the representation of delegation states. The fields in the message are appropriately named and typed.
38-43
: LGTM!The new
StakersByOperator
message looks good. It seems to be a helper struct used to construct the genesis state and maintain a list of stakers associated with a specific operator. The fields in the message are appropriately named and typed.
17-17
: Verify the impact of the breaking changes to theassociations
field.The changes to the
associations
field in theGenesisState
message are breaking changes as they modify the field name, type, and position. Please ensure that all the code that depends on this field is updated to reflect these changes.Run the following script to find all the occurrences of the old field name and type in the codebase:
If you need help updating the affected code, please let me know and I'll be happy to assist you.
Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (3)
Line range hint
29-46
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The loop correctly processes the deposits and updates the staker asset state. The comments provide a clear explanation, and the error handling is consistent with the existing code.
48-59
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The nested loop correctly processes the operator assets and updates the operator asset state. The error handling is consistent with the existing code, and the
#nosec G703
comment indicates that the Bech32 address has already been validated.
62-92
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The
ExportGenesis
method correctly retrieves the necessary state information and populates theGenesisState
structure. The error handling is consistent with the existing code, and the changes align with the updated function signature that now includes the context parameter.x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2)
12-53
: ** Improve error handling inInitGenesis
.**The changes enhance the initialization logic by ensuring the earnings address is always populated and setting operator consensus keys for each chain. However, the function continues to panic on errors, which is not ideal for initialization logic.
As suggested in the previous review, consider returning errors and handling them gracefully at a higher level, especially in initialization logic where recovery might be preferred over termination.
- panic(err) + return err
57-103
: ** Enhance error handling inExportGenesis
.**The changes improve the export process by providing a more detailed export of the state. The function now constructs a
GenesisState
object that includes various elements such as operators, operator records, opted information, etc., retrieved through dedicated getter methods. This ensures that the exported state reflects the current state of the system accurately.However, as pointed out in the previous review, the function continues to panic on errors, which is not ideal for export logic. Consider returning errors and handling them gracefully at a higher level, especially in export logic where recovery might be preferred over termination.
- panic(err) + return nil, errx/operator/keeper/keeper.go (2)
16-17
: LGTM!The removal of the unused
historicalCtx
field simplifies theKeeper
struct without affecting its core functionality.
Line range hint
30-36
: LGTM!The removal of the unused
historicalCtx
parameter simplifies the instantiation of theKeeper
without affecting its core functionality.x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (1)
37-49
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The usage of
OperatorDetail
struct aligns with the changes made to theOperatorInfo
struct.proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (5)
7-7
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-34
: Address the previous review comment.The previous review comment on this code segment is still valid and applicable.
36-45
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
47-54
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
61-76
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2)
46-48
: LGTM!The new validation check for ensuring non-negative
StakingTotalAmount
is correctly implemented. It enhances the robustness of the function by preventing invalid staking amounts from being processed.
94-103
: LGTM!The changes to simplify the return type and internal logic of
GetAllStakingAssetsInfo
are correctly implemented. Using a slice instead of a map may improve performance and memory usage in scenarios where the number of assets is large.The existing review comments suggesting error handling for corrupted data entries and ensuring test coverage for edge cases are still valid and applicable to the current implementation. Please address these suggestions.
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
15-45
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
47-66
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (2)
75-75
: LGTM!The code change is approved.
79-79
: LGTM!The code change is approved.
precompiles/assets/tx.go (1)
146-146
: LGTM!The code change is correct. Directly assigning the
asset
variable to theAssetBasicInfo
field is the right approach sinceAssetBasicInfo
is not a pointer field within theStakingAssetInfo
struct.x/assets/types/keys.go (2)
94-96
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
102-102
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
28-28
: The existing review comment is still valid and applicable to the current code segment. Skipping the generation of a similar comment.x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1)
88-116
: LGTM!The code changes in the
TestGetStakerAssetInfos
function are approved for the following reasons:
The addition of the
WaitUnbondingAmount
field to theDeltaStakerSingleAsset
struct expands the asset state representation to track unbonding amounts consistently across both asset types used in the test.The replacement of
assetsInfo
withgetAssetsInfo
when retrieving the staker asset information does not introduce any issues and suggests a shift in how the retrieved asset information is referenced in the assertions.The use of the
Contains
method in the assertions streamlines the test's readability by focusing on the presence of the expected data rather than its specific structure, improving the test's maintainability.x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6)
27-29
: LGTM!The code changes for generating keys and account addresses for testing are approved.
Line range hint
51-57
: LGTM!The test case for validating an invalid genesis state due to a non-bech32 operator address is approved.
Line range hint
62-72
: LGTM!The test case for validating an invalid genesis state due to a duplicate operator address is approved.
Line range hint
76-97
: LGTM!The test case for validating an invalid genesis state due to a duplicate lz chain id is approved.
99-220
: LGTM!The test cases for validating various invalid genesis states due to issues with the operator consensus key records are approved. The test cases cover the following scenarios:
- Invalid consensus key operator address.
- Unregistered operator in consensus key.
- Duplicate operator in consensus key.
- Invalid consensus key.
- Duplicate consensus key for the same chain id.
These test cases enhance the robustness of the validation logic by ensuring that the genesis state adheres to stricter criteria, thereby improving the overall integrity of the system.
4-6
: LGTM!The remaining code changes related to importing packages and updating the
OperatorInfo
struct toOperatorDetail
struct are approved. The changes are consistent with the alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities and are necessary for the new test cases and the overall functionality.Also applies to: 27-29, 51-57, 62-72, 76-97, 99-220
x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1)
Line range hint
46-59
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The change in the return type from a map to a slice enhances the method's functionality by providing a more straightforward representation of the assets associated with an operator.
x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (5)
33-42
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
43-50
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
70-70
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
75-83
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
86-95
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (1)
7-7
: New import statement forgenesis.proto
.The addition of the
genesis.proto
import statement suggests that the changes in the data structures might be related to the genesis state of the assets, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.Could you provide more context on how the changes in the data structures are related to the genesis state? This would help in understanding the overall impact of the changes.
x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2)
77-77
: LGTM!The code change is approved as it simplifies the data structure usage by eliminating the pointer dereference, aligning with the overall approach to favor direct value references over pointers.
135-135
: LGTM!The code change is approved as it enhances readability and reduces the risk of nil pointer dereference errors, aligning with the overall approach to favor direct value references over pointers.
x/operator/types/keys.go (2)
31-33
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
41-42
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 77-83
x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (4)
22-22
: LGTM!The new constant
FlagEarningAddr
is defined correctly and has a clear name.
79-82
: LGTM!The new flag
FlagEarningAddr
is defined correctly and has a clear description. It enhances the flexibility of the operator registration process by allowing operators to specify a distinct earning address.
118-122
: LGTM!The logic for setting the
EarningsAddr
has been updated correctly to use the value from theFlagEarningAddr
instead of defaulting to the sender's address. This change ensures that the operator can explicitly define where their rewards should be sent, improving the functionality of the operator registration process.
127-127
: LGTM!The
EarningsAddr
field in theOperatorInfo
struct is set correctly to the value ofearningAddr
. This change is consistent with the updated logic in thenewBuildRegisterOperatorMsg
function.x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (2)
159-167
: The past review comment is still valid.The existing review comment suggesting to ensure atomicity by wrapping the loop in a transaction is still applicable to the current implementation.
169-184
: The past review comment is still valid.The existing review comment suggesting to optimize the retrieval logic if performance becomes an issue is still applicable to the current implementation.
x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3)
76-89
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The modifications to the
AllOperators
method enhance its functionality by returning detailed operator information, improving usability for clients.
205-220
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new
GetAllOptedInfo
method provides a useful functionality to retrieve all opted states from the store, which can be beneficial for querying or processing opted states in bulk. The implementation follows the expected logic and looks good.
25-25
: Verify the validation of theaddr
parameter.Ensure that the
addr
parameter is properly validated before using it to derive theopAccAddr
. If the validation is missing, it could lead to invalid addresses being accepted.proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (7)
20-24
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-26
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-31
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
33-36
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
38-38
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
40-40
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
43-43
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
app/ethtest_helper.go (5)
192-193
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. Directly referencing the asset instead of using a pointer simplifies the initialization and improves readability.
195-195
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new
StakingTotalAmount
field provides useful information about the asset's staking state, and the initialization withdepositAmount
seems appropriate.
206-216
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The new
OperatorDetail
struct and the nestedOperatorInfo
struct provide a clearer organization of the operator-related data in the genesis state. This restructuring enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code.
Line range hint
219-243
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The modifications to the delegation handling in the genesis state introduce several improvements:
- The new
delegationStates
structure provides a more nuanced approach to managing delegation states by including fields for wait undelegation amount and undelegatable share.- The change in the delegation key to a string representation of a joined store key suggests an optimization in how delegation data is indexed.
- The introduction of the
stakersByOperator
array enhances the organization by mapping operators to their respective stakers.These changes reflect enhancements in the data organization and logic flow within the delegation genesis state initialization, leading to improved clarity and maintainability.
252-252
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The modification to the
OperatorAccAddr
field in theGenesisValidator
struct aligns it with the newOperatorDetail
structure introduced earlier. By referencing theOperatorAddress
instead of theEarningsAddr
, the code ensures consistency with the updated operator data organization. This change is a necessary adaptation to the modifications made in the operator module's genesis state initialization.x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Line range hint
129-141
: LGTM!The code changes are approved for the following reasons:
- The change from pointer type to value type for
UndelegationRecord
instantiation is a good practice as it avoids unnecessary memory allocation and simplifies the code.- The change in the argument type passed to
SetUndelegationRecords
is consistent with the change in theUndelegationRecord
instantiation.- There are no apparent issues or side effects caused by these changes.
x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (2)
16-27
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
32-41
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2)
158-158
: LGTM!The code change is correct. The
AssetBasicInfo
field should be assigned theAssetInfo
value directly, not a pointer to it.
247-247
: LGTM!The code change is correct for the same reason as the previous one.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2)
73-73
: LGTM!The addition of the
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
option to theasset_basic_info
field is a good change. It enforces that theAssetInfo
must always be present when creating aStakingAssetInfo
instance, enhancing data integrity.
120-121
: LGTM!The expanded comment for the
total_amount
field is a good change. It clarifies that the total amount of the asset deposited excludes thewait_unbonding_amount
, improving the documentation and understanding of the field's purpose.x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4)
50-50
: LGTM!The code change is approved.
86-87
: LGTM!The code change is approved. Initializing
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
fields as slices instead of pointers simplifies the data structure management and aligns with the updated struct definition.
95-95
: LGTM!The code change is approved. Appending the dereferenced value of
slashFromUndelegation
toexecutionInfo.SlashUndelegations
slice aligns with the new structure definition and streamlines the code.
135-138
: LGTM!The code change is approved. Appending a
SlashFromAssetsPool
instance toexecutionInfo.SlashAssetsPool
slice using value types aligns with the new structure definition and streamlines the code.app/test_helpers.go (5)
228-243
: LGTM!The code changes for initializing the
AssetsByOperator
field in the assets genesis state are approved.
284-284
: LGTM!The code changes for initializing the delegation genesis state with the updated data structures are approved.
260-269
: Verify the consistency of thedelegationStates
change across the codebase.Ensure that the shift from
delegationsByStaker
todelegationStates
and the new key-value pairing approach is consistently applied across the codebase. Verify that it does not introduce any bugs or unintended behavior in the delegation management functionality.Verification successful
The transition to
delegationStates
is consistently applied across the codebase.The
delegationStates
is used in multiple files, and there is no occurrence ofdelegationsByStaker
, indicating a complete transition. This change appears to be well-integrated and tested within the codebase.
- Files with
delegationStates
usage includegenesis.pb.go
,genesis.go
,genesis_test.go
,delegation_state.go
,utils.go
,ethtest_helper.go
, andtestnet.go
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `delegationStates` and `DelegationStates` type. # Expect: Consistent usage of `delegationStates` and no usage of `delegationsByStaker`. # Search for usage of `delegationStates` rg --type go --glob '!test_helpers.go' $'delegationStates' # Search for usage of `delegationsByStaker` rg --type go --glob '!test_helpers.go' $'delegationsByStaker'Length of output: 3105
247-257
: Verify the impact of changing theoperatorInfos
type and nesting theOperatorInfo
struct.Ensure that this structural change is consistently applied across the codebase and does not break any existing functionality related to operator information handling.
223-223
: Verify the impact of changing from a pointer to a direct reference for the asset information.Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects or bugs in how the asset data is accessed and manipulated within the function and other parts of the codebase that interact with this genesis state.
Verification successful
Verification successful: No pointer-specific operations found for
AssetBasicInfo
.The change from a pointer to a direct reference for
AssetBasicInfo
does not introduce any unintended side effects or bugs related to pointer manipulation in the codebase. The usage ofAssetBasicInfo
is consistent with the change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `AssetBasicInfo` field. # Expect: No dereferences using `&` operator. # Search for pointer dereferences of `AssetBasicInfo` field rg --type go --glob '!test_helpers.go' $'AssetBasicInfo: \&'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `AssetBasicInfo` field for any pointer-specific operations. # Expect: No pointer-specific operations like dereferencing. # Search for any pointer-specific operations on `AssetBasicInfo` rg --type go --glob '!test_helpers.go' 'AssetBasicInfo\.\*'Length of output: 61
proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (2)
172-172
: LGTM!The change to enforce non-null
slash_undelegations
field is approved.
174-174
: LGTM!The change to enforce non-null
slash_assets_pool
field is approved.x/delegation/types/genesis.go (7)
15-25
: LGTM!The changes to the
NewGenesis
function are approved. The addition of new parameters and their inclusion in the returnedGenesisState
enhance the function's capability to initialize the genesis state with more comprehensive data.
30-31
: LGTM!The changes to the
DefaultGenesis
function are approved. CallingNewGenesis
withnil
values for the new parameters ensures that the function can still return a valid genesis state even when no specific data is provided.
180-212
: LGTM!The new
ValidateAssociations
method is approved. It enhances the validation logic for theAssociations
field by checking for duplicate staker IDs and validating operator addresses.
214-254
: LGTM!The new
ValidateDelegationStates
method is approved. It enhances the validation logic for theDelegationStates
field by ensuring that delegation states are not nil and do not contain negative values.
256-311
: LGTM!The new
ValidateStakerList
method is approved. It enhances the validation logic for theStakersByOperator
field by validating the operator address, asset ID, and the list of stakers for each operator.
313-361
: LGTM!The new
ValidateUndelegations
method is approved. It enhances the validation logic for theUndelegations
field by validating the staker ID, asset ID, operator address, transaction hash, and other fields of each undelegation record.
365-382
: LGTM!The changes to the
Validate
method are approved. Calling the new validation functions centralizes the validation process and improves code organization.x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (1)
29-30
: LGTM!The changes to the
TestValidateGenesis
function look good:
- Simplifying the
NewGenesis
function call by usingnil
values for slices.- Updating the
StakingTotalAmount
to a non-zero value for testing.- Removing some test cases that are no longer relevant.
The test cases cover a wide range of scenarios to ensure the robustness of the genesis validation logic.
Also applies to: 54-55
testutil/utils.go (5)
136-165
: LGTM!The initialization of
operatorAssets
with detailed information for each operator's assets looks good. It provides a more granular representation and improves clarity.
166-174
: Approved.The initialization of
assetsGenesis
with the updatedoperatorAssets
and total staking amounts looks good.
204-219
: Looks good!The initialization of
operatorInfos
using the newOperatorDetail
structure enhances the encapsulation of operator-related data. The changes are implemented correctly.
231-245
: Approved.The initialization of
delegationStates
with detailed information for each delegation looks good. The changes provide a more refined representation and improve the overall organization of delegation data.
257-271
: LGTM!The initialization of
stakersByOperator
with a mapping of operators to their respective stakers enhances the organization of delegation data. ThedelegationGenesis
is properly initialized with the updated structures.x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (3)
383-396
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
296-304
: Handle potential errors fromMustMarshal
.To prevent data corruption or crashes, handle errors during the marshalling process.
- bz := k.cdc.MustMarshal(&delegationtype.StakerList{Stakers: singleElement.Stakers}) + bz, err := k.cdc.Marshal(&delegationtype.StakerList{Stakers: singleElement.Stakers}) + if err != nil { + return err + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
34-42
: Handle potential errors fromMustMarshal
.To prevent data corruption or crashes, handle errors during the marshalling process.
- bz := k.cdc.MustMarshal(&singleElement.States) + bz, err := k.cdc.Marshal(&singleElement.States) + if err != nil { + return err + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
local_node.sh (5)
99-99
: LGTM!The change to set the
staking_total_amount
to"5000"
for the first token in theassets
module looks good.
105-110
: LGTM! Verify if the financial metrics are intended for testing purposes only.The new entry under
operator_assets
looks good. However, please confirm if setting all the financial metrics to"5000"
is intended for testing purposes only and not meant to reflect real-world scenarios.
116-121
: LGTM!The restructuring of the operator-related information under
operator_info
enhances clarity and organization. The change looks good.
124-126
: LGTM!The change to replace the
delegations
structure withdelegation_states
in thedelegation
module enhances clarity and organization. The inclusion of keys and states provides a clearer representation of the delegation data. The change looks good.
129-130
: LGTM!The new entry under
stakers_by_operator
in thedelegation
module looks good. It provides a way to organize and retrieve stakers by operator and asset, enhancing the data structure.x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (2)
25-25
: LGTM!The store prefix update from
KeyPrefixVotingPowerForOperator
toKeyPrefixUSDValueForOperator
is consistent with the overall changes in the file.
149-149
: LGTM!The store prefix update from
KeyPrefixVotingPowerForAVS
toKeyPrefixUSDValueForAVS
is consistent with the overall changes in the file.x/operator/types/genesis.go (9)
13-34
: LGTM!The changes to
NewGenesisState
andDefaultGenesis
look good. The additional parameters provide more flexibility in initializing the genesis state.
Line range hint
37-108
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperators
function performs important validation checks on the list of operators. The checks for duplicate addresses, bech32 format, and commission rates help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
110-170
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorConsKeyRecords
function performs important validation checks on the operator consensus key records. The checks for bech32 format, duplicate addresses, and consensus key format help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
172-213
: LGTM!The
ValidateOptedStates
function performs important validation checks on the opted states. The checks for registered operators, opted-in and opted-out heights, and AVS addresses help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
215-249
: LGTM!The
ValidateAVSUSDValues
function performs important validation checks on the AVS USD values. The checks for valid AVS addresses, opted-in AVS addresses, and non-negative USD values help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
251-324
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorUSDValues
function performs important validation checks on the operator USD values. The checks for non-negative USD values, registered operators, and consistency with AVS USD values help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
326-429
: LGTM!The
ValidateSlashStates
function performs important validation checks on the slash states. The checks for registered operators, opted-in AVS addresses, valid slash proportions, and valid slashing execution information help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
431-476
: LGTM!The
ValidatePrevConsKeys
function performs important validation checks on the previous consensus keys. The checks for valid key format, registered operators, and valid consensus keys help ensure the integrity of the genesis state.
478-550
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorKeyRemovals
function performs important validation checks on the operator key removals. The checks for valid key format and registered operators help ensure the integrity of the genesis state. The updatedValidate
function ensures that all the validation checks are performed on the genesis state.x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (3)
504-533
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
445-458
: Correct error handling inSetAllPrevConsKeys
.The error handling for decoding failures is incorrect. The function should return the error instead of
nil
to prevent silent failures.- return nil + return errLikely invalid or redundant comment.
477-488
: Correct error handling inSetAllOperatorKeyRemovals
.The error handling for decoding failures is incorrect. The function should return the error instead of
nil
to prevent silent failures.- return nil + return errLikely invalid or redundant comment.
x/assets/types/genesis.go (6)
41-68
: LGTM: Generic and reusable validation utility.The
CommonValidation
function is a well-structured and reusable utility for validating input data and checking for duplicates. The use of generics allows it to be used with different types of input slices and validation logic. The function correctly builds a map of unique field values and returns an error if any duplicates are found or if the validation function returns an error for any element.
70-106
: LGTM: Comprehensive validation of client chains.The
ValidateClientChains
function performs thorough validation of theClientChains
field in theGenesisState
struct. It checks for the presence of required fields such asName
,LayerZeroChainID
, andAddressLength
, ensuring that the data is well-formed. Additionally, it leverages theCommonValidation
function to detect and prevent duplicate entries based on theLayerZeroChainID
. The function is well-structured and effectively ensures the integrity of the client chains data.
108-180
: LGTM: Robust validation of tokens.The
ValidateTokens
function provides a comprehensive validation of theTokens
field in theGenesisState
struct. It ensures that eachStakingAssetInfo
has a registeredLayerZeroChainID
, a valid hex address, non-negativeStakingTotalAmount
, and non-negativeTotalSupply
. The function leverages theCommonValidation
utility to detect and prevent duplicate entries based on theAssetID
field. Additionally, it includes a safeguard check to ensure that theStakingTotalAmount
does not exceed theTotalSupply
for each token. The validation logic is thorough and effectively maintains the integrity of the tokens data.
182-287
: LGTM: Comprehensive validation of deposits.The
ValidateDeposits
function provides a thorough validation of theDeposits
field in theGenesisState
struct. It ensures that eachDepositsByStaker
has a validStakerID
with a registeredLayerZeroChainID
and uses theCommonValidation
utility to detect and prevent duplicate entries based on theStakerID
field. For eachDepositByAsset
within aDepositsByStaker
, the function checks that theAssetID
is registered, matches theStakerID
'sLayerZeroChainID
, and has non-negative deposit amounts. Additionally, it includes a safeguard check to ensure that the total deposit amount does not exceed the total staking amount for each asset. The validation logic is comprehensive and effectively maintains the integrity of the deposits data.
289-347
: LGTM: Thorough validation of operator assets.The
ValidateOperatorAssets
function provides a robust validation of theOperatorAssets
field in theGenesisState
struct. It ensures that eachAssetsByOperator
has a validOperator
address and uses theCommonValidation
utility to detect and prevent duplicate entries based on theOperator
field. For eachAssetByID
within anAssetsByOperator
, the function checks that theAssetID
is registered and includes safeguard checks to ensure that the sum of the operator's total amount and wait unbonding amount does not exceed the total staking amount for that asset, and that the operator's share does not exceed the total share for each asset. The validation logic is thorough and effectively maintains the integrity of the operator assets data.
352-369
: LGTM: Comprehensive validation of GenesisState.The refactored
Validate
method of theGenesisState
struct provides a thorough and well-structured validation process. It sequentially calls the newly introduced validation functionsValidateClientChains
,ValidateTokens
,ValidateDeposits
, andValidateOperatorAssets
, ensuring that all the required fields and relationships are properly validated. The method also includes the validation of theParams
field, which is a good practice. By leveraging the specialized validation functions, theValidate
method maintains a clear and modular structure, enhancing the overall readability and maintainability of the codebase.cmd/exocored/testnet.go (4)
398-398
: LGTM!The code change is approved. The change in the type of
operatorInfos
aligns with the AI-generated summary.
399-399
: LGTM!The code change is approved. The introduction of the
delegationStates
variable aligns with the AI-generated summary.
400-401
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The introduction of the
associations
andstakersByOperator
variables aligns with the AI-generated summary.
423-449
: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The appending of data to the new variables within the loop aligns with the AI-generated summary.
app/app.go (1)
Line range hint
1009-1009
: Verify the impact of removingbApp.CreateQueryContext
fromOperatorKeeper
instantiation.The removal of the
bApp.CreateQueryContext
argument suggests that theOperatorKeeper
no longer relies on this method frombApp
for handling queries. This change may impact how queries are handled within the application, particularly for theOperatorKeeper
.Please verify that:
- The
OperatorKeeper
can still function correctly without this argument.- There are no unintended consequences due to this change.
Consider adding unit tests to ensure the expected behavior of the
OperatorKeeper
after this change.
45160c0
to
44ba24b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
x/delegation/types/genesis.go (1)
Line range hint
63-178
: Suggestion: Remove the commented-outValidateDelegations
function.The
ValidateDelegations
function is commented out and not used in the current implementation. It seems to be replaced by the new validation functions introduced in this diff. To improve code cleanliness and maintainability, consider removing the commented-out function entirely.x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (4)
17-32
: Efficient retrieval of all delegation states.The
AllDelegationStates
function is implemented efficiently, iterating over the stored delegation information and constructing a slice ofDelegationStates
to return. Consider handling errors from theMustUnmarshal
method to enhance robustness.- k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stateInfo) + if err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stateInfo); err != nil { + return nil, err + }
34-42
: Ensure error handling during delegation state setting.The
SetAllDelegationStates
function correctly sets each delegation state in the store. However, it is crucial to handle errors during the marshalling process to prevent data corruption or crashes.- bz := k.cdc.MustMarshal(&singleElement.States) + bz, err := k.cdc.Marshal(&singleElement.States) + if err != nil { + return err + }
279-294
: Efficient retrieval of all staker lists.The
AllStakerList
function is implemented efficiently, iterating over the stored staker information and constructing a slice ofStakersByOperator
to return. Consider handling errors from theMustUnmarshal
method to enhance robustness.- k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stakers) + if err := k.cdc.Unmarshal(iterator.Value(), &stakers); err != nil { + return nil, err + }
296-304
: Ensure error handling during staker list setting.The
SetAllStakerList
function correctly sets each staker list in the store. However, it is crucial to handle errors during the marshalling process to prevent data corruption or crashes.- bz := k.cdc.MustMarshal(&delegationtype.StakerList{Stakers: singleElement.Stakers}) + bz, err := k.cdc.Marshal(&delegationtype.StakerList{Stakers: singleElement.Stakers}) + if err != nil { + return err + }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (53)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (4 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- local_node.sh (1 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/opt.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (11 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (5 hunks)
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- cmd/exocored/root.go
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto
- x/delegation/types/keys.go
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go
Additional context used
Learnings (4)
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (1)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go:94-103 Timestamp: 2024-09-09T06:07:43.713Z Learning: In the Exocore project, corrupted data handling is not required in functions like `GetAllStakingAssetsInfo` because the node won't function properly if the data is corrupted, following the Cosmos-SDK's design philosophy.
x/operator/keeper/operator.go (1)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/operator/keeper/operator.go:195-203 Timestamp: 2024-09-10T07:16:15.358Z Learning: The `SetAllOptedInfo` function is only used in the `InitGenesis` function, which panics on errors, making additional error handling unnecessary in this specific context.
x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (2)
Learnt from: MaxMustermann2 PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#95 File: x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go:91-116 Timestamp: 2024-06-12T04:29:35.064Z Learning: The `GetAllUndelegationsToMature` function in `x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding.go` uses an iterator that processes one record per iteration, and the record keys are stored efficiently as a key-value pair with the key being a prefix + big-endian epoch. This storage pattern provides direct and efficient access to the data.
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go:32-41 Timestamp: 2024-09-09T02:21:06.463Z Learning: The completion of undelegation can occur at the current block height, meaning that the `CompleteBlockNumber` can be equal to the current height in the `SetUndelegationRecords` function.
x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (1)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go:266-274 Timestamp: 2024-09-09T06:42:40.462Z Learning: The Cosmos SDK's KVStore doesn't support batch operations for setting multiple states.
buf
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
5-5: import "exocore/delegation/v1/query.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
Additional comments not posted (115)
x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1)
46-46
: Verify ifassets[0]
is the correct asset being tested.Thanks for clarifying that the assets type has been changed from a map to a list, so accessing by
assetID
is no longer possible.However, just to ensure correctness, is it guaranteed that the first asset in the list (
assets[0]
) is always the one being tested in this case? If not, we might need to find the correct asset in the list based on some property, such asassetID
, to ensure we are validating the expected asset.To verify if
assets[0]
is the correct asset being tested, you can add an assertion to check ifassets[0].AssetID
matches theassetID
used in the test. Here's a script to find the usage ofassetID
in the test:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the usage of `assetID` in the test file. # Test: Search for the declaration and usage of `assetID`. # Expect: `assetID` is declared and used in the test. rg --type go -A 5 $'assetID\s*:?=' x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.goIf
assetID
is not being used to set up the test case, thenassets[0]
might not be the correct asset to validate against. In that case, consider finding the asset in the list that matches theassetID
.x/delegation/types/errors.go (1)
83-86
: Enhance the error message to clarify the reason for the invalid block height.The new error variable
ErrInvalidCompletedHeight
improves error handling by signaling the specific error condition. However, consider making the error message more descriptive by specifying what makes the block height invalid, as suggested in the past review comment:- "the block height to complete the undelegation is invalid", + "the block height to complete the undelegation is invalid: must be greater than the current height",This will provide more context to the user about the reason for the error.
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (5)
29-30
: Verify if theStakingTotalAmount
initialization aligns with the expected staking behavior.The initialization of
StakingTotalAmount
has been changed frommath.NewInt(0)
tomath.NewIntWithDecimal(201, 6)
. This change may affect subsequent calculations or assertions related to staking amounts.Could you provide some context on the reason for using this specific decimal value? It's important to ensure that this value aligns with the expected behavior of the staking mechanism being tested.
To verify if the
StakingTotalAmount
initialization aligns with the expected staking behavior, you can:
Check if there are any calculations or assertions in the test that rely on the
StakingTotalAmount
value. If so, ensure that the expected results are updated to match the new initialization value.Review the staking mechanism's specifications or requirements to confirm if the chosen value is appropriate for testing the desired scenarios.
Consider adding assertions to validate if the
StakingTotalAmount
is correctly used in the relevant parts of the staking flow being tested.
37-37
: Clarify the reason for settingDepositsByStaker
tonil
and verify its impact.The
DepositsByStaker
parameter ofdefaultGensisState
is now explicitly set tonil
. This change could impact how deposits are processed or initialized in the genesis state.Could you provide some context on the reason behind this change? It's important to understand its implications on the behavior of the staking mechanism and ensure that it aligns with the expected functionality.
Please verify if this change is intended and if it aligns with the expected deposit handling in the genesis state. If necessary, consider adding assertions to validate the correct behavior of deposits after this change.
To verify the impact of setting
DepositsByStaker
tonil
, you can:
Review the code that processes deposits from the genesis state. Check if there are any assumptions or conditions that rely on
DepositsByStaker
being non-nil.Analyze the staking mechanism's specifications or requirements to understand the expected behavior of deposits in the genesis state. Confirm if setting
DepositsByStaker
tonil
aligns with these expectations.Consider adding test cases to cover scenarios where
DepositsByStaker
isnil
and validate if the staking mechanism behaves correctly under these conditions.
43-43
: Consider the impact of validating only the first client chain on the test's coverage.The assertion logic has been simplified to check if the
clientChains
slice contains the first client chain fromdefaultGensisState.ClientChains
, rather than iterating through all client chains.While this change simplifies the test, it may reduce the coverage of the assertion. It's important to consider if validating only the first client chain is sufficient for the test's purpose.
Could you provide some context on the reason for this change? If the test aims to validate the presence of all client chains, it might be beneficial to keep the iteration logic to ensure comprehensive coverage.
To verify if validating only the first client chain is sufficient, you can:
Review the purpose and scope of this specific test case. Determine if the test is intended to validate the presence of all client chains or if focusing on the first client chain serves the test's objective.
Analyze the code that populates the
clientChains
slice. Check if there are any assumptions or guarantees about the order or content of the slice that justify validating only the first element.Consider the potential risks or edge cases that may be missed by not validating all client chains. Assess if these risks are acceptable within the context of the test.
If the test's purpose requires validating all client chains, consider reverting the change and keeping the iteration logic to ensure comprehensive coverage.
47-47
: Consider the impact of comparing only the first client chain on the test's coverage.The comparison logic has been updated to compare the
chainInfo
with the first element of theclientChains
slice, instead of iterating through all client chains.This change aligns with the simplified assertion logic discussed in the previous comment. However, it may have the same impact on the test's coverage. It's important to consider if comparing only the first client chain is sufficient for the test's purpose.
Could you provide some context on the reason for this change? If the test aims to validate the equality of
chainInfo
with all client chains, it might be beneficial to keep the iteration logic to ensure comprehensive coverage.To verify if comparing only the first client chain is sufficient, you can:
Review the purpose and scope of this specific test case. Determine if the test is intended to validate the equality of
chainInfo
with all client chains or if focusing on the first client chain serves the test's objective.Analyze the code that retrieves the
chainInfo
from the keeper. Check if there are any assumptions or guarantees about the order or content of theclientChains
slice that justify comparing only the first element.Consider the potential risks or edge cases that may be missed by not comparing all client chains. Assess if these risks are acceptable within the context of the test.
If the test's purpose requires validating the equality of
chainInfo
with all client chains, consider reverting the change and keeping the iteration logic to ensure comprehensive coverage.
52-52
: **Consider the impactx/assets/types/errors.go (1)
95-98
: LGTM!The addition of the new error variable
ErrParseJoinedKey
is a good practice for improving error handling and reporting. The error message is clear and concise.x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1)
69-69
: Use the correct index based on theassetID
.The change in the index used to access the
assets
slice fromassets[assetID]
toassets[0]
in the test case is concerning. This change means that the test will now always use the first asset in theassets
slice regardless of the value ofassetID
, which may not accurately reflect the intended behavior of theGetStakingAssetInfo
method when different asset IDs are involved.Use the correct index based on the
assetID
to ensure that the test accurately reflects the intended behavior of theGetStakingAssetInfo
method:-suite.Equal(assets[0].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount) +suite.Equal(assets[assetID].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (3)
28-34
: Approved: NewDelegationStates
message.The addition of the
DelegationStates
message is approved. It provides a structured way to store delegation states, enhancing the tracking of delegations within the system.
38-43
: Approved: NewStakersByOperator
message.The addition of the
StakersByOperator
message is approved. It provides a structured way to store staker associations with operators, enhancing the tracking of staker relationships within the system.
17-23
: LGTM, but verify the impact on the codebase.The changes to the
GenesisState
message are approved. The restructuring provides a more comprehensive tracking of delegations and staker relationships.However, ensure that the removal of the
delegations
field and the addition of new fields do not break any existing functionality. Thoroughly test the changes and update any code that relies on the previous structure ofGenesisState
.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
GenesisState
message:x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2)
52-77
: Approved: EnhancedExportGenesis
function with improved error handling.The changes to the
ExportGenesis
function are approved. The function now gathers and returns a more comprehensive state, including associations, delegation states, staker lists, and undelegations.The enhanced error handling is a significant improvement. By logging errors with context if any of the retrievals fail, the function provides meaningful messages that aid in debugging and maintenance.
34-47
: Verify the impact of the changes on the initialization process.The changes to the
InitGenesis
function reflect a significant shift in how delegations are initialized. The removal of the nested loop structure that processed delegations suggests a move towards a more streamlined approach to handling delegation data.Ensure that the new logic for initializing the state from the general exporting genesis file is thoroughly tested and covers all necessary scenarios. Verify that the removal of the delegation processing logic does not introduce any gaps in the initialization process.
Run the following script to verify the initialization process:
Verification successful
Verify the implementation of new initialization functions.
The old delegation processing logic has been removed, and new functions (
SetAllDelegationStates
,SetAllStakerList
,SetUndelegationRecords
) have been introduced to handle the initialization of delegation data. These functions are present and used in the codebase, indicating a shift towards a more streamlined initialization process.
- Ensure that the implementation of these new functions is thoroughly reviewed to verify that they cover all necessary scenarios and do not introduce any gaps in the initialization process.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization process in `InitGenesis`. # Test: Search for the usage of the removed delegation processing logic. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type go 'for _, delegation := range gs.Delegations' # Test: Search for the usage of the new initialization logic. Expect: Occurrences in relevant code. rg --type go 'SetAllDelegationStates' rg --type go 'SetAllStakerList' rg --type go 'SetUndelegationRecords'Length of output: 1142
x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (3)
19-19
: Approved: Enhanced error handling inInitGenesis
.The changes to the error handling in the
InitGenesis
function are approved. By wrapping the original errors with context-specific messages using theerrorsmod.Wrap
function, the clarity of error reporting is improved, making it easier to diagnose issues during execution.This is a positive change that contributes to better maintainability and reliability of the code.
Also applies to: 26-26, 44-44
56-56
: Approved: Enhanced error handling when setting operator asset info.The change to the error handling when setting operator asset info in the
InitGenesis
function is approved. By wrapping the original error with a context-specific message using theerrorsmod.Wrap
function, the clarity of error reporting is improved, making it easier to diagnose issues during execution.This is a positive change that contributes to better maintainability and reliability of the code.
63-93
: Approved: EnhancedExportGenesis
function with improved error handling.The changes to the
ExportGenesis
function are approved. The inclusion of the receiver variablek
in the function signature aligns with the Go best practices.The enhanced error handling is a significant improvement. By logging errors with context if any of the retrievals fail, including parameters, client chains, staking assets, deposits, and operator assets, the function provides meaningful messages that aid in debugging and maintenance.
These changes contribute to better maintainability and reliability of the code.
x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (2)
Line range hint
4-33
: LGTM!The test changes are approved:
- Printing the account address length is helpful for debugging.
- Updating the
Commission
field to usesdk.ZeroDec()
aligns with the latest SDK conventions.
37-49
: LGTM!The test changes are approved:
- The test correctly sets the operator info and queries all operators.
- The test reflects the new
OperatorDetail
struct and updates the assertions accordingly.proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3)
30-34
: Approve the changes to theGenesisState
message.The addition of the
operator_assets
field of typeAssetsByOperator
in theGenesisState
message provides a clearer structure for managing operator assets.
36-54
: Approve the new messagesAssetsByOperator
andAssetByID
.The new messages
AssetsByOperator
andAssetByID
are well-defined and serve their purpose of managing operator assets effectively.
4-4
: Fix the invalid import statement.The import statement for
cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto
is incorrect as the file does not exist.Remove the invalid import statement:
-import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto";
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
buf
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2)
13-19
: Approve the changes toInitGenesis
.The changes to
InitGenesis
enhance the initialization process:
- Setting the
EarningsAddr
toOperatorAddress
if it's empty ensures that all operators have a valid earnings address.- Handling operator records by setting consensus keys for each operator based on their chain details adds a layer of functionality that was previously absent.
Also applies to: 20-29
58-104
: Approve the changes toExportGenesis
.The changes to
ExportGenesis
significantly enhance its functionality and robustness:
- Including a context parameter in the function signature aligns it with the standard practice in the SDK.
- Constructing a
GenesisState
object by aggregating various operator-related data enhances the functionality of the method.- Logging errors during the fetch operations instead of causing a panic improves error handling and makes the system more resilient.
x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2)
46-48
: LGTM!The new validation check for negative staking amounts enhances the robustness of the input validation process.
94-103
: LGTM!The changes to the return type and internal logic simplify the data structure and may improve performance and memory usage.
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
14-45
: LGTM!The new
AllDeposits
function provides a useful method for retrieving all deposits associated with stakers, which can be beneficial for generating reports or performing bulk operations on deposits.
Line range hint
47-64
: LGTM!The changes to the return type and internal logic reflect a more streamlined approach to managing deposits by structuring and accessing asset information differently.
x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1)
75-79
: Verify the impact of removing the dereferencing operator.The changes involve removing the dereferencing operator (
*
) from the elements accessed in theSlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
slices of theslashInfo.ExecutionInfo
structure. This suggests a shift in the handling of these data structures.Please ensure that the removal of the dereferencing operator does not introduce any unintended side effects or alter the behavior of the test. Verify that the elements in these slices are no longer expected to be pointers or that the dereferencing was unnecessary.
Run the following script to verify the usage of
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
in the codebase:Verification successful
Dereferencing operator removal is consistent and safe.
The removal of the dereferencing operator from
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
inslash_test.go
is consistent with their usage throughout the codebase. These fields are treated as non-pointer types, and the change does not introduce any unintended side effects.
x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go
: Direct access without dereferencing.x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
: Methods likeMarshalToSizedBuffer
andUnmarshal
treat them as non-pointer types.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `SlashUndelegations` and `SlashAssetsPool` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `SlashUndelegations` and `SlashAssetsPool`. # Expect: No occurrences of dereferencing these fields. rg --type go $'SlashUndelegations\[.*\]\.' rg --type go $'SlashAssetsPool\[.*\]\.'Length of output: 859
x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
28-28
: ****x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (2)
Line range hint
11-86
:
88-116
: LGTM!The changes to the
TestGetStakerAssetInfos
function are approved:
- The
WaitUnbondingAmount
field is correctly added to theDeltaStakerSingleAsset
struct for bothethUniInitialChangeValue
andethUsdtInitialChangeValue
.- The
assetsInfo
variable is renamed togetAssetsInfo
, which is more descriptive.- The assertions are simplified to use
suite.Contains
to check if the expected asset information is present in the returnedgetAssetsInfo
, which is more concise and readable.x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
27-220
: LGTM!The changes to the
TestValidateGenesis
function are approved:
- The
Operators
field in theGenesisState
struct is correctly changed from[]types.OperatorInfo
to[]types.OperatorDetail
, which reflects the shift in how operator-related data is represented.- The
EarningsAddr
field is renamed toOperatorAddress
, which is a more explicit naming convention that aligns with the new structure.- New test cases are added to validate the genesis state against various conditions, such as invalid operator addresses, unregistered operators, and duplicate entries in the consensus key records. These new test cases enhance the robustness of the validation logic by ensuring that the genesis state adheres to stricter criteria.
x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (2)
14-44
: LGTM!The new
AllOperatorAssets
function is approved:
- It correctly retrieves all operator assets from the store using a key-value store iterator.
- It groups assets by operator and constructs a slice of
AssetsByOperator
, which includes the operator's address and a list of associated asset states.- It handles potential errors during key parsing and unmarshalling of asset information.
- The function follows the best practices for iterating over a key-value store and grouping assets by operator.
Line range hint
46-59
: LGTM!The changes to the
GetOperatorAssetInfos
function are approved:
- The return type is correctly changed from a map to a slice of
AssetByID
, reflecting the shift in how asset information is structured and returned.- The internal logic is updated to accommodate the new return type, using an append operation to build the result slice instead of directly assigning values to a map.
- The changes are consistent with the new structure and improve the clarity of the function.
precompiles/assets/tx.go (1)
146-146
: LGTM!The change from passing
asset
by reference to passing it by value looks good. This change should not cause any issues.x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (11)
33-41
: LGTM!The initialization of
delegationStates
looks good.
43-50
: LGTM!The initialization of
stakersByOperator
looks good.
70-70
: LGTM!The initialization of the genesis state using
NewGenesis
with the newdelegationStates
andstakersByOperator
variables looks good.
78-79
: LGTM!The modification of the
Key
field to an invalid value is correctly setting up the test case for an invalid staker ID.
82-82
: LGTM!The restoration of the
Key
field to the original value in theunmalleate
function looks good.
90-90
: LGTM!Appending a duplicate of the first element in
DelegationStates
is correctly setting up the test case for duplicate state keys.
93-93
: LGTM!Restoring
DelegationStates
to its original state in theunmalleate
function looks good.
101-102
: LGTM!Modifying the
Key
field to a value with an invalid asset ID is correctly setting up the test case for an invalid asset ID.
105-105
: LGTM!Restoring the
Key
field to the original value in theunmalleate
function looks good.
116-117
: LGTM!Modifying the
Key
field to a value with a different asset ID is correctly setting up the test case for asset ID mismatch.
120-120
: LGTM!Restoring the
Key
field to the original value in theunmalleate
function looks good.x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2)
77-77
: LGTM!The change from a pointer reference to a direct reference for
AssetBasicInfo
simplifies the code and is approved.
135-135
: LGTM!The change from dereferencing a pointer to directly assigning the value for
asset
simplifies the code and is approved.x/operator/types/keys.go (1)
135-156
: LGTM!The new function
ParseKeyForOperatorAndChainIDToConsKey
is well-implemented. It correctly extracts the operator address and chain ID from the key while validating the key length and handling errors appropriately.x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (2)
159-167
: Based on the learnings, theSetAllSlashInfo
function is only used in theInitGenesis
function, which panics on errors. Therefore, additional error handling is unnecessary in this context.
169-184
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (9)
15-44
: Based on the past comments, the impact of the field type change in theGenesisState
message has been addressed. Additionally, the data migration concerns are mitigated due to the upcoming Testnet launch using Bootstrap.
46-54
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
56-64
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
66-73
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
75-86
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
88-96
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
98-109
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
111-117
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
119-137
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3)
25-28
: The changes to theSetOperatorInfo
function address the concern raised in the past comments about the lack of robust validation for the operator address. The function now attempts to parse theaddr
directly into an account address and returns a wrapped error if the parsing fails.
79-92
: The changes to theAllOperators
function enhance the information returned by the method, allowing for more comprehensive data retrieval regarding operators. However, the concern raised in the past comments about potential performance issues due to not efficiently handling large data volumes still remains unaddressed.
198-206
: Based on the learnings, theSetAllOptedInfo
function is only used in theInitGenesis
function, which panics on errors. Therefore, additional error handling is unnecessary in this context.app/ethtest_helper.go (3)
192-193
: LGTM!The change to initialize
StakingTotalAmount
using thedepositAmount
instead of a fixed zero value is approved. This enhances the flexibility of asset initialization.
206-213
: LGTM!The change to replace the
OperatorInfo
structure withOperatorDetail
is approved. This improves the clarity and maintainability of the code by using a more comprehensive structure for operator details.
Line range hint
219-243
: LGTM!The changes to the delegation handling in the genesis state setup are approved. These changes, including the introduction of
DelegationStates
,stakersByOperator
, and the updateddelegationGenesis
initialization, enhance the functionality and clarity of the genesis state setup, allowing for more dynamic and detailed management of delegations within the system.x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (1)
Line range hint
129-141
: LGTM!The change to instantiate the
UndelegationRecord
as a value type instead of a pointer type is approved. This simplifies the handling of records within the function by eliminating the need for dereferencing pointers when marshaling the records.x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (2)
16-27
: LGTM!The new
AllUndelegations
function is approved. This function enhances the functionality of theKeeper
by allowing for the retrieval of all undelegation records in a single call using a prefix iterator.
32-41
: LGTM!The changes to the
SetUndelegationRecords
function are approved. These changes, including accepting a slice oftypes.UndelegationRecord
instead of a slice of pointers and adding a validation check against the current block height, simplify the handling of records within the function and enforce stricter validation on undelegation records being set, thereby enhancing the overall integrity of the undelegation process.precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2)
158-158
: Verify the impact of passingusdcClientChainAsset
by value instead of reference.The change involves removing the address-of operator (
&
) when assigningusdcClientChainAsset
toAssetBasicInfo
in theSetStakingAssetInfo
method call.This indicates a shift from passing a pointer to passing the value directly, which may affect how the data is handled within the
SetStakingAssetInfo
method.Verify that the
SetStakingAssetInfo
method correctly handles theAssetBasicInfo
field when passed by value and ensure that the change does not alter the expected behavior of theTestAVSUSDValue
test.
247-247
: Verify the impact of passingusdcClientChainAsset
by value instead of reference.The change involves removing the address-of operator (
&
) when assigningusdcClientChainAsset
toAssetBasicInfo
in theSetStakingAssetInfo
method call.This indicates a shift from passing a pointer to passing the value directly, which may affect how the data is handled within the
SetStakingAssetInfo
method.Verify that the
SetStakingAssetInfo
method correctly handles theAssetBasicInfo
field when passed by value and ensure that the change does not alter the expected behavior of theTestGetOperatorOptedUSDValue
test.proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2)
73-73
: LGTM!The addition of the
(gogoproto.nullable) = false
option to theasset_basic_info
field enhances data integrity by ensuring that an asset's basic information must always be provided when creating an instance ofStakingAssetInfo
.
120-121
: LGTM!The updated comment for the
total_amount
field improves the documentation and understanding of the field's purpose by clarifying that it excludes thewait_unbonding_amount
.x/operator/keeper/slash.go (2)
45-47
: LGTM!The additional validation for the
SlashProportion
parameter enhances the robustness of the input validation process by ensuring it is neither nil nor negative.The updated error wrapping using
Wrapf
improves the clarity of error messages by providing a more structured output.Also applies to: 50-50
86-87
: LGTM!The modifications to the handling of
SlashUndelegations
andSlashAssetsPool
simplify the data structure management by using values directly instead of pointers.Appending a dereferenced value of
slashFromUndelegation
toSlashUndelegations
and directly appending aSlashFromAssetsPool
value toSlashAssetsPool
streamlines the code and potentially improves performance by reducing memory allocation overhead associated with pointers.Also applies to: 95-95, 135-138
app/test_helpers.go (1)
223-243
: Approved: The changes improve code structure and clarity.The modifications to the
GenesisStateWithValSet
function enhance the logical structure and clarity of the code:
- Directly referencing
assets
may improve performance by reducing indirection.- The new
AssetsByOperator
structure enhances the organization of asset management.- The
OperatorDetail
structure provides clearer identification of the operator.- The
DelegationStates
structure simplifies the representation of delegation states.- The
StakersByOperator
structure allows for better management of staker information.Also applies to: 247-257, 260-283, 284-285
proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1)
172-172
: Approved: The changes improve data integrity.The modifications to the
SlashExecutionInfo
message enforce that theslash_undelegations
andslash_assets_pool
fields cannot be null by including the(gogoproto.nullable) = false
option. This improves data integrity and ensures that any instances ofSlashExecutionInfo
will always contain valid lists for these fields.Also applies to: 174-174
x/delegation/types/genesis.go (4)
17-19
: Approved: The changes enhance genesis state management functionality.The modifications to the
NewGenesis
function reflect a broader scope of data being handled during genesis state initialization. The function now accepts additional parameters:delegationStates
,stakersByOperator
, andundelegations
, which are included in the returnedGenesisState
. This enhances the functionality related to genesis state management in a blockchain context.Also applies to: 22-25
31-31
: Approved: The changes maintain consistency with theNewGenesis
function.The adjustment to the
DefaultGenesis
function accommodates the new parameters introduced in theNewGenesis
function. This ensures that theDefaultGenesis
function can still return a valid genesis state with the new structure, maintaining consistency between the two functions.
34-61
: Approved: The new validation functions ensure data integrity.The introduction of the new validation functions:
ValidateIDAndOperator
,ValidateAssociations
,ValidateDelegationStates
,ValidateStakerList
, andValidateUndelegations
, improves the overall validation logic by providing comprehensive checks for each data structure. These functions ensure that the genesis state adheres to the expected format and constraints, enhancing data integrity.
ValidateIDAndOperator
validates the operator address and checks that the staker and asset IDs belong to the same client chain.ValidateAssociations
ensures that each staker ID is associated with a unique operator and checks for valid addresses.ValidateDelegationStates
validates the delegation states, ensuring that no nil or negative values are present.ValidateStakerList
checks the integrity of the staker list against the operator and asset IDs.ValidateUndelegations
verifies the correctness of undelegation records, including checks for pending status and valid transaction hashes.Also applies to: 180-212, 214-254, 256-311, 313-361
366-382
: Approved: The changes improve control flow and ensure comprehensive validation.The modifications to the
Validate
method of theGenesisState
enhance the control flow and ensure comprehensive validation of the genesis state. The method now sequentially calls each validation function introduced earlier:ValidateAssociations
,ValidateDelegationStates
,ValidateStakerList
, andValidateUndelegations
, returning errors if any checks fail. This modular approach improves code readability and maintainability while ensuring thorough validation of the genesis state.x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (2)
29-30
: Simplifytypes.NewGenesis
function parameters.The changes to replace empty slices with
nil
when callingtypes.NewGenesis
simplify the function call and improve readability.
54-55
: Verify the impact of updatingStakingTotalAmount
.The
StakingTotalAmount
for thestakingInfo
variable has been updated frommath.NewInt(0)
tomath.NewInt(100)
. Ensure that this change does not adversely affect the expected behavior of the test cases.testutil/utils.go (3)
136-175
: Enhance the genesis setup process for assets.The introduction of the
operatorAssets
structure and the modifications to the genesis state construction for assets usingNewGenesis
enhance the clarity and functionality of the genesis setup process. The changes allow for a more detailed and structured representation of asset states.Verify the correctness of the
operatorAssets
structure and its usage in the genesis setup process. Ensure that the asset states are accurately captured and that theNewGenesis
method is called with the appropriate parameters.
203-219
: Improve operator registration usingOperatorDetail
.The operator registration process has been updated to utilize the
OperatorDetail
structure instead ofOperatorInfo
. This change reflects a more structured approach to managing operator data, enhancing clarity in the operator's identification.
Line range hint
231-271
: Revise delegation handling withdelegationStates
.The delegation handling has been revised, replacing the
delegationsByStaker
structure withdelegationStates
. This simplifies the representation of delegation information and aligns with the updated logic for managing delegations in the genesis state.Verify that the
delegationStates
structure accurately captures the necessary delegation information and that thedelegationGenesis
state is created correctly using the new structures.x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (3)
54-54
: Verify the correctness of the key parsing change.The
IterateDelegationsForStakerAndAsset
function now usesParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
instead ofParseStakerAssetIDAndOperatorAddrFromKey
to parse keys. Ensure that this change is correct and aligns with the updated key structure or interpretation.
74-74
: Verify the correctness of the key parsing change.The
IterateDelegationsForStaker
function now usesParseStakerAssetIDAndOperator
instead ofParseStakerAssetIDAndOperatorAddrFromKey
to parse keys. Ensure that this change is correct and aligns with the updated key structure or interpretation.
383-396
: Efficient retrieval of all associations.The
GetAllAssociations
function is implemented efficiently, iterating over the stored association information and constructing a slice ofStakerToOperator
to return. The implementation follows a similar pattern to other retrieval functions in the file.x/operator/types/genesis.go (10)
12-18
: LGTM!The changes to the
NewGenesisState
function are approved. The updated signature and initialization are consistent with the modifications made to theGenesisState
struct.Also applies to: 21-27
33-33
: LGTM!The change to the
DefaultGenesis
function is approved. It now returns aGenesisState
initialized with multiplenil
slices, which is consistent with the updatedNewGenesisState
function signature.
Line range hint
36-107
: Reminder: Add unit tests forValidateOperators
.The
ValidateOperators
function performs critical validation checks on the list of operators in the genesis state. However, no unit tests were found for this function.Please add comprehensive unit tests to ensure the robustness of this function.
109-169
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorConsKeyRecords
function is well-implemented and performs important validation checks on the operator consensus key records in the genesis state.
171-212
: Reminder: Add unit tests forValidateOptedStates
.The
ValidateOptedStates
function performs critical validation checks on the opted states in the genesis state. However, no unit tests were found for this function.Please add comprehensive unit tests to ensure the reliability of this function and maintain state integrity.
214-248
: LGTM!The
ValidateAVSUSDValues
function is well-implemented and performs important validation checks on the AVS USD values in the genesis state.
250-323
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorUSDValues
function is well-implemented and performs important validation checks on the operator USD values in the genesis state.
325-428
: Reminder: Add unit tests forValidateSlashStates
.The
ValidateSlashStates
function performs critical validation checks on the slash states in the genesis state. However, no unit tests were found for this function.Please add comprehensive unit tests to ensure the correctness and robustness of this function.
430-468
: Reminder: Add unit tests forValidatePrevConsKeys
.The
ValidatePrevConsKeys
function performs critical validation checks on the previous consensus keys in the genesis state. However, no unit tests were found for this function.Please add unit tests for the
ValidatePrevConsKeys
function inx/operator/types/genesis_test.go
to ensure the integrity and reliability of the codebase.
470-495
: LGTM!The
ValidateOperatorKeyRemovals
function is well-implemented and performs an important validation check on the operator key removals in the genesis state.x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (4)
266-274
: Acknowledged: Batch operation not supported by Cosmos SDK's KVStore.The
SetAllOperatorUSDValues
function sets USD values for all operators in a loop, which is a valid approach given the limitations of the Cosmos SDK's KVStore.Thanks for clarifying that the Cosmos SDK's KVStore doesn't support batch operations for setting multiple states. No further changes are needed here.
276-291
: LGTM!The
GetAllOperatorUSDValues
function is well-implemented and retrieves USD values for all operators by iterating over the store and unmarshaling the data.
293-301
: Acknowledged: Batch operation not supported by Cosmos SDK's KVStore.The
SetAllAVSUSDValues
function sets USD values for all AVS in a loop, which is a valid approach given the limitations of the Cosmos SDK's KVStore.Thanks for clarifying that the Cosmos SDK's KVStore doesn't support batch operations for setting multiple states. No further changes are needed here.
303-318
: LGTM!The
GetAllAVSUSDValues
function is well-implemented and retrieves USD values for all AVS by iterating over the store and unmarshaling the data.x/assets/types/genesis.go (2)
290-347
: LGTM: Comprehensive operator assets validation.The
ValidateOperatorAssets
function ensures that operator addresses are valid, assets are registered, and the operator's asset amounts do not exceed the total staking amount. The logic is clear and well-implemented, covering critical aspects of operator assets validation.
352-369
: LGTM: Refactored Validate function.The refactored
Validate
function sequentially calls the new validation methods, ensuring that all aspects of the genesis state are validated before finalizing the state. This refactoring enhances the modularity and clarity of the validation process, allowing for easier maintenance and potential future extensions.x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (4)
525-554
: LGTM: Comprehensive operator consensus key records retrieval.The
GetAllOperatorConsKeyRecords
function collects all operator consensus key records, organizing them by operator address. It utilizes a prefix iterator to gather data and constructs a structured response that groups consensus keys by operator. The logic is clear and well-implemented, enhancing the keeper's capabilities in managing and retrieving operator-related data.
446-465
: Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
467-486
: Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
506-523
: Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?cmd/exocored/testnet.go (1)
Line range hint
398-449
: LGTM: Enhanced operator and delegation management.The changes in the
getTestExocoreGenesis
function involve significant modifications to the data structures used for managing operator and delegation information. The original code utilizedOperatorInfo
andDelegationsByStaker
, which have been replaced withOperatorDetail
andDelegationStates
, respectively. This indicates a shift in how operator details are encapsulated, withOperatorDetail
now containing an embeddedOperatorInfo
, suggesting a more structured approach to operator data.Additionally, new data structures
StakerToOperator
andStakersByOperator
have been introduced, enhancing the relationships between stakers and operators. The logic for appending to these new structures has been implemented, indicating a more complex handling of delegation states and associations.The overall control flow remains similar, but the internal data handling has been enriched, allowing for more detailed tracking of operators and their associated stakers. The changes suggest an enhancement in the functionality related to staking and delegation management, likely aimed at improving the clarity and efficiency of these operations.
app/app.go (1)
Line range hint
1293-1300
: StreamlinedOperatorKeeper
initialization. Verify that it functions correctly without the query context.The removal of the
bApp.CreateQueryContext
argument from the call tooperatorKeeper.NewKeeper
streamlines the initialization of theOperatorKeeper
by reducing its dependencies.To verify that the
OperatorKeeper
can still function correctly without the query context, run the following script:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
OperatorKeeper
Initialization SimplifiedThe removal of the
bApp.CreateQueryContext
argument from theoperatorKeeper.NewKeeper
call does not impact the functionality ofOperatorKeeper
. The broader search confirmed that there are no dependencies on a query context within theOperatorKeeper
usage. This change effectively streamlines the initialization process without affecting functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `OperatorKeeper` can function without the query context. # Test: Search for `OperatorKeeper` function calls that use the query context. # Expect: No occurrences of `OperatorKeeper` functions using the query context. rg --type go -A 5 $'OperatorKeeper\\.\\w+\\(ctx' app/Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify that the `OperatorKeeper` can function without the query context. # Test: Search for any usage of `OperatorKeeper` functions that might imply dependency on a query context. # Use a broader pattern to ensure no relevant occurrences are missed. rg --type go -A 5 'OperatorKeeper' app/Length of output: 2617
x/operator/keeper/opt.go (1)
23-23
: Improved error handling.The change from directly returning the
delegationtypes.ErrOperatorNotExist
error to wrapping it usingerrorsmod.Wrapf
is a good practice. It enhances the error message by including contextual information about the operator address that triggered the error.The wrapped error provides better traceability and debugging capabilities, as it now conveys not only the type of error but also the specific operator address involved in the failure.
x/assets/types/keys.go (2)
94-96
: New utility function for identifying joined store keys.The addition of the
IsJoinedStoreKey
function is a useful utility that checks if a given key string contains the "/" character. This function may improve the handling of keys within the system, allowing for more robust key validation or processing.
102-102
: Improved error handling inParseJoinedStoreKey
.The update to the error returned when the expected length of the key does not match the actual length, from
ErrParseAssetsStateKey
toErrParseJoinedKey
, is a good change. It reflects a more accurate representation of the error context and aligns the error message with the function's purpose of parsing joined keys.
44ba24b
to
a12fc91
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (8)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (52)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (4 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- local_node.sh (1 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (11 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (5 hunks)
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto
- x/assets/types/errors.go
- x/delegation/types/keys.go
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (36)
- app/app.go
- app/ethtest_helper.go
- app/test_helpers.go
- cmd/exocored/root.go
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go
- local_node.sh
- precompiles/assets/tx.go
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go
- x/assets/types/genesis.go
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go
- x/assets/types/keys.go
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go
- x/delegation/types/errors.go
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go
- x/operator/types/genesis.go
- x/operator/types/keys.go
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (1)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go:266-274 Timestamp: 2024-09-09T06:42:40.462Z Learning: The Cosmos SDK's KVStore doesn't support batch operations for setting multiple states.
buf
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
5-5: import "exocore/delegation/v1/query.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
Additional comments not posted (42)
x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1)
69-69
: Use dynamic index based onassetID
to ensure test's validity.The change from using a dynamic index
assets[assetID]
to a static indexassets[0]
when comparing the asset state after a slash event could potentially affect the validity of the test.Using a static index means the test will always use the first asset in the
assets
slice, regardless of the value ofassetID
. This may not accurately reflect the intended behavior of theGetStakingAssetInfo
method when different asset IDs are involved.To ensure the test's validity, consider using the dynamic index based on
assetID
:-suite.Equal(assets[0].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount) +suite.Equal(assets[assetID].StakingTotalAmount.Add(depositEvent.OpAmount).Sub(event.OpAmount), assetInfo.StakingTotalAmount)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2)
17-23
: LGTM! The changes to theGenesisState
message enhance the data model.The modifications to the
GenesisState
message, including:
- Removing the
delegations
field- Moving the
associations
field to the first position- Adding new fields
delegation_states
,stakers_by_operator
, andundelegations
These changes reflect a significant enhancement in the data model, allowing for more comprehensive tracking of delegations and staker relationships within the system.
26-43
: LGTM! The new message types provide more detailed information.The addition of two new message types,
DelegationStates
andStakersByOperator
, enhances the structure of the genesis state by providing more detailed information about delegation states and staker associations.x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2)
34-47
: LGTM! The changes inInitGenesis
improve the clarity and functionality.The modifications to the
InitGenesis
function, including:
- Removing the nested loop structure that processed delegations
- Adding new logic to set all delegation states, staker lists, and undelegation records using the keeper methods
These changes reflect a significant restructuring of the initialization process, with a focus on improving the clarity and functionality of state management within the delegation module. The removal of the nested loop structure suggests a shift towards a more streamlined approach to handling delegation data.
52-77
: LGTM! The enhancements inExportGenesis
ensure comprehensive state export.The enhancements in the
ExportGenesis
function, including:
- Gathering and returning the current state of associations, delegation states, staker lists, and undelegations
- Constructing a
GenesisState
object by retrieving these states from the keeper- Handling errors by logging them and populating the
GenesisState
accordinglyThese changes indicate a more comprehensive approach to exporting the module's state, ensuring that all relevant data is captured and returned.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (5)
4-4
: Fix the invalid import statement.The import statement for
cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto
is incorrect as the file does not exist.Remove the invalid import statement:
-import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto";
Tools
buf
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
30-34
: Clarify the use ofoperator_assets
in theGenesisState
.The addition of
operator_assets
in theGenesisState
message (line 33) is crucial for tracking assets by operator. However, the current implementation does not show any handling ofoperator_assets
in theInitGenesis
andExportGenesis
functions. Please ensure that these functions are updated to properly handle theoperator_assets
field.Run the following script to verify the handling of
operator_assets
during genesis import and export:#!/bin/bash # Verify the handling of `operator_assets` during genesis import and export. rg 'operator_assets' --type go
36-45
: LGTM!The
AssetsByOperator
message is used to store the operator and its assets state in the genesis state. Theoperator
field is the address of the operator and theassets_state
field is the list of assets state, indexed by the asset id.
47-54
: LGTM!The
AssetByID
message is a helper struct used to store the asset id and its info for an operator in the genesis state. It is namedAssetByID
since it is indexed by theasset_id
.
61-61
: LGTM!The change is a minor renaming of the
staker
field toStakerID
in theDepositsByStaker
message and does not affect the functionality.x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
14-45
: LGTM!The
AllDeposits
function is a useful addition to retrieve all deposits associated with stakers. The implementation looks correct and efficient. It utilizes a prefix iterator to traverse the store and aggregates deposits by staker ID, returning a slice ofDepositsByStaker
structures. The logic includes checks to group deposits under the correct staker ID and constructs a list of deposits for each staker.
Line range hint
47-64
: LGTM!The modification to the
GetStakerAssetInfos
function reflects a shift in how asset information is structured and accessed, emphasizing a more streamlined approach to managing deposits. The changes look correct and the new return type[]assetstype.DepositByAsset
is more suitable for the purpose of the function compared to the previousmap[string]*assetstype.StakerAssetInfo
.x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (5)
6-9
: LGTM!The new import statements are required for the changes introduced in the test cases. They provide necessary dependencies for generating keys, addresses, and encoding.
28-30
: LGTM!The generation of a new key and account addresses is necessary for setting up the test cases. The changes look correct and use the appropriate functions from the imported packages.
Line range hint
52-68
: LGTM!The changes reflect a shift in how operator-related data is represented, likely enhancing the clarity and functionality of the operator details being validated. The test case has been updated to use the new
OperatorDetail
structure and theOperatorAddress
field, which aligns with the new structure. The changes look correct and maintain the purpose of the test case.
Line range hint
77-98
: LGTM!The new test case enhances the robustness of the validation logic by ensuring that the genesis state does not contain duplicate lz chain ids. The test case is well-structured and uses appropriate values to simulate the scenario. The changes look correct and add value to the test suite.
100-115
: LGTM!The new test case ensures that the genesis state validation checks for invalid operator addresses in the
OperatorRecords
. The test case is well-structured and uses an invalid address to simulate the scenario. The changes look correct and enhance the validation coverage.x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (2)
14-44
: LGTM!The
AllOperatorAssets
function correctly retrieves all operator assets from the store and groups them by operator. The grouping logic ensures that assets are aggregated correctly for each operator, and the function handles potential errors during key parsing and unmarshalling of asset information.The code changes are approved.
46-52
: LGTM!The modifications to the
GetOperatorAssetInfos
function correctly retrieve asset information for the specified operator. The change in the return type from a map to a slice ofAssetByID
reflects a shift in how asset information is structured and returned. The internal logic has been updated to accommodate the new return type, ensuring that the result is built correctly using an append operation.The code changes are approved.
x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
33-154
: LGTM!The modifications to the
TestValidateGenesis
function enhance the clarity and functionality of the genesis state validation process. The changes align the validation logic with the new delegation model, transitioning from using aDelegationsByStaker
structure to aDelegationStates
structure.The updated test cases ensure comprehensive test coverage for various edge cases, including invalid staker IDs, duplicate entries, and mismatched asset IDs. The malleate and unmalleate functions have been updated to align with the new data structure, ensuring that the tests accurately reflect the expected behavior of the genesis state under different conditions.
The code changes are approved.
proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (7)
48-54
: LGTM!The new
OperatorDetail
message provides a structured way to store operator information in the genesis state. It contains anoperator_address
field representing the address of the operator and anoperator_info
field containing detailed information about the operator. The inclusion of both the operator address and detailed information allows for a comprehensive representation of operators.The code changes are approved.
58-64
: LGTM!The new
OptedState
message provides a structured way to store opted state information in the genesis state. The combination of the operator address and AVS address in thekey
field allows for unique identification of opted states, while theopt_info
field encapsulates the undelegation state for the corresponding key.The code changes are approved.
68-73
: LGTM!The new
AVSUSDValue
message provides a structured way to store USD values for AVS addresses in the genesis state. Theavs_addr
field uniquely identifies the AVS, while thevalue
field holds the corresponding USD value.The code changes are approved.
77-86
: LGTM!The new
OperatorUSDValue
message provides a structured way to store USD values for operator and AVS combinations in the genesis state. Thekey
field uniquely identifies the operator and AVS combination, while theopted_usd_value
field holds the corresponding USD value states.The code changes are approved.
90-96
: LGTM!The new
OperatorSlashState
message provides a structured way to store slash information in the genesis state. Thekey
field uniquely identifies the combination of operator, AVS, and slashID, while theinfo
field holds the corresponding voting power value.The code changes are approved.
101-109
: LGTM!The new
PrevConsKey
message provides a structured way to store previous consensus keys in the genesis state. Thekey
field uniquely identifies the combination of chainID and operator address, while theconsensus_key
field holds the corresponding consensus key.It's important to note that the
consensus_key
field is expected to be a hex encoding of a 32-byte key, and this length constraint must be enforced outside of protobuf.The code changes are approved.
114-117
: LGTM!The new
OperatorKeyRemoval
message provides a structured way to store information about operators who are in the process of unbonding their keys in the genesis state. Thekey
field uniquely identifies the combination of operator address and chainID.The code changes are approved.
x/delegation/types/genesis.go (8)
34-61
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
180-212
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
214-254
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
256-311
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
313-361
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
15-26
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
29-31
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
365-382
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
testutil/utils.go (1)
136-174
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 257-271
x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (6)
276-291
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
303-318
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
25-25
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-60
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
85-85
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
97-97
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
…om bootstrap or the exported genesis file. fix the issues caused by rebase
fix the issue from code comments fix the error after rebasing
fix the unit tests fix the issue for genesis exporting launch define the common delimiter for combined key,stakerID and assetID. And add the check for the chainID
… genesis state for dogfood
f5befcb
to
b7777b1
Compare
b7777b1
to
6fe680e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (1)
Line range hint
28-221
: Great job on expanding the test suite!The test suite now covers a wide range of scenarios related to the genesis state validation, including invalid operator addresses, duplicate entries, invalid consensus keys, and more. The test cases are well-defined and provide good coverage for the validation logic.
For future improvements, consider adding test cases for any remaining edge cases or scenarios that are not currently covered. Additionally, consider adding test cases for the positive scenarios to ensure that valid genesis states are accepted.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (1)
7-7
: New import added:genesis.proto
.The addition of the
genesis.proto
import suggests new functionalities or dependencies related to genesis data. Could you provide more context on howgenesis.proto
is being used in this module?x/delegation/types/genesis.go (1)
125-125
: Remove Extra Space in Error MessageThere's an extra space between "state" and "for" in the error message, which could affect readability.
Apply this diff to correct the error message:
- "negative delegation state for %s: %+v", + "negative delegation state for %s: %+v",x/operator/types/genesis.go (1)
513-547
: Re-evaluate the validation flow inValidate
functionThe
Validate
function sequentially calls multiple validation functions. While this modular approach enhances readability, consider adding checks to ensure that data dependencies between these functions are intelligently handled. For instance, ifValidateOperators
fails, subsequent validations relying on its output may also fail or cause unintended errors. Implementing early returns or conditional checks can improve robustness.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (9)
x/assets/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/assets/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/delegation/types/types/query.pb.gw.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
x/dogfood/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/genesis.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
x/operator/types/tx.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (69)
- app/app.go (0 hunks)
- app/ethtest_helper.go (4 hunks)
- app/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/root.go (4 hunks)
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go (3 hunks)
- local_node.sh (1 hunks)
- precompiles/assets/tx.go (1 hunks)
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/utils.go (6 hunks)
- utils/utils.go (4 hunks)
- utils/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2 hunks)
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/assets/types/general.go (3 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis.go (6 hunks)
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/assets/types/keys.go (3 hunks)
- x/avs/keeper/avs.go (2 hunks)
- x/avs/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/avs/keeper/query.go (1 hunks)
- x/avs/types/types.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go (5 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/delegation/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/impl_epochs_hooks.go (1 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/impl_epochs_hooks_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/opt_out_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/dogfood/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/dogfood/types/genesis.go (0 hunks)
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go (5 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go (1 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/opt_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go (10 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (13 hunks)
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys.go (5 hunks)
- x/operator/types/keys_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (3)
- app/app.go
- x/dogfood/types/genesis.go
- x/operator/keeper/opt_test.go
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- proto/exocore/dogfood/v1/genesis.proto
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (49)
- app/ethtest_helper.go
- cmd/exocored/root.go
- cmd/exocored/testnet.go
- precompiles/assets/tx.go
- precompiles/avs/query_test.go
- proto/exocore/assets/v1/tx.proto
- proto/exocore/operator/v1/tx.proto
- utils/utils.go
- utils/utils_test.go
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_and_asset_test.go
- x/assets/keeper/client_chain_asset.go
- x/assets/keeper/genesis.go
- x/assets/keeper/keeper.go
- x/assets/keeper/staker_asset_test.go
- x/assets/types/errors.go
- x/assets/types/general.go
- x/assets/types/genesis.go
- x/assets/types/genesis_test.go
- x/assets/types/keys.go
- x/avs/keeper/avs.go
- x/avs/keeper/keeper.go
- x/avs/keeper/query.go
- x/avs/types/types.go
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation.go
- x/delegation/keeper/delegation_state.go
- x/delegation/keeper/un_delegation_state.go
- x/delegation/types/errors.go
- x/delegation/types/keys.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/genesis.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/impl_epochs_hooks.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/impl_epochs_hooks_test.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/msg_server.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/opt_out_test.go
- x/dogfood/keeper/unbonding_test.go
- x/dogfood/types/expected_keepers.go
- x/operator/client/cli/tx.go
- x/operator/keeper/consensus_keys.go
- x/operator/keeper/keeper.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator_info_test.go
- x/operator/keeper/operator_slash_state.go
- x/operator/keeper/slash.go
- x/operator/keeper/slash_test.go
- x/operator/keeper/usd_value_test.go
- x/operator/types/expected_keepers.go
- x/operator/types/keys.go
- x/operator/types/keys_test.go
- x/reward/keeper/claim_reward_test.go
- x/slash/keeper/execute_slash_test.go
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (3)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go:52-73 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:45:22.028Z Learning: In the `ExportGenesis` function, panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable as panic provides detailed context for debugging.
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go:34-47 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:44:23.781Z Learning: In the `InitGenesis` function, panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable as panic provides detailed context for debugging.
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/operator/keeper/genesis.go:63-96 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:46:25.700Z Learning: In the `ExportGenesis` function, panicking on errors is acceptable because the node is offline during genesis export.
x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (3)
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go:52-73 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:45:22.028Z Learning: In the `ExportGenesis` function, panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable as panic provides detailed context for debugging.
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/operator/keeper/genesis.go:63-96 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:46:25.700Z Learning: In the `ExportGenesis` function, panicking on errors is acceptable because the node is offline during genesis export.
Learnt from: TimmyExogenous PR: ExocoreNetwork/exocore#108 File: x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go:34-47 Timestamp: 2024-09-17T14:44:23.781Z Learning: In the `InitGenesis` function, panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable as panic provides detailed context for debugging.
buf
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto
4-4: import "cosmos_proto/cosmos.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
5-5: import "exocore/delegation/v1/query.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
GitHub Check: break-check
proto/exocore/assets/v1/query.proto
[failure] 48-48:
Field "1" on message "QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAllStakingAssetsInfoResponse.AllStakingAssetsInfoEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.StakingAssetInfo".
[failure] 60-60:
Field "1" on message "QueryAssetInfoResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryAssetInfoResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.DepositByAsset".
[failure] 80-80:
Field "1" on message "QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse" changed type from "exocore.assets.v1.QueryOperatorAssetInfosResponse.AssetInfosEntry" to "exocore.assets.v1.AssetByID".proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 19-19:
Field "2" with name "delegation_states" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "associations" to "delegationStates".
Additional comments not posted (76)
x/delegation/keeper/genesis.go (2)
34-47
: The error handling in this function has been previously discussed and accepted. Panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable in theInitGenesis
function as it provides detailed context for debugging.
52-73
: The error handling in this function has been previously discussed and accepted. Panicking on errors without additional logging is acceptable in theExportGenesis
function as it provides detailed context for debugging.x/operator/keeper/genesis.go (2)
10-55
: LGTM!The changes to the
InitGenesis
function are well-structured and improve the initialization logic for the operator module. Key improvements include:
- Defaulting the
EarningsAddr
to theOperatorAddress
if not provided, ensuring all operators have a valid earnings address.- Processing operator records more comprehensively by iterating through the
OperatorRecords
slice and setting consensus keys for each operator based on their chain details.- Initializing various other state variables from the genesis state.
These enhancements facilitate better management of operator data during the genesis initialization phase.
58-98
: Excellent refactoring of theExportGenesis
function!The modifications to the
ExportGenesis
function significantly improve its structure, readability, and error handling. Notable enhancements include:
- Aligning the function signature with standard SDK practices by including a context parameter.
- Constructing a
GenesisState
object to aggregate various operator-related data points.- Utilizing dedicated getter methods for retrieving each data point, promoting modularity and maintainability.
- Handling errors encountered during data retrieval by panicking with wrapped error messages, providing more informative error handling.
These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable implementation of the genesis export functionality for the operator module.
proto/exocore/assets/v1/genesis.proto (6)
30-34
: LGTM!The addition of the
operator_assets
field to theGenesisState
message is a crucial change for tracking assets by operator. The past review comment raised a valid concern about ensuring the proper handling of this field in theInitGenesis
andExportGenesis
functions.Since the developer has confirmed that the necessary handling has been implemented, I consider this concern resolved. Great work!
36-45
: Excellent addition of theAssetsByOperator
message type!The introduction of the
AssetsByOperator
message type is a great enhancement for managing operator assets within the genesis state. It provides a clear and organized structure for associating an operator with their list of assets.The use of the
AssetByID
message type for theassets_state
field is also a smart choice, as it allows for efficient indexing of assets by their ID.Overall, this addition improves the clarity and maintainability of the codebase. Well done!
47-54
: Great addition of theAssetByID
message type!The introduction of the
AssetByID
message type is a helpful addition to be used in the genesis state. It provides a structured way to store the asset ID and its corresponding information for an operator.The use of the
OperatorAssetInfo
message type for theinfo
field is a good design choice, as it ensures that all relevant asset information is encapsulated within theAssetByID
message.This addition enhances the clarity and organization of the asset data within the genesis state. Nice work!
61-61
: Minor change to thestaker
field.The modification to the
staker
field in theDepositsByStaker
message is a minor change that adds a custom name annotation using thegogoproto
extension. This annotation allows for customizing the generated Go code for this field, specifically setting the field name toStakerID
.This change does not have any significant impact on the functionality or behavior of the code. It's a small adjustment for code generation purposes.
74-74
: Minor formatting change.The modification to the
DepositByAsset
message is a minor formatting change that removes extra spaces before the message name. This change does not have any impact on the functionality or behavior of the code.It is purely a cosmetic adjustment to improve code readability and consistency. Good catch!
76-76
: Minor change to theasset_id
field.The modification to the
asset_id
field in theDepositByAsset
message is a minor change that adds a custom name annotation using thegogoproto
extension. This annotation allows for customizing the generated Go code for this field, specifically setting the field name toAssetID
.This change does not have any significant impact on the functionality or behavior of the code. It's a small adjustment for code generation purposes.
x/assets/keeper/staker_asset.go (2)
14-45
: LGTM!The
AllDeposits
function looks good. It efficiently retrieves all deposits grouped by staker ID using a prefix iterator. The logic for grouping deposits by staker ID and constructing the result slice is correct. The error handling and defer of iterator close follow best practices.
Line range hint
47-66
: Looks good!The modifications to the
GetStakerAssetInfos
function are appropriate. Changing the return type from a map to a slice simplifies the code and aligns with the new data structure for representing asset infos. The internal logic has been correctly updated to construct and return a slice ofDepositByAsset
. The error handling and defer of iterator close remain in place.x/operator/types/genesis_test.go (8)
Line range hint
52-58
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for an invalid operator address in the genesis state and expects the validation to fail.
Line range hint
63-73
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for duplicate operator addresses in the genesis state and expects the validation to fail.
Line range hint
77-99
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for duplicate lz chain ids in the client chain earning address list and expects the validation to fail.
100-115
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for an invalid operator address in the consensus key records and expects the validation to fail.
116-131
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for an unregistered operator in the consensus key records and expects the validation to fail.
132-165
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for duplicate operators in the consensus key records and expects the validation to fail.
166-187
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for an invalid consensus key in the consensus key records and expects the validation to fail.
188-221
: LGTM!The test case correctly checks for duplicate consensus keys for the same chain id in the consensus key records and expects the validation to fail.
x/assets/keeper/operator_asset.go (2)
14-44
: LGTM!The
AllOperatorAssets
function correctly retrieves all operator assets from the store and groups them by operator. It handles errors appropriately and returns the expected slice ofAssetsByOperator
.
46-52
: LGTM!The modifications to the
GetOperatorAssetInfos
function, including the change in return type from a map to a slice ofAssetByID
, are implemented correctly. The internal logic has been updated appropriately to use an append operation to build the result slice, and the function returns the expected slice ofAssetByID
.x/delegation/types/genesis_test.go (12)
33-42
: LGTM!The changes to the genesis state structure, specifically the introduction of
DelegationStates
andStakersByOperator
, are correctly implemented in the test setup.
70-70
: LGTM!The
NewGenesis
function call has been updated to use the new genesis state structure, which is correct.
78-82
: LGTM!The
malleate
andunmalleate
functions for the "invalid staker id" test case have been correctly updated to modify the new genesis state structure.
86-95
: LGTM!The new "duplicate state key" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic catches duplicate entries in the
DelegationStates
slice.
98-107
: LGTM!The
malleate
andunmalleate
functions for the "invalid asset id" test case have been correctly updated to modify the new genesis state structure.
110-122
: LGTM!The
malleate
andunmalleate
functions for the "asset id mismatch" test case have been correctly updated to modify the new genesis state structure.
124-133
: LGTM!The new "nil wrapped undelegatable share" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic catches nil values for the
UndelegatableShare
field in theDelegationAmounts
struct.
135-144
: LGTM!The new "nil wrapped unbonding amount" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic catches nil values for the
WaitUndelegationAmount
field in theDelegationAmounts
struct.
146-155
: LGTM!The new "negative wrapped undelegatable share" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic catches negative values for the
UndelegatableShare
field in theDelegationAmounts
struct.
158-167
: LGTM!The
malleate
andunmalleate
functions for the "invalid operator address" test case have been correctly updated to modify the new genesis state structure.
Line range hint
170-182
: LGTM!The new "duplicate stakerID in associations" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic catches duplicate entries in the
Associations
slice.
Line range hint
185-195
: LGTM!The new "one stakerID in associations" test case is a valid addition to ensure that the genesis state validation logic allows a single entry in the
Associations
slice.proto/exocore/operator/v1/genesis.proto (10)
15-15
: ** Field type change inGenesisState
requires careful consideration.**The change from
OperatorInfo
toOperatorDetail
in theGenesisState
message indicates a more detailed structuring of operator data. This change could affect serialization and deserialization logic, so ensure all dependent code is updated.
23-43
: New fields inGenesisState
enhance the data model.The addition of several new fields, such as
operator_records
,opt_states
,avs_usd_values
,operator_usd_values
,slash_states
,pre_cons_keys
, andoperator_key_removals
, allows for more comprehensive tracking of operator and AVS data. This expansion reflects a substantial enhancement in the data model, enabling more robust handling of operator-related information.
48-54
:OperatorDetail
message provides a structured way to store operator information.The introduction of the
OperatorDetail
message is a good design choice. It encapsulates the operator's address and detailed information (OperatorInfo
) in a modular and reusable manner, enhancing the overall structure of the genesis state.
58-64
:OptedState
message efficiently stores opted state information.The
OptedState
message is well-designed, using a composite key (key
field) to store the combination of operator address and AVS address. This allows for efficient lookup and retrieval of opted state data. Theopt_info
field, of typeOptedInfo
, encapsulates the details of the opted state, promoting a modular and maintainable structure.
68-73
:AVSUSDValue
message effectively stores USD value for AVS addresses.The
AVSUSDValue
message is a suitable choice for storing USD value information associated with an AVS address (avs_addr
field). The use ofDecValueField
for thevalue
field allows for precise storage of decimal values, ensuring accurate representation of USD values.
77-86
:OperatorUSDValue
message efficiently stores USD value for operator and AVS combinations.The
OperatorUSDValue
message is well-structured, using a composite key (key
field) to store the combination of operator and AVS address. This enables efficient lookup and retrieval of USD value data for specific operator and AVS pairs. Theopted_usd_value
field, of typeOperatorOptedUSDValue
, encapsulates the details of the opted USD value, promoting a modular and maintainable design.
90-96
:OperatorSlashState
message efficiently stores slash information.The
OperatorSlashState
message is well-designed, using a composite key (key
field) to store the combination of operator address, AVS address, and slashID. This allows for efficient lookup and retrieval of slash state data. Theinfo
field, of typeOperatorSlashInfo
, encapsulates the details of the slash information, promoting a modular and maintainable structure.
101-109
:PrevConsKey
message efficiently stores previous consensus key information.The
PrevConsKey
message is well-structured, using a composite key (key
field) to store the combination of chainID and operator address. This enables efficient lookup and retrieval of previous consensus key data. Theconsensus_key
field stores the hex-encoded 32-byte consensus key value.Ensure that the length of the
consensus_key
is exactly 32 bytes and is enforced outside of protobuf, as mentioned in the comments.
114-117
:OperatorKeyRemoval
message efficiently stores operator key removal information.The
OperatorKeyRemoval
message is well-designed, using a composite key (key
field) to store the combination of operator address and chainID. This allows for efficient lookup and retrieval of information about operators in the process of unbonding their keys for specific chainIDs.
121-137
:OperatorConsKeyRecord
andChainDetails
messages provide a modular structure for storing operator and chain information.The introduction of the
OperatorConsKeyRecord
andChainDetails
messages as helper structures for the genesis state is a good design choice. TheOperatorConsKeyRecord
message encapsulates the operator address and a list of associated chain details, while theChainDetails
message contains the chain id and consensus key information. This modular structure promotes maintainability and reusability of the codebase.app/test_helpers.go (3)
219-239
: LGTM!The changes to the assets module initialization improve the organization and clarity of asset management by:
- Using
AssetBasicInfo
directly instead of a pointer, which may improve performance by reducing indirection.- Introducing a new structure
AssetsByOperator
to encapsulate operator-specific asset states, including total amounts and shares.
243-253
: LGTM!The changes to the operator module initialization enhance the clarity and organization of operator data by:
- Using
OperatorDetail
instead ofOperatorInfo
, reflecting a more comprehensive encapsulation of operator data.- Adding the
OperatorAddress
field to provide clearer identification of the operator.- Nesting the existing fields within an
OperatorInfo
structure to promote better organization of related data.
Line range hint
256-280
: LGTM!The changes to the delegation module initialization simplify the representation of delegation states and enhance the clarity of the delegation logic by:
- Replacing the
DelegationsByStaker
structure withDelegationStates
, which consolidates related fields.- Introducing
StakersByOperator
to allow for a more structured approach to managing staker information associated with operators.local_node.sh (6)
98-99
: LGTM!The changes correctly configure the token address and chain ID for the
assets
module in the genesis state.
100-100
: LGTM!The change correctly initializes the total staking amount for the token in the genesis state.
106-111
: LGTM!The changes correctly initialize a new operator asset entry with the specified operator address and asset ID. The asset state values are being initialized appropriately.
118-123
: LGTM!The changes correctly configure the operator address, earnings address, meta info, and commission rates for the first operator entry. Setting the commission rates to
0.0
effectively disables commissions for this operator.
126-128
: LGTM!The changes correctly initialize a new delegation state entry with the specified key. The
undelegatable_share
is set to5000
, indicating the initial delegation amount, and thewait_undelegation_amount
is set to0
, indicating no pending undelegations.
131-132
: LGTM!The changes correctly initialize a new entry in the
stakers_by_operator
field, which maps operators and assets to their associated stakers. The specified staker ID is being added to the list of stakers for the given operator and asset.x/operator/keeper/usd_value.go (11)
Line range hint
25-57
: LGTM!The function correctly updates the USD share for the specified operator and AVS based on the provided delta values. The error handling and store interactions are implemented properly.
Line range hint
60-78
: LGTM!The function correctly initializes the USD value for the specified operator and AVS if it doesn't already exist in the store. The error handling and store interactions are implemented properly.
Line range hint
85-94
: LGTM!The function correctly deletes the USD share related to the specified operator and AVS from the store. The error handling for empty
operatorAddr
is implemented properly.
Line range hint
97-105
: LGTM!The function correctly deletes all operators' USD values for the specified AVS by iterating over the keys with the AVS prefix and deleting each key-value pair from the store. The iterator is properly closed using
defer
.
Line range hint
123-136
: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the USD share of the specified operator and AVS. It handles the case when the operator has not opted-in by returning zero values. The error handling for empty
operatorAddr
and missing key in the store is implemented properly.
Line range hint
149-163
: LGTM!The function correctly updates the total USD share of the specified AVS based on the provided
opAmount
. The error handling and store interactions are implemented properly.
Line range hint
171-177
: LGTM!The function correctly sets the total USD share of the specified AVS using the provided
amount
. The error handling for nilamount
is implemented properly.
Line range hint
180-184
: LGTM!The function correctly deletes the USD share of the specified AVS from the store using the
avsAddr
as the key.
Line range hint
192-203
: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the USD share of the specified AVS from the store using the
avsAddr
as the key. The error handling for missing key in the store is implemented properly.
Line range hint
208-230
: LGTM!The function correctly iterates over the operators of the specified AVS, unmarshals the values, and calls the provided
opFunc
for each operator. IfisUpdate
is true, it updates the values back in the store. The iterator is properly closed usingdefer
, and error handling is implemented for any errors encountered during the iteration process.
Line range hint
234-249
: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the vote power for the specified chain ID by checking if it corresponds to an AVS and retrieving the
OperatorOptedUSDValue
for each operator. The truncation ofActiveUSDValue
toint64
and error handling for unknown chain ID and retrieval errors are implemented properly.proto/exocore/delegation/v1/genesis.proto (2)
26-34
: Definition ofDelegationStates
message is appropriateThe introduction of the
DelegationStates
message enhances the data model, and the fields are well-documented. This addition aligns with the goal of providing more detailed tracking of delegation states.
36-43
: Definition ofStakersByOperator
message is well-structuredThe
StakersByOperator
message is correctly defined to store the list of stakers for each operator. The clear documentation aids in understanding its purpose within the genesis state.x/delegation/types/genesis.go (2)
227-227
: Correct Non-Standard Colon Character in Error MessageThe error message uses a non-standard colon character ':' (full-width colon) instead of the standard ':' (colon). This might cause issues in log parsing or display.
Apply this diff to correct the colon character:
- ErrInvalidGenesisData, "the block number to complete shouldn't be less than the submitted , undelegation:%v", + ErrInvalidGenesisData, "the block number to complete shouldn't be less than the submitted , undelegation:%v",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
233-233
: Correct Non-Standard Colon Character in Error MessageThe error message uses a non-standard colon character ':' (full-width colon) instead of the standard ':' (colon). This might cause issues in log parsing or display.
Apply this diff to correct the colon character:
- ErrInvalidGenesisData, "the completed amount shouldn't be greater than the submitted amount , undelegation:%v", + ErrInvalidGenesisData, "the completed amount shouldn't be greater than the submitted amount , undelegation:%v",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
testutil/utils.go (8)
7-8
: Import statement foravstypes
added correctly.The addition of the
avstypes
import is appropriate and necessary for the subsequent code changes.
140-179
: Initialization ofoperatorAssets
is properly structured.The
operatorAssets
slice is correctly initialized with the relevant operator information and asset states. The data aligns with the expected genesis configuration.
207-223
:operatorInfos
are correctly initialized.The
operatorInfos
slice accurately captures the operator details, including addresses and commission settings.
231-247
:operatorConsKeys
are set appropriately.The consensus keys for each operator are correctly assigned, ensuring proper validation and consensus operations.
252-286
: Initialization ofoptStates
andoperatorUSDValues
is accurate.The
optStates
andoperatorUSDValues
slices are properly populated, reflecting the operators' opted-in statuses and their respective USD values.
287-296
:avsUSDValues
andoperatorGenesis
are configured correctly.The total USD value for the AVS address is accurately calculated, and the
operatorGenesis
state is constructed with all necessary components.
298-314
:delegationStates
initialization is sound.The
delegationStates
slice correctly represents the delegation amounts for each staker-operator pair, ensuring accurate tracking of undelegatable shares.
325-338
:stakersByOperator
slice is properly set up.The mapping of stakers to operators is accurately established, facilitating correct delegation relationships.
// associations represents the association between a staker and an operator. | ||
repeated StakerToOperator associations = 2 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false]; | ||
repeated StakerToOperator associations = 1 [(gogoproto.nullable) = false]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing field numbers and types may cause backward compatibility issues
Changing field number 1
in GenesisState
from delegations
of type DelegationsByStaker
to associations
of type StakerToOperator
can lead to backward compatibility problems. Reusing field numbers with different types or names in Protocol Buffers may cause old clients or persisted data to misinterpret the data.
Consider assigning a new, unused field number to the associations
field and deprecate the old delegations
field if necessary. This approach preserves backward compatibility and prevents potential deserialization issues.
Tools
GitHub Check: break-check
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" with name "associations" on message "GenesisState" changed option "json_name" from "delegations" to "associations".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed type from "exocore.delegation.v1.DelegationsByStaker" to "exocore.delegation.v1.StakerToOperator".
[failure] 17-17:
Field "1" on message "GenesisState" changed name from "delegations" to "associations".
Description
It provides the genesis exporting functions for the assets, delegation, and operator modules. It provides compatibility for starting the Exocore node from the bootStrap contract and general genesis file.
Please refer to this documentation to get more details:
understanding-of-the-Genesis-exporting
The main changes are the proto files related to the genesis state. All other changes are implemented around the redefined genesis state structure to enable the genesis import and export functionality.
operator_assets
in the genesis stateOperatorConsKeyRecord,OptedState,AVSUSDValue,OperatorUSDValue,OperatorSlashState,PrevConsKey,OperatorKeyRemoval
in the genesis state.delegations
, and adddelegation_states,stakers_by_operator,undelegations
in the genesis state.The purpose of these changes is to ensure the unbalanced states won't influence the exported state.
Todo
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
ExocoreApp
toexocoreApp
for clarity and consistency in application creation and export functions.Tests
Chores
git
package version in the Dockerfile for potential bug fixes and improvements.