Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add maintainers #78

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Add maintainers #78

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

danielcdz
Copy link
Contributor

@danielcdz danielcdz commented Oct 22, 2024

Pull Request Overview

📝 Summary

🔄 Changes Made

🔧 Tests Results

🔜 Next Steps

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a "Maintainers" section in the README.md file, featuring images and Telegram links for maintainers danielcdz and Marco for easier contact.

@danielcdz danielcdz self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new section titled "Maintainers" in the README.md file. This section includes a table with images and Telegram links for two maintainers, danielcdz and Marco. The new section is positioned after the existing content related to communication channels. No other modifications to existing content or structure are present.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added "Maintainers" section with images and Telegram links for danielcdz and Marco.

Possibly related PRs

  • README improvements #72: The changes in the README.md file include updates to the contribution section, which may relate to the new "Maintainers" section added in the main PR, as both involve enhancing the documentation for contributors.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9813dbf and d7c2be6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • assets/danielcdz.everai.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • assets/marco.everai.jpg is excluded by !**/*.jpg
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

113-131: Great addition of the Maintainers section!

Adding this section improves project transparency and provides clear contact points. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. There's a mismatch between the Telegram usernames in the links and the displayed names. For example, Luis's link shows "danielcdz" instead of "Luis". Consider aligning these for consistency.

  2. The image paths use relative links. To ensure they work correctly across different contexts (e.g., when viewed on GitHub or cloned locally), consider using absolute URLs or GitHub's raw content URLs.

  3. It would be helpful to add a brief description of the maintainers' roles or responsibilities above the table. This provides context for contributors on whom to contact for specific issues.

Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 367ad2a and ebb729d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danielcdz danielcdz added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation core-dev Only available for ByteBuilders Core Devs labels Oct 22, 2024
@coxmars coxmars requested review from coxmars and removed request for coxmars October 22, 2024 03:35
@danielcdz danielcdz requested a review from coxmars October 22, 2024 03:37
Copy link
Contributor

@coxmars coxmars left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM bro 🚀

@danielcdz danielcdz merged commit 4a3e7c6 into main Oct 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@danielcdz danielcdz deleted the danielcdz-add-maintainers branch October 22, 2024 05:18
@danielcdz danielcdz restored the danielcdz-add-maintainers branch October 22, 2024 05:18
@danielcdz danielcdz deleted the danielcdz-add-maintainers branch October 22, 2024 05:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-dev Only available for ByteBuilders Core Devs documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add maintainers to readme
2 participants