You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Or: Provide a web form that people can fill in where they can download their answers at the end.
Reflect: reflect on how other people may apply the labels differently, and how you might prevent some of the outcomes that you and others have identified. Getting other people's feedback is optional, but encouraged.
Dream: allow other people to ethics-register your project
Or: provide a mailing list, panel, discussion group, subreddit/whatever, where we apply the labels to registered projects
Display: display your hazard labels in slides, papers, and grant applications:
to let other people know that you've thought about this stuff, and what steps you've taken to minimise negative outcomes
to let other people know that when they use the tech/algorithm, they take on the repsonsibility of continuing to ensure that the work is used for everyone's benefit
Note: the JGI seedcorn successful participants will be notified on the week commencing the 13th December, which means it would be good to get our asynchronous materials in order by then, so that we can get things rolling with them at that point.
Question:
Do we need to alter/update our Eng faculty ethics application for this slightly different use case (if we'd like to get feedback from people who use it?)
I've been thinking about how to make filling in Data Hazards asynchronously easy. This is related to #45, but a little more specific.
Using Data Hazards = LARD.
Videos
Video aims:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: