-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 711
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pokemon Red/Blue: Fixed Deprecated options system #3564
Pokemon Red/Blue: Fixed Deprecated options system #3564
Conversation
While you're fixing these, you may as well change |
Perhaps out of scope, but since you changed |
You missed at least two instances of the old option getters in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These kinds of changes have already been made on a dev branch and this would likely lead to massive merge conflicts
As the world maintainer, I'm pretty sure you're allowed to block the PR on these grounds, so if that's your stance, so be it. I took initiative because I don't know the timeline on that dev branch, but what I do know is that it has been over 8 months since #993 was merged, and that these specific options not being fixed is a significant annoyance to a lot of people (myself included). Do you have a rough timeline for the dev branch, so that we know what to expect? |
Seemingly that's what the just posted #3566 is about. |
Going to default to the PR by the world author, which has been opened now |
What is this fixing or adding?
I was tired of the infinity warnings, so I did something about it. Also took care of the per_slot_randoms while I was here.
How was this tested?
Not much.
I ran the generic unit tests, but Pokemon Red/Blue does not have specific unit tests, so it is impossible to know if things are correct or not.
Plus, I don't play the game myself.
Overall, low confidence, but I figured that's better than leaving the options in limbo forever. I just recommend the reviewers pay close attention I guess.