-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[wg/webperf] Web Performance rechartering #371
Comments
(note, not as i18n review comment) Draft charter as Markdown seems (for me) to be based on quite old charter template, like HR in coordinate section. I'd propose to align with the newest template. |
The HTML version is now ready at https://www.w3.org/2023/07/webperf.html |
Is this ready for horizontal review?
Maybe that's changed, but it would be to edit/strike that out if it's changed. |
no comment or request from i18n (for updated HTML version) |
no comment from APA. |
(PING has comments, coming soon) |
|
About section 7, the intent is to say that although all the work and records are accessible to the public, participation to meetings is not public. Should that be phrased differently? public really means public there. |
Possible amendment to the charter would be to describe "living standard" as either "stay in Candidate Recommentation and upgrade using snapshots" or "Recommendation to be updated with Candidate changes", as the process offers both possibilities. |
Overall this looks good. Couple of minor points: In success criteria, the part about mitigations and residual risk was removed from the template (because of complaints) so should be removed here also.
Drop Director |
Agree. I think we need a little clarification on this. |
Looking at this further, the webperf charter follows the charter template. So, section 7 of the webperf charter is fine as-is. If it's unclear, we should really push the change into the charter template. |
[[ s/the Chairs or the Team/the Chairs./ to follow w3c/charter-drafts@e78c83e |
Also re-align with w3c/charter-drafts@c41b4d6 and w3c/charter-drafts@a13d26f |
[[ This needs update. |
I think I fixed the latest comments. |
the latest entry in charter history seems the same with one previous. it should be |
(approved to start the AC review) |
minor fixes:
|
Charter Review
Charter: Web Performance Working Group
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Github issues
Anything else we should think about as we review?
cc @nicjansma @yoavweiss
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: