-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
VSS Version Governance (Major Minor)
Erik Jaegervall edited this page Mar 18, 2024
·
4 revisions
This page intends to give guidelines on version governance
Version | First Release | Status | EoL | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
v3.X | 2022-08-09 | EoL | 2023-11-02 (six months after VSS v4.0) | |
v4.X | 2023-05-02 | Supported | Six months after v5.0, or at earliest 2024-05-02 (1 year after v4.0) |
- We intend to have at least two releases per year, but unless there is a good reason not more than 1 major release per year.
- The "master" branch is the default branch and contains the content for the next major release.
- In addition to the "master" branch we may have one or more branches like "4.X" or "3.X" with content that potentially could be included in a minor release.
- Pull Requests (PRs) shall by default be targeting the "master" branch
- If a PR is considered "minor", then project maintainers shall after the PR has been merged to "master" do a cherry-pick or merge towards relevant minor-branches (like "4.X")
- At least twice a year the VSS project shall make a decision on what to release (if anything)
- A minor release shall typically be created if there is "anything" in the corresponding branch. It is no problem to release minor releases more than twice a year if needed/requested
- A major release shall be created if there are significant changes in master branch, but there should be good reasons to release major releases more frequently than once a year (like high inflow of features)
In general a major change is something that breaks backward compatibility, changes semantics or introduce a major set of new functionality.
List of changes that NOT shall be included in minor releases:
- Changing unit of a signal
- Changing name of a signal
- But could in many cases be included in the minor release by using the "deprecated" approach, i.e. adding a signal with the new name and mark the old name as deprecated
- TBD: Do we still want to use deprecation as concept? Or is it better to just change name in "master" and keep minor-branches unchanged?
- Changing datatype of a signal, even for "simple ones" like uint8 to uint16
- Rationale is that we do NOT know if downstream implementations can handle (simple) type mismatches, we have no recommendations that implementations shall be flexible on types, like accepting a response/request of type A if the value could be cast to type B.
- Changing or adding "allowed" literals
- Using new features that require that a new VSS-tools major version is used
- Changing description/comment resulting in semantic change of signal
- Example: If we change description of
Vehicle.Speed
to state "Vehicle speed measured at wheels" rather than just "Vehicle speed" then that could be considered as a semantic change
- Example: If we change description of
- For vss-tools: *: Any changes resulting in changed output or require additional arguments. Exception is obvious error corrections.
List of changes that can be included in a minor release:
- Adding a signal
- A possible exception could be if the number of signals are significant
- Adding/Improving/Changing description and comment, if it does not change semantic meaning of signal
- Changes when current description contain obvious errors
- Example: Changing type from int8 to uint8 may be OK if description or range says that negative values may be used
- Upgrading vss-tools minor version.
- For vss-tools: *: Adding a new tool or new arguments that does not affect (default/existing) behavior of existing tools.
- "master" branch is the default branch and will be used for the next major release
- Whenever a major release is created a maintenance branch for minor releases shall be created
- example: When v5.0 is released a branch 5.X shall be created, to be used for minor releases in the 5.X series
- A release-branch (like
release/5.0
orrelease/5.1
) may be created already at feature freeze but shall be created at latest at release- The release branch shall never be deleted (see discussion in Issue 704)
- After release the branch may only be used for low risk changes intended for patches. Larger changes shall be added to the maintenance branch (like
5.X
instead)
- A patch branch, like "5.0.X" may be created as well, but only if needed. No defined end-time for patches/fixes.
- The project ambition for maintenance branches is to maintain them:
- For 1 year after the major release
- But at least 6 months after next major release. This gives downstream projects a 6 months window to migrate to the newer version
- Example: VSS 4.0 was released 2023-05-22. If we assume VSS 5.0 will be released 2024-05-01 then minor changes on master will be merged/cherry-picked to the 4.X branch until 2024-11-01.
- A minor release shall be created before a branch is "closed"
- If requested contributors may volunteer to maintain a maintenance-branch for a longer time