-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(frontend)[AGE 1444]: Enhance documentation for Frontend repo, and include best practices #2356
(frontend)[AGE 1444]: Enhance documentation for Frontend repo, and include best practices #2356
Conversation
…n in react components
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ardaerzin not the expert but it's very clear to me.
One point that's still open is ee/ -> Saw your comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about FE testing??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
Thank you for the PR, @ardaerzin. LGTM! One thought: should we consider adding a section to discuss when and why to import a component dynamically? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
will add a follow up ticket this week, and make sure it includes the additional topics mentioned here. Thanks for the feedback 🙏 |
We're already discussing this topic. once it is a refined more, will share with the team and include them in an updated version of this |
closes AGE-1444
closes AGE-1445
closes AGE-1446
What has changed?
This'll be a living document, but this iteration should be enough to give a better structure to upcoming PRs. Looking forward to your feedback