Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump react-router from 4.2.0 to 6.21.1 #875

Closed

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 21, 2023

Bumps react-router from 4.2.0 to 6.21.1.

Release notes

Sourced from react-router's releases.

v6.21.1

Release notes are stored in the CHANGELOG.md file:

https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6211

v6.21.0

Release notes are stored in the CHANGELOG.md file:

https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6210

v6.20.1

Release notes are stored in the CHANGELOG.md file:

https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6201

v6.20.0

Release notes are stored in the CHANGELOG.md file:

https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6200

v6.19.0

Release notes are stored in the CHANGELOG.md file:

https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6190

v6.18.0

Minor Changes

New Fetcher APIs

Per this RFC, we've introduced some new APIs that give you more granular control over your fetcher behaviors. (#10960)

  • You may now specify your own fetcher identifier via useFetcher({ key: string }), which allows you to access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling
  • Fetcher keys are now exposed on the fetchers returned from useFetchers so that they can be looked up by key
  • Form and useSumbit now support optional navigate/fetcherKey props/params to allow kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specified key
    • <Form method="post" navigate={false} fetcherKey="my-key">
    • submit(data, { method: "post", navigate: false, fetcherKey: "my-key" })
    • Invoking a fetcher in this way is ephemeral and stateless
    • If you need to access the state of one of these fetchers, you will need to leverage useFetchers() or useFetcher({ key }) to look it up elsewhere

Persistence Future Flag (future.v7_fetcherPersist)

Per the same RFC as above, we've introduced a new future.v7_fetcherPersist flag that allows you to opt-into the new fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior. Instead of being immediately cleaned up on unmount, fetchers will persist until they return to an idle state. This makes pending/optimistic UI much easier in scenarios where the originating fetcher needs to unmount. (#10962)

  • This is sort of a long-standing bug fix as the useFetchers() API was always supposed to only reflect in-flight fetcher information for pending/optimistic UI -- it was not intended to reflect fetcher data or hang onto fetchers after they returned to an idle state
  • Keep an eye out for the following specific behavioral changes when opting into this flag and check your app for compatibility:
    • Fetchers that complete while still mounted will no longer appear in useFetchers() after completion - they served no purpose in there since you can access the data via useFetcher().data
    • Fetchers that previously unmounted while in-flight will not be immediately aborted and will instead be cleaned up once they return to an idle state
      • They will remain exposed via useFetchers while in-flight so you can still access pending/optimistic data after unmount
      • If a fetcher is no longer mounted when it completes, then it's result will not be post processed - e.g., redirects will not be followed and errors will not bubble up in the UI

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from react-router's changelog.

6.21.1

Patch Changes

  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#11121)
  • Updated dependencies:

6.21.0

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#11087)

    This fix was originally added in #10983 and was later reverted in #11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #11052)

    The Bug The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
        <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
      return (
        <div>
          <h2>Dashboard</h2>
          <nav>
            <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
            <Link to="team">Team</Link>
            <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
          </nav>
      &lt;Routes&gt;
        &lt;Route path=&quot;/&quot; element={&lt;DashboardHome /&gt;} /&gt;
        &lt;Route path=&quot;team&quot; element={&lt;DashboardTeam /&gt;} /&gt;
        &lt;Route path=&quot;projects&quot; element={&lt;DashboardProjects /&gt;} /&gt;
      &lt;/Routes&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [react-router](https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/tree/HEAD/packages/react-router) from 4.2.0 to 6.21.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/packages/react-router/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/commits/[email protected]/packages/react-router)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: react-router
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Dec 21, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 11, 2024

Superseded by #883.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Jan 11, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/react-router-6.21.1 branch January 11, 2024 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants