-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About the loss function #13
Comments
We provided huber loss in the code. |
But the huber loss in your code doesn't have the cycle-consistency regularization term. Is that correct? |
That's correct. Cycle-consistency regularization should be easy to implement. Do you want me to upload the implementation? |
I am having some issues in implementing it. It would be great if you can upload it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi Xingyu,
Thank you for releasing code here.
I noticed that the loss function used in the code is different from the one in the Paper. In the paper, you used a huber loss together with a cycle-consistency regularization.
Are there particular reasons that you removed it from your code?
Thank you very much.
Best,
Dylan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: