Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation script #14

Open
ludvigsundoen opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluation script #14

ludvigsundoen opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ludvigsundoen
Copy link

Thanks for you interesting work.
I am currently trying to recreate your evaluation on the CAPE dataset. I have generated point clouds from the validation set split of PTF (['00122', '00159', '00215']). Added gaussian noise of zero mean and 1mm standard-deviation. Then I subsampled the point cloud to 2048 points using farthest point sampling. Using your generate_pt.py script I find SMPL models and calculate the mean vertex-to-vertex error.

The results I get are 44.3 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error, compared to the 21.8 mm error that is reported in the paper. I also get 105.2 mm mean vertex-to-vertex error on the raw smpl output of the regressor.

Have I done something wrong? Or would it be possible to supply an evaluation script?
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant