-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pass vectors along wires for instantaneous machines #112
Merged
slibkind
merged 6 commits into
AlgebraicJulia:master
from
slwu89:slwu89/instantaneous_vector
Aug 17, 2022
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
81c44a1
(not working) attempt to add vector wires for instantaneous continuou…
slwu89 9ebea21
fix errors and check InstantaneousContinuousMachine with vector reado…
slwu89 13693d3
test composition works
slwu89 52009ef
add test for InstantaneousDelayMachine with vectors on wires
slwu89 710b78c
ensure single-typed ports are default
slwu89 d09c731
remove commented out code
slwu89 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -310,7 +310,76 @@ end | |
@test readout(m, vcat(u1, u2, u3), nothing, 0) == [u1 + u2, u2, u3] | ||
@test eval_dynamics(m, vcat(u1, u2, u3), [x1, x2], nothing, 0) == vcat(x1, u2 + x1 + 2*u2 + u3, x2) | ||
end | ||
end | ||
|
||
@testset "VectorInterface for InstantaneousContinuousMachine" begin | ||
m = InstantaneousContinuousMachine{Float64,3}( | ||
1, 3, 1, | ||
(u, x, p, t) -> u*1.5, # dynamics | ||
(u, x, p, t) -> u+x, # readout | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm surprised this works, since There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. fixed. |
||
[1 => 1] | ||
) | ||
|
||
x1 = Float64.([1,2,3]) | ||
u1 = Float64.([4,5,6]) | ||
|
||
@test readout(m, u1, x1, nothing, 0) == u1+x1 | ||
slibkind marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
@test eval_dynamics(m, u1, [x1], nothing, 0) == u1*1.5 | ||
|
||
# compare to analytic soln | ||
prob = ODEProblem(m, u1, [x1], (0.0, 0.05)) | ||
sol = solve(prob, Tsit5()) | ||
|
||
@test sol.u[end] ≈ [x*exp(1.5*0.05) for x in u1] | ||
|
||
# check it composes | ||
m1 = InstantaneousContinuousMachine{Float64,3}(2, 3, 1, | ||
(u, x, p, t) -> x[1] + x[2], | ||
(u,p,t) -> [u]) | ||
m2 = InstantaneousContinuousMachine{Float64, 3}(1, 3, 2, | ||
(u, x, p, t) -> x[1] + u, | ||
(u,p,t) -> [u, 2*u]) | ||
m3 = InstantaneousContinuousMachine{Float64, 3}(1, 3, 1, | ||
(u, x, p, t) -> x[1], | ||
(u,p,t) -> [u]) | ||
m = oapply(d_big, [m1, m2, m3]) | ||
|
||
u1 = 1:3; u2 = 4:6; u3 = 7:9; | ||
x1 = ones(3); x2 = fill(0.5, 3) | ||
|
||
@test readout(m, vcat(u1, u2, u3), nothing, 0) == [u1 + u2, u2, u3] | ||
@test eval_dynamics(m, vcat(u1, u2, u3), [x1, x2], nothing, 0) == vcat(x1, u2 + x1 + 2*u2 + u3, x2) | ||
|
||
end | ||
|
||
@testset "VectorInterface for InstantaneousDelayMachine" begin | ||
m = InstantaneousDelayMachine{Float64,3}( | ||
1, 3, 1, # ninputs, nstates, noutputs | ||
(u, x, h, p, t) -> -h(p, t-1), # dynamics | ||
(u, x, h, p, t) -> u+x, # readout | ||
[1 => 1] # output -> input dependency | ||
) | ||
|
||
x1 = Float64.([1,2,3]) | ||
u1 = Float64.([4,5,6]) | ||
hist(p,t) = u1 | ||
|
||
@test readout(m, u1, x1, hist, nothing, 0) == u1+x1 | ||
@test eval_dynamics(m, u1, [x1], hist, nothing, 0) == -u1 | ||
|
||
prob = DDEProblem(m, u1, [x1], hist, (0.0, 3.0), nothing) | ||
sol = solve(prob,MethodOfSteps(Tsit5()),abstol=1e-12,reltol=1e-12) | ||
|
||
# DiffEq.jl solution | ||
prob1 = DDEProblem((du,u,h,p,t) -> begin | ||
x_lag = -h(p, t-1) | ||
du[1] = x_lag[1] | ||
du[2] = x_lag[2] | ||
du[3] = x_lag[3] | ||
end, u1, hist, (0.0, 3.0), nothing) | ||
|
||
sol1 = solve(prob1,MethodOfSteps(Tsit5()),abstol=1e-12,reltol=1e-12) | ||
|
||
@test sol.u[end] ≈ sol1.u[end] | ||
|
||
end | ||
end |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check here that the given interface
I
is a subtype ofAbstractInstantaneousDirectedInterface{T}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@slibkind I tried to implement something like
const InstantaneousContinuousMachine{T,I<: AbstractInstantaneousDirectedInterface{T}} = Machine{T, I, ContinuousDirectedSystem{T}}
but it ran into problems with the constructors as implemented. That is, the constructor typed as{T,N}
complained whenN
was given as anInt64
for the dimensions of the vectors on the ports, because it expected an interface. So I did the checking in the constructors.I think this is a general problem we have to live with because when I tried to do some type checking for regular continuous machines as
const ContinuousMachine{T,I <: AbstractDirectedInterface{T}} = Machine{T, I, ContinuousDirectedSystem{T}}
the constructor typed as{T,N}
also failed with the type errorERROR: TypeError: in Type, in I, expected I<:AlgebraicDynamics.DWDDynam.AbstractDirectedInterface{Float64}, got a value of type Int64
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I agree that having the vector length as part of the type parameter has led to some clunky issues. I made note of this in Issue #113.