Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): downgrade node due to nodejs/node#53902 #56

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 commented Jul 19, 2024

A bug in node version 22.5.0 has caused the CI to fail. While a patch has been merged, a release is still awaited. This PR works around that by pinning the node version to one that does not contain the bug.

Once there is a new release, the pinned part (.4) can be removed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Downgraded Node.js version in workflows to 22.4 due to a bug in version 22.5.
    • Added a step to clear the npm cache in the workflow.

A bug in node version 22.5.0 has caused the CI to fail. While a patch
has been merged, a release is still awaited. This PR works around that
by pinning the node version to one that does not contain the bug.

Once there is a new release, the pinned part (`.4`) can be removed
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The Node.js version in the GitHub Actions workflow is downgraded from 22 to 22.4 due to a bug present in version 22.5. A comment is added to explain the bug and advise reverting the version once it is resolved. Additionally, a step to clear the npm cache is introduced using npm cache clean --force.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint.yml Node.js version downgraded from 22 to 22.4 due to a bug; added a step to clear npm cache with npm cache clean --force

Poem

In our workflow, a bug did creep,
So to version 22.4, we took a leap.
With npm cache, we swept it clean,
Awaiting fixes, keeping code pristine.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@wewecalibrate wewecalibrate self-requested a review July 19, 2024 03:19
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6dfa2d and 4cb7f68.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/lint.yml (2)

31-32: LGTM!

Adding the step to clear the npm cache using npm cache clean --force is a good practice to prevent issues related to cached packages.


25-29: LGTM! Ensure the Node.js version is correctly set.

The comments provide necessary context, and the downgrade to version 22.4 is appropriate given the bug in version 22.5.

However, ensure that the Node.js version is correctly set in the workflow.

Verification successful

Node.js version is correctly set to 22.4 in the workflow.

The comments provide necessary context, and the downgrade to version 22.4 is appropriate given the bug in version 22.5.

  • .github/workflows/lint.yml:
    • Node.js version is set to 22.4.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Node.js version is correctly set to 22.4 in the workflow.

# Test: Search for the Node.js version setting. Expect: Only occurrences of version 22.4.
rg --type yaml -A 5 $'node-version: \'22.4\''

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Node.js version is correctly set to 22.4 in the workflow.

# Test: Search for the Node.js version setting in all YAML files.
rg -t yaml -A 5 "node-version: '22.4'"

Length of output: 195


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Node.js version is correctly set to 22.4 in the workflow.

# Test: Search for the Node.js version setting across all files.
rg -A 5 "node-version: '22.4'"

Length of output: 38


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Node.js version is correctly set to 22.4 in the workflow.

# Locate the workflow file and search for the Node.js version setting.
fd -e yml | xargs rg -A 5 "node-version: '22.4'"

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the contents of the GitHub Actions workflow file to verify the Node.js version setting.

# Display the contents of the .github/workflows/lint.yml file.
cat .github/workflows/lint.yml

Length of output: 1311

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 merged commit 486e3f2 into main Jul 19, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants