Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are charge-backs/refunds out of scope? #8

Open
msporny opened this issue May 7, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Are charge-backs/refunds out of scope? #8

msporny opened this issue May 7, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented May 7, 2013

Should charge-backs and refunds be handled outside of the API? Should the API only focus on initiating payments. It's true that a charge-back and refund could be viewed as a "reverse payment". However, we should be sure that we understand the ramifications of a charge-back/refund. For example, if the browser ends up holding digital receipts for items, would a charge-back/refund need to mark those digital receipts as invalid at that point? If so, we most likely need to spec that for interop.

It would be good to understand the use cases for charge-backs and refunds necessitating spec language (instead of saying it's out of scope for the spec).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant