Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the explanation surrounding "virtual temperature" and a hypothetical "density temperature" #171

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

glwagner
Copy link
Member

@glwagner glwagner commented Dec 2, 2023

I thought the description could be improved by being a little more explicit. If I've made a mistake, let me know and I can fix it. I also embellished the "side point" by putting it in a box to emphasize that this is additional information that isn't core to understanding the main thread.

Copy link
Member

@trontrytel trontrytel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

The need to express everything in temperatures...

@glwagner
Copy link
Member Author

glwagner commented Dec 5, 2023

Any idea why tests fail? Something about a variable test_project_toml_formatting that's not defined. It seems unrelated to this PR.

@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member

Any idea why tests fail? Something about a variable test_project_toml_formatting that's not defined. It seems unrelated to this PR.

Yeah, it's unrelated, Aqua's test_project_toml_formatting was removed. I'll open a PR to fix this. Also, this PR LGTM.

@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member

Feel free to rebase and merge

@glwagner
Copy link
Member Author

glwagner commented Dec 5, 2023

The need to express everything in temperatures...

😅

Worth noting, I was reading this section because (some) bulk formula compute heat flux using the air-sea difference in virtual temperature. Blame the fluxes...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (025a07f) 93.02% compared to head (0d97c3e) 93.02%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #171   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.02%   93.02%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        1133     1133           
=======================================
  Hits         1054     1054           
  Misses         79       79           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glwagner
Copy link
Member Author

glwagner commented Dec 7, 2023

Note I also changed Aqua.type_piracy to Aqua.type_piracies via JuliaTesting/Aqua.jl#230

@glwagner glwagner enabled auto-merge December 7, 2023 12:45
@navidcy navidcy added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 7, 2023
@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member

Can we rebase / squash this PR?

@glwagner
Copy link
Member Author

glwagner commented Dec 8, 2023

Yes. Not sure how to do that at this point, should I disable auto-merge?

@charleskawczynski
Copy link
Member

Yes, you can disable and then re-enable auto merge. Not sure why it didn't merge 🤔

@glwagner
Copy link
Member Author

glwagner commented Jan 5, 2024

Superceded by #174

@glwagner glwagner closed this Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants