Post a waiting message to show that the conversation is being processed #29
Assignees
Comments
|
/start |
Tips:
|
|
@Sadaf-A Please provide an update. |
|
Mixed feelings funding this task. We should only be working on v2 |
|
@0x4007 Not sure to understand, this is a v2 task, for the conversation rewards? |
+ Evaluating results. Please wait... |
![UbiquiBot[dev]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/257883?s=40&u=1eea9b595c7c8aa1f9dd80751aa25f169024431e&v=4){kind=avatar}
|
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Task | 1 | 50 |
| Issue | Specification | 1 | 7.9 |
| Issue | Comment | 2 | 0.56 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
The current bot would display: ``` + Evaluating resu… | 7.9content:
p:
count: 74
score: 1
code:
count: 5
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 7.9 |
@Sadaf-A Please provide an update. | 1content:
p:
count: 5
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
| - | - |
@0x4007 Not sure to understand, this is a v2 task, for the conve… | 2.8content:
p:
count: 14
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.2 | 0.56 |
[ 0 WXDAI ]
@Sadaf-A
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|
[ 0 WXDAI ]
@0x4007
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Comment | 1 | 0 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
Mixed feelings funding this task. We should only be working on v2 | 1.2content:
p:
count: 12
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| - | - |
@gentlementlegen v2 doesn't load the pull comments. |
|
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Task | 1 | 50 |
| Issue | Specification | 1 | 7.1 |
| Issue | Comment | 3 | 5.12 |
| Review | Comment | 9 | 118.8 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
The current bot would display: ``` + Evaluating re… | 7.1content:
p:
count: 44
score: 1
pre:
count: 5
score: 0
code:
count: 5
score: 1
ul:
count: 22
score: 0
li:
count: 22
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 7.1 |
@Sadaf-A Please provide an update. | 1content:
p:
count: 5
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.8 | 0.8 |
@0x4007 Not sure to understand, this is a v2 task, for the conve… | 2.8content:
p:
count: 14
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.8 | 2.24 |
@0x4007 It seems so. I added this result for debug in issue http… | 2.6content:
p:
count: 13
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.8 | 2.08 |
Resolves #29 <!-- - You must link the issue number e.g. "R… | 0content:
p:
count: 3
score: 1
ul:
count: 18
score: 0
li:
count: 18
score: 1
wordValue: 0
formattingMultiplier: 0
| 0.8 | - |
Was required for an import within a test. Removed it and changed… | 6content:
p:
count: 15
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 6 |
This is what I did at first but running a script requires: - clo… | 37.2content:
p:
count: 12
score: 1
ul:
count: 81
score: 0
li:
count: 81
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 37.2 |
@rndquu Was not removed the diff is misleading: https://github.c… | 3.6content:
p:
count: 9
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 3.6 |
It does not anymore afaik. Its only purpose is to create a `… | 14.8content:
p:
count: 36
score: 1
code:
count: 1
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 14.8 |
Will add a comment describing what this does to make it more cle… | 5.2content:
p:
count: 13
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 5.2 |
Let me know if that helps https://github.com/ubiquibot/conversa… | 2.8content:
p:
count: 7
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 2.8 |
QA run : https://github.com/Meniole/conversation-rewards/issues/… | 34.8content:
h2:
count: 4
score: 1
p:
count: 83
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 34.8 |
@0x4007 The problem is not polling but cold boot + package insta… | 14.4content:
p:
count: 36
score: 1
wordValue: 0.2
formattingMultiplier: 2
| 1 | 14.4 |
[ 14.02 WXDAI ]
@0x4007
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue | Comment | 2 | 1.52 |
| Review | Comment | 5 | 12.5 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
Mixed feelings funding this task. We should only be working on v2 | 1.2content:
p:
count: 12
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.8 | 0.96 |
@gentlementlegen v2 doesn't load the pull comments. | 0.7content:
p:
count: 7
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 0.8 | 0.56 |
What's this for | 0.3content:
p:
count: 3
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 0.3 |
It seems to make more sense to write all the logic inside of typ… | 6.5content:
p:
count: 65
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 6.5 |
Let's try this approach then. I understand now. | 0.8content:
p:
count: 8
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 0.8 |
Polling is a possibility given the long max run time It may eve… | 2.4content:
p:
count: 24
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 2.4 |
I don't understand your comment but just poll for like 30 minute… | 2.5content:
p:
count: 25
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 2.5 |
[ 7.5 WXDAI ]
@rndquu
Contributions Overview
| View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review | Comment | 3 | 7.5 |
Conversation Incentives
| Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
|---|---|---|---|
@gentlementlegen This was really useful, at least I used this st… | 2.6content:
p:
count: 26
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 2.6 |
@gentlementlegen Right now this package writes all of the log en… | 2.1content:
p:
count: 20
score: 1
code:
count: 1
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 2.1 |
This is not super clear that `process.env.COMMENT_ID` is… | 2.8content:
p:
count: 26
score: 1
code:
count: 1
score: 1
a:
count: 1
score: 1
wordValue: 0.1
formattingMultiplier: 1
| 1 | 2.8 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The current bot would display:
while the content is being processed. However, it would post a second comment with the result. In this version ideally it would just post the comment once, and update it with the final result.
Tasks to be carried out:
Example run
#25 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: