updated formatting

pages/technologies_standards/dac_management.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ contributors: [Irene Hung]
 affiliations: [GA4GH]
 ---
 
-# What is a Data Access Committee?
+## What is a Data Access Committee?
 
 A Data Access Committee (DAC) consists of a group of individuals who are responsible for reviewing and assessing data access requests to particular datasets. There are a range of roles and stages involved in the data access request process. Some examples are listed below:
 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ A Data Access Committee (DAC) consists of a group of individuals who are respons
 | **Authorised Officer**   | Person who is authorised to sign data sharing agreements with another organisation on behalf of their own organisation (e.g. board member, executive officer or CEO).                                          |
 | **Data Distributor**     | Person who arranges for the provision of the approved data on a successful data access application with a signed data sharing agreement in place. This role may sit within a variety of teams in an organisation and data is provided using various methods. |
 
-## System use cases
+### System use cases
 
 Below are some examples of use cases for the roles participating in the data access application process. These interactions and capabilities may be manual or automated, and may differ depending on the organisation.
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ There are some current limitations identified with the tool relating to its limi
 
 ### DUOS
 
-DUOS is a semi-automated data access management service, created by the Broad Institute.
+DUOS ({% tool "duos" %}) is a semi-automated data access management service, created by the Broad Institute.
 
 DUOS leverages Data Use Ontology, which is a standardised vocabulary for data use limitations and proposed research that is also computer-readable. Using the same ontology, data custodians are able to describe their data use limitations and data requestors are able to describe their research purpose. This means that using the DUOS service, DACs are able to compare data use limitations and research purposes using the same vocabulary of terms, making it easier for them to make data access decisions. There is also the ability to enable an algorithm to automate this comparison and replicate the decision that a DAC could make, which has seen >90% agreement through testing.