Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Anomaly score should really be 1-S(t) (i.e. 1 - normalized PSNR)? #21

Open
kb1ooo opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Anomaly score should really be 1-S(t) (i.e. 1 - normalized PSNR)? #21

kb1ooo opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kb1ooo
Copy link

kb1ooo commented Feb 28, 2024

In the paper the "anomaly score" is defined as the normalized PSNR, denoted $S(t)$ in the paper, and calculated as such in the code.
However, higher PSNR means more "normal", so shouldn't the anomaly score be $1-S(t)$, which I believe is what is shown in the example animation and labeled as "anomaly score"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant