-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow non-zero vendor_id for libspdm_get_element_from_opaque_data() #2935
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does
libspdm_get_element_from_opaque_data
only get the firstelement_id
? What if opaque data contains multiple opaque elements with the sameelement_id
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
libspdm_get_element_from_opaque_data() will get (element_id, and sm_data_id) pair. Although the name is generic, but it has assumption that element_id is DMTF, because sm_data_id is only under DMTF.
To me, this function is mess, I would not define in this way, if I can redo the work.
I plan to define two functions:
libspdm_get_element_from_opaque_data_with_element_id (element_id, element_index)
- that is to get element with ID and index to support multiple elements.libspdm_get_sm_data_element_from_opaque_data (sm_data_id)
- that is to get SM_DATA only, with assumption that element_id is DMTF.The first function can be used for SPDM 1.4 with DMTF-DSP, and support DSP0289 Authorization AODS.
libspdm_get_aods_element_from_opaque_data (aods_id)
- that is to get AODS with assumption that element_id is DMTF-DSP.I will file a new issue for the new function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That will be in a separate pull request?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, separate PR definitely.
Most likely, I will submit after I finish DSP0289 Auth POC. Then we can know how to handle different element ID.