Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HAL 01: Zeta supply does not track assets correctly #564

Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #638 ...
fadeev opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks done
Tracked by #638 ...

HAL 01: Zeta supply does not track assets correctly #564

fadeev opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@fadeev
Copy link
Member

fadeev commented May 9, 2023

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
  1. zetaclient
  2. zetaclient
  3. zetaclient
  4. zetaclient
@fadeev fadeev changed the title HAL-01: Zeta supply does not track assets correctly HAL 01: Zeta supply does not track assets correctly May 9, 2023
@fadeev fadeev added this to the Open-sourcing the repository milestone May 9, 2023
@fadeev fadeev mentioned this issue May 23, 2023
@fadeev fadeev mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2023
@fadeev fadeev mentioned this issue Sep 25, 2023
@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Oct 30, 2023

@kingpinXD can we break down into several tasks?

@lumtis lumtis mentioned this issue Nov 2, 2023
@lumtis lumtis mentioned this issue Nov 13, 2023
@CharlieMc0
Copy link
Member

Is this completed? @lumtis @kingpinXD ?

@kingpinXD
Copy link
Contributor

No, it's not
The supply checker initially implemented was disabled as we planned to test it on Athens to determine the frequency of these checks so that the notifications are helpful.

This would need to be prioritised / revisited to enable it backup again . Based on the current codebase , we would need to refactor the checking function

@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Oct 14, 2024

We decided to go with monitoring + using emergency proposals

The previous ZetaClient implementation was bloated since requiring new queries and unclear process to report accounting issues.
There is no reason for ZetaClient to be in charge of this if emergency proposals are executed by external parties

What we should do is refactor to use a lock/unlock model for ZETA instead of mint/burn for non-Ethereum chians but we should first decide if we want to transition ZETA to the contract v2 model

@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Nov 25, 2024

Closing in favor of #881

@lumtis lumtis closed this as completed Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants