adding first version of the 2.2 exercise #54
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
UndeadFairy
changed the title
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB clausmichele commented on 2024-09-13T07:19:06Z This part is pretty similar to the previous, could we merge them into a single section? |
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB clausmichele commented on 2024-09-13T07:19:06Z I would directly inspect only items[0], otherwise the rendered notebook includes all the items and becomes difficult to read, since there is too much content to scroll. |
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB clausmichele commented on 2024-09-13T07:19:07Z Could we merge this part with the previous? For instance, the projection was printed there already. |
|
View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB clausmichele commented on 2024-09-13T07:19:08Z I don't think this part fits in here. The lecture is about data properties, not processing. We could consider to reuse the exercise in another lecture. UndeadFairy commented on 2024-09-19T07:34:46Z Understand the point, I was also contemplating if it is not too much, but I thought of finishing with some nice visualization (usually students like to see something visual) and as hint what comes next. Maybe just single band visualisation would be better here? clausmichele commented on 2024-09-19T07:48:52Z Yes, I think that visualization without particular processing would be fine, especially if it involves using metadata from the file needed for scaling. |
|
@UndeadFairy I left some comments using ReviewNB, I hope you can see them properly. |
|
Understand the point, I was also contemplating if it is not too much, but I thought of finishing with some nice visualization (usually students like to see something visual) and as hint what comes next. Maybe just single band visualisation would be better here? View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
|
Yes, I think that visualization without particular processing would be fine, especially if it involves using metadata from the file needed for scaling. View entire conversation on ReviewNB |
No description provided.