Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BFTask retain cycle #284

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

BFTask retain cycle #284

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sgl0v
Copy link

@sgl0v sgl0v commented Oct 19, 2016

There is a way to introduce retain cycle and get a BFTask object leaked. Just create a task that is never finished with result/error or cancelled. Here is the example:

[[self asyncTask] continueWithSuccessBlock:^id _Nullable(BFTask * _Nonnull t) {
    ...
}];

- (BFTask *)syncTask {
    BFTaskCompletionSource *taskSource = [BFTaskCompletionSource taskCompletionSource];
    return taskSource.task;
}

The BFTask object is captured in the executionBlock block of the continueWithExecutor:block:cancellationToken: method.
screen shot 2016-10-13 at 15 24 47

I'd propose to get rid of self reference capturing and cancel the task on deallocation (if needed).

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla - and if you have received this in error or have any questions, please drop us a line at [email protected]. Thanks!

If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer): the individual CLA is not sufficient - use https://developers.facebook.com/opensource/cla?type=company instead. Contact [email protected] if you have any questions.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@hhanesand
Copy link

hhanesand commented Jun 7, 2017

I'm pretty sure we can't implement this suggestion, as the retain cycle is needed to keep one off tasks alive before they finish/cancel/error. If this was implemented, tasks that do not have external references to them would be deallocated immediately.

IMO: It's a user error not to finish or cancel your task, not the frameworks error.

[executor execute:executionBlock];
[executor execute:^{
executionBlock(self);
}];

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove block

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants