Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing permit from URL on mobile only #256

Closed
0x4007 opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #258
Closed

Removing permit from URL on mobile only #256

0x4007 opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #258

Comments

@0x4007
Copy link
Member

0x4007 commented Jul 17, 2024

It seems to get in the way for me when I'm doing the normal flow claiming on my desktop for when the encoded permit in the url query param is removed.

As I was looking to sync our card-issuance branch I realized we have a mobile check function. https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/compare/beta...development?expand=1#diff-8b45f88f73e078f719a15a90ca2cca60cd2276fff7786aa1d2739d2aec5ff905R7-R25

Lets only remove the encoded permit in the query param on mobile since that was the reason why the feature was implemented anyways (there is a bug on metamask mobile ui that was solved by removing the query param)

@0x4007
Copy link
Member Author

0x4007 commented Jul 17, 2024

@Keyrxng might be an easy one for you

Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented Jul 18, 2024

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

Copy link

ubiquibot-dev bot commented Jul 18, 2024

[ 25 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Task 1 25
Review Comment 1 0
Conversation Incentives
Comment Formatting Relevance Reward
Resolves #256 Manually QA'd desktop and mobile with both working…
0
content:
  p:
    count: 12
    score: 1
wordValue: 0
formattingMultiplier: 0
0.5 -

[ 8.08 WXDAI ]

@0x4007
Contributions Overview
View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Specification 1 7.92
Issue Comment 1 0.16
Conversation Incentives
Comment Formatting Relevance Reward
It seems to get in the way for me when I'm doing the normal flow…
8.8
content:
  p:
    count: 88
    score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
0.9 7.92
@Keyrxng might be an easy one for you
1.6
content:
  p:
    count: 8
    score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
0.1 0.16

Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented Jul 18, 2024

[ 22.4 WXDAI ]

@0x4007
Contributions Overview
ViewContributionCountReward
IssueSpecification120.8
IssueComment11.6
Conversation Incentives
CommentFormattingRelevanceReward
It seems to get in the way for me when I'm doing the normal flow...
20.8120.8
@Keyrxng might be an easy one for you...
1.60.211.6

[ 25 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
ViewContributionCountReward
IssueTask125

@0x4007
Copy link
Member Author

0x4007 commented Jul 18, 2024

[ 25 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng

[ 8.08 WXDAI ]

@0x4007
Contributions Overview

View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Specification 1 7.92
Issue Comment 1 0.16

Conversation Incentives

Comment Formatting Relevance Reward

It seems to get in the way for me when I'm doing the normal flow…

8.8
0.9 7.92

@Keyrxng might be an easy one for you

1.6
0.1 0.16

@gentlementlegen relevance needs to be 1 for spec.

Also the scoring is so different. Is it the spec multiplier? It doesn't seem to be intervals of each other (my scoring between both versions) so I don't understand.

@gentlementlegen
Copy link
Member

Scoring equal to one was noted within this issue: ubiquity-os-marketplace/text-conversation-rewards#26

As for the multiplier for the spec I am not sure how v1 counted it because there is no detail. The multipliers are supposedly the same in both versions but the logic might be different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants