You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The proposed $: operator is handy if the empty string is a reasonable fallback value in most situations. But I may not have enough experience to answer this, as Citre uses another strategy.
Say we are given an expression (eq? $name "foo"). Citre scans all field name symbols in it, and add an explicit check in the generated filter:
(and $name (eq? $name "foo"))
So the expression returns false if $name is missing. And, if we require Citre to keep the lines with missing fields, it generates:
(or (not $name) (eq? $name "foo"))
So the concept of fallback value is not used. See citre-readtags-regexp-quote for details.
I have many chances to write the
-Q
expression.I found I had to write
$
with a fallback value to make readtags run without error:To make the expressions shorter, I want to add a short-hand variant for these expressions:
@AmaiKinono, you have a lot of experience in this area. Could you give me comments?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: