-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/client section #62
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@austintgriffith so we get the img to be a little bit smaller and also the text right? basically we should be making at as close to the other ones as possible? |
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
@import url("https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Space+Grotesk:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap"); | |||
@import url("https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Space+Mono:wght@400;700&display=swap"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth it to add a new font? We already have a few fonts on the site and some inconsistencies (like the batches section)
When in doubt I'd personally try to keep the site consistent. If not, we might end up with a monstrosity after a few iterations of tweaking sections. I think Space Grotesk is fine (I'd also fix the Batches section). But we can use font-mono
if we really want monospaced.
Also this monospace is only being used in one paragraph (+ is different from the nodes website!)
Description
Implements the new BG client section design as per the img above
msedge_opjLqTjHpJ.mp4