Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: readme #246

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

fix: readme #246

merged 8 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

Keyrxng
Copy link
Member

@Keyrxng Keyrxng commented Jun 10, 2024

Resolves #244

How relevant is everything underneath # How to test locally? I think it could be all be removed. There is auto-deploy for previews etc now so Cloudflare and hosting is irrelevant.

I think remove everything below and write a simplified walk through of the paths the UI can take and what is expected from things and when the amazon cards are released they can have their own section.

@ubiquity-os-deployer
Copy link

ubiquity-os-deployer bot commented Jun 10, 2024

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@0x4007 0x4007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The level of detail is good on the README, but consider using ChatGPT 4o to rewrite to make it as concise and clear as possible. I generally do this when I write long form content.

README.md

@Keyrxng
Copy link
Member Author

Keyrxng commented Jun 11, 2024

The level of detail is good on the README, but consider using ChatGPT 4o to rewrite to make it as concise and clear as possible. I generally do this when I write long form content.

I will keep this in mind in the future, that readme you attached is a lot cleaner and direct. Should we use it in place of the suggestions you have made to my written version?

I have also had GPT4o rewrite it and had it keep the expected behaviour but tighten it up, I think I'd use it over my version as-is but I'm not 100% on what to do.

@Keyrxng
Copy link
Member Author

Keyrxng commented Jun 11, 2024

https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/actions/runs/9472156534/job/26097027405?pr=246

That's an interesting CI error

@0x4007
Copy link
Member

0x4007 commented Jun 11, 2024

You can use any ChatGPT 4o processed version in place of your submission. Don't need to worry about my suggestions.

@0x4007 0x4007 merged commit 114e59a into ubiquity:development Jun 17, 2024
4 checks passed
@ubiquibot ubiquibot bot mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default .env in README.md
3 participants