You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
constdoc=nlp.readDoc('I have a cold.');doc.printTokens();
outputs
token p-spaces prefix suffix shape case nerHint type normal/pos
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
I 0 I I X 2 0 word i / PRON
have 1 ha ave xxxx 1 0 word have / AUX
a 1 a a x 1 0 word a / DET
cold 1 co old xxxx 1 0 word cold / ADJ
. 0 . . . 0 0 punctuat . / PUNCT
In all cases I encountered, it never got classified as a noun, always an adjective.
P.S. wink-eng-lite-web-model v1.8.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
POS tagging in models like wink-eng-lite-web-model employs probabilistic methods. While effective, these methods don't guarantee 100% accuracy. The quality of training data plays a crucial role in determining the probabilities.
We will explore possibilities for improvements.
Also, please note that .printTokens() is an undocumented, debugging-only API. For better reliability, it’s recommended to use documented methods from the API.
I kind of understand the machine learning bit, but the gist of my concern is that, from what I see, the model seems to have 0% accuracy on this word. (and potentially others)
It never got one right.
I don't actually know the details, but I just suspect the data tagging used for model training.
outputs
In all cases I encountered, it never got classified as a noun, always an adjective.
P.S. wink-eng-lite-web-model v1.8.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: