Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copyright License #74

Open
GitWatin opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Copyright License #74

GitWatin opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@GitWatin
Copy link

GitWatin commented Mar 29, 2021

Add Copyright License with symbol

Hi,

Do you have a copyright system already applied in the package "doclicense" ?
If not, do you think it would be a good idea to add it?

Kind regards

@ypid
Copy link
Owner

ypid commented Mar 29, 2021

Can you give me an example what you mean? I don’t quite get it.

@GitWatin
Copy link
Author

GitWatin commented Apr 2, 2021

Yes, no problem

For example in my reports I add the creative common banner and the logo.
But sometimes I need a very restrictive version like for documents that are not intended for the public and must remain in the prescribed domain.

I would like to see if it is possible to add a more closed type of copyright phrase and an associated logo

I don't know if it is possible because I am far from being an expert in the field of intellectual property.
regards
Capture

@ypid
Copy link
Owner

ypid commented Apr 4, 2021

IANAL.

Licenses: As a Free Software developer and sysadmin, I have an understanding of software licenses. The doclicense package is intended not to invent things and I am not aware of an existing license we could use that does what you asked for. The closes I know from the area of software is https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32214751/what-should-put-in-the-license-field-of-package-json-if-my-code-is-only-for-use.

https://spdx.org/licenses/ could also be worth a look, but I am not aware of a license that covers your use case.

On a second thought I would say you are not actually looking for a license here. If no license is applied, normal copyright applies which already prevents free sharing of the document (in the jurisdictions that I know of, Germany and USA). Maybe classified information is what you are looking for? But I am not sure if that should still be in scope for the package. A suitable framework would be needed. You would have to do some research and make an proposal how to solve it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants