You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally, the Cottontail Access Layer would be refactored so that the schema to be used (currently cineast) can be specified in the config. This would mean we could write tests using the "real" database names and eliminate the hypothetical user error where tests are run against a productive database.
For new Contributors
Feel free to set up the stack: https://vitrivr.org/getting_started.html. Afterwards, have a look at the implementation suggestion above and feel free to get started.
Ideally, the Cottontail Access Layer would be refactored so that the schema to be used (currently
cineast
) can be specified in the config. This would mean we could write tests using the "real" database names and eliminate the hypothetical user error where tests are run against a productive database.For new Contributors
Feel free to set up the stack: https://vitrivr.org/getting_started.html. Afterwards, have a look at the implementation suggestion above and feel free to get started.
A starting point in the code would be the unit-tests for the database layer at https://github.com/vitrivr/cineast/tree/master/cineast-core/src/test/java/org/vitrivr/cineast/core/db
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: