Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TUNIC: Add link to logic tricks doc #4087

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ScipioWright
Copy link
Collaborator

What is this fixing or adding?

For the new logic options that have already been merged into main, I put together a doc detailing each of the individual instances of these tricks and which logic level they fall under.

I'm not attached to how I wrote the sentence describing this doc here, so please feel free to suggest an alternate.

How was this tested?

Reading.

If this makes graphical changes, please attach screenshots.

N/A

@ScipioWright ScipioWright added is: documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet. labels Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Exempt-Medic Exempt-Medic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ScipioWright ScipioWright added waiting-on: core-review Issue/PR has been peer-reviewed and is ready to be merged or needs input from a core maintainer. and removed waiting-on: peer-review Issue/PR has not been reviewed by enough people yet. labels Oct 24, 2024
@NewSoupVi NewSoupVi merged commit 594a832 into ArchipelagoMW:main Oct 28, 2024
12 checks passed
@ScipioWright ScipioWright deleted the patch-1 branch October 28, 2024 23:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
is: documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. waiting-on: core-review Issue/PR has been peer-reviewed and is ready to be merged or needs input from a core maintainer.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants