Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

accessModeSufficient to ONIX correspondance #67

Open
LaZay opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

accessModeSufficient to ONIX correspondance #67

LaZay opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
Crosswalk Issues with the crosswalk mappings

Comments

@LaZay
Copy link

LaZay commented Aug 30, 2022

ONIX code list 81 Product content type was initially used to describe the content of the publication BEFORE accessibility adaptations.
Trying to use it, as combined with the code list 196, to value the accessModeSufficient property, meaning AFTER adaptation, is quite a challenge indeed. The warning was worth it. :-)

Some inference was tempted on textual value. But not on visual. Nor on auditory value (except for audiobook, which is not a complex inference...). Though there are ONIX values addressing specific adaptations.
As a matter of fact, the ONIX code list 196 available values cannot be used for any reliable inference of accessModeSufficient = visual or auditory values:

  • 14 Short alternative descriptions (still /moving image, audio file/track)
  • 15 Full alternative descriptions (same)
  • 20 Synchronised pre-recorded audio
  • 28 Full alternative audio descriptions

Maybe that would be interesting to keep track of this, to avoid redoing all the analysis, or to avoid believing that something is missing in the correspondance table, regarding visual and auditory values of accessModeSufficient.

@mattgarrish mattgarrish added the Crosswalk Issues with the crosswalk mappings label May 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Crosswalk Issues with the crosswalk mappings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants