Add Changelog for 0.2.0 #962
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
sjspielman
reviewed
Dec 20, 2024
| - `cell-type-wilms0tumor-14` | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| This release also adds the following new modules developed by the Data Lab: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cell-type-consensus is also getting added with this release
Co-authored-by: Jaclyn Taroni <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a draft of a Changelog for 0.2.0
I tried to be brief but informative, looking through all of the descriptions in the dated releases, but I may well have missed important changes worth mentioning. Please let me know if there are things you think I should add, as well as any other changes you would suggest!
When drafting, I realized that there was one inconsistently named module,
celltype-glioblastomaso I also took this chance to move it and rename references to it. If we don't want to do this now, I can easily revert the commit that accomplished this. I wasn't sure whether we wanted to include the module in the release notes, as it does not yet have anything but example code, so may not really be worth including?