-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ci): carve out comment failure workflow #125
fix(ci): carve out comment failure workflow #125
Conversation
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai cancel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml (1)
3-8
: Consider optimizing the workflow triggerThe workflow could be more efficient by only triggering on failure completions instead of all completions and then filtering with an
if
condition.on: workflow_run: workflows: ["Forge CI"] types: - - completed + - completed + status: + - failure.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml (2)
Line range hint
133-134
: Consider using more flexible Python version constraintUsing an exact Python version (
3.12.4
) might cause unnecessary workflow failures when patch updates are released. Consider using a more flexible version constraint that allows patch updates.- python-version: '3.12.4' + python-version: '3.12'
Line range hint
108-142
: Add documentation for storage layout comparisonThe storage layout comparison job performs critical checks for contract upgrades, but its purpose isn't immediately clear. Consider adding a comment to explain why this check is important and what it verifies.
+ # This job ensures that storage layout changes don't break existing deployed contracts + # by comparing the current storage layout with the target branch - name: Generate target branch layout files run: | forge inspect src/core/ExocoreGateway.sol:ExocoreGateway storage-layout --pretty > ExocoreGateway_target.txt
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/forge-ci.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/forge-ci.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-142
: Verify error handling migration completeness
The error handling steps have been moved to a separate workflow file. While this separation of concerns is good, we should ensure there are no gaps in error reporting.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly migrated and functional
The error handling has been successfully migrated to a dedicated workflow file comment-on-failure.yml
which:
- Triggers on completion of the "Forge CI" workflow
- Automatically comments on associated PRs when failures occur
- Handles failures across all jobs since it monitors the entire workflow
The separation provides cleaner organization without creating any gaps in error reporting, as it uses GitHub's workflow_run
event to catch all failure scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all failure scenarios are handled in the new workflow
# Check if the new workflow file exists and contains all necessary failure handlers
if [ -f ".github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml" ]; then
echo "Checking comment-on-failure.yml for comprehensive error handling..."
# Check for build failure handling
rg -l "workflow_run" .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
# Check if it handles all job types (build, test, format, storage-layout)
rg -l "conclusion.*failure" .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
else
echo "Error: comment-on-failure.yml not found!"
exit 1
fi
# Verify no orphaned error handling references remain
rg -l "github-script.*failure" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual content of comment-on-failure.yml to verify error handling
cat .github/workflows/comment-on-failure.yml
# Also check for any failure handling in the main workflow
rg "if: failure\(\)" .github/workflows/forge-ci.yml
Length of output: 1154
@MaxMustermann2: Understood, I have paused the automatic reviews for this pull request. ✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
@coderabbitai configuration |
CodeRabbit configurationlanguage: en-US
tone_instructions: ''
early_access: false
enable_free_tier: true
reviews:
profile: chill
request_changes_workflow: false
high_level_summary: true
high_level_summary_placeholder: '@coderabbitai summary'
auto_title_placeholder: '@coderabbitai title'
review_status: true
commit_status: true
poem: true
collapse_walkthrough: false
sequence_diagrams: true
changed_files_summary: true
labeling_instructions: []
path_filters: []
path_instructions: []
abort_on_close: true
auto_review:
enabled: true
auto_incremental_review: true
ignore_title_keywords: []
labels: []
drafts: false
base_branches:
- master
- main
- develop
tools:
shellcheck:
enabled: true
ruff:
enabled: true
markdownlint:
enabled: true
github-checks:
enabled: true
timeout_ms: 90000
languagetool:
enabled: true
enabled_only: false
level: default
enabled_rules: []
disabled_rules:
- EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
- EN_UNPAIRED_QUOTES
enabled_categories: []
disabled_categories:
- TYPOS
- TYPOGRAPHY
- CASING
biome:
enabled: true
hadolint:
enabled: true
swiftlint:
enabled: true
phpstan:
enabled: true
level: '1'
golangci-lint:
enabled: true
yamllint:
enabled: true
gitleaks:
enabled: true
checkov:
enabled: true
detekt:
enabled: true
eslint:
enabled: true
rubocop:
enabled: true
buf:
enabled: true
regal:
enabled: true
actionlint:
enabled: true
pmd:
enabled: true
cppcheck:
enabled: true
semgrep:
enabled: true
circleci:
enabled: true
ast-grep:
packages: []
rule_dirs: []
util_dirs: []
essential_rules: true
chat:
auto_reply: true
knowledge_base:
opt_out: false
learnings:
scope: auto
issues:
scope: auto
jira:
project_keys: []
linear:
team_keys: []
pull_requests:
scope: auto
|
Superseded by #127 |
Testing this at the moment
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes