Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Common,DPG] PID: Add AO2D metadata handling for pass name in TPC CCDB calls (pull/6793), adding NN-version number , using nSigmaTOFdautrack in protons from Lambda decays #8835

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

amaringarcia
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…DB calls (pull/6793), adding NN-version number , using nSigmaTOFdautrack in protons from Lambda decays
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [Common, DPG] PID: Add AO2D metadata handling for pass name in TPC CCDB calls (pull/6793), adding NN-version number , using nSigmaTOFdautrack in protons from Lambda decays [Common,DPG] PID: Add AO2D metadata handling for pass name in TPC CCDB calls (pull/6793), adding NN-version number , using nSigmaTOFdautrack in protons from Lambda decays Dec 5, 2024
@amaringarcia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alcaliva @chiarazampolli could you have a look at this pull request. It is important for the TPC dE/dx. In the test that it failed, I only see warnings. I think I can ignor them, or?
Thanks in advance.
Ana

Copy link
Collaborator

@chiarazampolli chiarazampolli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sees ok with me, though I find it weird to use both CcdbApi andBasicCCDBManager. I guess there is no other way.

@chiarazampolli
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @amaringarcia ,

To me it looks ok, but you have to fix the issues with the linter test for sure. I am not an expert about it, though, I guess that warnings are a problem.

Chiara

@amaringarcia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear all,

all "required" tests are successful. Can one approve and "merge" this request? Changing so many names int the pidTPC I find it "risky".
Regards,
Ana

@njacazio njacazio enabled auto-merge (squash) December 9, 2024 11:48
@njacazio
Copy link
Collaborator

njacazio commented Dec 9, 2024

For the Common part @ddobrigk has to approve

@amaringarcia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ddobrigk can you have a look? I think your approval is needed.
Thanks in advance,
Ana

Copy link
Collaborator

@ddobrigk ddobrigk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved, though please note that 'skimming' is not the right word to use for custom derived tables - please consider changing the name to avoid confusion. Thank you!

@njacazio njacazio merged commit 81c7bcd into AliceO2Group:master Dec 10, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
Archita-Dash pushed a commit to Archita-Dash/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…B calls (pull/6793), adding NN-version number , using nSigmaTOFdautrack in protons from Lambda decays (AliceO2Group#8835)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants