Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ci): carve out comment failure workflow #125

Conversation

MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 commented Nov 15, 2024

Testing this at the moment

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow to comment on pull requests when the CI workflow fails, providing immediate feedback to developers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed redundant error handling steps from the Forge CI workflow, streamlining the process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Reviews paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named comment-on-failure.yml has been added, which triggers when the "Forge CI" workflow fails. This workflow comments on related pull requests to inform authors of the failure and advises them to check the logs. Additionally, modifications were made to the existing "Forge CI" workflow, including a name change and the removal of error handling steps that previously commented on various failure states.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml New workflow added to comment on pull requests when the "Forge CI" workflow fails.
.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml Workflow name shortened; error handling steps for commenting on failures removed.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code does play,
A new comment sings when CI goes astray.
"Oh dear authors, heed this call,
Check the logs, don’t let your spirits fall!"
With every failure, a message bright,
Guiding the way to fix it right. 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 marked this pull request as draft November 15, 2024 14:46
@MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai cancel

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml (1)

3-8: Consider optimizing the workflow trigger

The workflow could be more efficient by only triggering on failure completions instead of all completions and then filtering with an if condition.

 on:
   workflow_run:
     workflows: ["Forge CI"]
     types:
-      - completed
+      - completed
+    status:
+      - failure
.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml (2)

Line range hint 133-134: Consider using more flexible Python version constraint

Using an exact Python version (3.12.4) might cause unnecessary workflow failures when patch updates are released. Consider using a more flexible version constraint that allows patch updates.

-          python-version: '3.12.4'
+          python-version: '3.12'

Line range hint 108-142: Add documentation for storage layout comparison

The storage layout comparison job performs critical checks for contract upgrades, but its purpose isn't immediately clear. Consider adding a comment to explain why this check is important and what it verifies.

+      # This job ensures that storage layout changes don't break existing deployed contracts
+      # by comparing the current storage layout with the target branch
       - name: Generate target branch layout files
         run: |
           forge inspect src/core/ExocoreGateway.sol:ExocoreGateway storage-layout --pretty > ExocoreGateway_target.txt
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46f9927 and 8565a6e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/forge-ci.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-142: Verify error handling migration completeness

The error handling steps have been moved to a separate workflow file. While this separation of concerns is good, we should ensure there are no gaps in error reporting.

✅ Verification successful

Error handling is properly migrated and functional

The error handling has been successfully migrated to a dedicated workflow file comment-on-failure.yml which:

  • Triggers on completion of the "Forge CI" workflow
  • Automatically comments on associated PRs when failures occur
  • Handles failures across all jobs since it monitors the entire workflow

The separation provides cleaner organization without creating any gaps in error reporting, as it uses GitHub's workflow_run event to catch all failure scenarios.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all failure scenarios are handled in the new workflow

# Check if the new workflow file exists and contains all necessary failure handlers
if [ -f ".github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml" ]; then
    echo "Checking comment-on-failure.yml for comprehensive error handling..."
    
    # Check for build failure handling
    rg -l "workflow_run" .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
    
    # Check if it handles all job types (build, test, format, storage-layout)
    rg -l "conclusion.*failure" .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
else
    echo "Error: comment-on-failure.yml not found!"
    exit 1
fi

# Verify no orphaned error handling references remain
rg -l "github-script.*failure" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 465


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual content of comment-on-failure.yml to verify error handling
cat .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml

# Also check for any failure handling in the main workflow
rg "if: failure\(\)" .github/workflows/forge-ci.yml

Length of output: 1154

.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

@MaxMustermann2: Understood, I have paused the automatic reviews for this pull request.

✅ Actions performed

Reviews paused.

@MaxMustermann2 MaxMustermann2 changed the base branch from main to fix/workflow-split November 15, 2024 15:07
@MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai configuration

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

CodeRabbit configuration
language: en-US
tone_instructions: ''
early_access: false
enable_free_tier: true
reviews:
  profile: chill
  request_changes_workflow: false
  high_level_summary: true
  high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
  auto_title_placeholder: '@coderabbitai title'
  review_status: true
  commit_status: true
  poem: true
  collapse_walkthrough: false
  sequence_diagrams: true
  changed_files_summary: true
  labeling_instructions: []
  path_filters: []
  path_instructions: []
  abort_on_close: true
  auto_review:
    enabled: true
    auto_incremental_review: true
    ignore_title_keywords: []
    labels: []
    drafts: false
    base_branches:
      - master
      - main
      - develop
  tools:
    shellcheck:
      enabled: true
    ruff:
      enabled: true
    markdownlint:
      enabled: true
    github-checks:
      enabled: true
      timeout_ms: 90000
    languagetool:
      enabled: true
      enabled_only: false
      level: default
      enabled_rules: []
      disabled_rules:
        - EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
        - EN_UNPAIRED_QUOTES
      enabled_categories: []
      disabled_categories:
        - TYPOS
        - TYPOGRAPHY
        - CASING
    biome:
      enabled: true
    hadolint:
      enabled: true
    swiftlint:
      enabled: true
    phpstan:
      enabled: true
      level: '1'
    golangci-lint:
      enabled: true
    yamllint:
      enabled: true
    gitleaks:
      enabled: true
    checkov:
      enabled: true
    detekt:
      enabled: true
    eslint:
      enabled: true
    rubocop:
      enabled: true
    buf:
      enabled: true
    regal:
      enabled: true
    actionlint:
      enabled: true
    pmd:
      enabled: true
    cppcheck:
      enabled: true
    semgrep:
      enabled: true
    circleci:
      enabled: true
    ast-grep:
      packages: []
      rule_dirs: []
      util_dirs: []
      essential_rules: true
chat:
  auto_reply: true
knowledge_base:
  opt_out: false
  learnings:
    scope: auto
  issues:
    scope: auto
  jira:
    project_keys: []
  linear:
    team_keys: []
  pull_requests:
    scope: auto

@MaxMustermann2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Superseded by #127

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant