-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Safe CMA-ES (GECCO 2024) #187
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
613567a
fe46475
dc3ad8d
b7716b4
629e0dc
5d8569f
7f3732a
08b605a
2373dfd
f23baf0
d5ebbc9
7ceff0e
5c1ab7e
7971c6b
c840f1f
0804ab1
fabd39b
c3930a3
5eeaab3
0388bda
6c3b1af
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -6,4 +6,9 @@ | |||||||||
from ._dxnesic import DXNESIC # NOQA | ||||||||||
from ._catcma import CatCMA # NOQA | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
try: | ||||||||||
from ._safe_cma import SafeCMA # NOQA | ||||||||||
except ImportError: | ||||||||||
pass # Implementation of Safe CMA-ES requires scipy, gpytorch, and torch | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Comment on lines
+9
to
+13
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It seems that the current approach is somewhat tricky, as users may be confused if How about simply removing
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the great suggestion! It looks good to me. @kento031 |
||||||||||
__version__ = "0.11.1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you provide a brief description and usage for SafeCMA (like LRA-CMA-ES)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be clearer to explicitly state that the current implementation assumes no noise.