-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
viostor: It seems that RhelScsiVerify has an improperly handled boundary condition. #1095
Comments
Right, we probably missed this case when applied 67f64d0 Thank you for spotting it out. |
Other location I found it seems to be correct: kvm-guest-drivers-windows/viostor/virtio_stor.c Line 1333 in 657ad7e
|
zjmletang
added a commit
to zjmletang/kvm-guest-drivers-windows
that referenced
this issue
May 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Zhang JianMing [email protected] for the problem description please visit virtio-win#1095
YanVugenfirer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Zhang JianMing [email protected] for the problem description please visit #1095
Quess this can be closed with 4a38831 |
yes, it can be closed |
MartinDrab
pushed a commit
to MartinDrab/kvm-guest-drivers-windows
that referenced
this issue
Jul 9, 2024
Signed-off-by: Zhang JianMing [email protected] for the problem description please visit virtio-win#1095
MartinDrab
pushed a commit
to MartinDrab/kvm-guest-drivers-windows
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2024
Signed-off-by: Zhang JianMing [email protected] for the problem description please visit virtio-win#1095
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
In the RhelScsiVerify function, I understand that the case where lba + blocks == adaptExt->lastLBA should be a normal SRB. As shown in the figure below. If I am mistaken, please point it out to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: