noMasked changes beta values #167
Replies: 5 comments 6 replies
-
If you apply getBetas directly, like getBetas(noMasked(sdf)) and getBetas(sdf), there shouldn't be a difference. My guess is you are using openSesame which includes additional preprocessing some of which may use the masked probes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for your reply. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is sdf just one SigDF? under the hood noMasked is simply
so you just need
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
No I have over 50 SigDF in sdf. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here are the steps I applied. I did all QC step by step, to be able to reconstruct: #inferInfiniumIChannel Run dye bias correctionidatlist_CD <- lapply(idatlist_C, dyeBiasNL) #Detection Pvalue -> until here everything seems fine. Beta values are as they should be##################################################################### #-> after this step some beta values changes. idatlist_CDPo_ExcMask <- lapply(idatlist_CDPo,function (x) noMasked(x)) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all,
I'm currently working on an EPICv2 array using sesame .. during the QC steps I realized that the beta-values change after applying the noMasked function on the SigDF. Anyone else experienced the same? or can someone explain this ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions