You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for you interesting work.
I am currently trying to recreate your evaluation on the CAPE dataset. I have generated point clouds from the validation set split of PTF (['00122', '00159', '00215']). Added gaussian noise of zero mean and 1mm standard-deviation. Then I subsampled the point cloud to 2048 points using farthest point sampling. Using your generate_pt.py script I find SMPL models and calculate the mean vertex-to-vertex error.
The results I get are 44.3 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error, compared to the 21.8 mm error that is reported in the paper. I also get 105.2 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error on the raw smpl output of the regressor.
Have I done something wrong? Or would it be possible to supply an evaluation script?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for you interesting work.
I am currently trying to recreate your evaluation on the CAPE dataset. I have generated point clouds from the validation set split of PTF (['00122', '00159', '00215']). Added gaussian noise of zero mean and 1mm standard-deviation. Then I subsampled the point cloud to 2048 points using farthest point sampling. Using your generate_pt.py script I find SMPL models and calculate the mean vertex-to-vertex error.
The results I get are 44.3 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error, compared to the 21.8 mm error that is reported in the paper. I also get 105.2 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error on the raw smpl output of the regressor.
Have I done something wrong? Or would it be possible to supply an evaluation script?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: