You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we are having problems validating pdfa documents containing multiple signatures.
The documents we are creating have a CR in front of the %%EOF marker but verapdf expects a LF in front of the %%EOF marker.
This is checked in the method private boolean isEOFFound(byte[] buffer) in class SignatureParser.java
As a result all documents with multiple signatures containing CR%%EOF are validated as invalid from verapdf with the following error:
Would it be possible to extend this check to allow CR as well as LF in front of %%EOF?
Looks like this is indeed an issue that shows up in the documents with more than one signature and a single CR used as EOL marker. We'll fix it now in the dev version and include it in the next veraPDF release.
Hi,
we are having problems validating pdfa documents containing multiple signatures.
The documents we are creating have a CR in front of the %%EOF marker but verapdf expects a LF in front of the %%EOF marker.
This is checked in the method
private boolean isEOFFound(byte[] buffer)
in classSignatureParser.java
As a result all documents with multiple signatures containing CR%%EOF are validated as invalid from verapdf with the following error:
Would it be possible to extend this check to allow CR as well as LF in front of %%EOF?
Best regards
Margarita
SignedTwice.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: