Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
It's already new fork, always been. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
LOL case closed On the same general subject... should extensions like these be removable? This was a diferentiation this fork used to have, but apart from things like Lycoris and ControlNet, maybe it's not as relevant nowadays to include a lot of these extensions built-in? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Image Browser is one of the pre-packed extensions in Automatic (and it reinstalls even if manually removed upon update), hence this discussion.
The original author of the extension seems to be in hiatus, and development has continued under this fork: Github
Given that it is producing erros in the startup log as described in #980, should Automatic either move to the new fork, or exclude the extension?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions